KTM X-Bow GT-XR
Car comparison
KTM X-Bow GT-XR 2.5 TFSIvsLamborghini Huracan Sterrato · Facelift 2023 5.2 V10
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonLamborghini Huracan Sterrato · Facelift 2023
5.2 V10
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
KTM X-Bow GT-XR 2.5 TFSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h3.4 s
- Fastest top speed295 km/h183 mph Unrestricted280 km/h174 mph Restricted
- Highest torque581 Nm429 lb-ft
- Lightest1,130 kg2,491 lb
- Best power-to-weight442 hp/t330 kW/t2.3 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption9.1 L/100 km25.8 mpg US31.0 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,055 km656 mi
- Largest trunk160 L
- Best overall score71/100
- Best performance score91/100
- Best economy score82/100
Lamborghini Huracan Sterrato Facelift 2023 5.2 V10
- Most powerful610 hp455 kW
- Best practicality score30/100
Specification comparison
| Model | KTMX-Bow GT-XR2.5 TFSI | LamborghiniHuracan SterratoFacelift 20235.2 V10 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 500hp373kW | 610hp455kW |
| Torque | 581Nm429lb-ft | 565Nm417lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,130kg2,491lb | 1,470kg3,241lb |
| Gross weight | 1,600kg3,527lb | - |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 295 km/h183 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 275 km/h171 mph Restricted 260 km/h162 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 37.0s99% target: 292 km/h / 181 mph Calculated | 34.8s99% target: 272 km/h / 169 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 3.4s | 3.4s |
| 0-200 km/h | 9.2s Calculated | 9.8s |
| 0-60 mph | 3.3s Calculated | 3.3s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 9.1L/100 km25.8mpg US31.0mpg UK | 14.6L/100 km16.1mpg US19.3mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 10.9s Calculated | 11.1s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 442hp/t330kW/t201hp/1000 lb Calculated | 415hp/t309kW/t188hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 514Nm/t344lb-ft/ton Calculated | 384Nm/t257lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,055km656mi Calculated | 548km340mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,480cc151cu in | 5,204cc318cu in |
| Length | 4,626mm182in | 4,525mm178in |
| Width | 2,041mm80in | 1,956mm77in |
| Height | 1,164mm46in | 1,248mm49in |
| Wheelbase | 2,850mm112in | 2,629mm104in |
| Front track | - | 1,698mm67in |
| Rear track | - | 1,654mm65in |
| Ground clearance | 90mm4in | 162mm6in |
| Trunk volume | 160L | 100L |
| Doors | 1 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 96L | 80L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- KTM X-Bow GT-XR 2.5 TFSI: Power / Torque
- Lamborghini Huracan Sterrato Facelift 2023 5.2 V10: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| KTMX-Bow GT-XR2.5 TFSI | 6,350 rpm | 5,550 rpm | 7,000 rpm |
| LamborghiniHuracan SterratoFacelift 20235.2 V10 | 8,000 rpm | 6,500 rpm | 8,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | KTMX-Bow GT-XR2.5 TFSI | LamborghiniHuracan SterratoFacelift 20235.2 V10 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 3.3 s | 3.3 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 3.4 s | 3.4 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 9.2 s | 9.8 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 295 km/h183 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 275 km/h171 mph Restricted 260 km/h162 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.0 s | 2.0 s |
330 ft 101 m | 4.9 s | 4.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 7.3 s | 7.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 9.3 s | 9.3 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 10.9 s | 11.1 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 218 km/h 136 mph | 212 km/h 131 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| KTMX-Bow GT-XR2.5 TFSI | 500 hp 373 kW |
| LamborghiniHuracan SterratoFacelift 20235.2 V10 | 610 hp 455 kW |
Lamborghini Huracan Sterrato Facelift 2023 5.2 V10 has 110 hp more than KTM X-Bow GT-XR 2.5 TFSI.
