Car comparison

Lotus Elise (SERIES 3) Cup 250 1.8vsKTM X-Bow GT 2.0 Turbo

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Lotus Elise (SERIES 3)

Cup 250 1.8

246 hp1798 ccGasolineRWDManualSuperchargedRoadster2016-2017
VS

KTM X-Bow GT

2.0 Turbo

285 hp1984 ccGasolineRWDManualTurbochargedRoadster2013-2017

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

KTM X-Bow GT 2.0 Turbo

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    4.1 s
  • Most powerful
    285 hp
    213 kW
  • Highest torque
    420 Nm
    310 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    847 kg
    1,867 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    336 hp/t
    251 kW/t
    3.0 kg/hp
  • Best overall score
    55/100
  • Best performance score
    68/100
  • Best practicality score
    27/100

Lotus Elise (SERIES 3) Cup 250 1.8

  • Fastest top speed
    248 km/h
    154 mph
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    7.5 L/100 km
    31.4 mpg US
    37.7 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    175 g/km
  • Best estimated range
    533 km
    331 mi
  • Best economy score
    87/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelLotusElise (SERIES 3)Cup 250 1.8KTMX-Bow GT2.0 Turbo
Power
246hp183kW
285hp213kW
Torque
250Nm184lb-ft
420Nm310lb-ft
Curb weight
931kg2,053lb
847kg1,867lb
Top speed
248 km/h
154 mph
231 km/h
144 mph
To 99% top speed
43.4s99% target: 246 km/h / 153 mph
Calculated
43.1s99% target: 229 km/h / 142 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
4.3s
4.1s
0-200 km/h
14.6s
Calculated
17.0s
Calculated
0-60 mph
4.1s
Calculated
3.9s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
7.5L/100 km31.4mpg US37.7mpg UK
8.3L/100 km28.3mpg US34.0mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
10.1L/100 km23.3mpg US28.0mpg UK
-
Fuel consumption highway
6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK
-
Quarter mile
12.3s
Calculated
12.3s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
264hp/t197kW/t120hp/1000 lb
Calculated
336hp/t251kW/t153hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
269Nm/t180lb-ft/ton
Calculated
496Nm/t332lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
533km331mi
Calculated
482km299mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,798cc110cu in
1,984cc121cu in
Length
3,824mm151in
3,738mm147in
Width
1,719mm68in
1,915mm75in
Height
1,117mm44in
1,202mm47in
Wheelbase
2,300mm91in
2,430mm96in
Front track
1,457mm57in
1,672mm66in
Rear track
1,507mm59in
1,626mm64in
Ground clearance
130mm5in
-
Trunk volume
112L
-
Doors
2
-
Seats
2
2
Fuel tank
40L
40L
CO2 emissions
175g/km
189g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Lotus Elise (SERIES 3) Cup 250 1.8KTM X-Bow GT 2.0 TurboPowerTorque
  • Lotus Elise (SERIES 3) Cup 250 1.8: Power / Torque
  • KTM X-Bow GT 2.0 Turbo: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
LotusElise (SERIES 3)Cup 250 1.87,200 rpm3,500-5,000 rpm7,450 rpm
KTMX-Bow GT2.0 Turbo6,400 rpm3,200 rpm6,650 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricLotusElise (SERIES 3)Cup 250 1.8KTMX-Bow GT2.0 Turbo
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
4.1 s
3.9 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
4.3 s
4.1 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
14.6 s
17.0 s
Top speed
248 km/h
154 mph
231 km/h
144 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.1 s
2.0 s
330 ft
101 m
5.4 s
5.3 s
1/8 mile
201 m
8.1 s
8.0 s
1000 ft
305 m
10.4 s
10.3 s
1/4 mile
402 m
12.3 s
12.3 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
187 km/h
116 mph
180 km/h
112 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
LotusElise (SERIES 3)Cup 250 1.8
246 hp
183 kW
KTMX-Bow GT2.0 Turbo
285 hp
213 kW

KTM X-Bow GT 2.0 Turbo has 39 hp more than Lotus Elise (SERIES 3) Cup 250 1.8.

