Car comparison

Porsche Boxster (981) S 3.4vsKTM X-Bow GT 2.0 Turbo

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Porsche Boxster (981)

S 3.4

315 hp3436 ccGasolineRWDManualNaturally aspiratedRoadster2012-2016
VS

KTM X-Bow GT

2.0 Turbo

285 hp1984 ccGasolineRWDManualTurbochargedRoadster2013-2017

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

KTM X-Bow GT 2.0 Turbo

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    4.1 s
  • Highest torque
    420 Nm
    310 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    847 kg
    1,867 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    336 hp/t
    251 kW/t
    3.0 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    8.3 L/100 km
    28.3 mpg US
    34.0 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    189 g/km
  • Best economy score
    85/100

Porsche Boxster (981) S 3.4

  • Fastest top speed
    279 km/h
    173 mph
  • Most powerful
    315 hp
    235 kW
  • Best estimated range
    711 km
    442 mi
  • Best overall score
    58/100
  • Best performance score
    70/100
  • Best practicality score
    31/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelPorscheBoxster (981)S 3.4KTMX-Bow GT2.0 Turbo
Power
315hp235kW
285hp213kW
Torque
360Nm266lb-ft
420Nm310lb-ft
Curb weight
1,340kg2,954lb
847kg1,867lb
Gross weight
1,655kg3,649lb
-
Top speed
279 km/h
173 mph
231 km/h
144 mph
To 99% top speed
66.4s99% target: 276 km/h / 172 mph
Calculated
43.1s99% target: 229 km/h / 142 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
5.1s
4.1s
0-200 km/h
16.1s
Calculated
17.0s
Calculated
0-60 mph
4.9s
Calculated
3.9s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
9L/100 km26.1mpg US31.4mpg UK
8.3L/100 km28.3mpg US34.0mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
12.7L/100 km18.5mpg US22.2mpg UK
-
Fuel consumption highway
7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK
-
Quarter mile
13.1s
Calculated
12.3s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
235hp/t175kW/t107hp/1000 lb
Calculated
336hp/t251kW/t153hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
269Nm/t180lb-ft/ton
Calculated
496Nm/t332lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
711km442mi
Calculated
482km299mi
Calculated
Displacement
3,436cc210cu in
1,984cc121cu in
Length
4,374mm172in
3,738mm147in
Width
1,801mm71in
1,915mm75in
Height
1,281mm50in
1,202mm47in
Wheelbase
2,475mm97in
2,430mm96in
Front track-
1,672mm66in
Rear track-
1,626mm64in
Trunk volume
280L
-
Doors
2
-
Seats
2
2
Fuel tank
64L
40L
CO2 emissions
211g/km
189g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Porsche Boxster (981) S 3.4KTM X-Bow GT 2.0 TurboPowerTorque
  • Porsche Boxster (981) S 3.4: Power / Torque
  • KTM X-Bow GT 2.0 Turbo: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
PorscheBoxster (981)S 3.46,700 rpm4,500-5,800 rpm6,950 rpm
KTMX-Bow GT2.0 Turbo6,400 rpm3,200 rpm6,650 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricPorscheBoxster (981)S 3.4KTMX-Bow GT2.0 Turbo
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
4.9 s
3.9 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
5.1 s
4.1 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
16.1 s
17.0 s
Top speed
279 km/h
173 mph
231 km/h
144 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.3 s
2.0 s
330 ft
101 m
5.8 s
5.3 s
1/8 mile
201 m
8.7 s
8.0 s
1000 ft
305 m
11.1 s
10.3 s
1/4 mile
402 m
13.1 s
12.3 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
181 km/h
113 mph
180 km/h
112 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
PorscheBoxster (981)S 3.4
315 hp
235 kW
KTMX-Bow GT2.0 Turbo
285 hp
213 kW

Porsche Boxster (981) S 3.4 has 30 hp more than KTM X-Bow GT 2.0 Turbo.

The biggest power difference is between KTM X-Bow GT 2.0 Turbo and Porsche Boxster (981) S 3.4: 30 hp (22 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
PorscheBoxster (981)S 3.4
360 Nm
266 lb-ft
KTMX-Bow GT2.0 Turbo
420 Nm
310 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
PorscheBoxster (981)S 3.4
1,340 kg
2,954 lb
KTMX-Bow GT2.0 Turbo
847 kg
1,867 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
PorscheBoxster (981)S 3.4
279 km/h
173 mph
KTMX-Bow GT2.0 Turbo
231 km/h
144 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
PorscheBoxster (981)S 3.45.1 s
KTMX-Bow GT2.0 Turbo4.1 s

