Jeep Grand Cherokee IV (WK2) · Facelift 2017
Car comparison
Jeep Grand Cherokee IV (WK2) · Facelift 2017 Trackhawk 6.2 V8vsTesla Model X Performance 100 kWh
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonTesla Model X
Performance 100 kWh
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Jeep Grand Cherokee IV (WK2) Facelift 2017 Trackhawk 6.2 V8
- Fastest top speed289 km/h180 mph
- Most powerful710 hp529 kW
- Lightest2,483 kg5,474 lb
- Best power-to-weight286 hp/t213 kW/t3.5 kg/hp
- Largest trunk800 L
- Best overall score87/100
- Best performance score85/100
- Best economy score61/100
- Best practicality score92/100
Tesla Model X Performance 100 kWh
- Quickest 0-100 km/h2.9 s
Specification comparison
| Model | JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 2017Trackhawk 6.2 V8 | TeslaModel XPerformance 100 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 710hp529kW | 611hp456kW |
| Torque | 868Nm640lb-ft | - |
| Curb weight | 2,483kg5,474lb | 2,562kg5,648lb |
| Gross weight | 2,993kg6,598lb | 3,120kg6,878lb |
| Top speed | 289 km/h 180 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 52.7s99% target: 286 km/h / 178 mph Calculated | 31.9s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 3.7s | 2.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 11.5s Calculated | 9.4s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 3.5s Calculated | 2.8s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 17.1L/100 km13.8mpg US16.5mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption city | 25.4L/100 km9.3mpg US11.1mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 12.3L/100 km19.1mpg US23.0mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 11.6s Calculated | 10.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 286hp/t213kW/t130hp/1000 lb Calculated | 238hp/t178kW/t108hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 350Nm/t234lb-ft/ton Calculated | - |
| Estimated range | 544km338mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 6,166cc376cu in | - |
| Length | 4,846mm191in | 5,036mm198in |
| Width | 1,954mm77in | 1,999mm79in |
| Height | 1,749mm69in | 1,684mm66in |
| Wheelbase | 2,915mm115in | 2,965mm117in |
| Front track | 1,669mm66in | 1,705mm67in |
| Rear track | 1,661mm65in | 1,710mm67in |
| Ground clearance | 210mm8in | 223mm9in |
| Trunk volume | 800L | 357L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,689L | 2,166L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 7 |
| Fuel tank | 93L | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 2017Trackhawk 6.2 V8 | TeslaModel XPerformance 100 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 3.5 s | 2.8 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 3.7 s | 2.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 11.5 s | 9.4 s |
| Top speed | 289 km/h 180 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 1.9 s | 1.8 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.1 s | 4.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 7.6 s | 6.9 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 9.8 s | 8.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 11.6 s | 10.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 200 km/h 125 mph | 210 km/h 130 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 2017Trackhawk 6.2 V8 | 710 hp 529 kW |
| TeslaModel XPerformance 100 kWh | 611 hp 456 kW |
Jeep Grand Cherokee IV (WK2) Facelift 2017 Trackhawk 6.2 V8 has 99 hp more than Tesla Model X Performance 100 kWh.
The biggest power difference is between Tesla Model X Performance 100 kWh and Jeep Grand Cherokee IV (WK2) Facelift 2017 Trackhawk 6.2 V8: 99 hp (74 kW).
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 2017Trackhawk 6.2 V8 | 2,483 kg 5,474 lb |
| TeslaModel XPerformance 100 kWh | 2,562 kg 5,648 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 2017Trackhawk 6.2 V8 | 289 km/h 180 mph |
| TeslaModel XPerformance 100 kWh | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 2017Trackhawk 6.2 V8 | 3.7 s |
| TeslaModel XPerformance 100 kWh | 2.9 s |
Although Jeep Grand Cherokee IV (WK2) Facelift 2017 Trackhawk 6.2 V8 has more power, Tesla Model X Performance 100 kWh is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Tesla Model X Performance 100 kWh and Jeep Grand Cherokee IV (WK2) Facelift 2017 Trackhawk 6.2 V8: 0.8 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 2017Trackhawk 6.2 V8 | 286 hp/t 213 kW/t 3.5 kg/hp |
| TeslaModel XPerformance 100 kWh | 238 hp/t 178 kW/t 4.2 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 2017Trackhawk 6.2 V8 | 710 hp 529 kW | 3.7 s | 289 km/h 180 mph |
| TeslaModel XPerformance 100 kWh | 611 hp 456 kW | 2.9 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 2017Trackhawk 6.2 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| TeslaModel XPerformance 100 kWh |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 2017Trackhawk 6.2 V8 | TeslaModel XPerformance 100 kWh | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 710 hp 529 kW | 611 hp 456 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 868 Nm 640 lb-ft | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 3.7 s | 2.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 289 km/h 180 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,483 kg 5,474 lb | 2,562 kg 5,648 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 17.1 L/100 km 13.8 mpg US 16.5 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 544 km 338 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 800 L 28.3 cu ft | 357 L 12.6 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 286 hp/t 213 kW/t 3.5 kg/hp | 238 hp/t 178 kW/t 4.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Jeep Grand Cherokee IV (WK2) Facelift 2017 Trackhawk 6.2 V8 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 17.1 L/100 km13.8 mpg US16.5 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 29.93 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 48.16 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 2,565 L678 US gal564 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 4,489 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Jeep Grand Cherokee IV (WK2) Facelift 2017 Trackhawk 6.2 V8
- Has 99 hp more
- Is 79 kg lighter
- Has 29 km/h (18 mph) higher top speed
- Has 47 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 443 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
Tesla Model X Performance 100 kWh
- Is 0.8 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
Cons
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