The biggest power difference is between Lotus Elise (SERIES 3) Cup 250 1.8 and KTM X-Bow GT 2.0 Turbo: 39 hp (29 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
LotusElise (SERIES 3)Cup 250 1.8
250 Nm
184 lb-ft
KTMX-Bow GT2.0 Turbo
420 Nm
310 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
LotusElise (SERIES 3)Cup 250 1.8
931 kg
2,053 lb
KTMX-Bow GT2.0 Turbo
847 kg
1,867 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
LotusElise (SERIES 3)Cup 250 1.8
248 km/h
154 mph
KTMX-Bow GT2.0 Turbo
231 km/h
144 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
LotusElise (SERIES 3)Cup 250 1.84.3 s
KTMX-Bow GT2.0 Turbo4.1 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between KTM X-Bow GT 2.0 Turbo and Lotus Elise (SERIES 3) Cup 250 1.8: 0.2 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
LotusElise (SERIES 3)Cup 250 1.8
7.5 L/100 km
31.4 mpg US
37.7 mpg UK
KTMX-Bow GT2.0 Turbo
8.3 L/100 km
28.3 mpg US
34.0 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Lotus Elise (SERIES 3) Cup 250 1.8 and KTM X-Bow GT 2.0 Turbo: 0.8 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
LotusElise (SERIES 3)Cup 250 1.8
264 hp/t
197 kW/t
3.8 kg/hp
KTMX-Bow GT2.0 Turbo
336 hp/t
251 kW/t
3.0 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
LotusElise (SERIES 3)Cup 250 1.8
533 km
331 mi
KTMX-Bow GT2.0 Turbo
482 km
299 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
LotusElise (SERIES 3)Cup 250 1.8
246 hp
183 kW
4.3 s
248 km/h
154 mph
KTMX-Bow GT2.0 Turbo
285 hp
213 kW
4.1 s
231 km/h
144 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
LotusElise (SERIES 3)Cup 250 1.8
Power
246 hp
183 kW
0-100 km/h4.3 s
Top speed
248 km/h
154 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk
112 L
4.0 cu ft
Length
3,824 mm
150.6 in
Height
1,117 mm
44.0 in
KTMX-Bow GT2.0 Turbo
Power
285 hp
213 kW
0-100 km/h4.1 s
Top speed
231 km/h
144 mph
Doors/seats2 seats
Trunk-
Length
3,738 mm
147.2 in
Height
1,202 mm
47.3 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
LotusElise (SERIES 3)Cup 250 1.8
Power
246 hp
183 kW
0-100 km/h4.3 s
Top speed
248 km/h
154 mph
7.5 L/100 km
31.4 mpg US
37.7 mpg UK
KTMX-Bow GT2.0 Turbo
Power
285 hp
213 kW
0-100 km/h4.1 s
Top speed
231 km/h
144 mph
8.3 L/100 km
28.3 mpg US
34.0 mpg UK

