KTM X-Bow GT
Car comparison
KTM X-Bow GT 2.0 Turbo · Stage 3vsKTM X-Bow GT 2.0 Turbo · Stage 2vsKTM X-Bow GT 2.0 Turbo · Stage 1vsKTM X-Bow GT 2.0 Turbo
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonKTM X-Bow GT
2.0 Turbo (Stage 2)
KTM X-Bow GT
2.0 Turbo (Stage 1)
KTM X-Bow GT
2.0 Turbo
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
KTM X-Bow GT 2.0 Turbo (Stage 3) 427 hp
- Quickest 0-100 km/h3.2 s
- Fastest top speed280 km/h174 mph Unrestricted270 km/h168 mph Restricted
- Most powerful427 hp319 kW
- Highest torque651 Nm480 lb-ft
- Lightest847 kg1,867 lb
- Best power-to-weight505 hp/t376 kW/t2.0 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption8.3 L/100 km28.3 mpg US34.0 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions189 g/km
- Best estimated range482 km299 mi
- Best overall score67/100
- Best performance score86/100
- Best economy score85/100
- Best practicality score27/100
Specification comparison
| Model | KTMX-Bow GT2.0 Turbo (Stage 3)427 hp | KTMX-Bow GT2.0 Turbo (Stage 2)370 hp | KTMX-Bow GT2.0 Turbo (Stage 1)336 hp | KTMX-Bow GT2.0 Turbo285 hp |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 427hp319kW+142 hp | 370hp276kW+85 hp | 336hp251kW+51 hp | 285hp213kW |
| Torque | 651Nm480lb-ft+231 Nm | 567Nm418lb-ft+147 Nm | 512Nm378lb-ft+92 Nm | 420Nm310lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 847kg1,867lb | 847kg1,867lb | 847kg1,867lb | 847kg1,867lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 280 km/h174 mph Restricted 270 km/h168 mph Calculated | 259 km/h 161 mph | 252 km/h 157 mph | 231 km/h 144 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 37.4s99% target: 277 km/h / 172 mph-5.7 s Calculated | 39.2s99% target: 256 km/h / 159 mph-3.9 s Calculated | 41.7s99% target: 249 km/h / 155 mph-1.4 s Calculated | 43.1s99% target: 229 km/h / 142 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 3.2s-0.9 s | 3.5s-0.6 s | 3.7s-0.4 s | 4.1s |
| 0-200 km/h | 9.5s-7.4 s Calculated | 11.5s-5.4 s Calculated | 12.9s-4.1 s Calculated | 17.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 3.0s-0.9 s Calculated | 3.3s-0.6 s Calculated | 3.5s-0.4 s Calculated | 3.9s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 8.3L/100 km28.3mpg US34.0mpg UK | 8.3L/100 km28.3mpg US34.0mpg UK | 8.3L/100 km28.3mpg US34.0mpg UK | 8.3L/100 km28.3mpg US34.0mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 10.9s-1.5 s Calculated | 11.4s-0.9 s Calculated | 11.7s-0.6 s Calculated | 12.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 505hp/t376kW/t229hp/1000 lb Calculated | 437hp/t326kW/t198hp/1000 lb Calculated | 397hp/t296kW/t180hp/1000 lb Calculated | 336hp/t251kW/t153hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 769Nm/t514lb-ft/ton Calculated | 669Nm/t448lb-ft/ton Calculated | 605Nm/t405lb-ft/ton Calculated | 496Nm/t332lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 482km299mi Calculated | 482km299mi Calculated | 482km299mi Calculated | 482km299mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 1,984cc121cu in | 1,984cc121cu in | 1,984cc121cu in |
| Length | 3,738mm147in | 3,738mm147in | 3,738mm147in | 3,738mm147in |
| Width | 1,915mm75in | 1,915mm75in | 1,915mm75in | 1,915mm75in |
| Height | 1,202mm47in | 1,202mm47in | 1,202mm47in | 1,202mm47in |
| Wheelbase | 2,430mm96in | 2,430mm96in | 2,430mm96in | 2,430mm96in |
| Front track | 1,672mm66in | 1,672mm66in | 1,672mm66in | 1,672mm66in |
| Rear track | 1,626mm64in | 1,626mm64in | 1,626mm64in | 1,626mm64in |
| Seats | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 40L | 40L | 40L | 40L |
