Car comparison

KTM X-Bow GT 2.0 Turbo · Stage 3vsKTM X-Bow GT 2.0 Turbo · Stage 2vsKTM X-Bow GT 2.0 Turbo · Stage 1vsKTM X-Bow GT 2.0 Turbo

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison
VS
VS
VS

KTM X-Bow GT

2.0 Turbo

285 hp1984 ccGasolineRWDManualTurbochargedRoadster2013-2017

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

KTM X-Bow GT 2.0 Turbo (Stage 3) 427 hp

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    3.2 s
  • Fastest top speed
    280 km/h
    174 mph Unrestricted
    270 km/h
    168 mph Restricted
  • Most powerful
    427 hp
    319 kW
  • Highest torque
    651 Nm
    480 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    847 kg
    1,867 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    505 hp/t
    376 kW/t
    2.0 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    8.3 L/100 km
    28.3 mpg US
    34.0 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    189 g/km
  • Best estimated range
    482 km
    299 mi
  • Best overall score
    67/100
  • Best performance score
    86/100
  • Best economy score
    85/100
  • Best practicality score
    27/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelKTMX-Bow GT2.0 Turbo (Stage 3)427 hpKTMX-Bow GT2.0 Turbo (Stage 2)370 hpKTMX-Bow GT2.0 Turbo (Stage 1)336 hpKTMX-Bow GT2.0 Turbo285 hp
Power
427hp319kW+142 hp
370hp276kW+85 hp
336hp251kW+51 hp
285hp213kW
Torque
651Nm480lb-ft+231 Nm
567Nm418lb-ft+147 Nm
512Nm378lb-ft+92 Nm
420Nm310lb-ft
Curb weight
847kg1,867lb
847kg1,867lb
847kg1,867lb
847kg1,867lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
280 km/h174 mph
Restricted
270 km/h168 mph
+49 km/h
Calculated
259 km/h
161 mph
+28 km/h
252 km/h
157 mph
+21 km/h
231 km/h
144 mph
To 99% top speed
37.4s99% target: 277 km/h / 172 mph-5.7 s
Calculated
39.2s99% target: 256 km/h / 159 mph-3.9 s
Calculated
41.7s99% target: 249 km/h / 155 mph-1.4 s
Calculated
43.1s99% target: 229 km/h / 142 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
3.2s-0.9 s
3.5s-0.6 s
3.7s-0.4 s
4.1s
0-200 km/h
9.5s-7.4 s
Calculated
11.5s-5.4 s
Calculated
12.9s-4.1 s
Calculated
17.0s
Calculated
0-60 mph
3.0s-0.9 s
Calculated
3.3s-0.6 s
Calculated
3.5s-0.4 s
Calculated
3.9s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
8.3L/100 km28.3mpg US34.0mpg UK
8.3L/100 km28.3mpg US34.0mpg UK
8.3L/100 km28.3mpg US34.0mpg UK
8.3L/100 km28.3mpg US34.0mpg UK
Quarter mile
10.9s-1.5 s
Calculated
11.4s-0.9 s
Calculated
11.7s-0.6 s
Calculated
12.3s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
505hp/t376kW/t229hp/1000 lb
Calculated
437hp/t326kW/t198hp/1000 lb
Calculated
397hp/t296kW/t180hp/1000 lb
Calculated
336hp/t251kW/t153hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
769Nm/t514lb-ft/ton
Calculated
669Nm/t448lb-ft/ton
Calculated
605Nm/t405lb-ft/ton
Calculated
496Nm/t332lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
482km299mi
Calculated
482km299mi
Calculated
482km299mi
Calculated
482km299mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,984cc121cu in
1,984cc121cu in
1,984cc121cu in
1,984cc121cu in
Length
3,738mm147in
3,738mm147in
3,738mm147in
3,738mm147in
Width
1,915mm75in
1,915mm75in
1,915mm75in
1,915mm75in
Height
1,202mm47in
1,202mm47in
1,202mm47in
1,202mm47in
Wheelbase
2,430mm96in
2,430mm96in
2,430mm96in
2,430mm96in
Front track
1,672mm66in
1,672mm66in
1,672mm66in
1,672mm66in
Rear track
1,626mm64in
1,626mm64in
1,626mm64in
1,626mm64in
Seats
2
2
2
2
Fuel tank
40L
40L
40L
40L
CO2 emissions
189g/km
189g/km
189g/km
189g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