The biggest power difference is between KTM X-Bow GT-XR 2.5 TFSI and Lamborghini Huracan Sterrato Facelift 2023 5.2 V10: 110 hp (82 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| KTMX-Bow GT-XR2.5 TFSI | 581 Nm 429 lb-ft |
| LamborghiniHuracan SterratoFacelift 20235.2 V10 | 565 Nm 417 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| KTMX-Bow GT-XR2.5 TFSI | 1,130 kg 2,491 lb |
| LamborghiniHuracan SterratoFacelift 20235.2 V10 | 1,470 kg 3,241 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| KTMX-Bow GT-XR2.5 TFSI | Unrestricted 295 km/h183 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph |
| LamborghiniHuracan SterratoFacelift 20235.2 V10 | Unrestricted 275 km/h171 mph Restricted 260 km/h162 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| KTMX-Bow GT-XR2.5 TFSI | 3.4 s |
| LamborghiniHuracan SterratoFacelift 20235.2 V10 | 3.4 s |
Although Lamborghini Huracan Sterrato Facelift 2023 5.2 V10 has more power, KTM X-Bow GT-XR 2.5 TFSI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| KTMX-Bow GT-XR2.5 TFSI | 9.1 L/100 km 25.8 mpg US 31.0 mpg UK |
| LamborghiniHuracan SterratoFacelift 20235.2 V10 | 14.6 L/100 km 16.1 mpg US 19.3 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between KTM X-Bow GT-XR 2.5 TFSI and Lamborghini Huracan Sterrato Facelift 2023 5.2 V10: 5.5 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| KTMX-Bow GT-XR2.5 TFSI | 442 hp/t 330 kW/t 2.3 kg/hp |
| LamborghiniHuracan SterratoFacelift 20235.2 V10 | 415 hp/t 309 kW/t 2.4 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| KTMX-Bow GT-XR2.5 TFSI | 1,055 km 656 mi |
| LamborghiniHuracan SterratoFacelift 20235.2 V10 | 548 km 340 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| KTMX-Bow GT-XR2.5 TFSI | 500 hp 373 kW | 3.4 s | Unrestricted 295 km/h183 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph |
| LamborghiniHuracan SterratoFacelift 20235.2 V10 | 610 hp 455 kW | 3.4 s | Unrestricted 275 km/h171 mph Restricted 260 km/h162 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KTMX-Bow GT-XR2.5 TFSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| LamborghiniHuracan SterratoFacelift 20235.2 V10 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KTMX-Bow GT-XR2.5 TFSI |
| 9.1 L/100 km 25.8 mpg US 31.0 mpg UK | ||||||
| LamborghiniHuracan SterratoFacelift 20235.2 V10 |
| 14.6 L/100 km 16.1 mpg US 19.3 mpg UK | ||||||
KTM X-Bow GT-XR 2.5 TFSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| KTMX-Bow GT-XR2.5 TFSI | 9.1 L/100 km 25.8 mpg US 31.0 mpg UK | 3.4 s |
| LamborghiniHuracan SterratoFacelift 20235.2 V10 | 14.6 L/100 km 16.1 mpg US 19.3 mpg UK | 3.4 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| KTMX-Bow GT-XR2.5 TFSI | 442 hp/t 330 kW/t 2.3 kg/hp | 9.1 L/100 km 25.8 mpg US 31.0 mpg UK |
| LamborghiniHuracan SterratoFacelift 20235.2 V10 | 415 hp/t 309 kW/t 2.4 kg/hp | 14.6 L/100 km 16.1 mpg US 19.3 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | KTMX-Bow GT-XR2.5 TFSI | LamborghiniHuracan SterratoFacelift 20235.2 V10 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 500 hp 373 kW | 610 hp 455 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 581 Nm 429 lb-ft | 565 Nm 417 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 3.4 s | 3.4 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 295 km/h183 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph | Unrestricted 275 km/h171 mph Restricted 260 km/h162 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,130 kg 2,491 lb | 1,470 kg 3,241 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 9.1 L/100 km 25.8 mpg US 31.0 mpg UK | 14.6 L/100 km 16.1 mpg US 19.3 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,055 km 656 mi | 548 km 340 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 160 L 5.7 cu ft | 100 L 3.5 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 442 hp/t 330 kW/t 2.3 kg/hp | 415 hp/t 309 kW/t 2.4 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | KTM X-Bow GT-XR 2.5 TFSI | Lamborghini Huracan Sterrato Facelift 2023 5.2 V10 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 9.1 L/100 km25.8 mpg US31 mpg UK | 14.6 L/100 km16.1 mpg US19.3 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 15.92 LC100 km | 25.55 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 25.63 LC100 mi | 41.12 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,365 L361 US gal300 UK gal | 2,190 L579 US gal482 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,389 LC/year | 3,833 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
KTM X-Bow GT-XR 2.5 TFSI
- Has 16 Nm more
- Is 340 kg lighter
- Has 20 km/h (12 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 5.5 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 28 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 507 km (315 mi) more estimated range
- Has 60 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
Lamborghini Huracan Sterrato Facelift 2023 5.2 V10
- Has 110 hp more
Pros
- Most powerful
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























