Car comparison

Aston Martin V8 Vantage F1 Edition 4.0 V8vsKTM X-Bow GT-XR 2.5 TFSI

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Aston Martin V8 Vantage

F1 Edition 4.0 V8

535 hpGasolineRWDAutomaticTwin-turboCoupe2021-2024
VS

KTM X-Bow GT-XR

2.5 TFSI

500 hp2480 ccGasolineRWDDual-clutchTurbochargedCoupe2023-present

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

KTM X-Bow GT-XR 2.5 TFSI

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    3.4 s
  • Lightest
    1,130 kg
    2,491 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    442 hp/t
    330 kW/t
    2.3 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    9.1 L/100 km
    25.8 mpg US
    31.0 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    1,055 km
    656 mi
  • Best economy score
    82/100

Aston Martin V8 Vantage F1 Edition 4.0 V8

  • Fastest top speed
    314 km/h
    195 mph
  • Most powerful
    535 hp
    399 kW
  • Highest torque
    685 Nm
    505 lb-ft
  • Best overall score
    75/100
  • Best performance score
    92/100
  • Best practicality score
    39/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelAston MartinV8 VantageF1 Edition 4.0 V8KTMX-Bow GT-XR2.5 TFSI
Power
535hp399kW
500hp373kW
Torque
685Nm505lb-ft
581Nm429lb-ft
Curb weight
1,570kg3,461lb
1,130kg2,491lb
Gross weight-
1,600kg3,527lb
Top speed
314 km/h
195 mph
Unrestricted
295 km/h183 mph
Restricted
280 km/h174 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
50.2s99% target: 311 km/h / 193 mph
Calculated
37.0s99% target: 292 km/h / 181 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
3.6s
3.4s
0-200 km/h
10.1s
Calculated
9.2s
Calculated
0-60 mph
3.4s
Calculated
3.3s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
11.6L/100 km20.3mpg US24.4mpg UK
9.1L/100 km25.8mpg US31.0mpg UK
Quarter mile
11.3s
Calculated
10.9s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
341hp/t254kW/t155hp/1000 lb
Calculated
442hp/t330kW/t201hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
436Nm/t292lb-ft/ton
Calculated
514Nm/t344lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
629km391mi
Calculated
1,055km656mi
Calculated
Displacement-
2,480cc151cu in
Length
4,490mm177in
4,626mm182in
Width-
2,041mm80in
Height
1,274mm50in
1,164mm46in
Wheelbase
2,704mm106in
2,850mm112in
Ground clearance-
90mm4in
Trunk volume-
160L
Doors
2
1
Seats
2
2
Fuel tank
73L
96L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Aston Martin V8 Vantage F1 Edition 4.0 V8KTM X-Bow GT-XR 2.5 TFSIPowerTorque
  • Aston Martin V8 Vantage F1 Edition 4.0 V8: Power / Torque
  • KTM X-Bow GT-XR 2.5 TFSI: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
Aston MartinV8 VantageF1 Edition 4.0 V86,000 rpm2,000-5,000 rpm6,250 rpm
KTMX-Bow GT-XR2.5 TFSI6,350 rpm5,550 rpm7,000 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricAston MartinV8 VantageF1 Edition 4.0 V8KTMX-Bow GT-XR2.5 TFSI
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
3.4 s
3.3 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
3.6 s
3.4 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
10.1 s
9.2 s
Top speed
314 km/h
195 mph
Unrestricted
295 km/h183 mph
Restricted
280 km/h174 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.0 s
2.0 s
330 ft
101 m
5.0 s
4.9 s
1/8 mile
201 m
7.5 s
7.3 s
1000 ft
305 m
9.5 s
9.3 s
1/4 mile
402 m
11.3 s
10.9 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
212 km/h
132 mph
218 km/h
136 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Aston MartinV8 VantageF1 Edition 4.0 V8
535 hp
399 kW
KTMX-Bow GT-XR2.5 TFSI
500 hp
373 kW

Aston Martin V8 Vantage F1 Edition 4.0 V8 has 35 hp more than KTM X-Bow GT-XR 2.5 TFSI.