KTM X-Bow GT 2.0 Turbo (Stage 3) 427 hpKTM X-Bow GT 2.0 Turbo (Stage 2) 370 hpKTM X-Bow GT 2.0 Turbo (Stage 1) 336 hpKTM X-Bow GT 2.0 Turbo 285 hpPowerTorque
  • KTM X-Bow GT 2.0 Turbo (Stage 3) 427 hp: Power / Torque
  • KTM X-Bow GT 2.0 Turbo (Stage 2) 370 hp: Power / Torque
  • KTM X-Bow GT 2.0 Turbo (Stage 1) 336 hp: Power / Torque
  • KTM X-Bow GT 2.0 Turbo 285 hp: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
KTMX-Bow GT2.0 Turbo (Stage 3)427 hp6,400 rpm3,200 rpm6,650 rpm
KTMX-Bow GT2.0 Turbo (Stage 2)370 hp6,400 rpm3,200 rpm6,650 rpm
KTMX-Bow GT2.0 Turbo (Stage 1)336 hp6,400 rpm3,200 rpm6,650 rpm
KTMX-Bow GT2.0 Turbo285 hp6,400 rpm3,200 rpm6,650 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricKTMX-Bow GT2.0 Turbo (Stage 3)427 hpKTMX-Bow GT2.0 Turbo (Stage 2)370 hpKTMX-Bow GT2.0 Turbo (Stage 1)336 hpKTMX-Bow GT2.0 Turbo285 hp
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
3.0 s
3.3 s
3.5 s
3.9 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
3.2 s
3.5 s
3.7 s
4.1 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
9.5 s
11.5 s
12.9 s
17.0 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
280 km/h174 mph
Restricted
270 km/h168 mph
Likely limited
259 km/h
161 mph
252 km/h
157 mph
231 km/h
144 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
1.9 s
1.9 s
1.9 s
2.0 s
330 ft
101 m
4.8 s
5.0 s
5.1 s
5.3 s
1/8 mile
201 m
7.1 s
7.4 s
7.6 s
8.0 s
1000 ft
305 m
9.2 s
9.6 s
9.8 s
10.3 s
1/4 mile
402 m
10.9 s
11.4 s
11.7 s
12.3 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
212 km/h
132 mph
199 km/h
124 mph
193 km/h
120 mph
180 km/h
112 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

KTM X-Bow GT 2.0 Turbo (Stage 3) 427 hp has 142 hp more than KTM X-Bow GT 2.0 Turbo 285 hp.

The biggest power difference is between KTM X-Bow GT 2.0 Turbo 285 hp and KTM X-Bow GT 2.0 Turbo (Stage 3) 427 hp: 142 hp (106 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
KTMX-Bow GT2.0 Turbo (Stage 3)427 hp
Unrestricted
280 km/h174 mph
Restricted
270 km/h168 mph
KTMX-Bow GT2.0 Turbo (Stage 2)370 hp
259 km/h
161 mph
KTMX-Bow GT2.0 Turbo (Stage 1)336 hp
252 km/h
157 mph
KTMX-Bow GT2.0 Turbo285 hp
231 km/h
144 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between KTM X-Bow GT 2.0 Turbo (Stage 3) 427 hp and KTM X-Bow GT 2.0 Turbo 285 hp: 0.9 s.

The closest cars by acceleration are KTM X-Bow GT 2.0 Turbo (Stage 2) 370 hp and KTM X-Bow GT 2.0 Turbo (Stage 1) 336 hp, separated by only 0.2 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
KTMX-Bow GT2.0 Turbo (Stage 3)427 hp
8.3 L/100 km
28.3 mpg US
34.0 mpg UK
KTMX-Bow GT2.0 Turbo (Stage 2)370 hp
8.3 L/100 km
28.3 mpg US
34.0 mpg UK
KTMX-Bow GT2.0 Turbo (Stage 1)336 hp
8.3 L/100 km
28.3 mpg US
34.0 mpg UK
KTMX-Bow GT2.0 Turbo285 hp
8.3 L/100 km
28.3 mpg US
34.0 mpg UK

