Car comparison

KTM X-Bow GT-XR 2.5 TFSIvsBMW M4 (G82) Competition 3.0

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

KTM X-Bow GT-XR

2.5 TFSI

500 hp2480 ccGasolineRWDDual-clutchTurbochargedCoupe2023-present
VS

BMW M4 (G82)

Competition 3.0

510 hp2993 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbochargedCoupe2021-2024

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

KTM X-Bow GT-XR 2.5 TFSI

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    3.4 s
  • Fastest top speed
    295 km/h
    183 mph Unrestricted
    280 km/h
    174 mph Restricted
  • Lightest
    1,130 kg
    2,491 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    442 hp/t
    330 kW/t
    2.3 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    9.1 L/100 km
    25.8 mpg US
    31.0 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    1,055 km
    656 mi
  • Best performance score
    91/100
  • Best economy score
    82/100

BMW M4 (G82) Competition 3.0

  • Most powerful
    510 hp
    380 kW
  • Highest torque
    650 Nm
    479 lb-ft
  • Largest trunk
    440 L
  • Best overall score
    75/100
  • Best practicality score
    53/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelKTMX-Bow GT-XR2.5 TFSIBMWM4 (G82)Competition 3.0
Power
500hp373kW
510hp380kW
Torque
581Nm429lb-ft
650Nm479lb-ft
Curb weight
1,130kg2,491lb
1,775kg3,913lb
Gross weight
1,600kg3,527lb
2,205kg4,861lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
295 km/h183 mph
Restricted
280 km/h174 mph
Calculated
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
36.8s99% target: 292 km/h / 181 mph
Calculated
46.3s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
3.4s
3.5s
0-200 km/h
9.2s
Calculated
12.0s
Calculated
0-60 mph
3.3s
Calculated
3.3s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
9.1L/100 km25.8mpg US31.0mpg UK
10.1L/100 km23.3mpg US28.0mpg UK
Quarter mile
10.9s
Calculated
11.5s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
442hp/t330kW/t201hp/1000 lb
Calculated
287hp/t214kW/t130hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
514Nm/t344lb-ft/ton
Calculated
366Nm/t245lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
1,055km656mi
Calculated
584km363mi
Calculated
Displacement
2,480cc151cu in
2,993cc183cu in
Length
4,626mm182in
4,794mm189in
Width
2,041mm80in
1,887mm74in
Height
1,164mm46in
1,394mm55in
Wheelbase
2,850mm112in
2,857mm112in
Front track-
1,617mm64in
Rear track-
1,605mm63in
Ground clearance
90mm4in
121mm5in
Trunk volume
160L
440L
Doors
1
2
Seats
2
4
Fuel tank
96L
59L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

KTM X-Bow GT-XR 2.5 TFSIBMW M4 (G82) Competition 3.0PowerTorque
  • KTM X-Bow GT-XR 2.5 TFSI: Power / Torque
  • BMW M4 (G82) Competition 3.0: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
KTMX-Bow GT-XR2.5 TFSI6,350 rpm5,550 rpm7,000 rpm
BMWM4 (G82)Competition 3.06,250 rpm2,750-5,500 rpm6,500 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricKTMX-Bow GT-XR2.5 TFSIBMWM4 (G82)Competition 3.0
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
3.3 s
3.3 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
3.4 s
3.5 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
9.2 s
12.0 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
295 km/h183 mph
Restricted
280 km/h174 mph
Likely limited
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.0 s
1.9 s
330 ft
101 m
4.9 s
4.9 s
1/8 mile
201 m
7.3 s
7.5 s
1000 ft
305 m
9.3 s
9.6 s
1/4 mile
402 m
10.9 s
11.5 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
219 km/h
136 mph
196 km/h
122 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
KTMX-Bow GT-XR2.5 TFSI
500 hp
373 kW
BMWM4 (G82)Competition 3.0
510 hp
380 kW

BMW M4 (G82) Competition 3.0 has 10 hp more than KTM X-Bow GT-XR 2.5 TFSI.

