Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C190) · Facelift 2017
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C190) · Facelift 2017 4.0 V8vsMercedes-Benz AMG GT (C192) 55 V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMercedes-Benz AMG GT (C192)
55 V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C190) Facelift 2017 4.0 V8
- Fastest top speed304 km/h189 mph
- Most powerful476 hp355 kW
- Lightest1,540 kg3,395 lb
- Best power-to-weight309 hp/t230 kW/t3.2 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption9.6 L/100 km24.5 mpg US29.4 mpg UK
- Best estimated range677 km421 mi
- Best performance score88/100
- Best economy score81/100
Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C192) 55 V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h3.9 s
- Highest torque700 Nm516 lb-ft
- Best overall score76/100
- Best practicality score52/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)Facelift 20174.0 V8 | Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)55 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 476hp355kW | 476hp355kW |
| Torque | 630Nm465lb-ft | 700Nm516lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,540kg3,395lb | 1,895kg4,178lb |
| Gross weight | 1,890kg4,167lb | - |
| Top speed | 304 km/h 189 mph | 295 km/h 183 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 55.9s99% target: 301 km/h / 187 mph Calculated | 61.0s99% target: 292 km/h / 181 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.0s | 3.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 11.6s Calculated | 12.3s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 3.8s Calculated | 3.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 9.6L/100 km24.5mpg US29.4mpg UK | 14.1L/100 km16.7mpg US20.0mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 12.5L/100 km18.8mpg US22.6mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.9L/100 km29.8mpg US35.8mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 11.8s Calculated | 11.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 309hp/t230kW/t140hp/1000 lb Calculated | 251hp/t187kW/t114hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 409Nm/t274lb-ft/ton Calculated | 369Nm/t247lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 677km421mi Calculated | 496km308mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,982cc243cu in | 3,982cc243cu in |
| Length | 4,544mm179in | 4,728mm186in |
| Width | - | 1,984mm78in |
| Height | 1,287mm51in | 1,354mm53in |
| Wheelbase | 2,630mm104in | 2,700mm106in |
| Front track | 1,684mm66in | 1,683mm66in |
| Rear track | - | 1,686mm66in |
| Ground clearance | 96mm4in | - |
| Trunk volume | - | 321L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 675L |
| Doors | 2 | 3 |
| Seats | 2 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 65L | 70L |
| CO2 emissions | 224g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C190) Facelift 2017 4.0 V8: Power / Torque
- Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C192) 55 V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)Facelift 20174.0 V8 | 6,000 rpm | 1,700-5,000 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)55 V8 | 5,500-6,500 rpm | 2,250-4,500 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)Facelift 20174.0 V8 | Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)55 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 3.8 s | 3.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.0 s | 3.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 11.6 s | 12.3 s |
| Top speed | 304 km/h 189 mph | 295 km/h 183 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.1 s | 2.0 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.3 s | 5.2 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 7.8 s | 7.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.0 s | 10.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 11.8 s | 11.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 202 km/h 125 mph | 196 km/h 122 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)Facelift 20174.0 V8 | 476 hp 355 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)55 V8 | 476 hp 355 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)Facelift 20174.0 V8 | 630 Nm 465 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)55 V8 | 700 Nm 516 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)Facelift 20174.0 V8 | 1,540 kg 3,395 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)55 V8 | 1,895 kg 4,178 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)Facelift 20174.0 V8 | 304 km/h 189 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)55 V8 | 295 km/h 183 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)Facelift 20174.0 V8 | 4.0 s |
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)55 V8 | 3.9 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C192) 55 V8 and Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C190) Facelift 2017 4.0 V8: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)Facelift 20174.0 V8 | 9.6 L/100 km 24.5 mpg US 29.4 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)55 V8 | 14.1 L/100 km 16.7 mpg US 20.0 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C190) Facelift 2017 4.0 V8 and Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C192) 55 V8: 4.5 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)Facelift 20174.0 V8 | 309 hp/t 230 kW/t 3.2 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)55 V8 | 251 hp/t 187 kW/t 4.0 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)Facelift 20174.0 V8 | 677 km 421 mi |
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)55 V8 | 496 km 308 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)Facelift 20174.0 V8 | 476 hp 355 kW | 4.0 s | 304 km/h 189 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)55 V8 | 476 hp 355 kW | 3.9 s | 295 km/h 183 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)Facelift 20174.0 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)55 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)Facelift 20174.0 V8 |
| 9.6 L/100 km 24.5 mpg US 29.4 mpg UK | ||||||
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)55 V8 |
| 14.1 L/100 km 16.7 mpg US 20.0 mpg UK | ||||||
Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C190) Facelift 2017 4.0 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)Facelift 20174.0 V8 | 9.6 L/100 km 24.5 mpg US 29.4 mpg UK | 4.0 s |
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)55 V8 | 14.1 L/100 km 16.7 mpg US 20.0 mpg UK | 3.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)Facelift 20174.0 V8 | 309 hp/t 230 kW/t 3.2 kg/hp | 9.6 L/100 km 24.5 mpg US 29.4 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)55 V8 | 251 hp/t 187 kW/t 4.0 kg/hp | 14.1 L/100 km 16.7 mpg US 20.0 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)Facelift 20174.0 V8 | Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)55 V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 476 hp 355 kW | 476 hp 355 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 630 Nm 465 lb-ft | 700 Nm 516 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.0 s | 3.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 304 km/h 189 mph | 295 km/h 183 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,540 kg 3,395 lb | 1,895 kg 4,178 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 9.6 L/100 km 24.5 mpg US 29.4 mpg UK | 14.1 L/100 km 16.7 mpg US 20.0 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 677 km 421 mi | 496 km 308 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 224 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | - | 321 L 11.3 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 309 hp/t 230 kW/t 3.2 kg/hp | 251 hp/t 187 kW/t 4.0 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C190) Facelift 2017 4.0 V8 | Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C192) 55 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 9.6 L/100 km24.5 mpg US29.4 mpg UK | 14.1 L/100 km16.7 mpg US20 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 16.80 LC100 km | 24.68 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 27.04 LC100 mi | 39.71 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,440 L380 US gal317 UK gal | 2,115 L559 US gal465 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,520 LC/year | 3,701 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C190) Facelift 2017 4.0 V8
- Is 355 kg lighter
- Has 9 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 4.5 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 58 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 181 km (112 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C192) 55 V8
- Has 70 Nm more
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest torque
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























