Car comparison

Jaguar XF (X260) · Facelift 2020 2.0dvsVolga C50 2.0T

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Jaguar XF (X260) · Facelift 2020

2.0d

204 hp1997 ccDieselRWDAutomaticTurbochargedSedan2020-2024
VS

Volga C50

2.0T

200 hp1969 ccGasolineFWDDual-clutchTurbochargedSedan2026-present

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Jaguar XF (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0d

  • Fastest top speed
    235 km/h
    146 mph
  • Most powerful
    204 hp
    152 kW
  • Highest torque
    430 Nm
    317 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    5.6 L/100 km
    42.0 mpg US
    50.4 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    1,179 km
    732 mi
  • Best overall score
    60/100
  • Best performance score
    53/100
  • Best economy score
    92/100

Volga C50 2.0T

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.1 s
  • Lightest
    1,610 kg
    3,549 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    124 hp/t
    93 kW/t
    8.1 kg/hp
  • Largest trunk
    500 L
  • Best practicality score
    75/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelJaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0dVolgaC502.0T
Power
204hp152kW
200hp149kW
Torque
430Nm317lb-ft
325Nm240lb-ft
Curb weight
1,735kg3,825lb
1,610kg3,549lb
Gross weight-
2,043kg4,504lb
Top speed
235 km/h
146 mph
Unrestricted
225 km/h140 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
69.1s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph
Calculated
60.5s99% target: 223 km/h / 138 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.6s
7.1s
0-200 km/h
27.5s
Calculated
28.0s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.2s
Calculated
6.8s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
5.6L/100 km42mpg US50.4mpg UK
7.2L/100 km32.7mpg US39.2mpg UK
Fuel consumption city-
10L/100 km23.5mpg US28.2mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway-
5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.4s
Calculated
15.1s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
118hp/t88kW/t53hp/1000 lb
Calculated
124hp/t93kW/t56hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
248Nm/t166lb-ft/ton
Calculated
202Nm/t135lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
1,179km732mi
Calculated
681km423mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,997cc122cu in
1,969cc120cu in
Length
4,962mm195in
4,825mm190in
Width-
1,880mm74in
Height
1,456mm57in
1,469mm58in
Wheelbase
2,960mm117in
2,800mm110in
Front track
1,602mm63in
1,618mm64in
Rear track
1,605mm63in
1,618mm64in
Ground clearance-
147mm6in
Trunk volume
448L
500L
Max trunk volume
1,474L
-
Doors
4
4
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
66L
49L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Jaguar XF (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0dVolga C50 2.0TPowerTorque
  • Jaguar XF (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0d: Power / Torque
  • Volga C50 2.0T: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0d4,250 rpm1,750-2,500 rpm4,500 rpm
VolgaC502.0T4,500 rpm1,800-4,000 rpm4,750 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricJaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0dVolgaC502.0T
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.2 s
6.8 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.6 s
7.1 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
27.5 s
28.0 s
Top speed
235 km/h
146 mph
Unrestricted
225 km/h140 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.8 s
2.7 s
330 ft
101 m
7.0 s
6.8 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.3 s
10.0 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.1 s
12.7 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.4 s
15.1 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
156 km/h
97 mph
158 km/h
98 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0d
204 hp
152 kW
VolgaC502.0T
200 hp
149 kW

Jaguar XF (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0d has 4 hp more than Volga C50 2.0T.

The biggest power difference is between Volga C50 2.0T and Jaguar XF (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0d: 4 hp (3 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0d
430 Nm
317 lb-ft
VolgaC502.0T
325 Nm
240 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0d
1,735 kg
3,825 lb
VolgaC502.0T
1,610 kg
3,549 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0d
235 km/h
146 mph
VolgaC502.0T
Unrestricted
225 km/h140 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0d7.6 s
VolgaC502.0T7.1 s

