Car comparison

AUDI TTS Roadster (8S) · Facelift 2018 2.0 TFSIvsKTM X-Bow GT 2.0 Turbo

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

AUDI TTS Roadster (8S) · Facelift 2018

2.0 TFSI

306 hp1984 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbochargedRoadster2018-2020
VS

KTM X-Bow GT

2.0 Turbo

285 hp1984 ccGasolineRWDManualTurbochargedRoadster2013-2017

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

AUDI TTS Roadster (8S) Facelift 2018 2.0 TFSI

  • Fastest top speed
    260 km/h
    162 mph Unrestricted
    250 km/h
    155 mph Restricted
  • Most powerful
    306 hp
    228 kW
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    7.3 L/100 km
    32.2 mpg US
    38.7 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    166 g/km
  • Best estimated range
    616 km
    383 mi
  • Best overall score
    56/100
  • Best performance score
    68/100
  • Best economy score
    87/100
  • Best practicality score
    32/100

KTM X-Bow GT 2.0 Turbo

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    4.1 s
  • Highest torque
    420 Nm
    310 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    847 kg
    1,867 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    336 hp/t
    251 kW/t
    3.0 kg/hp

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelAUDITTS Roadster (8S)Facelift 20182.0 TFSIKTMX-Bow GT2.0 Turbo
Power
306hp228kW
285hp213kW
Torque
400Nm295lb-ft
420Nm310lb-ft
Curb weight
1,495kg3,296lb
847kg1,867lb
Gross weight
1,825kg4,023lb
-
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Calculated
231 km/h
144 mph
To 99% top speed
62.7s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph
Calculated
43.1s99% target: 229 km/h / 142 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
4.8s
4.1s
0-200 km/h
17.0s
Calculated
17.0s
Calculated
0-60 mph
4.6s
Calculated
3.9s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
7.3L/100 km32.2mpg US38.7mpg UK
8.3L/100 km28.3mpg US34.0mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
9.2L/100 km25.6mpg US30.7mpg UK
-
Fuel consumption highway
6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK
-
Quarter mile
12.9s
Calculated
12.3s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
205hp/t153kW/t93hp/1000 lb
Calculated
336hp/t251kW/t153hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
268Nm/t179lb-ft/ton
Calculated
496Nm/t332lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
616km383mi
Calculated
482km299mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,984cc121cu in
1,984cc121cu in
Length
4,199mm165in
3,738mm147in
Width
1,832mm72in
1,915mm75in
Height
1,345mm53in
1,202mm47in
Wheelbase
2,505mm99in
2,430mm96in
Front track
1,574mm62in
1,672mm66in
Rear track
1,553mm61in
1,626mm64in
Trunk volume
280L
-
Doors
2
-
Seats
2
2
Fuel tank
45L
40L
CO2 emissions
166g/km
189g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

AUDI TTS Roadster (8S) Facelift 2018 2.0 TFSIKTM X-Bow GT 2.0 TurboPowerTorque
  • AUDI TTS Roadster (8S) Facelift 2018 2.0 TFSI: Power / Torque
  • KTM X-Bow GT 2.0 Turbo: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
AUDITTS Roadster (8S)Facelift 20182.0 TFSI5,400-6,500 rpm2,000-5,300 rpm6,750 rpm
KTMX-Bow GT2.0 Turbo6,400 rpm3,200 rpm6,650 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricAUDITTS Roadster (8S)Facelift 20182.0 TFSIKTMX-Bow GT2.0 Turbo
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
4.6 s
3.9 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
4.8 s
4.1 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
17.0 s
17.0 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Likely limited
231 km/h
144 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.1 s
2.0 s
330 ft
101 m
5.6 s
5.3 s
1/8 mile
201 m
8.4 s
8.0 s
1000 ft
305 m
10.9 s
10.3 s
1/4 mile
402 m
12.9 s
12.3 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
178 km/h
111 mph
180 km/h
112 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDITTS Roadster (8S)Facelift 20182.0 TFSI
306 hp
228 kW
KTMX-Bow GT2.0 Turbo
285 hp
213 kW

AUDI TTS Roadster (8S) Facelift 2018 2.0 TFSI has 21 hp more than KTM X-Bow GT 2.0 Turbo.