| CO2 emissions | 189g/km | 189g/km | 189g/km | 189g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- KTM X-Bow GT 2.0 Turbo (Stage 3) 427 hp: Power / Torque
- KTM X-Bow GT 2.0 Turbo (Stage 2) 370 hp: Power / Torque
- KTM X-Bow GT 2.0 Turbo (Stage 1) 336 hp: Power / Torque
- KTM X-Bow GT 2.0 Turbo 285 hp: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| KTMX-Bow GT2.0 Turbo (Stage 3)427 hp | 6,400 rpm | 3,200 rpm | 6,650 rpm |
| KTMX-Bow GT2.0 Turbo (Stage 2)370 hp | 6,400 rpm | 3,200 rpm | 6,650 rpm |
| KTMX-Bow GT2.0 Turbo (Stage 1)336 hp | 6,400 rpm | 3,200 rpm | 6,650 rpm |
| KTMX-Bow GT2.0 Turbo285 hp | 6,400 rpm | 3,200 rpm | 6,650 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | KTMX-Bow GT2.0 Turbo (Stage 3)427 hp | KTMX-Bow GT2.0 Turbo (Stage 2)370 hp | KTMX-Bow GT2.0 Turbo (Stage 1)336 hp | KTMX-Bow GT2.0 Turbo285 hp |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 3.0 s | 3.3 s | 3.5 s | 3.9 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 3.2 s | 3.5 s | 3.7 s | 4.1 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 9.5 s | 11.5 s | 12.9 s | 17.0 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 280 km/h174 mph Restricted 270 km/h168 mph Likely limited | 259 km/h 161 mph | 252 km/h 157 mph | 231 km/h 144 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||||
60 ft 18 m | 1.9 s | 1.9 s | 1.9 s | 2.0 s |
330 ft 101 m | 4.8 s | 5.0 s | 5.1 s | 5.3 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 7.1 s | 7.4 s | 7.6 s | 8.0 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 9.2 s | 9.6 s | 9.8 s | 10.3 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 10.9 s | 11.4 s | 11.7 s | 12.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 212 km/h 132 mph | 199 km/h 124 mph | 193 km/h 120 mph | 180 km/h 112 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| KTMX-Bow GT2.0 Turbo (Stage 3)427 hp | 427 hp 319 kW |
| KTMX-Bow GT2.0 Turbo (Stage 2)370 hp | 370 hp 276 kW |
| KTMX-Bow GT2.0 Turbo (Stage 1)336 hp | 336 hp 251 kW |
| KTMX-Bow GT2.0 Turbo285 hp | 285 hp 213 kW |
KTM X-Bow GT 2.0 Turbo (Stage 3) 427 hp has 142 hp more than KTM X-Bow GT 2.0 Turbo 285 hp.
The biggest power difference is between KTM X-Bow GT 2.0 Turbo 285 hp and KTM X-Bow GT 2.0 Turbo (Stage 3) 427 hp: 142 hp (106 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| KTMX-Bow GT2.0 Turbo (Stage 3)427 hp | 651 Nm 480 lb-ft |
| KTMX-Bow GT2.0 Turbo (Stage 2)370 hp | 567 Nm 418 lb-ft |
| KTMX-Bow GT2.0 Turbo (Stage 1)336 hp | 512 Nm 378 lb-ft |
| KTMX-Bow GT2.0 Turbo285 hp | 420 Nm 310 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| KTMX-Bow GT2.0 Turbo (Stage 3)427 hp | 847 kg 1,867 lb |
| KTMX-Bow GT2.0 Turbo (Stage 2)370 hp | 847 kg 1,867 lb |
| KTMX-Bow GT2.0 Turbo (Stage 1)336 hp | 847 kg 1,867 lb |
| KTMX-Bow GT2.0 Turbo285 hp | 847 kg 1,867 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| KTMX-Bow GT2.0 Turbo (Stage 3)427 hp | Unrestricted 280 km/h174 mph Restricted 270 km/h168 mph |
| KTMX-Bow GT2.0 Turbo (Stage 2)370 hp | 259 km/h 161 mph |
| KTMX-Bow GT2.0 Turbo (Stage 1)336 hp | 252 km/h 157 mph |
| KTMX-Bow GT2.0 Turbo285 hp | 231 km/h 144 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| KTMX-Bow GT2.0 Turbo (Stage 3)427 hp | 3.2 s |
| KTMX-Bow GT2.0 Turbo (Stage 2)370 hp | 3.5 s |
| KTMX-Bow GT2.0 Turbo (Stage 1)336 hp | 3.7 s |
| KTMX-Bow GT2.0 Turbo285 hp | 4.1 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between KTM X-Bow GT 2.0 Turbo (Stage 3) 427 hp and KTM X-Bow GT 2.0 Turbo 285 hp: 0.9 s.