The biggest power difference is between KTM X-Bow GT-XR 2.5 TFSI and Aston Martin V8 Vantage F1 Edition 4.0 V8: 35 hp (26 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Aston MartinV8 VantageF1 Edition 4.0 V8
685 Nm
505 lb-ft
KTMX-Bow GT-XR2.5 TFSI
581 Nm
429 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Aston MartinV8 VantageF1 Edition 4.0 V8
1,570 kg
3,461 lb
KTMX-Bow GT-XR2.5 TFSI
1,130 kg
2,491 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Aston MartinV8 VantageF1 Edition 4.0 V8
314 km/h
195 mph
KTMX-Bow GT-XR2.5 TFSI
Unrestricted
295 km/h183 mph
Restricted
280 km/h174 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Aston MartinV8 VantageF1 Edition 4.0 V83.6 s
KTMX-Bow GT-XR2.5 TFSI3.4 s

Although Aston Martin V8 Vantage F1 Edition 4.0 V8 has more power, KTM X-Bow GT-XR 2.5 TFSI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between KTM X-Bow GT-XR 2.5 TFSI and Aston Martin V8 Vantage F1 Edition 4.0 V8: 0.2 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Aston MartinV8 VantageF1 Edition 4.0 V8
11.6 L/100 km
20.3 mpg US
24.4 mpg UK
KTMX-Bow GT-XR2.5 TFSI
9.1 L/100 km
25.8 mpg US
31.0 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between KTM X-Bow GT-XR 2.5 TFSI and Aston Martin V8 Vantage F1 Edition 4.0 V8: 2.5 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Aston MartinV8 VantageF1 Edition 4.0 V8
341 hp/t
254 kW/t
2.9 kg/hp
KTMX-Bow GT-XR2.5 TFSI
442 hp/t
330 kW/t
2.3 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Aston MartinV8 VantageF1 Edition 4.0 V8
629 km
391 mi
KTMX-Bow GT-XR2.5 TFSI
1,055 km
656 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
Aston MartinV8 VantageF1 Edition 4.0 V8
535 hp
399 kW
3.6 s
314 km/h
195 mph
KTMX-Bow GT-XR2.5 TFSI
500 hp
373 kW
3.4 s
Unrestricted
295 km/h183 mph
Restricted
280 km/h174 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
Aston MartinV8 VantageF1 Edition 4.0 V8
Power
535 hp
399 kW
0-100 km/h3.6 s
Top speed
314 km/h
195 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,490 mm
176.8 in
Height
1,274 mm
50.2 in
KTMX-Bow GT-XR2.5 TFSI
Power
500 hp
373 kW
0-100 km/h3.4 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
295 km/h183 mph
Restricted
280 km/h174 mph
Doors/seats
1 doors
2 seats
Trunk
160 L
5.7 cu ft
Length
4,626 mm
182.1 in
Height
1,164 mm
45.8 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
Aston MartinV8 VantageF1 Edition 4.0 V8
Power
535 hp
399 kW
0-100 km/h3.6 s
Top speed
314 km/h
195 mph
11.6 L/100 km
20.3 mpg US
24.4 mpg UK
KTMX-Bow GT-XR2.5 TFSI
Power
500 hp
373 kW
0-100 km/h3.4 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
295 km/h183 mph
Restricted
280 km/h174 mph
9.1 L/100 km
25.8 mpg US
31.0 mpg UK

