Maserati Levante
Car comparison
Maserati Levante GTS 3.8 V8vsJeep Grand Cherokee IV (WK2) · Facelift 2017 Trackhawk 6.2 V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonJeep Grand Cherokee IV (WK2) · Facelift 2017
Trackhawk 6.2 V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Maserati Levante GTS 3.8 V8
- Fastest top speed292 km/h181 mph
- Lightest2,170 kg4,784 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption13.5 L/100 km17.4 mpg US20.9 mpg UK
- Best overall score87/100
- Best performance score86/100
- Best economy score71/100
Jeep Grand Cherokee IV (WK2) Facelift 2017 Trackhawk 6.2 V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h3.7 s
- Most powerful710 hp529 kW
- Highest torque868 Nm640 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight286 hp/t213 kW/t3.5 kg/hp
- Best practicality score92/100
Specification comparison
| Model | MaseratiLevanteGTS 3.8 V8 | JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 2017Trackhawk 6.2 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 550hp410kW | 710hp529kW |
| Torque | 730Nm538lb-ft | 868Nm640lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,170kg4,784lb | 2,483kg5,474lb |
| Gross weight | - | 2,993kg6,598lb |
| Top speed | 292 km/h 181 mph | 289 km/h 180 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 56.3s99% target: 289 km/h / 180 mph Calculated | 52.8s99% target: 286 km/h / 178 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.2s | 3.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 12.6s Calculated | 11.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.0s Calculated | 3.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 13.5L/100 km17.4mpg US20.9mpg UK | 17.1L/100 km13.8mpg US16.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 25.4L/100 km9.3mpg US11.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 12.3L/100 km19.1mpg US23.0mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.1s Calculated | 11.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 253hp/t189kW/t115hp/1000 lb Calculated | 286hp/t213kW/t130hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 336Nm/t225lb-ft/ton Calculated | 350Nm/t234lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | - | 544km338mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,799cc232cu in | 6,166cc376cu in |
| Length | 5,020mm198in | 4,846mm191in |
| Width | 1,968mm77in | 1,954mm77in |
| Height | 1,698mm67in | 1,749mm69in |
| Wheelbase | 3,004mm118in | 2,915mm115in |
| Front track | - | 1,669mm66in |
| Rear track | - | 1,661mm65in |
| Ground clearance | - | 210mm8in |
| Trunk volume | - | 800L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 1,689L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | - | 93L |
| CO2 emissions | 313g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Maserati Levante GTS 3.8 V8: Power / Torque
- Jeep Grand Cherokee IV (WK2) Facelift 2017 Trackhawk 6.2 V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MaseratiLevanteGTS 3.8 V8 | 6,250 rpm | 2,500-5,000 rpm | 6,500 rpm |
| JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 2017Trackhawk 6.2 V8 | 6,000 rpm | 4,800 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | MaseratiLevanteGTS 3.8 V8 | JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 2017Trackhawk 6.2 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.0 s | 3.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.2 s | 3.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 12.6 s | 11.5 s |
| Top speed | 292 km/h 181 mph | 289 km/h 180 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.1 s | 1.9 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.4 s | 5.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.0 s | 7.6 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.2 s | 9.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.1 s | 11.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 196 km/h 122 mph | 200 km/h 124 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiLevanteGTS 3.8 V8 | 550 hp 410 kW |
| JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 2017Trackhawk 6.2 V8 | 710 hp 529 kW |
Jeep Grand Cherokee IV (WK2) Facelift 2017 Trackhawk 6.2 V8 has 160 hp more than Maserati Levante GTS 3.8 V8.
