Jaguar XF (X250)
Car comparison
Jaguar XF (X250) 5.0 V8vsJaguar XF (X260) · Facelift 2020 2.0d
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonJaguar XF (X260) · Facelift 2020
2.0d
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Jaguar XF (X250) 5.0 V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.7 s
- Fastest top speed265 km/h165 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful385 hp287 kW
- Highest torque515 Nm380 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight216 hp/t161 kW/t4.6 kg/hp
- Largest trunk500 L
- Best overall score73/100
- Best performance score71/100
- Best practicality score76/100
Jaguar XF (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0d
- Lightest1,735 kg3,825 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.6 L/100 km42.0 mpg US50.4 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,179 km732 mi
- Best economy score92/100
Specification comparison
| Model | JaguarXF (X250)5.0 V8 | JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0d |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 385hp287kW | 204hp152kW |
| Torque | 515Nm380lb-ft | 430Nm317lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,780kg3,924lb | 1,735kg3,825lb |
| Gross weight | 2,285kg5,038lb | - |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 56.4s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated | 69.1s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.7s | 7.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 17.1s Calculated | 27.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.5s Calculated | 7.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 11.1L/100 km21.2mpg US25.4mpg UK | 5.6L/100 km42mpg US50.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 17.3L/100 km13.6mpg US16.3mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 13.6s Calculated | 15.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 216hp/t161kW/t98hp/1000 lb Calculated | 118hp/t88kW/t53hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 289Nm/t194lb-ft/ton Calculated | 248Nm/t166lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 631km392mi Calculated | 1,179km732mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 5,000cc305cu in | 1,997cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,961mm195in | 4,962mm195in |
| Width | 1,877mm74in | - |
| Height | 1,460mm57in | 1,456mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,909mm115in | 2,960mm117in |
| Front track | 1,559mm61in | 1,602mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,605mm63in | 1,605mm63in |
| Trunk volume | 500L | 448L |
| Max trunk volume | 923L | 1,474L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 70L | 66L |
| CO2 emissions | 264g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Jaguar XF (X250) 5.0 V8: Power / Torque
- Jaguar XF (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0d: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X250)5.0 V8 | 6,500 rpm | 3,500 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
| JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0d | 4,250 rpm | 1,750-2,500 rpm | 4,500 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | JaguarXF (X250)5.0 V8 | JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0d |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.5 s | 7.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.7 s | 7.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 17.1 s | 27.5 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.8 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.2 s | 7.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.1 s | 10.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.6 s | 13.1 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.6 s | 15.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 179 km/h 111 mph | 156 km/h 97 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X250)5.0 V8 | 385 hp 287 kW |
| JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0d | 204 hp 152 kW |
Jaguar XF (X250) 5.0 V8 has 181 hp more than Jaguar XF (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0d.
The biggest power difference is between Jaguar XF (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0d and Jaguar XF (X250) 5.0 V8: 181 hp (135 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X250)5.0 V8 | 515 Nm 380 lb-ft |
| JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0d | 430 Nm 317 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X250)5.0 V8 | 1,780 kg 3,924 lb |
| JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0d | 1,735 kg 3,825 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X250)5.0 V8 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0d | 235 km/h 146 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X250)5.0 V8 | 5.7 s |
| JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0d | 7.6 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Jaguar XF (X250) 5.0 V8 and Jaguar XF (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0d: 1.9 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X250)5.0 V8 | 11.1 L/100 km 21.2 mpg US 25.4 mpg UK |
| JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0d | 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Jaguar XF (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0d and Jaguar XF (X250) 5.0 V8: 5.5 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X250)5.0 V8 | 216 hp/t 161 kW/t 4.6 kg/hp |
| JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0d | 118 hp/t 88 kW/t 8.5 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X250)5.0 V8 | 631 km 392 mi |
| JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0d | 1,179 km 732 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X250)5.0 V8 | 385 hp 287 kW | 5.7 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0d | 204 hp 152 kW | 7.6 s | 235 km/h 146 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X250)5.0 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X250)5.0 V8 |
| 11.1 L/100 km 21.2 mpg US 25.4 mpg UK | ||||||
| JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0d |
| 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK | ||||||
Jaguar XF (X250) 5.0 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X250)5.0 V8 | 11.1 L/100 km 21.2 mpg US 25.4 mpg UK | 5.7 s |
| JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0d | 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK | 7.6 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X250)5.0 V8 | 216 hp/t 161 kW/t 4.6 kg/hp | 11.1 L/100 km 21.2 mpg US 25.4 mpg UK |
| JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0d | 118 hp/t 88 kW/t 8.5 kg/hp | 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | JaguarXF (X250)5.0 V8 | JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0d | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 385 hp 287 kW | 204 hp 152 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 515 Nm 380 lb-ft | 430 Nm 317 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.7 s | 7.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | 235 km/h 146 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,780 kg 3,924 lb | 1,735 kg 3,825 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 11.1 L/100 km 21.2 mpg US 25.4 mpg UK | 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 631 km 392 mi | 1,179 km 732 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 264 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 500 L 17.7 cu ft | 448 L 15.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 216 hp/t 161 kW/t 4.6 kg/hp | 118 hp/t 88 kW/t 8.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Jaguar XF (X250) 5.0 V8 | Jaguar XF (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0d |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 11.1 L/100 km21.2 mpg US25.4 mpg UK | 5.6 L/100 km42 mpg US50.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 19.43 LC100 km | 9.80 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 31.26 LC100 mi | 15.77 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,665 L440 US gal366 UK gal | 840 L222 US gal185 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,914 LC/year | 1,470 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Jaguar XF (X250) 5.0 V8
- Has 181 hp more
- Has 85 Nm more
- Is 1.9 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 30 km/h (19 mph) higher top speed
- Has 99 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 52 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
Jaguar XF (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0d
- Is 45 kg lighter
- Uses 5.5 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 548 km (340 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























