Car comparison

BMW X6 (F16) 50ivsJeep Grand Cherokee IV (WK2) · Facelift 2013 SRT 6.4 V8

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

BMW X6 (F16)

50i

450 hp4395 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2014-2018
VS

Jeep Grand Cherokee IV (WK2) · Facelift 2013

SRT 6.4 V8

481 hp6417 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticNaturally aspiratedSUV2016-2017

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

BMW X6 (F16) 50i

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    4.8 s
  • Fastest top speed
    260 km/h
    162 mph Unrestricted
    250 km/h
    155 mph Restricted
  • Highest torque
    650 Nm
    479 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    2,170 kg
    4,784 lb
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    9.7 L/100 km
    24.2 mpg US
    29.1 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    13.1 L/100 km
    18.0 mpg US
    21.6 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    7.8 L/100 km
    30.2 mpg US
    36.2 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    876 km
    545 mi
  • Best overall score
    80/100
  • Best performance score
    77/100
  • Best economy score
    81/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelBMWX6 (F16)50iJeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 2013SRT 6.4 V8
Power
450hp336kW
481hp359kW
Torque
650Nm479lb-ft
637Nm470lb-ft
Curb weight
2,170kg4,784lb
2,315kg5,104lb
Gross weight
2,885kg6,360lb
2,948kg6,499lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Calculated
257 km/h
160 mph
To 99% top speed
65.2s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph
Calculated
72.6s99% target: 254 km/h / 158 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
4.8s
5.0s
0-200 km/h
17.3s
Calculated
19.0s
Calculated
0-60 mph
4.6s
Calculated
4.7s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
9.7L/100 km24.2mpg US29.1mpg UK
15.7L/100 km15mpg US18.0mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
13.1L/100 km18mpg US21.6mpg UK
18.1L/100 km13mpg US15.6mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK
12.4L/100 km19mpg US22.8mpg UK
Quarter mile
13.0s
Calculated
13.2s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
207hp/t155kW/t94hp/1000 lb
Calculated
208hp/t155kW/t94hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
300Nm/t200lb-ft/ton
Calculated
275Nm/t184lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
876km545mi
Calculated
592km368mi
Calculated
Displacement
4,395cc268cu in
6,417cc392cu in
Length
4,909mm193in
4,859mm191in
Width
1,989mm78in
1,958mm77in
Height
1,702mm67in
1,717mm68in
Wheelbase
2,933mm115in
2,915mm115in
Front track
1,640mm65in
1,617mm64in
Rear track
1,706mm67in
1,633mm64in
Ground clearance
212mm8in
211mm8in
Trunk volume
550L
-
Max trunk volume
1,525L
-
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
85L
93L
CO2 emissions
227g/km
-

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

BMW X6 (F16) 50iJeep Grand Cherokee IV (WK2) Facelift 2013 SRT 6.4 V8PowerTorque
  • BMW X6 (F16) 50i: Power / Torque
  • Jeep Grand Cherokee IV (WK2) Facelift 2013 SRT 6.4 V8: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
BMWX6 (F16)50i5,500-6,000 rpm2,000-4,500 rpm6,250 rpm
JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 2013SRT 6.4 V86,000 rpm4,300 rpm6,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricBMWX6 (F16)50iJeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 2013SRT 6.4 V8
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
4.6 s
4.7 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
4.8 s
5.0 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
17.3 s
19.0 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Likely limited
257 km/h
160 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.1 s
2.1 s
330 ft
101 m
5.6 s
5.7 s
1/8 mile
201 m
8.4 s
8.6 s
1000 ft
305 m
10.9 s
11.1 s
1/4 mile
402 m
13.0 s
13.2 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
177 km/h
110 mph
172 km/h
107 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX6 (F16)50i
450 hp
336 kW
JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 2013SRT 6.4 V8
481 hp
359 kW

Jeep Grand Cherokee IV (WK2) Facelift 2013 SRT 6.4 V8 has 31 hp more than BMW X6 (F16) 50i.

The biggest power difference is between BMW X6 (F16) 50i and Jeep Grand Cherokee IV (WK2) Facelift 2013 SRT 6.4 V8: 31 hp (23 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX6 (F16)50i
650 Nm
479 lb-ft
JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 2013SRT 6.4 V8
637 Nm
470 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX6 (F16)50i
2,170 kg
4,784 lb
JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 2013SRT 6.4 V8
2,315 kg
5,104 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX6 (F16)50i
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 2013SRT 6.4 V8
257 km/h
160 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX6 (F16)50i4.8 s
JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 2013SRT 6.4 V85.0 s