The closest cars by acceleration are KTM X-Bow GT 2.0 Turbo (Stage 2) 370 hp and KTM X-Bow GT 2.0 Turbo (Stage 1) 336 hp, separated by only 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| KTMX-Bow GT2.0 Turbo (Stage 3)427 hp | 8.3 L/100 km 28.3 mpg US 34.0 mpg UK |
| KTMX-Bow GT2.0 Turbo (Stage 2)370 hp | 8.3 L/100 km 28.3 mpg US 34.0 mpg UK |
| KTMX-Bow GT2.0 Turbo (Stage 1)336 hp | 8.3 L/100 km 28.3 mpg US 34.0 mpg UK |
| KTMX-Bow GT2.0 Turbo285 hp | 8.3 L/100 km 28.3 mpg US 34.0 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| KTMX-Bow GT2.0 Turbo (Stage 3)427 hp | 505 hp/t 376 kW/t 2.0 kg/hp |
| KTMX-Bow GT2.0 Turbo (Stage 2)370 hp | 437 hp/t 326 kW/t 2.3 kg/hp |
| KTMX-Bow GT2.0 Turbo (Stage 1)336 hp | 397 hp/t 296 kW/t 2.5 kg/hp |
| KTMX-Bow GT2.0 Turbo285 hp | 336 hp/t 251 kW/t 3.0 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| KTMX-Bow GT2.0 Turbo (Stage 3)427 hp | 482 km 299 mi |
| KTMX-Bow GT2.0 Turbo (Stage 2)370 hp | 482 km 299 mi |
| KTMX-Bow GT2.0 Turbo (Stage 1)336 hp | 482 km 299 mi |
| KTMX-Bow GT2.0 Turbo285 hp | 482 km 299 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| KTMX-Bow GT2.0 Turbo (Stage 3)427 hp | 427 hp 319 kW | 3.2 s | Unrestricted 280 km/h174 mph Restricted 270 km/h168 mph |
| KTMX-Bow GT2.0 Turbo (Stage 2)370 hp | 370 hp 276 kW | 3.5 s | 259 km/h 161 mph |
| KTMX-Bow GT2.0 Turbo (Stage 1)336 hp | 336 hp 251 kW | 3.7 s | 252 km/h 157 mph |
| KTMX-Bow GT2.0 Turbo285 hp | 285 hp 213 kW | 4.1 s | 231 km/h 144 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KTMX-Bow GT2.0 Turbo (Stage 3)427 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| KTMX-Bow GT2.0 Turbo (Stage 2)370 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| KTMX-Bow GT2.0 Turbo (Stage 1)336 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| KTMX-Bow GT2.0 Turbo285 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KTMX-Bow GT2.0 Turbo (Stage 3)427 hp |
| 8.3 L/100 km 28.3 mpg US 34.0 mpg UK | ||||||
| KTMX-Bow GT2.0 Turbo (Stage 2)370 hp |
| 8.3 L/100 km 28.3 mpg US 34.0 mpg UK | ||||||
| KTMX-Bow GT2.0 Turbo (Stage 1)336 hp |
| 8.3 L/100 km 28.3 mpg US 34.0 mpg UK | ||||||
| KTMX-Bow GT2.0 Turbo285 hp |
| 8.3 L/100 km 28.3 mpg US 34.0 mpg UK | ||||||
KTM X-Bow GT 2.0 Turbo (Stage 3) 427 hp is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| KTMX-Bow GT2.0 Turbo (Stage 3)427 hp | 8.3 L/100 km 28.3 mpg US 34.0 mpg UK | 3.2 s |
| KTMX-Bow GT2.0 Turbo (Stage 2)370 hp | 8.3 L/100 km 28.3 mpg US 34.0 mpg UK | 3.5 s |
| KTMX-Bow GT2.0 Turbo (Stage 1)336 hp | 8.3 L/100 km 28.3 mpg US 34.0 mpg UK | 3.7 s |
| KTMX-Bow GT2.0 Turbo285 hp | 8.3 L/100 km 28.3 mpg US 34.0 mpg UK | 4.1 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| KTMX-Bow GT2.0 Turbo (Stage 3)427 hp | 505 hp/t 376 kW/t 2.0 kg/hp | 8.3 L/100 km 28.3 mpg US 34.0 mpg UK |
| KTMX-Bow GT2.0 Turbo (Stage 2)370 hp | 437 hp/t 326 kW/t 2.3 kg/hp | 8.3 L/100 km 28.3 mpg US 34.0 mpg UK |