The biggest power difference is between Maserati Levante GTS 3.8 V8 and Jeep Grand Cherokee IV (WK2) Facelift 2017 Trackhawk 6.2 V8: 160 hp (119 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiLevanteGTS 3.8 V8 | 730 Nm 538 lb-ft |
| JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 2017Trackhawk 6.2 V8 | 868 Nm 640 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiLevanteGTS 3.8 V8 | 2,170 kg 4,784 lb |
| JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 2017Trackhawk 6.2 V8 | 2,483 kg 5,474 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiLevanteGTS 3.8 V8 | 292 km/h 181 mph |
| JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 2017Trackhawk 6.2 V8 | 289 km/h 180 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiLevanteGTS 3.8 V8 | 4.2 s |
| JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 2017Trackhawk 6.2 V8 | 3.7 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Jeep Grand Cherokee IV (WK2) Facelift 2017 Trackhawk 6.2 V8 and Maserati Levante GTS 3.8 V8: 0.5 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiLevanteGTS 3.8 V8 | 13.5 L/100 km 17.4 mpg US 20.9 mpg UK |
| JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 2017Trackhawk 6.2 V8 | 17.1 L/100 km 13.8 mpg US 16.5 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Maserati Levante GTS 3.8 V8 and Jeep Grand Cherokee IV (WK2) Facelift 2017 Trackhawk 6.2 V8: 3.6 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiLevanteGTS 3.8 V8 | 253 hp/t 189 kW/t 3.9 kg/hp |
| JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 2017Trackhawk 6.2 V8 | 286 hp/t 213 kW/t 3.5 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MaseratiLevanteGTS 3.8 V8 | 550 hp 410 kW | 4.2 s | 292 km/h 181 mph |
| JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 2017Trackhawk 6.2 V8 | 710 hp 529 kW | 3.7 s | 289 km/h 180 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MaseratiLevanteGTS 3.8 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 2017Trackhawk 6.2 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MaseratiLevanteGTS 3.8 V8 |
| 13.5 L/100 km 17.4 mpg US 20.9 mpg UK | ||||||
| JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 2017Trackhawk 6.2 V8 |
| 17.1 L/100 km 13.8 mpg US 16.5 mpg UK | ||||||
Maserati Levante GTS 3.8 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| MaseratiLevanteGTS 3.8 V8 | 13.5 L/100 km 17.4 mpg US 20.9 mpg UK | 4.2 s |
| JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 2017Trackhawk 6.2 V8 | 17.1 L/100 km 13.8 mpg US 16.5 mpg UK | 3.7 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| MaseratiLevanteGTS 3.8 V8 | 253 hp/t 189 kW/t 3.9 kg/hp | 13.5 L/100 km 17.4 mpg US 20.9 mpg UK |
| JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 2017Trackhawk 6.2 V8 | 286 hp/t 213 kW/t 3.5 kg/hp | 17.1 L/100 km 13.8 mpg US 16.5 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | MaseratiLevanteGTS 3.8 V8 | JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 2017Trackhawk 6.2 V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 550 hp 410 kW | 710 hp 529 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 730 Nm 538 lb-ft | 868 Nm 640 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.2 s | 3.7 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 292 km/h 181 mph | 289 km/h 180 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,170 kg 4,784 lb | 2,483 kg 5,474 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 13.5 L/100 km 17.4 mpg US 20.9 mpg UK | 17.1 L/100 km 13.8 mpg US 16.5 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | - | 544 km 338 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 313 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | - | 800 L 28.3 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 253 hp/t 189 kW/t 3.9 kg/hp | 286 hp/t 213 kW/t 3.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Maserati Levante GTS 3.8 V8 | Jeep Grand Cherokee IV (WK2) Facelift 2017 Trackhawk 6.2 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 13.5 L/100 km17.4 mpg US20.9 mpg UK | 17.1 L/100 km13.8 mpg US16.5 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 23.63 LC100 km | 29.93 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 38.02 LC100 mi | 48.16 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 2,025 L535 US gal445 UK gal | 2,565 L678 US gal564 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,544 LC/year | 4,489 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Maserati Levante GTS 3.8 V8
- Is 313 kg lighter
- Has 3 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 3.6 L/100 km less fuel
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
Jeep Grand Cherokee IV (WK2) Facelift 2017 Trackhawk 6.2 V8
- Has 160 hp more
- Has 138 Nm more
- Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 32 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