Although Jeep Grand Cherokee IV (WK2) Facelift 2013 SRT 6.4 V8 has more power, BMW X6 (F16) 50i is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW X6 (F16) 50i and Jeep Grand Cherokee IV (WK2) Facelift 2013 SRT 6.4 V8: 0.2 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX6 (F16)50i
9.7 L/100 km
24.2 mpg US
29.1 mpg UK
JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 2013SRT 6.4 V8
15.7 L/100 km
15.0 mpg US
18.0 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW X6 (F16) 50i and Jeep Grand Cherokee IV (WK2) Facelift 2013 SRT 6.4 V8: 6.0 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX6 (F16)50i
207 hp/t
155 kW/t
4.8 kg/hp
JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 2013SRT 6.4 V8
208 hp/t
155 kW/t
4.8 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX6 (F16)50i
876 km
545 mi
JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 2013SRT 6.4 V8
592 km
368 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
BMWX6 (F16)50i
450 hp
336 kW
4.8 s
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 2013SRT 6.4 V8
481 hp
359 kW
5.0 s
257 km/h
160 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
BMWX6 (F16)50i
Power
450 hp
336 kW
0-100 km/h4.8 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
550 L
19.4 cu ft
Length
4,909 mm
193.3 in
Height
1,702 mm
67.0 in
JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 2013SRT 6.4 V8
Power
481 hp
359 kW
0-100 km/h5.0 s
Top speed
257 km/h
160 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,859 mm
191.3 in
Height
1,717 mm
67.6 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
BMWX6 (F16)50i
Power
450 hp
336 kW
0-100 km/h4.8 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
9.7 L/100 km
24.2 mpg US
29.1 mpg UK
JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 2013SRT 6.4 V8
Power
481 hp
359 kW
0-100 km/h5.0 s
Top speed
257 km/h
160 mph
15.7 L/100 km
15.0 mpg US
18.0 mpg UK

BMW X6 (F16) 50i is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
BMWX6 (F16)50i
9.7 L/100 km
24.2 mpg US
29.1 mpg UK
4.8 s
JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 2013SRT 6.4 V8
15.7 L/100 km
15.0 mpg US
18.0 mpg UK
5.0 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
BMWX6 (F16)50i
207 hp/t
155 kW/t
4.8 kg/hp
9.7 L/100 km
24.2 mpg US
29.1 mpg UK
JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 2013SRT 6.4 V8
208 hp/t
155 kW/t
4.8 kg/hp
15.7 L/100 km
15.0 mpg US
18.0 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleBMWX6 (F16)50iJeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 2013SRT 6.4 V8
Power
450 hp
336 kW
481 hp
359 kW
Torque
650 Nm
479 lb-ft
637 Nm
470 lb-ft
Acceleration
4.8 s
5.0 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
257 km/h
160 mph
Lightness
2,170 kg
4,784 lb
2,315 kg
5,104 lb
Fuel consumption
9.7 L/100 km
24.2 mpg US
29.1 mpg UK
15.7 L/100 km
15.0 mpg US
18.0 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
550 L
19.4 cu ft
Length
4,909 mm
193.3 in
Height
1,702 mm
67.0 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,859 mm
191.3 in
Height
1,717 mm
67.6 in
Range score
876 km
545 mi
592 km
368 mi
CO2 score
227 g/km
-
Trunk score
550 L
19.4 cu ft
-
Power-to-weight score
207 hp/t
155 kW/t
4.8 kg/hp
208 hp/t
155 kW/t
4.8 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleBMW X6 (F16) 50iJeep Grand Cherokee IV (WK2) Facelift 2013 SRT 6.4 V8
Consumption9.7 L/100 km24.2 mpg US29.1 mpg UK15.7 L/100 km15 mpg US18 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km16.97 LC100 km27.47 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi27.32 LC100 mi44.22 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,455 L384 US gal320 UK gal2,355 L622 US gal518 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,546 LC/year4,121 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

BMW X6 (F16) 50i

  • Has 13 Nm more
  • Is 145 kg lighter
  • Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 3 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 6.0 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 284 km (176 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Lowest power

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
BMW X6 (F16) 50i
Jeep Grand Cherokee IV (WK2) SRT 6.4 V8
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

50i
50i
VS
BMWX6 (F16)50ivsBMWX6 (E71)50i
SRT 6.4 V8
GLS 500
VS
JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 2013SRT 6.4 V8vsMercedes-BenzGLS (X166)GLS 500
50i
M50d
VS
BMWX6 (F16)50ivsBMWX6 (G06)M50d
SRT 6.4 V8
90D 90 kWh
VS
JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 2013SRT 6.4 V8vsTeslaModel X90D 90 kWh
50i
M60i V8
VS
BMWX6 (F16)50ivsBMWX6 (G06 LCI)Facelift 2023M60i V8
SRT 6.4 V8
GTS 3.6 V6
VS
JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 2013SRT 6.4 V8vsPorscheCayenne IIFacelift 2014GTS 3.6 V6
50i
50i
VS
BMWX6 (F16)50ivsBMWX7 (G07)50i
SRT 6.4 V8
S 3.0 V6 GDI
VS
JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 2013SRT 6.4 V8vsMaseratiLevanteS 3.0 V6 GDI
50i
4.4 V8
VS
BMWX6 (F16)50ivsBMWX5 M (F85)4.4 V8
50i
4.4 V8
VS
BMWX6 (F16)50ivsBMWX6 M (F86)4.4 V8
SRT 6.4 V8
GLS 580 V8
VS
JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 2013SRT 6.4 V8vsMercedes-BenzGLS (X167)GLS 580 V8
50i
M50d
VS
BMWX6 (F16)50ivsBMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 2010M50d
BMW X6 (F16) 50i vs Jeep Grand Cherokee IV (WK2) · Facelift 2013 SRT 6.4 V8 - car comparison - FastVsFaster