Car comparison

AUDI TT RS Roadster (8J) · Facelift 2010 2.5 TFSIvsKTM X-Bow GT 2.0 Turbo

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

AUDI TT RS Roadster (8J) · Facelift 2010

2.5 TFSI

340 hp2480 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbochargedRoadster2010-2014
VS

KTM X-Bow GT

2.0 Turbo

285 hp1984 ccGasolineRWDManualTurbochargedRoadster2013-2017

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

AUDI TT RS Roadster (8J) Facelift 2010 2.5 TFSI

  • Fastest top speed
    265 km/h
    165 mph Unrestricted
    250 km/h
    155 mph Restricted
  • Most powerful
    340 hp
    254 kW
  • Highest torque
    450 Nm
    332 lb-ft
  • Best estimated range
    698 km
    434 mi
  • Best overall score
    59/100
  • Best performance score
    72/100
  • Best practicality score
    30/100

KTM X-Bow GT 2.0 Turbo

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    4.1 s
  • Lightest
    847 kg
    1,867 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    336 hp/t
    251 kW/t
    3.0 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    8.3 L/100 km
    28.3 mpg US
    34.0 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    189 g/km
  • Best economy score
    85/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelAUDITT RS Roadster (8J)Facelift 20102.5 TFSIKTMX-Bow GT2.0 Turbo
Power
340hp254kW
285hp213kW
Torque
450Nm332lb-ft
420Nm310lb-ft
Curb weight
1,535kg3,384lb
847kg1,867lb
Gross weight
1,855kg4,090lb
-
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Calculated
231 km/h
144 mph
To 99% top speed
57.5s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph
Calculated
43.1s99% target: 229 km/h / 142 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
4.4s
4.1s
0-200 km/h
15.0s
Calculated
17.0s
Calculated
0-60 mph
4.2s
Calculated
3.9s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
8.6L/100 km27.4mpg US32.8mpg UK
8.3L/100 km28.3mpg US34.0mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
12.4L/100 km19mpg US22.8mpg UK
-
Fuel consumption highway
6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK
-
Quarter mile
12.5s
Calculated
12.3s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
221hp/t165kW/t100hp/1000 lb
Calculated
336hp/t251kW/t153hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
293Nm/t196lb-ft/ton
Calculated
496Nm/t332lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
698km434mi
Calculated
482km299mi
Calculated
Displacement
2,480cc151cu in
1,984cc121cu in
Length
4,198mm165in
3,738mm147in
Width
1,842mm73in
1,915mm75in
Height
1,348mm53in
1,202mm47in
Wheelbase
2,468mm97in
2,430mm96in
Front track
1,555mm61in
1,672mm66in
Rear track
1,546mm61in
1,626mm64in
Trunk volume
250L
-
Doors
2
-
Seats
2
2
Fuel tank
60L
40L
CO2 emissions
199g/km
189g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

AUDI TT RS Roadster (8J) Facelift 2010 2.5 TFSIKTM X-Bow GT 2.0 TurboPowerTorque
  • AUDI TT RS Roadster (8J) Facelift 2010 2.5 TFSI: Power / Torque
  • KTM X-Bow GT 2.0 Turbo: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
AUDITT RS Roadster (8J)Facelift 20102.5 TFSI5,400-6,500 rpm1,600-5,300 rpm6,750 rpm
KTMX-Bow GT2.0 Turbo6,400 rpm3,200 rpm6,650 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricAUDITT RS Roadster (8J)Facelift 20102.5 TFSIKTMX-Bow GT2.0 Turbo
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
4.2 s
3.9 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
4.4 s
4.1 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
15.0 s
17.0 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Likely limited
231 km/h
144 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.1 s
2.0 s
330 ft
101 m
5.4 s
5.3 s
1/8 mile
201 m
8.2 s
8.0 s
1000 ft
305 m
10.5 s
10.3 s
1/4 mile
402 m
12.5 s
12.3 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
185 km/h
115 mph
180 km/h
112 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDITT RS Roadster (8J)Facelift 20102.5 TFSI
340 hp
254 kW
KTMX-Bow GT2.0 Turbo
285 hp
213 kW

AUDI TT RS Roadster (8J) Facelift 2010 2.5 TFSI has 55 hp more than KTM X-Bow GT 2.0 Turbo.