| KTMX-Bow GT2.0 Turbo (Stage 1)336 hp | 397 hp/t 296 kW/t 2.5 kg/hp | 8.3 L/100 km 28.3 mpg US 34.0 mpg UK |
| KTMX-Bow GT2.0 Turbo285 hp | 336 hp/t 251 kW/t 3.0 kg/hp | 8.3 L/100 km 28.3 mpg US 34.0 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | KTMX-Bow GT2.0 Turbo (Stage 3)427 hp | KTMX-Bow GT2.0 Turbo (Stage 2)370 hp | KTMX-Bow GT2.0 Turbo (Stage 1)336 hp | KTMX-Bow GT2.0 Turbo285 hp | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 427 hp 319 kW | 370 hp 276 kW | 336 hp 251 kW | 285 hp 213 kW | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 651 Nm 480 lb-ft | 567 Nm 418 lb-ft | 512 Nm 378 lb-ft | 420 Nm 310 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 3.2 s | 3.5 s | 3.7 s | 4.1 s | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 280 km/h174 mph Restricted 270 km/h168 mph | 259 km/h 161 mph | 252 km/h 157 mph | 231 km/h 144 mph | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 847 kg 1,867 lb | 847 kg 1,867 lb | 847 kg 1,867 lb | 847 kg 1,867 lb | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 8.3 L/100 km 28.3 mpg US 34.0 mpg UK | 8.3 L/100 km 28.3 mpg US 34.0 mpg UK | 8.3 L/100 km 28.3 mpg US 34.0 mpg UK | 8.3 L/100 km 28.3 mpg US 34.0 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 482 km 299 mi | 482 km 299 mi | 482 km 299 mi | 482 km 299 mi | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 189 g/km | 189 g/km | 189 g/km | 189 g/km | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 505 hp/t 376 kW/t 2.0 kg/hp | 437 hp/t 326 kW/t 2.3 kg/hp | 397 hp/t 296 kW/t 2.5 kg/hp | 336 hp/t 251 kW/t 3.0 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | KTM X-Bow GT 2.0 Turbo (Stage 3) 427 hp | KTM X-Bow GT 2.0 Turbo (Stage 2) 370 hp | KTM X-Bow GT 2.0 Turbo (Stage 1) 336 hp | KTM X-Bow GT 2.0 Turbo 285 hp |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 8.3 L/100 km28.3 mpg US34 mpg UK | 8.3 L/100 km28.3 mpg US34 mpg UK | 8.3 L/100 km28.3 mpg US34 mpg UK | 8.3 L/100 km28.3 mpg US34 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 14.53 LC100 km | 14.53 LC100 km | 14.53 LC100 km | 14.53 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 23.38 LC100 mi | 23.38 LC100 mi | 23.38 LC100 mi | 23.38 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,245 L329 US gal274 UK gal | 1,245 L329 US gal274 UK gal | 1,245 L329 US gal274 UK gal | 1,245 L329 US gal274 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,179 LC/year | 2,179 LC/year | 2,179 LC/year | 2,179 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
KTM X-Bow GT 2.0 Turbo (Stage 3) 427 hp
- Has 57 hp more
- Has 84 Nm more
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 21 km/h (13 mph) higher top speed
- Has 67 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Highest CO2 emissions
KTM X-Bow GT 2.0 Turbo (Stage 2) 370 hp
No measurable advantages in the available data.
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























