Lancia Delta III (844)
Car comparison
Lancia Delta III (844) 1.9 MultijetvsRenault Laguna III 2.0 dCi FAP
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonRenault Laguna III
2.0 dCi FAP
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Lancia Delta III (844) 1.9 Multijet
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.9 s
- Fastest top speed222 km/h138 mph
- Most powerful190 hp142 kW
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Lightest1,430 kg3,153 lb
- Best power-to-weight133 hp/t99 kW/t7.5 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.7 L/100 km41.3 mpg US49.6 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption7.3 L/100 km32.2 mpg US38.7 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.7 L/100 km50.0 mpg US60.1 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,018 km632 mi
- Best overall score58/100
- Best performance score50/100
- Best economy score91/100
Renault Laguna III 2.0 dCi FAP
- Largest trunk450 L
- Best practicality score77/100
Specification comparison
| Model | LanciaDelta III (844)1.9 Multijet | RenaultLaguna III2.0 dCi FAP |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 190hp142kW | 178hp133kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,430kg3,153lb | 1,539kg3,393lb |
| Gross weight | 2,000kg4,409lb | 2,089kg4,605lb |
| Top speed | 222 km/h 138 mph | 218 km/h 135 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 86.7s99% target: 220 km/h / 137 mph Calculated | 92.7s99% target: 216 km/h / 134 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.9s | 8.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 38.6s Calculated | 44.8s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.5s Calculated | 8.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 5.7L/100 km41.3mpg US49.6mpg UK | 6.5L/100 km36.2mpg US43.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 7.3L/100 km32.2mpg US38.7mpg UK | 8.6L/100 km27.4mpg US32.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4.7L/100 km50mpg US60.1mpg UK | 5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.7s Calculated | 16.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 133hp/t99kW/t60hp/1000 lb Calculated | 116hp/t86kW/t52hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 280Nm/t187lb-ft/ton Calculated | 260Nm/t174lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,018km632mi Calculated | 1,015km631mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,910cc117cu in | 1,995cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,520mm178in | 4,695mm185in |
| Width | 1,797mm71in | 1,811mm71in |
| Height | 1,499mm59in | 1,445mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,700mm106in | 2,756mm109in |
| Front track | 1,538mm61in | 1,557mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,531mm60in | 1,512mm60in |
| Ground clearance | - | 120mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 420L | 450L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,190L | 1,377L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 58L | 66L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Lancia Delta III (844) 1.9 Multijet: Power / Torque
- Renault Laguna III 2.0 dCi FAP: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| LanciaDelta III (844)1.9 Multijet | 4,000 rpm | 2,000 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
| RenaultLaguna III2.0 dCi FAP | 3,750 rpm | 2,000 rpm | 4,000 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | LanciaDelta III (844)1.9 Multijet | RenaultLaguna III2.0 dCi FAP |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.5 s | 8.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.9 s | 8.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 38.6 s | 44.8 s |
| Top speed | 222 km/h 138 mph | 218 km/h 135 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.8 s | 7.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.3 s | 10.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.2 s | 13.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.7 s | 16.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 146 km/h 91 mph | 142 km/h 88 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LanciaDelta III (844)1.9 Multijet | 190 hp 142 kW |
| RenaultLaguna III2.0 dCi FAP | 178 hp 133 kW |
Lancia Delta III (844) 1.9 Multijet has 12 hp more than Renault Laguna III 2.0 dCi FAP.
The biggest power difference is between Renault Laguna III 2.0 dCi FAP and Lancia Delta III (844) 1.9 Multijet: 12 hp (9 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LanciaDelta III (844)1.9 Multijet | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| RenaultLaguna III2.0 dCi FAP | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LanciaDelta III (844)1.9 Multijet | 1,430 kg 3,153 lb |
| RenaultLaguna III2.0 dCi FAP | 1,539 kg 3,393 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LanciaDelta III (844)1.9 Multijet | 222 km/h 138 mph |
| RenaultLaguna III2.0 dCi FAP | 218 km/h 135 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LanciaDelta III (844)1.9 Multijet | 7.9 s |
| RenaultLaguna III2.0 dCi FAP | 8.5 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Lancia Delta III (844) 1.9 Multijet and Renault Laguna III 2.0 dCi FAP: 0.6 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LanciaDelta III (844)1.9 Multijet | 5.7 L/100 km 41.3 mpg US 49.6 mpg UK |
| RenaultLaguna III2.0 dCi FAP | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Lancia Delta III (844) 1.9 Multijet and Renault Laguna III 2.0 dCi FAP: 0.8 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LanciaDelta III (844)1.9 Multijet | 133 hp/t 99 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp |
| RenaultLaguna III2.0 dCi FAP | 116 hp/t 86 kW/t 8.6 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LanciaDelta III (844)1.9 Multijet | 1,018 km 632 mi |
| RenaultLaguna III2.0 dCi FAP | 1,015 km 631 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| LanciaDelta III (844)1.9 Multijet | 190 hp 142 kW | 7.9 s | 222 km/h 138 mph |
| RenaultLaguna III2.0 dCi FAP | 178 hp 133 kW | 8.5 s | 218 km/h 135 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LanciaDelta III (844)1.9 Multijet |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| RenaultLaguna III2.0 dCi FAP |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LanciaDelta III (844)1.9 Multijet |
| 5.7 L/100 km 41.3 mpg US 49.6 mpg UK | ||||||
| RenaultLaguna III2.0 dCi FAP |
| 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK | ||||||
Lancia Delta III (844) 1.9 Multijet is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| LanciaDelta III (844)1.9 Multijet | 5.7 L/100 km 41.3 mpg US 49.6 mpg UK | 7.9 s |
| RenaultLaguna III2.0 dCi FAP | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK | 8.5 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| LanciaDelta III (844)1.9 Multijet | 133 hp/t 99 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp | 5.7 L/100 km 41.3 mpg US 49.6 mpg UK |
| RenaultLaguna III2.0 dCi FAP | 116 hp/t 86 kW/t 8.6 kg/hp | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | LanciaDelta III (844)1.9 Multijet | RenaultLaguna III2.0 dCi FAP | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 190 hp 142 kW | 178 hp 133 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.9 s | 8.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 222 km/h 138 mph | 218 km/h 135 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,430 kg 3,153 lb | 1,539 kg 3,393 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 5.7 L/100 km 41.3 mpg US 49.6 mpg UK | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,018 km 632 mi | 1,015 km 631 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 420 L 14.8 cu ft | 450 L 15.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 133 hp/t 99 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp | 116 hp/t 86 kW/t 8.6 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Lancia Delta III (844) 1.9 Multijet | Renault Laguna III 2.0 dCi FAP |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 5.7 L/100 km41.3 mpg US49.6 mpg UK | 6.5 L/100 km36.2 mpg US43.5 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 9.98 LC100 km | 11.38 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 16.05 LC100 mi | 18.31 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 855 L226 US gal188 UK gal | 975 L258 US gal214 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,496 LC/year | 1,706 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Lancia Delta III (844) 1.9 Multijet
- Has 12 hp more
- Is 109 kg lighter
- Is 0.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 4 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.8 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 17 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 2 km (1 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Smallest trunk
Renault Laguna III 2.0 dCi FAP
- Has 30 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