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
KTMX-Bow GT2.0 Turbo (Stage 3)427 hp
505 hp/t
376 kW/t
2.0 kg/hp
KTMX-Bow GT2.0 Turbo (Stage 2)370 hp
437 hp/t
326 kW/t
2.3 kg/hp
KTMX-Bow GT2.0 Turbo (Stage 1)336 hp
397 hp/t
296 kW/t
2.5 kg/hp
KTMX-Bow GT2.0 Turbo285 hp
336 hp/t
251 kW/t
3.0 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
KTMX-Bow GT2.0 Turbo (Stage 3)427 hp
427 hp
319 kW
3.2 s
Unrestricted
280 km/h174 mph
Restricted
270 km/h168 mph
KTMX-Bow GT2.0 Turbo (Stage 2)370 hp
370 hp
276 kW
3.5 s
259 km/h
161 mph
KTMX-Bow GT2.0 Turbo (Stage 1)336 hp
336 hp
251 kW
3.7 s
252 km/h
157 mph
KTMX-Bow GT2.0 Turbo285 hp
285 hp
213 kW
4.1 s
231 km/h
144 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
KTMX-Bow GT2.0 Turbo (Stage 3)427 hp
Power
427 hp
319 kW
0-100 km/h3.2 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
280 km/h174 mph
Restricted
270 km/h168 mph
Doors/seats2 seats
Trunk-
Length
3,738 mm
147.2 in
Height
1,202 mm
47.3 in
KTMX-Bow GT2.0 Turbo (Stage 2)370 hp
Power
370 hp
276 kW
0-100 km/h3.5 s
Top speed
259 km/h
161 mph
Doors/seats2 seats
Trunk-
Length
3,738 mm
147.2 in
Height
1,202 mm
47.3 in
KTMX-Bow GT2.0 Turbo (Stage 1)336 hp
Power
336 hp
251 kW
0-100 km/h3.7 s
Top speed
252 km/h
157 mph
Doors/seats2 seats
Trunk-
Length
3,738 mm
147.2 in
Height
1,202 mm
47.3 in
KTMX-Bow GT2.0 Turbo285 hp
Power
285 hp
213 kW
0-100 km/h4.1 s
Top speed
231 km/h
144 mph
Doors/seats2 seats
Trunk-
Length
3,738 mm
147.2 in
Height
1,202 mm
47.3 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
KTMX-Bow GT2.0 Turbo (Stage 3)427 hp
Power
427 hp
319 kW
0-100 km/h3.2 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
280 km/h174 mph
Restricted
270 km/h168 mph
8.3 L/100 km
28.3 mpg US
34.0 mpg UK
KTMX-Bow GT2.0 Turbo (Stage 2)370 hp
Power
370 hp
276 kW
0-100 km/h3.5 s
Top speed
259 km/h
161 mph
8.3 L/100 km
28.3 mpg US
34.0 mpg UK
KTMX-Bow GT2.0 Turbo (Stage 1)336 hp
Power
336 hp
251 kW
0-100 km/h3.7 s
Top speed
252 km/h
157 mph
8.3 L/100 km
28.3 mpg US
34.0 mpg UK
KTMX-Bow GT2.0 Turbo285 hp
Power
285 hp
213 kW
0-100 km/h4.1 s
Top speed
231 km/h
144 mph
8.3 L/100 km
28.3 mpg US
34.0 mpg UK