The biggest power difference is between KTM X-Bow GT 2.0 Turbo and AUDI TT RS Roadster (8J) Facelift 2010 2.5 TFSI: 55 hp (41 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDITT RS Roadster (8J)Facelift 20102.5 TFSI
450 Nm
332 lb-ft
KTMX-Bow GT2.0 Turbo
420 Nm
310 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDITT RS Roadster (8J)Facelift 20102.5 TFSI
1,535 kg
3,384 lb
KTMX-Bow GT2.0 Turbo
847 kg
1,867 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDITT RS Roadster (8J)Facelift 20102.5 TFSI
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
KTMX-Bow GT2.0 Turbo
231 km/h
144 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDITT RS Roadster (8J)Facelift 20102.5 TFSI4.4 s
KTMX-Bow GT2.0 Turbo4.1 s

Although AUDI TT RS Roadster (8J) Facelift 2010 2.5 TFSI has more power, KTM X-Bow GT 2.0 Turbo is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between KTM X-Bow GT 2.0 Turbo and AUDI TT RS Roadster (8J) Facelift 2010 2.5 TFSI: 0.3 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDITT RS Roadster (8J)Facelift 20102.5 TFSI
8.6 L/100 km
27.4 mpg US
32.8 mpg UK
KTMX-Bow GT2.0 Turbo
8.3 L/100 km
28.3 mpg US
34.0 mpg UK

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDITT RS Roadster (8J)Facelift 20102.5 TFSI
221 hp/t
165 kW/t
4.5 kg/hp
KTMX-Bow GT2.0 Turbo
336 hp/t
251 kW/t
3.0 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDITT RS Roadster (8J)Facelift 20102.5 TFSI
698 km
434 mi
KTMX-Bow GT2.0 Turbo
482 km
299 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
AUDITT RS Roadster (8J)Facelift 20102.5 TFSI
340 hp
254 kW
4.4 s
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
KTMX-Bow GT2.0 Turbo
285 hp
213 kW
4.1 s
231 km/h
144 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
AUDITT RS Roadster (8J)Facelift 20102.5 TFSI
Power
340 hp
254 kW
0-100 km/h4.4 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk
250 L
8.8 cu ft
Length
4,198 mm
165.3 in
Height
1,348 mm
53.1 in
KTMX-Bow GT2.0 Turbo
Power
285 hp
213 kW
0-100 km/h4.1 s
Top speed
231 km/h
144 mph
Doors/seats2 seats
Trunk-
Length
3,738 mm
147.2 in
Height
1,202 mm
47.3 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
AUDITT RS Roadster (8J)Facelift 20102.5 TFSI
Power
340 hp
254 kW
0-100 km/h4.4 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
8.6 L/100 km
27.4 mpg US
32.8 mpg UK
KTMX-Bow GT2.0 Turbo
Power
285 hp
213 kW
0-100 km/h4.1 s
Top speed
231 km/h
144 mph
8.3 L/100 km
28.3 mpg US
34.0 mpg UK

