Car comparison

Lotus 2-Eleven 1.8vsKTM X-Bow GT 2.0 Turbo

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Lotus 2-Eleven

1.8

255 hp1796 ccGasolineRWDManualSuperchargedRoadster2007-2011
VS

KTM X-Bow GT

2.0 Turbo

285 hp1984 ccGasolineRWDManualTurbochargedRoadster2013-2017

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Lotus 2-Eleven 1.8

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    4.0 s
  • Fastest top speed
    241 km/h
    150 mph
  • Lightest
    745 kg
    1,642 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    342 hp/t
    255 kW/t
    2.9 kg/hp
  • Best practicality score
    27/100

KTM X-Bow GT 2.0 Turbo

  • Most powerful
    285 hp
    213 kW
  • Highest torque
    420 Nm
    310 lb-ft
  • Best overall score
    55/100
  • Best performance score
    68/100
  • Best economy score
    85/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelLotus2-Eleven1.8KTMX-Bow GT2.0 Turbo
Power
255hp190kW
285hp213kW
Torque
242Nm178lb-ft
420Nm310lb-ft
Curb weight
745kg1,642lb
847kg1,867lb
Top speed
241 km/h
150 mph
231 km/h
144 mph
To 99% top speed
37.8s99% target: 239 km/h / 148 mph
Calculated
43.1s99% target: 229 km/h / 142 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
4.0s
4.1s
0-200 km/h
13.9s
Calculated
17.0s
Calculated
0-60 mph
3.8s
Calculated
3.9s
Calculated
Fuel consumption-
8.3L/100 km28.3mpg US34.0mpg UK
Quarter mile
12.0s
Calculated
12.3s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
342hp/t255kW/t155hp/1000 lb
Calculated
336hp/t251kW/t153hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
325Nm/t217lb-ft/ton
Calculated
496Nm/t332lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range-
482km299mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,796cc110cu in
1,984cc121cu in
Length
3,822mm150in
3,738mm147in
Width
1,735mm68in
1,915mm75in
Height
1,112mm44in
1,202mm47in
Wheelbase
2,300mm91in
2,430mm96in
Front track-
1,672mm66in
Rear track-
1,626mm64in
Seats
2
2
Fuel tank
40L
40L
CO2 emissions-
189g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Lotus 2-Eleven 1.8KTM X-Bow GT 2.0 TurboPowerTorque
  • Lotus 2-Eleven 1.8: Power / Torque
  • KTM X-Bow GT 2.0 Turbo: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
Lotus2-Eleven1.88,000 rpm7,000 rpm8,250 rpm
KTMX-Bow GT2.0 Turbo6,400 rpm3,200 rpm6,650 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricLotus2-Eleven1.8KTMX-Bow GT2.0 Turbo
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
3.8 s
3.9 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
4.0 s
4.1 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
13.9 s
17.0 s
Top speed
241 km/h
150 mph
231 km/h
144 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.1 s
2.0 s
330 ft
101 m
5.3 s
5.3 s
1/8 mile
201 m
7.9 s
8.0 s
1000 ft
305 m
10.1 s
10.3 s
1/4 mile
402 m
12.0 s
12.3 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
189 km/h
118 mph
180 km/h
112 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Lotus2-Eleven1.8
255 hp
190 kW
KTMX-Bow GT2.0 Turbo
285 hp
213 kW

KTM X-Bow GT 2.0 Turbo has 30 hp more than Lotus 2-Eleven 1.8.

The biggest power difference is between Lotus 2-Eleven 1.8 and KTM X-Bow GT 2.0 Turbo: 30 hp (22 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Lotus2-Eleven1.8
242 Nm
178 lb-ft
KTMX-Bow GT2.0 Turbo
420 Nm
310 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Lotus2-Eleven1.8
745 kg
1,642 lb
KTMX-Bow GT2.0 Turbo
847 kg
1,867 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Lotus2-Eleven1.8
241 km/h
150 mph
KTMX-Bow GT2.0 Turbo
231 km/h
144 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Lotus2-Eleven1.84.0 s
KTMX-Bow GT2.0 Turbo4.1 s

