Car comparison

KTM X-Bow GT-XR 2.5 TFSIvsMercedes-Benz AMG GT (C192) 55 V8

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

KTM X-Bow GT-XR

2.5 TFSI

500 hp2480 ccGasolineRWDDual-clutchTurbochargedCoupe2023-present
VS

Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C192)

55 V8

476 hp3982 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbochargedCoupe2023-present

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

KTM X-Bow GT-XR 2.5 TFSI

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    3.4 s
  • Fastest top speed
    295 km/h
    183 mph Unrestricted
    280 km/h
    174 mph Restricted
  • Most powerful
    500 hp
    373 kW
  • Lightest
    1,130 kg
    2,491 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    442 hp/t
    330 kW/t
    2.3 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    9.1 L/100 km
    25.8 mpg US
    31.0 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    1,055 km
    656 mi
  • Best performance score
    91/100
  • Best economy score
    82/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelKTMX-Bow GT-XR2.5 TFSIMercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)55 V8
Power
500hp373kW
476hp355kW
Torque
581Nm429lb-ft
700Nm516lb-ft
Curb weight
1,130kg2,491lb
1,895kg4,178lb
Gross weight
1,600kg3,527lb
-
Top speed
Unrestricted
295 km/h183 mph
Restricted
280 km/h174 mph
Calculated
295 km/h
183 mph
To 99% top speed
37.0s99% target: 292 km/h / 181 mph
Calculated
61.0s99% target: 292 km/h / 181 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
3.4s
3.9s
0-200 km/h
9.2s
Calculated
12.3s
Calculated
0-60 mph
3.3s
Calculated
3.7s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
9.1L/100 km25.8mpg US31.0mpg UK
14.1L/100 km16.7mpg US20.0mpg UK
Quarter mile
10.9s
Calculated
11.8s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
442hp/t330kW/t201hp/1000 lb
Calculated
251hp/t187kW/t114hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
514Nm/t344lb-ft/ton
Calculated
369Nm/t247lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
1,055km656mi
Calculated
496km308mi
Calculated
Displacement
2,480cc151cu in
3,982cc243cu in
Length
4,626mm182in
4,728mm186in
Width
2,041mm80in
1,984mm78in
Height
1,164mm46in
1,354mm53in
Wheelbase
2,850mm112in
2,700mm106in
Front track-
1,683mm66in
Rear track-
1,686mm66in
Ground clearance
90mm4in
-
Trunk volume
160L
321L
Max trunk volume-
675L
Doors
1
3
Seats
2
4
Fuel tank
96L
70L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

KTM X-Bow GT-XR 2.5 TFSIMercedes-Benz AMG GT (C192) 55 V8PowerTorque
  • KTM X-Bow GT-XR 2.5 TFSI: Power / Torque
  • Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C192) 55 V8: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
KTMX-Bow GT-XR2.5 TFSI6,350 rpm5,550 rpm7,000 rpm
Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)55 V85,500-6,500 rpm2,250-4,500 rpm6,750 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricKTMX-Bow GT-XR2.5 TFSIMercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)55 V8
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
3.3 s
3.7 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
3.4 s
3.9 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
9.2 s
12.3 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
295 km/h183 mph
Restricted
280 km/h174 mph
Likely limited
295 km/h
183 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.0 s
2.0 s
330 ft
101 m
4.9 s
5.2 s
1/8 mile
201 m
7.3 s
7.8 s
1000 ft
305 m
9.3 s
10.0 s
1/4 mile
402 m
10.9 s
11.8 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
218 km/h
136 mph
196 km/h
122 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
KTMX-Bow GT-XR2.5 TFSI
500 hp
373 kW
Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)55 V8
476 hp
355 kW

KTM X-Bow GT-XR 2.5 TFSI has 24 hp more than Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C192) 55 V8.

The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C192) 55 V8 and KTM X-Bow GT-XR 2.5 TFSI: 24 hp (18 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
KTMX-Bow GT-XR2.5 TFSI
581 Nm
429 lb-ft
Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)55 V8
700 Nm
516 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
KTMX-Bow GT-XR2.5 TFSI
1,130 kg
2,491 lb
Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)55 V8
1,895 kg
4,178 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
KTMX-Bow GT-XR2.5 TFSI
Unrestricted
295 km/h183 mph
Restricted
280 km/h174 mph
Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)55 V8
295 km/h
183 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
KTMX-Bow GT-XR2.5 TFSI3.4 s
Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)55 V83.9 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between KTM X-Bow GT-XR 2.5 TFSI and Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C192) 55 V8: 0.5 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
KTMX-Bow GT-XR2.5 TFSI
9.1 L/100 km
25.8 mpg US
31.0 mpg UK
Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)55 V8
14.1 L/100 km
16.7 mpg US
20.0 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between KTM X-Bow GT-XR 2.5 TFSI and Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C192) 55 V8: 5.0 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
KTMX-Bow GT-XR2.5 TFSI
442 hp/t
330 kW/t
2.3 kg/hp
Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)55 V8
251 hp/t
187 kW/t
4.0 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
KTMX-Bow GT-XR2.5 TFSI
1,055 km
656 mi
Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)55 V8
496 km
308 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
KTMX-Bow GT-XR2.5 TFSI
500 hp
373 kW
3.4 s
Unrestricted
295 km/h183 mph
Restricted
280 km/h174 mph
Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)55 V8
476 hp
355 kW
3.9 s
295 km/h
183 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
KTMX-Bow GT-XR2.5 TFSI
Power
500 hp
373 kW
0-100 km/h3.4 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
295 km/h183 mph
Restricted
280 km/h174 mph
Doors/seats
1 doors
2 seats
Trunk
160 L
5.7 cu ft
Length
4,626 mm
182.1 in
Height
1,164 mm
45.8 in
Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)55 V8
Power
476 hp
355 kW
0-100 km/h3.9 s
Top speed
295 km/h
183 mph
Doors/seats
3 doors
4 seats
Trunk
321 L
11.3 cu ft
Length
4,728 mm
186.1 in
Height
1,354 mm
53.3 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
KTMX-Bow GT-XR2.5 TFSI
Power
500 hp
373 kW
0-100 km/h3.4 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
295 km/h183 mph
Restricted
280 km/h174 mph
9.1 L/100 km
25.8 mpg US
31.0 mpg UK
Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)55 V8
Power
476 hp
355 kW
0-100 km/h3.9 s
Top speed
295 km/h
183 mph
14.1 L/100 km
16.7 mpg US
20.0 mpg UK

