Porsche Cayenne III
Car comparison
Porsche Cayenne III S 2.9 V6vsJeep Grand Cherokee IV (WK2) · Facelift 2013 SRT 6.4 V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonJeep Grand Cherokee IV (WK2) · Facelift 2013
SRT 6.4 V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Porsche Cayenne III S 2.9 V6
- Fastest top speed265 km/h165 mph
- Lightest2,020 kg4,453 lb
- Best power-to-weight218 hp/t162 kW/t4.6 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption9.4 L/100 km25.0 mpg US30.1 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption11.8 L/100 km19.9 mpg US23.9 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption8.4 L/100 km28.0 mpg US33.6 mpg UK
- Best estimated range798 km496 mi
- Best overall score80/100
- Best economy score82/100
- Best practicality score92/100
Jeep Grand Cherokee IV (WK2) Facelift 2013 SRT 6.4 V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.0 s
- Most powerful481 hp359 kW
- Highest torque637 Nm470 lb-ft
- Best performance score76/100
Specification comparison
| Model | PorscheCayenne IIIS 2.9 V6 | JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 2013SRT 6.4 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 440hp328kW | 481hp359kW |
| Torque | 550Nm406lb-ft | 637Nm470lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,020kg4,453lb | 2,315kg5,104lb |
| Gross weight | 2,840kg6,261lb | 2,948kg6,499lb |
| Top speed | 265 km/h 165 mph | 257 km/h 160 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 68.6s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated | 72.6s99% target: 254 km/h / 158 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.2s | 5.0s |
| 0-200 km/h | 17.9s Calculated | 19.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.9s Calculated | 4.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 9.4L/100 km25mpg US30.1mpg UK | 15.7L/100 km15mpg US18.0mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 11.8L/100 km19.9mpg US23.9mpg UK | 18.1L/100 km13mpg US15.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK | 12.4L/100 km19mpg US22.8mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.3s Calculated | 13.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 218hp/t162kW/t99hp/1000 lb Calculated | 208hp/t155kW/t94hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 272Nm/t182lb-ft/ton Calculated | 275Nm/t184lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 798km496mi Calculated | 592km368mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,894cc177cu in | 6,417cc392cu in |
| Length | 4,918mm194in | 4,859mm191in |
| Width | 1,983mm78in | 1,958mm77in |
| Height | 1,696mm67in | 1,717mm68in |
| Wheelbase | 2,895mm114in | 2,915mm115in |
| Front track | - | 1,617mm64in |
| Rear track | - | 1,633mm64in |
| Ground clearance | - | 211mm8in |
| Trunk volume | 770L | - |
| Max trunk volume | 1,710L | - |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 75L | 93L |
| CO2 emissions | 213g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Porsche Cayenne III S 2.9 V6: Power / Torque
- Jeep Grand Cherokee IV (WK2) Facelift 2013 SRT 6.4 V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IIIS 2.9 V6 | 5,700-6,600 rpm | 1,800-5,500 rpm | 6,850 rpm |
| JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 2013SRT 6.4 V8 | 6,000 rpm | 4,300 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | PorscheCayenne IIIS 2.9 V6 | JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 2013SRT 6.4 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.9 s | 4.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.2 s | 5.0 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 17.9 s | 19.0 s |
| Top speed | 265 km/h 165 mph | 257 km/h 160 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.2 s | 2.1 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.8 s | 5.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.7 s | 8.6 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.2 s | 11.1 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.3 s | 13.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 175 km/h 109 mph | 172 km/h 107 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IIIS 2.9 V6 | 440 hp 328 kW |
| JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 2013SRT 6.4 V8 | 481 hp 359 kW |
Jeep Grand Cherokee IV (WK2) Facelift 2013 SRT 6.4 V8 has 41 hp more than Porsche Cayenne III S 2.9 V6.
The biggest power difference is between Porsche Cayenne III S 2.9 V6 and Jeep Grand Cherokee IV (WK2) Facelift 2013 SRT 6.4 V8: 41 hp (31 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IIIS 2.9 V6 | 550 Nm 406 lb-ft |
| JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 2013SRT 6.4 V8 | 637 Nm 470 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IIIS 2.9 V6 | 2,020 kg 4,453 lb |
| JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 2013SRT 6.4 V8 | 2,315 kg 5,104 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IIIS 2.9 V6 | 265 km/h 165 mph |
| JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 2013SRT 6.4 V8 | 257 km/h 160 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IIIS 2.9 V6 | 5.2 s |
| JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 2013SRT 6.4 V8 | 5.0 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Jeep Grand Cherokee IV (WK2) Facelift 2013 SRT 6.4 V8 and Porsche Cayenne III S 2.9 V6: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IIIS 2.9 V6 | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK |
| JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 2013SRT 6.4 V8 | 15.7 L/100 km 15.0 mpg US 18.0 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Porsche Cayenne III S 2.9 V6 and Jeep Grand Cherokee IV (WK2) Facelift 2013 SRT 6.4 V8: 6.3 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IIIS 2.9 V6 | 218 hp/t 162 kW/t 4.6 kg/hp |
| JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 2013SRT 6.4 V8 | 208 hp/t 155 kW/t 4.8 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IIIS 2.9 V6 | 798 km 496 mi |
| JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 2013SRT 6.4 V8 | 592 km 368 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IIIS 2.9 V6 | 440 hp 328 kW | 5.2 s | 265 km/h 165 mph |
| JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 2013SRT 6.4 V8 | 481 hp 359 kW | 5.0 s | 257 km/h 160 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IIIS 2.9 V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 2013SRT 6.4 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IIIS 2.9 V6 |
| 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK | ||||||
| JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 2013SRT 6.4 V8 |
| 15.7 L/100 km 15.0 mpg US 18.0 mpg UK | ||||||
Porsche Cayenne III S 2.9 V6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IIIS 2.9 V6 | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK | 5.2 s |
| JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 2013SRT 6.4 V8 | 15.7 L/100 km 15.0 mpg US 18.0 mpg UK | 5.0 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IIIS 2.9 V6 | 218 hp/t 162 kW/t 4.6 kg/hp | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK |
| JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 2013SRT 6.4 V8 | 208 hp/t 155 kW/t 4.8 kg/hp | 15.7 L/100 km 15.0 mpg US 18.0 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | PorscheCayenne IIIS 2.9 V6 | JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 2013SRT 6.4 V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 440 hp 328 kW | 481 hp 359 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 550 Nm 406 lb-ft | 637 Nm 470 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.2 s | 5.0 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 265 km/h 165 mph | 257 km/h 160 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,020 kg 4,453 lb | 2,315 kg 5,104 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK | 15.7 L/100 km 15.0 mpg US 18.0 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 798 km 496 mi | 592 km 368 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 213 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 770 L 27.2 cu ft | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 218 hp/t 162 kW/t 4.6 kg/hp | 208 hp/t 155 kW/t 4.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Porsche Cayenne III S 2.9 V6 | Jeep Grand Cherokee IV (WK2) Facelift 2013 SRT 6.4 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 9.4 L/100 km25 mpg US30.1 mpg UK | 15.7 L/100 km15 mpg US18 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 16.45 LC100 km | 27.47 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 26.47 LC100 mi | 44.22 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,410 L372 US gal310 UK gal | 2,355 L622 US gal518 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,468 LC/year | 4,121 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Porsche Cayenne III S 2.9 V6
- Is 295 kg lighter
- Has 8 km/h (5 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 6.3 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 10 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 206 km (128 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
Jeep Grand Cherokee IV (WK2) Facelift 2013 SRT 6.4 V8
- Has 41 hp more
- Has 87 Nm more
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