Although Jaguar XF (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0d has more power, Volga C50 2.0T is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volga C50 2.0T and Jaguar XF (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0d: 0.5 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0d
5.6 L/100 km
42.0 mpg US
50.4 mpg UK
VolgaC502.0T
7.2 L/100 km
32.7 mpg US
39.2 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Jaguar XF (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0d and Volga C50 2.0T: 1.6 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0d
118 hp/t
88 kW/t
8.5 kg/hp
VolgaC502.0T
124 hp/t
93 kW/t
8.0 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0d
1,179 km
732 mi
VolgaC502.0T
681 km
423 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0d
204 hp
152 kW
7.6 s
235 km/h
146 mph
VolgaC502.0T
200 hp
149 kW
7.1 s
Unrestricted
225 km/h140 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0d
Power
204 hp
152 kW
0-100 km/h7.6 s
Top speed
235 km/h
146 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
448 L
15.8 cu ft
Length
4,962 mm
195.4 in
Height
1,456 mm
57.3 in
VolgaC502.0T
Power
200 hp
149 kW
0-100 km/h7.1 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
225 km/h140 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
500 L
17.7 cu ft
Length
4,825 mm
190.0 in
Height
1,469 mm
57.8 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0d
Power
204 hp
152 kW
0-100 km/h7.6 s
Top speed
235 km/h
146 mph
5.6 L/100 km
42.0 mpg US
50.4 mpg UK
VolgaC502.0T
Power
200 hp
149 kW
0-100 km/h7.1 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
225 km/h140 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
7.2 L/100 km
32.7 mpg US
39.2 mpg UK

Jaguar XF (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0d
5.6 L/100 km
42.0 mpg US
50.4 mpg UK
7.6 s
VolgaC502.0T
7.2 L/100 km
32.7 mpg US
39.2 mpg UK
7.1 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0d
118 hp/t
88 kW/t
8.5 kg/hp
5.6 L/100 km
42.0 mpg US
50.4 mpg UK
VolgaC502.0T
124 hp/t
93 kW/t
8.1 kg/hp
7.2 L/100 km
32.7 mpg US
39.2 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleJaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0dVolgaC502.0T
Power
204 hp
152 kW
200 hp
149 kW
Torque
430 Nm
317 lb-ft
325 Nm
240 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.6 s
7.1 s
Top speed
235 km/h
146 mph
Unrestricted
225 km/h140 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Lightness
1,735 kg
3,825 lb
1,610 kg
3,549 lb
Fuel consumption
5.6 L/100 km
42.0 mpg US
50.4 mpg UK
7.2 L/100 km
32.7 mpg US
39.2 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
448 L
15.8 cu ft
Length
4,962 mm
195.4 in
Height
1,456 mm
57.3 in
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
500 L
17.7 cu ft
Length
4,825 mm
190.0 in
Height
1,469 mm
57.8 in
Range score
1,179 km
732 mi
681 km
423 mi
Trunk score
448 L
15.8 cu ft
500 L
17.7 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
118 hp/t
88 kW/t
8.5 kg/hp
124 hp/t
93 kW/t
8.1 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleJaguar XF (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0dVolga C50 2.0T
Consumption5.6 L/100 km42 mpg US50.4 mpg UK7.2 L/100 km32.7 mpg US39.2 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km9.80 LC100 km12.60 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi15.77 LC100 mi20.28 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used840 L222 US gal185 UK gal1,080 L285 US gal238 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,470 LC/year1,890 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Jaguar XF (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0d

  • Has 4 hp more
  • Has 105 Nm more
  • Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 1.6 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 498 km (309 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Heaviest
  • Smallest trunk

Volga C50 2.0T

  • Is 125 kg lighter
  • Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 7 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 52 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0d
Volga C50 2.0T
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0d
2.0
VS
JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0dvsJaguarXF (X260)2.0
2.0T
C 250d
VS
VolgaC502.0TvsMercedes-BenzC-class (W206)Facelift 2026C 250d
2.0d
2.0d
VS
JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0dvsJaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0d
2.0T
40 TFSI
VS
VolgaC502.0TvsAUDIA3 Sedan (8Y)Facelift 202440 TFSI
2.0d
20d
VS
JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0dvsJaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)20d
2.0T
2.0 TFSI
VS
VolgaC502.0TvsAUDIA5L Sedan (B10)2.0 TFSI
2.0d
5.0 V8
VS
JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0dvsJaguarXF (X250)5.0 V8
2.0T
380TSI
VS
VolgaC502.0TvsVolkswagenMagotan (B9)380TSI
2.0d
R-S 5.0 V8
VS
JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0dvsJaguarXF (X250)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8
2.0T
C 200
VS
VolgaC502.0TvsMercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 200
2.0d
2.0d
VS
JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0dvsJaguarXE (X760)Facelift 20202.0d
2.0T
E 260
VS
VolgaC502.0TvsMercedes-BenzE-class (W214)E 260
Jaguar XF (X260) · Facelift 2020 2.0d vs Volga C50 2.0T - car comparison - FastVsFaster