KTM X-Bow GT-XR 2.5 TFSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
KTMX-Bow GT-XR2.5 TFSI
9.1 L/100 km
25.8 mpg US
31.0 mpg UK
3.4 s
Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)55 V8
14.1 L/100 km
16.7 mpg US
20.0 mpg UK
3.9 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
KTMX-Bow GT-XR2.5 TFSI
442 hp/t
330 kW/t
2.3 kg/hp
9.1 L/100 km
25.8 mpg US
31.0 mpg UK
Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)55 V8
251 hp/t
187 kW/t
4.0 kg/hp
14.1 L/100 km
16.7 mpg US
20.0 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleKTMX-Bow GT-XR2.5 TFSIMercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)55 V8
Power
500 hp
373 kW
476 hp
355 kW
Torque
581 Nm
429 lb-ft
700 Nm
516 lb-ft
Acceleration
3.4 s
3.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
295 km/h183 mph
Restricted
280 km/h174 mph
295 km/h
183 mph
Lightness
1,130 kg
2,491 lb
1,895 kg
4,178 lb
Fuel consumption
9.1 L/100 km
25.8 mpg US
31.0 mpg UK
14.1 L/100 km
16.7 mpg US
20.0 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
1 doors
2 seats
Trunk
160 L
5.7 cu ft
Length
4,626 mm
182.1 in
Height
1,164 mm
45.8 in
Doors/seats
3 doors
4 seats
Trunk
321 L
11.3 cu ft
Length
4,728 mm
186.1 in
Height
1,354 mm
53.3 in
Range score
1,055 km
656 mi
496 km
308 mi
Trunk score
160 L
5.7 cu ft
321 L
11.3 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
442 hp/t
330 kW/t
2.3 kg/hp
251 hp/t
187 kW/t
4.0 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleKTM X-Bow GT-XR 2.5 TFSIMercedes-Benz AMG GT (C192) 55 V8
Consumption9.1 L/100 km25.8 mpg US31 mpg UK14.1 L/100 km16.7 mpg US20 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km15.92 LC100 km24.68 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi25.63 LC100 mi39.71 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,365 L361 US gal300 UK gal2,115 L559 US gal465 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,389 LC/year3,701 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

KTM X-Bow GT-XR 2.5 TFSI

  • Has 24 hp more
  • Is 765 kg lighter
  • Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Uses 5.0 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 191 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 558 km (347 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Smallest trunk

Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C192) 55 V8

  • Has 119 Nm more
  • Has 161 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Highest torque
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
KTM X-Bow GT-XR 2.5 TFSI
Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C192) 55 V8
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.5 TFSI
GT3 RS 4.0
VS
KTMX-Bow GT-XR2.5 TFSIvsPorsche911 (992)GT3 RS 4.0
55 V8
4.0 V8
VS
Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)55 V8vsMercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)Facelift 20174.0 V8
2.5 TFSI
GT3 4.0
VS
KTMX-Bow GT-XR2.5 TFSIvsPorsche911 (992)Facelift 2024GT3 4.0
55 V8
4.0 V8
VS
Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)55 V8vsMercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)4.0 V8
2.5 TFSI
GT4 RS 4.0
VS
KTMX-Bow GT-XR2.5 TFSIvsPorsche718 Cayman (982)GT4 RS 4.0
55 V8
4.0 V8
VS
Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)55 V8vsMercedes-BenzAMG GT Roadster (R190)4.0 V8
2.5 TFSI
F1 Edition 4.0 V8
VS
KTMX-Bow GT-XR2.5 TFSIvsAston MartinV8 VantageF1 Edition 4.0 V8
55 V8
AMG GLC 63 V8
VS
Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)55 V8vsMercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C253)Facelift 2019AMG GLC 63 V8
2.5 TFSI
3.0
VS
KTMX-Bow GT-XR2.5 TFSIvsPorsche911 Dakar (992)3.0
55 V8
AMG CLE 53
VS
Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)55 V8vsMercedes-BenzCLE Coupe (C236)AMG CLE 53
2.5 TFSI
Competition 3.0
VS
KTMX-Bow GT-XR2.5 TFSIvsBMWM4 (G82)Competition 3.0
55 V8
AMG C 63 V8
VS
Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)55 V8vsMercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)Facelift 2018AMG C 63 V8
KTM X-Bow GT-XR 2.5 TFSI vs Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C192) 55 V8 - car comparison - FastVsFaster