Although KTM X-Bow GT 2.0 Turbo has more power, Lotus 2-Eleven 1.8 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Lotus 2-Eleven 1.8 and KTM X-Bow GT 2.0 Turbo: 0.1 s.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Lotus2-Eleven1.8
342 hp/t
255 kW/t
2.9 kg/hp
KTMX-Bow GT2.0 Turbo
336 hp/t
251 kW/t
3.0 kg/hp

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
Lotus2-Eleven1.8
255 hp
190 kW
4.0 s
241 km/h
150 mph
KTMX-Bow GT2.0 Turbo
285 hp
213 kW
4.1 s
231 km/h
144 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
Lotus2-Eleven1.8
Power
255 hp
190 kW
0-100 km/h4.0 s
Top speed
241 km/h
150 mph
Doors/seats2 seats
Trunk-
Length
3,822 mm
150.5 in
Height
1,112 mm
43.8 in
KTMX-Bow GT2.0 Turbo
Power
285 hp
213 kW
0-100 km/h4.1 s
Top speed
231 km/h
144 mph
Doors/seats2 seats
Trunk-
Length
3,738 mm
147.2 in
Height
1,202 mm
47.3 in

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleLotus2-Eleven1.8KTMX-Bow GT2.0 Turbo
Power
255 hp
190 kW
285 hp
213 kW
Torque
242 Nm
178 lb-ft
420 Nm
310 lb-ft
Acceleration
4.0 s
4.1 s
Top speed
241 km/h
150 mph
231 km/h
144 mph
Lightness
745 kg
1,642 lb
847 kg
1,867 lb
Fuel consumption
-
8.3 L/100 km
28.3 mpg US
34.0 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats2 seats
Trunk-
Length
3,822 mm
150.5 in
Height
1,112 mm
43.8 in
Doors/seats2 seats
Trunk-
Length
3,738 mm
147.2 in
Height
1,202 mm
47.3 in
Range score
-
482 km
299 mi
CO2 score
-
189 g/km
Power-to-weight score
342 hp/t
255 kW/t
2.9 kg/hp
336 hp/t
251 kW/t
3.0 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleKTM X-Bow GT 2.0 Turbo
Consumption8.3 L/100 km28.3 mpg US34 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km14.53 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi23.38 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,245 L329 US gal274 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,179 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Lotus 2-Eleven 1.8

  • Is 102 kg lighter
  • Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 6 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Lowest power

KTM X-Bow GT 2.0 Turbo

  • Has 30 hp more
  • Has 178 Nm more

Pros

  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Lotus 2-Eleven 1.8
KTM X-Bow GT 2.0 Turbo
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

1.8
Cup 250 1.8
VS
Lotus2-Eleven1.8vsLotusElise (SERIES 3)Cup 250 1.8
1.8
1.8 i 16V 111R
VS
Lotus2-Eleven1.8vsLotusElise (SERIES 2)1.8 i 16V 111R
2.0 Turbo
2.0 TFSI
VS
KTMX-Bow GT2.0 TurbovsAUDITTS Roadster (8S)2.0 TFSI
1.8
Cup 260 1.8
VS
Lotus2-Eleven1.8vsLotusElise (SERIES 3)Facelift 2017Cup 260 1.8
2.0 Turbo
S 3.4
VS
KTMX-Bow GT2.0 TurbovsPorscheBoxster (981)S 3.4
1.8
2.0 TFSI
VS
Lotus2-Eleven1.8vsAUDITTS Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI
1.8
30i
VS
Lotus2-Eleven1.8vsBMWZ4 (E89)30i
2.0 Turbo
3.7 V6
VS
KTMX-Bow GT2.0 TurbovsNissan370Z RoadsterFacelift 20123.7 V6
1.8
2.9
VS
Lotus2-Eleven1.8vsPorscheBoxster (987)Facelift 20092.9
2.0 Turbo
SLK 350 V6
VS
KTMX-Bow GT2.0 TurbovsMercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 350 V6
1.8
3.2i V6 24V
VS
Lotus2-Eleven1.8vsAUDITT Roadster (8J)3.2i V6 24V
2.0 Turbo
2.0 TFSI
VS
KTMX-Bow GT2.0 TurbovsAUDITTS Roadster (8J)Facelift 20102.0 TFSI
Lotus 2-Eleven 1.8 vs KTM X-Bow GT 2.0 Turbo - car comparison - FastVsFaster