Although Porsche Boxster (981) S 3.4 has more power, KTM X-Bow GT 2.0 Turbo is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between KTM X-Bow GT 2.0 Turbo and Porsche Boxster (981) S 3.4: 1.0 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
PorscheBoxster (981)S 3.4
9.0 L/100 km
26.1 mpg US
31.4 mpg UK
KTMX-Bow GT2.0 Turbo
8.3 L/100 km
28.3 mpg US
34.0 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between KTM X-Bow GT 2.0 Turbo and Porsche Boxster (981) S 3.4: 0.7 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
PorscheBoxster (981)S 3.4
235 hp/t
175 kW/t
4.3 kg/hp
KTMX-Bow GT2.0 Turbo
336 hp/t
251 kW/t
3.0 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
PorscheBoxster (981)S 3.4
711 km
442 mi
KTMX-Bow GT2.0 Turbo
482 km
299 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
PorscheBoxster (981)S 3.4
315 hp
235 kW
5.1 s
279 km/h
173 mph
KTMX-Bow GT2.0 Turbo
285 hp
213 kW
4.1 s
231 km/h
144 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
PorscheBoxster (981)S 3.4
Power
315 hp
235 kW
0-100 km/h5.1 s
Top speed
279 km/h
173 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk
280 L
9.9 cu ft
Length
4,374 mm
172.2 in
Height
1,281 mm
50.4 in
KTMX-Bow GT2.0 Turbo
Power
285 hp
213 kW
0-100 km/h4.1 s
Top speed
231 km/h
144 mph
Doors/seats2 seats
Trunk-
Length
3,738 mm
147.2 in
Height
1,202 mm
47.3 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
PorscheBoxster (981)S 3.4
Power
315 hp
235 kW
0-100 km/h5.1 s
Top speed
279 km/h
173 mph
9.0 L/100 km
26.1 mpg US
31.4 mpg UK
KTMX-Bow GT2.0 Turbo
Power
285 hp
213 kW
0-100 km/h4.1 s
Top speed
231 km/h
144 mph
8.3 L/100 km
28.3 mpg US
34.0 mpg UK

Porsche Boxster (981) S 3.4 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
PorscheBoxster (981)S 3.4
9.0 L/100 km
26.1 mpg US
31.4 mpg UK
5.1 s
KTMX-Bow GT2.0 Turbo
8.3 L/100 km
28.3 mpg US
34.0 mpg UK
4.1 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
PorscheBoxster (981)S 3.4
235 hp/t
175 kW/t
4.3 kg/hp
9.0 L/100 km
26.1 mpg US
31.4 mpg UK
KTMX-Bow GT2.0 Turbo
336 hp/t
251 kW/t
3.0 kg/hp
8.3 L/100 km
28.3 mpg US
34.0 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehiclePorscheBoxster (981)S 3.4KTMX-Bow GT2.0 Turbo
Power
315 hp
235 kW
285 hp
213 kW
Torque
360 Nm
266 lb-ft
420 Nm
310 lb-ft
Acceleration
5.1 s
4.1 s
Top speed
279 km/h
173 mph
231 km/h
144 mph
Lightness
1,340 kg
2,954 lb
847 kg
1,867 lb
Fuel consumption
9.0 L/100 km
26.1 mpg US
31.4 mpg UK
8.3 L/100 km
28.3 mpg US
34.0 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk
280 L
9.9 cu ft
Length
4,374 mm
172.2 in
Height
1,281 mm
50.4 in
Doors/seats2 seats
Trunk-
Length
3,738 mm
147.2 in
Height
1,202 mm
47.3 in
Range score
711 km
442 mi
482 km
299 mi
CO2 score
211 g/km
189 g/km
Trunk score
280 L
9.9 cu ft
-
Power-to-weight score
235 hp/t
175 kW/t
4.3 kg/hp
336 hp/t
251 kW/t
3.0 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehiclePorsche Boxster (981) S 3.4KTM X-Bow GT 2.0 Turbo
Consumption9 L/100 km26.1 mpg US31.4 mpg UK8.3 L/100 km28.3 mpg US34 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km15.75 LC100 km14.53 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi25.35 LC100 mi23.38 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,350 L357 US gal297 UK gal1,245 L329 US gal274 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,363 LC/year2,179 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Porsche Boxster (981) S 3.4

  • Has 30 hp more
  • Has 48 km/h (30 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 229 km (142 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Highest CO2 emissions

KTM X-Bow GT 2.0 Turbo

  • Has 60 Nm more
  • Is 493 kg lighter
  • Is 1.0 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Uses 0.7 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 101 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Emits 22 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Porsche Boxster (981) S 3.4
KTM X-Bow GT 2.0 Turbo
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

S 3.4
S 3.4
VS
PorscheBoxster (981)S 3.4vsPorscheBoxster (987)Facelift 2009S 3.4
2.0 Turbo
Cup 250 1.8
VS
KTMX-Bow GT2.0 TurbovsLotusElise (SERIES 3)Cup 250 1.8
S 3.4
S 3.4
VS
PorscheBoxster (981)S 3.4vsPorscheBoxster (987)S 3.4
2.0 Turbo
2.0 TFSI
VS
KTMX-Bow GT2.0 TurbovsAUDITTS Roadster (8S)2.0 TFSI
S 3.4
S 3.2
VS
PorscheBoxster (981)S 3.4vsPorscheBoxster (986)S 3.2
2.0 Turbo
S 3.4
VS
KTMX-Bow GT2.0 TurbovsPorscheBoxster (981)S 3.4
S 3.4
3.7 V6
VS
PorscheBoxster (981)S 3.4vsNissan370Z RoadsterFacelift 20123.7 V6
2.0 Turbo
Cup 260 1.8
VS
KTMX-Bow GT2.0 TurbovsLotusElise (SERIES 3)Facelift 2017Cup 260 1.8
S 3.4
SLK 350 V6
VS
PorscheBoxster (981)S 3.4vsMercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 350 V6
2.0 Turbo
1.8
VS
KTMX-Bow GT2.0 TurbovsLotus2-Eleven1.8
S 3.4
2.5 TFSI plus
VS
PorscheBoxster (981)S 3.4vsAUDITT RS Roadster (8J)Facelift 20102.5 TFSI plus
S 3.4
35i
VS
PorscheBoxster (981)S 3.4vsBMWZ4 (E89)35i
Porsche Boxster (981) S 3.4 vs KTM X-Bow GT 2.0 Turbo - car comparison - FastVsFaster