The biggest power difference is between KTM X-Bow GT-XR 2.5 TFSI and BMW M4 (G82) Competition 3.0: 10 hp (7 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
KTMX-Bow GT-XR2.5 TFSI
581 Nm
429 lb-ft
BMWM4 (G82)Competition 3.0
650 Nm
479 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
KTMX-Bow GT-XR2.5 TFSI
1,130 kg
2,491 lb
BMWM4 (G82)Competition 3.0
1,775 kg
3,913 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
KTMX-Bow GT-XR2.5 TFSI
Unrestricted
295 km/h183 mph
Restricted
280 km/h174 mph
BMWM4 (G82)Competition 3.0
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
KTMX-Bow GT-XR2.5 TFSI3.4 s
BMWM4 (G82)Competition 3.03.5 s

Although BMW M4 (G82) Competition 3.0 has more power, KTM X-Bow GT-XR 2.5 TFSI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between KTM X-Bow GT-XR 2.5 TFSI and BMW M4 (G82) Competition 3.0: 0.1 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
KTMX-Bow GT-XR2.5 TFSI
9.1 L/100 km
25.8 mpg US
31.0 mpg UK
BMWM4 (G82)Competition 3.0
10.1 L/100 km
23.3 mpg US
28.0 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between KTM X-Bow GT-XR 2.5 TFSI and BMW M4 (G82) Competition 3.0: 1.0 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
KTMX-Bow GT-XR2.5 TFSI
442 hp/t
330 kW/t
2.3 kg/hp
BMWM4 (G82)Competition 3.0
287 hp/t
214 kW/t
3.5 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
KTMX-Bow GT-XR2.5 TFSI
1,055 km
656 mi
BMWM4 (G82)Competition 3.0
584 km
363 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
KTMX-Bow GT-XR2.5 TFSI
500 hp
373 kW
3.4 s
Unrestricted
295 km/h183 mph
Restricted
280 km/h174 mph
BMWM4 (G82)Competition 3.0
510 hp
380 kW
3.5 s
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
KTMX-Bow GT-XR2.5 TFSI
Power
500 hp
373 kW
0-100 km/h3.4 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
295 km/h183 mph
Restricted
280 km/h174 mph
Doors/seats
1 doors
2 seats
Trunk
160 L
5.7 cu ft
Length
4,626 mm
182.1 in
Height
1,164 mm
45.8 in
BMWM4 (G82)Competition 3.0
Power
510 hp
380 kW
0-100 km/h3.5 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
440 L
15.5 cu ft
Length
4,794 mm
188.7 in
Height
1,394 mm
54.9 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
KTMX-Bow GT-XR2.5 TFSI
Power
500 hp
373 kW
0-100 km/h3.4 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
295 km/h183 mph
Restricted
280 km/h174 mph
9.1 L/100 km
25.8 mpg US
31.0 mpg UK
BMWM4 (G82)Competition 3.0
Power
510 hp
380 kW
0-100 km/h3.5 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
10.1 L/100 km
23.3 mpg US
28.0 mpg UK

