AUDI TT RS Roadster (8J) · Facelift 2010
Car comparison
AUDI TT RS Roadster (8J) · Facelift 2010 2.5 TFSI plusvsPorsche Boxster (981) S 3.4
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonPorsche Boxster (981)
S 3.4
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
AUDI TT RS Roadster (8J) Facelift 2010 2.5 TFSI plus
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.4 s
- Fastest top speed280 km/h174 mph
- Most powerful360 hp268 kW
- Highest torque465 Nm343 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight238 hp/t178 kW/t4.2 kg/hp
- Lowest highway consumption7.0 L/100 km33.6 mpg US40.4 mpg UK
- Best overall score61/100
- Best performance score75/100
Porsche Boxster (981) S 3.4
- Lightest1,340 kg2,954 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption9.0 L/100 km26.1 mpg US31.4 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption12.7 L/100 km18.5 mpg US22.2 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions211 g/km
- Best estimated range711 km442 mi
- Largest trunk280 L
- Best economy score83/100
- Best practicality score31/100
Specification comparison
| Model | AUDITT RS Roadster (8J)Facelift 20102.5 TFSI plus | PorscheBoxster (981)S 3.4 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 360hp268kW | 315hp235kW |
| Torque | 465Nm343lb-ft | 360Nm266lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,510kg3,329lb | 1,340kg2,954lb |
| Gross weight | 1,830kg4,034lb | 1,655kg3,649lb |
| Top speed | 280 km/h 174 mph | 279 km/h 173 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 60.8s99% target: 277 km/h / 172 mph Calculated | 66.4s99% target: 276 km/h / 172 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.4s | 5.1s |
| 0-200 km/h | 14.1s Calculated | 16.1s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.2s Calculated | 4.9s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 9.1L/100 km25.8mpg US31.0mpg UK | 9L/100 km26.1mpg US31.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 12.8L/100 km18.4mpg US22.1mpg UK | 12.7L/100 km18.5mpg US22.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7L/100 km33.6mpg US40.4mpg UK | 7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.4s Calculated | 13.1s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 238hp/t178kW/t108hp/1000 lb Calculated | 235hp/t175kW/t107hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 308Nm/t206lb-ft/ton Calculated | 269Nm/t180lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 659km410mi Calculated | 711km442mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,480cc151cu in | 3,436cc210cu in |
| Length | 4,198mm165in | 4,374mm172in |
| Width | 1,842mm73in | 1,801mm71in |
| Height | 1,348mm53in | 1,281mm50in |
| Wheelbase | 2,468mm97in | 2,475mm97in |
| Front track | 1,555mm61in | - |
| Rear track | 1,546mm61in | - |
| Trunk volume | 250L | 280L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 60L | 64L |
| CO2 emissions | 212g/km | 211g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- AUDI TT RS Roadster (8J) Facelift 2010 2.5 TFSI plus: Power / Torque
- Porsche Boxster (981) S 3.4: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDITT RS Roadster (8J)Facelift 20102.5 TFSI plus | 5,500-6,700 rpm | 1,650-5,400 rpm | 6,950 rpm |
| PorscheBoxster (981)S 3.4 | 6,700 rpm | 4,500-5,800 rpm | 6,950 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AUDITT RS Roadster (8J)Facelift 20102.5 TFSI plus | PorscheBoxster (981)S 3.4 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.2 s | 4.9 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.4 s | 5.1 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 14.1 s | 16.1 s |
| Top speed | 280 km/h 174 mph | 279 km/h 173 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.1 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.5 s | 5.8 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.2 s | 8.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.5 s | 11.1 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.4 s | 13.1 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 188 km/h 117 mph | 181 km/h 113 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDITT RS Roadster (8J)Facelift 20102.5 TFSI plus | 360 hp 268 kW |
| PorscheBoxster (981)S 3.4 | 315 hp 235 kW |
AUDI TT RS Roadster (8J) Facelift 2010 2.5 TFSI plus has 45 hp more than Porsche Boxster (981) S 3.4.