KTM X-Bow GT 2.0 Turbo (Stage 3) 427 hp is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
KTMX-Bow GT2.0 Turbo (Stage 3)427 hp
8.3 L/100 km
28.3 mpg US
34.0 mpg UK
3.2 s
KTMX-Bow GT2.0 Turbo (Stage 2)370 hp
8.3 L/100 km
28.3 mpg US
34.0 mpg UK
3.5 s
KTMX-Bow GT2.0 Turbo (Stage 1)336 hp
8.3 L/100 km
28.3 mpg US
34.0 mpg UK
3.7 s
KTMX-Bow GT2.0 Turbo285 hp
8.3 L/100 km
28.3 mpg US
34.0 mpg UK
4.1 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
KTMX-Bow GT2.0 Turbo (Stage 3)427 hp
505 hp/t
376 kW/t
2.0 kg/hp
8.3 L/100 km
28.3 mpg US
34.0 mpg UK
KTMX-Bow GT2.0 Turbo (Stage 2)370 hp
437 hp/t
326 kW/t
2.3 kg/hp
8.3 L/100 km
28.3 mpg US
34.0 mpg UK
KTMX-Bow GT2.0 Turbo (Stage 1)336 hp
397 hp/t
296 kW/t
2.5 kg/hp
8.3 L/100 km
28.3 mpg US
34.0 mpg UK
KTMX-Bow GT2.0 Turbo285 hp
336 hp/t
251 kW/t
3.0 kg/hp
8.3 L/100 km
28.3 mpg US
34.0 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleKTMX-Bow GT2.0 Turbo (Stage 3)427 hpKTMX-Bow GT2.0 Turbo (Stage 2)370 hpKTMX-Bow GT2.0 Turbo (Stage 1)336 hpKTMX-Bow GT2.0 Turbo285 hp
Power
427 hp
319 kW
370 hp
276 kW
336 hp
251 kW
285 hp
213 kW
Torque
651 Nm
480 lb-ft
567 Nm
418 lb-ft
512 Nm
378 lb-ft
420 Nm
310 lb-ft
Acceleration
3.2 s
3.5 s
3.7 s
4.1 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
280 km/h174 mph
Restricted
270 km/h168 mph
259 km/h
161 mph
252 km/h
157 mph
231 km/h
144 mph
Lightness
847 kg
1,867 lb
847 kg
1,867 lb
847 kg
1,867 lb
847 kg
1,867 lb
Fuel consumption
8.3 L/100 km
28.3 mpg US
34.0 mpg UK
8.3 L/100 km
28.3 mpg US
34.0 mpg UK
8.3 L/100 km
28.3 mpg US
34.0 mpg UK
8.3 L/100 km
28.3 mpg US
34.0 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats2 seats
Trunk-
Length
3,738 mm
147.2 in
Height
1,202 mm
47.3 in
Doors/seats2 seats
Trunk-
Length
3,738 mm
147.2 in
Height
1,202 mm
47.3 in
Doors/seats2 seats
Trunk-
Length
3,738 mm
147.2 in
Height
1,202 mm
47.3 in
Doors/seats2 seats
Trunk-
Length
3,738 mm
147.2 in
Height
1,202 mm
47.3 in
Range score
482 km
299 mi
482 km
299 mi
482 km
299 mi
482 km
299 mi
CO2 score
189 g/km
189 g/km
189 g/km
189 g/km
Power-to-weight score
505 hp/t
376 kW/t
2.0 kg/hp
437 hp/t
326 kW/t
2.3 kg/hp
397 hp/t
296 kW/t
2.5 kg/hp
336 hp/t
251 kW/t
3.0 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleKTM X-Bow GT 2.0 Turbo (Stage 3) 427 hpKTM X-Bow GT 2.0 Turbo (Stage 2) 370 hpKTM X-Bow GT 2.0 Turbo (Stage 1) 336 hpKTM X-Bow GT 2.0 Turbo 285 hp
Consumption8.3 L/100 km28.3 mpg US34 mpg UK8.3 L/100 km28.3 mpg US34 mpg UK8.3 L/100 km28.3 mpg US34 mpg UK8.3 L/100 km28.3 mpg US34 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km14.53 LC100 km14.53 LC100 km14.53 LC100 km14.53 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi23.38 LC100 mi23.38 LC100 mi23.38 LC100 mi23.38 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,245 L329 US gal274 UK gal1,245 L329 US gal274 UK gal1,245 L329 US gal274 UK gal1,245 L329 US gal274 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,179 LC/year2,179 LC/year2,179 LC/year2,179 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

KTM X-Bow GT 2.0 Turbo (Stage 3) 427 hp

  • Has 57 hp more
  • Has 84 Nm more
  • Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 21 km/h (13 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 67 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Highest CO2 emissions

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
KTM X-Bow GT 2.0 Turbo
Compare selected cars
1 vehicle selected

Popular comparisons

KTM X-Bow GT 2.0 Turbo · Stage 3 vs KTM X-Bow GT 2.0 Turbo · Stage 2 vs KTM X-Bow GT 2.0 Turbo · Stage 1 vs KTM X-Bow GT 2.0 Turbo - car comparison - FastVsFaster