The biggest power difference is between KTM X-Bow GT 2.0 Turbo and AUDI TTS Roadster (8S) Facelift 2018 2.0 TFSI: 21 hp (16 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDITTS Roadster (8S)Facelift 20182.0 TFSI
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
KTMX-Bow GT2.0 Turbo
420 Nm
310 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDITTS Roadster (8S)Facelift 20182.0 TFSI
1,495 kg
3,296 lb
KTMX-Bow GT2.0 Turbo
847 kg
1,867 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDITTS Roadster (8S)Facelift 20182.0 TFSI
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
KTMX-Bow GT2.0 Turbo
231 km/h
144 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDITTS Roadster (8S)Facelift 20182.0 TFSI4.8 s
KTMX-Bow GT2.0 Turbo4.1 s

Although AUDI TTS Roadster (8S) Facelift 2018 2.0 TFSI has more power, KTM X-Bow GT 2.0 Turbo is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between KTM X-Bow GT 2.0 Turbo and AUDI TTS Roadster (8S) Facelift 2018 2.0 TFSI: 0.7 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDITTS Roadster (8S)Facelift 20182.0 TFSI
7.3 L/100 km
32.2 mpg US
38.7 mpg UK
KTMX-Bow GT2.0 Turbo
8.3 L/100 km
28.3 mpg US
34.0 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between AUDI TTS Roadster (8S) Facelift 2018 2.0 TFSI and KTM X-Bow GT 2.0 Turbo: 1.0 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDITTS Roadster (8S)Facelift 20182.0 TFSI
205 hp/t
153 kW/t
4.9 kg/hp
KTMX-Bow GT2.0 Turbo
336 hp/t
251 kW/t
3.0 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDITTS Roadster (8S)Facelift 20182.0 TFSI
616 km
383 mi
KTMX-Bow GT2.0 Turbo
482 km
299 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
AUDITTS Roadster (8S)Facelift 20182.0 TFSI
306 hp
228 kW
4.8 s
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
KTMX-Bow GT2.0 Turbo
285 hp
213 kW
4.1 s
231 km/h
144 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
AUDITTS Roadster (8S)Facelift 20182.0 TFSI
Power
306 hp
228 kW
0-100 km/h4.8 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk
280 L
9.9 cu ft
Length
4,199 mm
165.3 in
Height
1,345 mm
53.0 in
KTMX-Bow GT2.0 Turbo
Power
285 hp
213 kW
0-100 km/h4.1 s
Top speed
231 km/h
144 mph
Doors/seats2 seats
Trunk-
Length
3,738 mm
147.2 in
Height
1,202 mm
47.3 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
AUDITTS Roadster (8S)Facelift 20182.0 TFSI
Power
306 hp
228 kW
0-100 km/h4.8 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
7.3 L/100 km
32.2 mpg US
38.7 mpg UK
KTMX-Bow GT2.0 Turbo
Power
285 hp
213 kW
0-100 km/h4.1 s
Top speed
231 km/h
144 mph
8.3 L/100 km
28.3 mpg US
34.0 mpg UK