AUDI TT RS Roadster (8J) Facelift 2010 2.5 TFSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
AUDITT RS Roadster (8J)Facelift 20102.5 TFSI
8.6 L/100 km
27.4 mpg US
32.8 mpg UK
4.4 s
KTMX-Bow GT2.0 Turbo
8.3 L/100 km
28.3 mpg US
34.0 mpg UK
4.1 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
AUDITT RS Roadster (8J)Facelift 20102.5 TFSI
221 hp/t
165 kW/t
4.5 kg/hp
8.6 L/100 km
27.4 mpg US
32.8 mpg UK
KTMX-Bow GT2.0 Turbo
336 hp/t
251 kW/t
3.0 kg/hp
8.3 L/100 km
28.3 mpg US
34.0 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleAUDITT RS Roadster (8J)Facelift 20102.5 TFSIKTMX-Bow GT2.0 Turbo
Power
340 hp
254 kW
285 hp
213 kW
Torque
450 Nm
332 lb-ft
420 Nm
310 lb-ft
Acceleration
4.4 s
4.1 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
231 km/h
144 mph
Lightness
1,535 kg
3,384 lb
847 kg
1,867 lb
Fuel consumption
8.6 L/100 km
27.4 mpg US
32.8 mpg UK
8.3 L/100 km
28.3 mpg US
34.0 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk
250 L
8.8 cu ft
Length
4,198 mm
165.3 in
Height
1,348 mm
53.1 in
Doors/seats2 seats
Trunk-
Length
3,738 mm
147.2 in
Height
1,202 mm
47.3 in
Range score
698 km
434 mi
482 km
299 mi
CO2 score
199 g/km
189 g/km
Trunk score
250 L
8.8 cu ft
-
Power-to-weight score
221 hp/t
165 kW/t
4.5 kg/hp
336 hp/t
251 kW/t
3.0 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleAUDI TT RS Roadster (8J) Facelift 2010 2.5 TFSIKTM X-Bow GT 2.0 Turbo
Consumption8.6 L/100 km27.4 mpg US32.8 mpg UK8.3 L/100 km28.3 mpg US34 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km15.05 LC100 km14.53 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi24.22 LC100 mi23.38 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,290 L341 US gal284 UK gal1,245 L329 US gal274 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,258 LC/year2,179 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

AUDI TT RS Roadster (8J) Facelift 2010 2.5 TFSI

  • Has 55 hp more
  • Has 30 Nm more
  • Has 34 km/h (21 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 216 km (134 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Highest CO2 emissions

KTM X-Bow GT 2.0 Turbo

  • Is 688 kg lighter
  • Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Uses 0.3 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 115 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Emits 10 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
AUDI TT RS Roadster (8J) 2.5 TFSI
KTM X-Bow GT 2.0 Turbo
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.5 TFSI
2.5 TFSI
VS
AUDITT RS Roadster (8J)Facelift 20102.5 TFSIvsAUDITT RS Roadster (8J)2.5 TFSI
2.0 Turbo
Cup 250 1.8
VS
KTMX-Bow GT2.0 TurbovsLotusElise (SERIES 3)Cup 250 1.8
2.5 TFSI
2.0 TFSI
VS
AUDITT RS Roadster (8J)Facelift 20102.5 TFSIvsAUDITTS Roadster (8S)2.0 TFSI
2.5 TFSI
2.0 TFSI
VS
AUDITT RS Roadster (8J)Facelift 20102.5 TFSIvsAUDITTS Roadster (8J)Facelift 20102.0 TFSI
2.0 Turbo
S 3.4
VS
KTMX-Bow GT2.0 TurbovsPorscheBoxster (981)S 3.4
2.5 TFSI
2.0 TFSI
VS
AUDITT RS Roadster (8J)Facelift 20102.5 TFSIvsAUDITTS Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI
2.0 Turbo
Cup 260 1.8
VS
KTMX-Bow GT2.0 TurbovsLotusElise (SERIES 3)Facelift 2017Cup 260 1.8
2.5 TFSI
2.0 TFSI
VS
AUDITT RS Roadster (8J)Facelift 20102.5 TFSIvsAUDITTS Roadster (8S)Facelift 20182.0 TFSI
2.0 Turbo
3.7 V6
VS
KTMX-Bow GT2.0 TurbovsNissan370Z RoadsterFacelift 20123.7 V6
2.5 TFSI
2.5 TFSI
VS
AUDITT RS Roadster (8J)Facelift 20102.5 TFSIvsAUDITT RS Coupe (8J)Facelift 20102.5 TFSI
2.0 Turbo
1.8
VS
KTMX-Bow GT2.0 TurbovsLotus2-Eleven1.8
2.5 TFSI
3.2i V6 24V
VS
AUDITT RS Roadster (8J)Facelift 20102.5 TFSIvsAUDITT Roadster (8J)3.2i V6 24V
AUDI TT RS Roadster (8J) · Facelift 2010 2.5 TFSI vs KTM X-Bow GT 2.0 Turbo - car comparison - FastVsFaster