KTM X-Bow GT-XR 2.5 TFSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
KTMX-Bow GT-XR2.5 TFSI
9.1 L/100 km
25.8 mpg US
31.0 mpg UK
3.4 s
BMWM4 (G82)Competition 3.0
10.1 L/100 km
23.3 mpg US
28.0 mpg UK
3.5 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
KTMX-Bow GT-XR2.5 TFSI
442 hp/t
330 kW/t
2.3 kg/hp
9.1 L/100 km
25.8 mpg US
31.0 mpg UK
BMWM4 (G82)Competition 3.0
287 hp/t
214 kW/t
3.5 kg/hp
10.1 L/100 km
23.3 mpg US
28.0 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleKTMX-Bow GT-XR2.5 TFSIBMWM4 (G82)Competition 3.0
Power
500 hp
373 kW
510 hp
380 kW
Torque
581 Nm
429 lb-ft
650 Nm
479 lb-ft
Acceleration
3.4 s
3.5 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
295 km/h183 mph
Restricted
280 km/h174 mph
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Lightness
1,130 kg
2,491 lb
1,775 kg
3,913 lb
Fuel consumption
9.1 L/100 km
25.8 mpg US
31.0 mpg UK
10.1 L/100 km
23.3 mpg US
28.0 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
1 doors
2 seats
Trunk
160 L
5.7 cu ft
Length
4,626 mm
182.1 in
Height
1,164 mm
45.8 in
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
440 L
15.5 cu ft
Length
4,794 mm
188.7 in
Height
1,394 mm
54.9 in
Range score
1,055 km
656 mi
584 km
363 mi
Trunk score
160 L
5.7 cu ft
440 L
15.5 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
442 hp/t
330 kW/t
2.3 kg/hp
287 hp/t
214 kW/t
3.5 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleKTM X-Bow GT-XR 2.5 TFSIBMW M4 (G82) Competition 3.0
Consumption9.1 L/100 km25.8 mpg US31 mpg UK10.1 L/100 km23.3 mpg US28 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km15.92 LC100 km17.68 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi25.63 LC100 mi28.45 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,365 L361 US gal300 UK gal1,515 L400 US gal333 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,389 LC/year2,651 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

KTM X-Bow GT-XR 2.5 TFSI

  • Is 645 kg lighter
  • Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 30 km/h (19 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 1.0 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 155 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 471 km (293 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Smallest trunk

BMW M4 (G82) Competition 3.0

  • Has 10 hp more
  • Has 69 Nm more
  • Has 280 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
KTM X-Bow GT-XR 2.5 TFSI
BMW M4 (G82) Competition 3.0
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.5 TFSI
GT3 RS 4.0
VS
KTMX-Bow GT-XR2.5 TFSIvsPorsche911 (992)GT3 RS 4.0
Competition 3.0
Competition 3.0
VS
BMWM4 (G82)Competition 3.0vsBMWM4 (F82)Competition 3.0
2.5 TFSI
GT3 4.0
VS
KTMX-Bow GT-XR2.5 TFSIvsPorsche911 (992)Facelift 2024GT3 4.0
Competition 3.0
Competition 3.0
VS
BMWM4 (G82)Competition 3.0vsBMWM4 Convertible (G83)Competition 3.0
2.5 TFSI
GT4 RS 4.0
VS
KTMX-Bow GT-XR2.5 TFSIvsPorsche718 Cayman (982)GT4 RS 4.0
Competition 3.0
Competition 3.0
VS
BMWM4 (G82)Competition 3.0vsBMWM4 Convertible (F83)Competition 3.0
2.5 TFSI
F1 Edition 4.0 V8
VS
KTMX-Bow GT-XR2.5 TFSIvsAston MartinV8 VantageF1 Edition 4.0 V8
Competition 3.0
M850i
VS
BMWM4 (G82)Competition 3.0vsBMW8 Series (G15)M850i
2.5 TFSI
3.0
VS
KTMX-Bow GT-XR2.5 TFSIvsPorsche911 Dakar (992)3.0
Competition 3.0
M850i V8
VS
BMWM4 (G82)Competition 3.0vsBMW8 Series Gran Coupe (G16)M850i V8
2.5 TFSI
5.2 V10
VS
KTMX-Bow GT-XR2.5 TFSIvsLamborghiniHuracan SterratoFacelift 20235.2 V10
Competition 3.0
3.0
VS
BMWM4 (G82)Competition 3.0vsBMWM2 (G87)3.0
KTM X-Bow GT-XR 2.5 TFSI vs BMW M4 (G82) Competition 3.0 - car comparison - FastVsFaster