The biggest power difference is between Porsche Boxster (981) S 3.4 and AUDI TT RS Roadster (8J) Facelift 2010 2.5 TFSI plus: 45 hp (34 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDITT RS Roadster (8J)Facelift 20102.5 TFSI plus | 465 Nm 343 lb-ft |
| PorscheBoxster (981)S 3.4 | 360 Nm 266 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDITT RS Roadster (8J)Facelift 20102.5 TFSI plus | 1,510 kg 3,329 lb |
| PorscheBoxster (981)S 3.4 | 1,340 kg 2,954 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDITT RS Roadster (8J)Facelift 20102.5 TFSI plus | 280 km/h 174 mph |
| PorscheBoxster (981)S 3.4 | 279 km/h 173 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDITT RS Roadster (8J)Facelift 20102.5 TFSI plus | 4.4 s |
| PorscheBoxster (981)S 3.4 | 5.1 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AUDI TT RS Roadster (8J) Facelift 2010 2.5 TFSI plus and Porsche Boxster (981) S 3.4: 0.7 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDITT RS Roadster (8J)Facelift 20102.5 TFSI plus | 9.1 L/100 km 25.8 mpg US 31.0 mpg UK |
| PorscheBoxster (981)S 3.4 | 9.0 L/100 km 26.1 mpg US 31.4 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDITT RS Roadster (8J)Facelift 20102.5 TFSI plus | 238 hp/t 178 kW/t 4.2 kg/hp |
| PorscheBoxster (981)S 3.4 | 235 hp/t 175 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDITT RS Roadster (8J)Facelift 20102.5 TFSI plus | 659 km 410 mi |
| PorscheBoxster (981)S 3.4 | 711 km 442 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDITT RS Roadster (8J)Facelift 20102.5 TFSI plus | 360 hp 268 kW | 4.4 s | 280 km/h 174 mph |
| PorscheBoxster (981)S 3.4 | 315 hp 235 kW | 5.1 s | 279 km/h 173 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDITT RS Roadster (8J)Facelift 20102.5 TFSI plus |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| PorscheBoxster (981)S 3.4 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDITT RS Roadster (8J)Facelift 20102.5 TFSI plus |
| 9.1 L/100 km 25.8 mpg US 31.0 mpg UK | ||||||
| PorscheBoxster (981)S 3.4 |
| 9.0 L/100 km 26.1 mpg US 31.4 mpg UK | ||||||
AUDI TT RS Roadster (8J) Facelift 2010 2.5 TFSI plus is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| AUDITT RS Roadster (8J)Facelift 20102.5 TFSI plus | 9.1 L/100 km 25.8 mpg US 31.0 mpg UK | 4.4 s |
| PorscheBoxster (981)S 3.4 | 9.0 L/100 km 26.1 mpg US 31.4 mpg UK | 5.1 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| AUDITT RS Roadster (8J)Facelift 20102.5 TFSI plus | 238 hp/t 178 kW/t 4.2 kg/hp | 9.1 L/100 km 25.8 mpg US 31.0 mpg UK |
| PorscheBoxster (981)S 3.4 | 235 hp/t 175 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp | 9.0 L/100 km 26.1 mpg US 31.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AUDITT RS Roadster (8J)Facelift 20102.5 TFSI plus | PorscheBoxster (981)S 3.4 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 360 hp 268 kW | 315 hp 235 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 465 Nm 343 lb-ft | 360 Nm 266 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.4 s | 5.1 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 280 km/h 174 mph | 279 km/h 173 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,510 kg 3,329 lb | 1,340 kg 2,954 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 9.1 L/100 km 25.8 mpg US 31.0 mpg UK | 9.0 L/100 km 26.1 mpg US 31.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 659 km 410 mi | 711 km 442 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 212 g/km | 211 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 250 L 8.8 cu ft | 280 L 9.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 238 hp/t 178 kW/t 4.2 kg/hp | 235 hp/t 175 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | AUDI TT RS Roadster (8J) Facelift 2010 2.5 TFSI plus | Porsche Boxster (981) S 3.4 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 9.1 L/100 km25.8 mpg US31 mpg UK | 9 L/100 km26.1 mpg US31.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 15.92 LC100 km | 15.75 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 25.63 LC100 mi | 25.35 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,365 L361 US gal300 UK gal | 1,350 L357 US gal297 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,389 LC/year | 2,363 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
AUDI TT RS Roadster (8J) Facelift 2010 2.5 TFSI plus
- Has 45 hp more
- Has 105 Nm more
- Is 0.7 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 1 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Has 3 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
Porsche Boxster (981) S 3.4
- Is 170 kg lighter
- Uses 0.1 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 52 km (32 mi) more estimated range
- Has 30 L more trunk volume
- Emits 1 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