AUDI TTS Roadster (8S) Facelift 2018 2.0 TFSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
AUDITTS Roadster (8S)Facelift 20182.0 TFSI
7.3 L/100 km
32.2 mpg US
38.7 mpg UK
4.8 s
KTMX-Bow GT2.0 Turbo
8.3 L/100 km
28.3 mpg US
34.0 mpg UK
4.1 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
AUDITTS Roadster (8S)Facelift 20182.0 TFSI
205 hp/t
153 kW/t
4.9 kg/hp
7.3 L/100 km
32.2 mpg US
38.7 mpg UK
KTMX-Bow GT2.0 Turbo
336 hp/t
251 kW/t
3.0 kg/hp
8.3 L/100 km
28.3 mpg US
34.0 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleAUDITTS Roadster (8S)Facelift 20182.0 TFSIKTMX-Bow GT2.0 Turbo
Power
306 hp
228 kW
285 hp
213 kW
Torque
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
420 Nm
310 lb-ft
Acceleration
4.8 s
4.1 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
231 km/h
144 mph
Lightness
1,495 kg
3,296 lb
847 kg
1,867 lb
Fuel consumption
7.3 L/100 km
32.2 mpg US
38.7 mpg UK
8.3 L/100 km
28.3 mpg US
34.0 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk
280 L
9.9 cu ft
Length
4,199 mm
165.3 in
Height
1,345 mm
53.0 in
Doors/seats2 seats
Trunk-
Length
3,738 mm
147.2 in
Height
1,202 mm
47.3 in
Range score
616 km
383 mi
482 km
299 mi
CO2 score
166 g/km
189 g/km
Trunk score
280 L
9.9 cu ft
-
Power-to-weight score
205 hp/t
153 kW/t
4.9 kg/hp
336 hp/t
251 kW/t
3.0 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleAUDI TTS Roadster (8S) Facelift 2018 2.0 TFSIKTM X-Bow GT 2.0 Turbo
Consumption7.3 L/100 km32.2 mpg US38.7 mpg UK8.3 L/100 km28.3 mpg US34 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km12.78 LC100 km14.53 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi20.56 LC100 mi23.38 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,095 L289 US gal241 UK gal1,245 L329 US gal274 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,916 LC/year2,179 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

AUDI TTS Roadster (8S) Facelift 2018 2.0 TFSI

  • Has 21 hp more
  • Has 29 km/h (18 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 1.0 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 135 km (84 mi) more estimated range
  • Emits 23 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Heaviest

KTM X-Bow GT 2.0 Turbo

  • Has 20 Nm more
  • Is 648 kg lighter
  • Is 0.7 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 132 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Lowest top speed
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
AUDI TTS Roadster (8S) 2.0 TFSI
KTM X-Bow GT 2.0 Turbo
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0 TFSI
2.0 TFSI
VS
AUDITTS Roadster (8S)Facelift 20182.0 TFSIvsAUDITTS Roadster (8S)2.0 TFSI
2.0 Turbo
Cup 250 1.8
VS
KTMX-Bow GT2.0 TurbovsLotusElise (SERIES 3)Cup 250 1.8
2.0 TFSI
45 TFSI
VS
AUDITTS Roadster (8S)Facelift 20182.0 TFSIvsAUDITT Roadster (8S)Facelift 201845 TFSI
2.0 TFSI
2.5 TFSI
VS
AUDITTS Roadster (8S)Facelift 20182.0 TFSIvsAUDITT RS Roadster (8J)Facelift 20102.5 TFSI
2.0 Turbo
S 3.4
VS
KTMX-Bow GT2.0 TurbovsPorscheBoxster (981)S 3.4
2.0 TFSI
2.0 TFSI
VS
AUDITTS Roadster (8S)Facelift 20182.0 TFSIvsAUDITTS Roadster (8J)Facelift 20102.0 TFSI
2.0 Turbo
Cup 260 1.8
VS
KTMX-Bow GT2.0 TurbovsLotusElise (SERIES 3)Facelift 2017Cup 260 1.8
2.0 TFSI
2.0 TFSI
VS
AUDITTS Roadster (8S)Facelift 20182.0 TFSIvsAUDITT Roadster (8S)2.0 TFSI
2.0 Turbo
3.7 V6
VS
KTMX-Bow GT2.0 TurbovsNissan370Z RoadsterFacelift 20123.7 V6
2.0 TFSI
2.0 TFSI
VS
AUDITTS Roadster (8S)Facelift 20182.0 TFSIvsAUDITTS Coupe (8S)Facelift 20182.0 TFSI
2.0 Turbo
1.8
VS
KTMX-Bow GT2.0 TurbovsLotus2-Eleven1.8
2.0 TFSI
2.5 TFSI
VS
AUDITTS Roadster (8S)Facelift 20182.0 TFSIvsAUDITT RS Roadster (8J)2.5 TFSI
AUDI TTS Roadster (8S) · Facelift 2018 2.0 TFSI vs KTM X-Bow GT 2.0 Turbo - car comparison - FastVsFaster