KTM X-Bow GT-XR 2.5 TFSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
Aston MartinV8 VantageF1 Edition 4.0 V8
11.6 L/100 km
20.3 mpg US
24.4 mpg UK
3.6 s
KTMX-Bow GT-XR2.5 TFSI
9.1 L/100 km
25.8 mpg US
31.0 mpg UK
3.4 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
Aston MartinV8 VantageF1 Edition 4.0 V8
341 hp/t
254 kW/t
2.9 kg/hp
11.6 L/100 km
20.3 mpg US
24.4 mpg UK
KTMX-Bow GT-XR2.5 TFSI
442 hp/t
330 kW/t
2.3 kg/hp
9.1 L/100 km
25.8 mpg US
31.0 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleAston MartinV8 VantageF1 Edition 4.0 V8KTMX-Bow GT-XR2.5 TFSI
Power
535 hp
399 kW
500 hp
373 kW
Torque
685 Nm
505 lb-ft
581 Nm
429 lb-ft
Acceleration
3.6 s
3.4 s
Top speed
314 km/h
195 mph
Unrestricted
295 km/h183 mph
Restricted
280 km/h174 mph
Lightness
1,570 kg
3,461 lb
1,130 kg
2,491 lb
Fuel consumption
11.6 L/100 km
20.3 mpg US
24.4 mpg UK
9.1 L/100 km
25.8 mpg US
31.0 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,490 mm
176.8 in
Height
1,274 mm
50.2 in
Doors/seats
1 doors
2 seats
Trunk
160 L
5.7 cu ft
Length
4,626 mm
182.1 in
Height
1,164 mm
45.8 in
Range score
629 km
391 mi
1,055 km
656 mi
Trunk score
-
160 L
5.7 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
341 hp/t
254 kW/t
2.9 kg/hp
442 hp/t
330 kW/t
2.3 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleAston Martin V8 Vantage F1 Edition 4.0 V8KTM X-Bow GT-XR 2.5 TFSI
Consumption11.6 L/100 km20.3 mpg US24.4 mpg UK9.1 L/100 km25.8 mpg US31 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km20.30 LC100 km15.92 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi32.67 LC100 mi25.63 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,740 L460 US gal383 UK gal1,365 L361 US gal300 UK gal
Annual fuel cost3,045 LC/year2,389 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Aston Martin V8 Vantage F1 Edition 4.0 V8

  • Has 35 hp more
  • Has 104 Nm more
  • Has 19 km/h (12 mph) higher top speed

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest

KTM X-Bow GT-XR 2.5 TFSI

  • Is 440 kg lighter
  • Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Uses 2.5 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 102 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 426 km (264 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Aston Martin V8 Vantage F1 Edition 4.0 V8
KTM X-Bow GT-XR 2.5 TFSI
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

F1 Edition 4.0 V8
4.0 V8
VS
Aston MartinV8 VantageF1 Edition 4.0 V8vsAston MartinV8 VantageFacelift 20244.0 V8
2.5 TFSI
GT3 RS 4.0
VS
KTMX-Bow GT-XR2.5 TFSIvsPorsche911 (992)GT3 RS 4.0
F1 Edition 4.0 V8
F1 Edition 4.0 V8
VS
Aston MartinV8 VantageF1 Edition 4.0 V8vsAston MartinV8 Vantage RoadsterF1 Edition 4.0 V8
2.5 TFSI
GT3 4.0
VS
KTMX-Bow GT-XR2.5 TFSIvsPorsche911 (992)Facelift 2024GT3 4.0
F1 Edition 4.0 V8
S 4.7 V8
VS
Aston MartinV8 VantageF1 Edition 4.0 V8vsAston MartinV8 VantageFacelift 2008S 4.7 V8
2.5 TFSI
GT4 RS 4.0
VS
KTMX-Bow GT-XR2.5 TFSIvsPorsche718 Cayman (982)GT4 RS 4.0
F1 Edition 4.0 V8
5.3 i V8 32V
VS
Aston MartinV8 VantageF1 Edition 4.0 V8vsAston MartinV8 Vantage (II)5.3 i V8 32V
2.5 TFSI
3.0
VS
KTMX-Bow GT-XR2.5 TFSIvsPorsche911 Dakar (992)3.0
F1 Edition 4.0 V8
4.0 V8
VS
Aston MartinV8 VantageF1 Edition 4.0 V8vsAston MartinV8 Vantage RoadsterFacelift 20244.0 V8
2.5 TFSI
Competition 3.0
VS
KTMX-Bow GT-XR2.5 TFSIvsBMWM4 (G82)Competition 3.0
F1 Edition 4.0 V8
N430 4.7 V8
VS
Aston MartinV8 VantageF1 Edition 4.0 V8vsAston MartinV8 Vantage RoadsterFacelift 2008N430 4.7 V8
2.5 TFSI
5.2 V10
VS
KTMX-Bow GT-XR2.5 TFSIvsLamborghiniHuracan SterratoFacelift 20235.2 V10
Aston Martin V8 Vantage F1 Edition 4.0 V8 vs KTM X-Bow GT-XR 2.5 TFSI - car comparison - FastVsFaster