KTM X-Bow GT 2.0 Turbo is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
LotusElise (SERIES 3)Cup 250 1.8
7.5 L/100 km
31.4 mpg US
37.7 mpg UK
4.3 s
KTMX-Bow GT2.0 Turbo
8.3 L/100 km
28.3 mpg US
34.0 mpg UK
4.1 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
LotusElise (SERIES 3)Cup 250 1.8
264 hp/t
197 kW/t
3.8 kg/hp
7.5 L/100 km
31.4 mpg US
37.7 mpg UK
KTMX-Bow GT2.0 Turbo
336 hp/t
251 kW/t
3.0 kg/hp
8.3 L/100 km
28.3 mpg US
34.0 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleLotusElise (SERIES 3)Cup 250 1.8KTMX-Bow GT2.0 Turbo
Power
246 hp
183 kW
285 hp
213 kW
Torque
250 Nm
184 lb-ft
420 Nm
310 lb-ft
Acceleration
4.3 s
4.1 s
Top speed
248 km/h
154 mph
231 km/h
144 mph
Lightness
931 kg
2,053 lb
847 kg
1,867 lb
Fuel consumption
7.5 L/100 km
31.4 mpg US
37.7 mpg UK
8.3 L/100 km
28.3 mpg US
34.0 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk
112 L
4.0 cu ft
Length
3,824 mm
150.6 in
Height
1,117 mm
44.0 in
Doors/seats2 seats
Trunk-
Length
3,738 mm
147.2 in
Height
1,202 mm
47.3 in
Range score
533 km
331 mi
482 km
299 mi
CO2 score
175 g/km
189 g/km
Trunk score
112 L
4.0 cu ft
-
Power-to-weight score
264 hp/t
197 kW/t
3.8 kg/hp
336 hp/t
251 kW/t
3.0 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleLotus Elise (SERIES 3) Cup 250 1.8KTM X-Bow GT 2.0 Turbo
Consumption7.5 L/100 km31.4 mpg US37.7 mpg UK8.3 L/100 km28.3 mpg US34 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km13.13 LC100 km14.53 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi21.12 LC100 mi23.38 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,125 L297 US gal247 UK gal1,245 L329 US gal274 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,969 LC/year2,179 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Lotus Elise (SERIES 3) Cup 250 1.8

  • Has 17 km/h (11 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 0.8 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 51 km (32 mi) more estimated range
  • Emits 14 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Heaviest

KTM X-Bow GT 2.0 Turbo

  • Has 39 hp more
  • Has 170 Nm more
  • Is 84 kg lighter
  • Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 72 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Lowest top speed
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Lotus Elise (SERIES 3) Cup 250 1.8
KTM X-Bow GT 2.0 Turbo
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

Cup 250 1.8
Cup 250 1.8
VS
LotusElise (SERIES 3)Cup 250 1.8vsLotusElise (SERIES 3)Facelift 2017Cup 250 1.8
2.0 Turbo
2.0 TFSI
VS
KTMX-Bow GT2.0 TurbovsAUDITTS Roadster (8S)2.0 TFSI
Cup 250 1.8
1.8 i 16V 111R
VS
LotusElise (SERIES 3)Cup 250 1.8vsLotusElise (SERIES 2)1.8 i 16V 111R
2.0 Turbo
S 3.4
VS
KTMX-Bow GT2.0 TurbovsPorscheBoxster (981)S 3.4
Cup 250 1.8
1.8
VS
LotusElise (SERIES 3)Cup 250 1.8vsLotus2-Eleven1.8
Cup 250 1.8
SLK 300
VS
LotusElise (SERIES 3)Cup 250 1.8vsMercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 300
2.0 Turbo
3.7 V6
VS
KTMX-Bow GT2.0 TurbovsNissan370Z RoadsterFacelift 20123.7 V6
Cup 250 1.8
2.0 TFSI
VS
LotusElise (SERIES 3)Cup 250 1.8vsAUDITT Roadster (8S)2.0 TFSI
Cup 250 1.8
30i
VS
LotusElise (SERIES 3)Cup 250 1.8vsBMWZ4 (G29)30i
2.0 Turbo
S CR 1.8
VS
KTMX-Bow GT2.0 TurbovsLotusElise (SERIES 3)S CR 1.8
2.0 Turbo
2.0 TFSI
VS
KTMX-Bow GT2.0 TurbovsAUDITTS Roadster (8J)Facelift 20102.0 TFSI
Cup 250 1.8
45 TFSI
VS
LotusElise (SERIES 3)Cup 250 1.8vsAUDITT Roadster (8S)Facelift 201845 TFSI
Lotus Elise (SERIES 3) Cup 250 1.8 vs KTM X-Bow GT 2.0 Turbo - car comparison - FastVsFaster