Car comparison

Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 200vsVolga C50 2.0T

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206)

C 200

204 hp1496 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSedan2021-2026
VS

Volga C50

2.0T

200 hp1969 ccGasolineFWDDual-clutchTurbochargedSedan2026-present

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 200

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.1 s
  • Fastest top speed
    241 km/h
    150 mph
  • Most powerful
    204 hp
    152 kW
  • Best power-to-weight
    125 hp/t
    93 kW/t
    8.0 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    6.9 L/100 km
    34.1 mpg US
    40.9 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    9.4 L/100 km
    25.0 mpg US
    30.1 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    5.4 L/100 km
    43.6 mpg US
    52.3 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    725 km
    450 mi
  • Best overall score
    60/100
  • Best performance score
    53/100
  • Best economy score
    88/100

Volga C50 2.0T

  • Highest torque
    325 Nm
    240 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,610 kg
    3,549 lb
  • Largest trunk
    500 L
  • Best practicality score
    75/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelMercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 200VolgaC502.0T
Power
204hp152kW
200hp149kW
Torque
300Nm221lb-ft
325Nm240lb-ft
Curb weight
1,630kg3,594lb
1,610kg3,549lb
Gross weight
2,320kg5,115lb
2,043kg4,504lb
Top speed
241 km/h
150 mph
Unrestricted
225 km/h140 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
65.0s99% target: 239 km/h / 148 mph
Calculated
60.5s99% target: 223 km/h / 138 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.1s
7.1s
0-200 km/h
24.3s
Calculated
28.0s
Calculated
0-60 mph
6.8s
Calculated
6.8s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
6.9L/100 km34.1mpg US40.9mpg UK
7.2L/100 km32.7mpg US39.2mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
9.4L/100 km25mpg US30.1mpg UK
10L/100 km23.5mpg US28.2mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
5.4L/100 km43.6mpg US52.3mpg UK
5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.0s
Calculated
15.1s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
125hp/t93kW/t57hp/1000 lb
Calculated
124hp/t93kW/t56hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
184Nm/t123lb-ft/ton
Calculated
202Nm/t135lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
725km450mi
Calculated
681km423mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,496cc91cu in
1,969cc120cu in
Length
4,751mm187in
4,825mm190in
Width
1,820mm72in
1,880mm74in
Height
1,437mm57in
1,469mm58in
Wheelbase
2,865mm113in
2,800mm110in
Front track
1,601mm63in
1,618mm64in
Rear track
1,613mm64in
1,618mm64in
Ground clearance-
147mm6in
Trunk volume
455L
500L
Doors
4
4
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
50L
49L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 200Volga C50 2.0TPowerTorque
  • Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 200: Power / Torque
  • Volga C50 2.0T: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 2005,800-6,100 rpm1,800-4,000 rpm6,350 rpm
VolgaC502.0T4,500 rpm1,800-4,000 rpm4,750 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricMercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 200VolgaC502.0T
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.8 s
6.8 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.1 s
7.1 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
24.3 s
28.0 s
Top speed
241 km/h
150 mph
Unrestricted
225 km/h140 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.7 s
2.7 s
330 ft
101 m
6.8 s
6.8 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.0 s
10.0 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.7 s
12.7 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.0 s
15.1 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
161 km/h
100 mph
158 km/h
98 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 200
204 hp
152 kW
VolgaC502.0T
200 hp
149 kW

Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 200 has 4 hp more than Volga C50 2.0T.

The biggest power difference is between Volga C50 2.0T and Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 200: 4 hp (3 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 200
300 Nm
221 lb-ft
VolgaC502.0T
325 Nm
240 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 200
1,630 kg
3,594 lb
VolgaC502.0T
1,610 kg
3,549 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 200
241 km/h
150 mph
VolgaC502.0T
Unrestricted
225 km/h140 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 2007.1 s
VolgaC502.0T7.1 s

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 200
6.9 L/100 km
34.1 mpg US
40.9 mpg UK
VolgaC502.0T
7.2 L/100 km
32.7 mpg US
39.2 mpg UK

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 200
125 hp/t
93 kW/t
8.0 kg/hp
VolgaC502.0T
124 hp/t
93 kW/t
8.0 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 200
725 km
450 mi
VolgaC502.0T
681 km
423 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 200
204 hp
152 kW
7.1 s
241 km/h
150 mph
VolgaC502.0T
200 hp
149 kW
7.1 s
Unrestricted
225 km/h140 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 200
Power
204 hp
152 kW
0-100 km/h7.1 s
Top speed
241 km/h
150 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
455 L
16.1 cu ft
Length
4,751 mm
187.0 in
Height
1,437 mm
56.6 in
VolgaC502.0T
Power
200 hp
149 kW
0-100 km/h7.1 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
225 km/h140 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
500 L
17.7 cu ft
Length
4,825 mm
190.0 in
Height
1,469 mm
57.8 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 200
Power
204 hp
152 kW
0-100 km/h7.1 s
Top speed
241 km/h
150 mph
6.9 L/100 km
34.1 mpg US
40.9 mpg UK
VolgaC502.0T
Power
200 hp
149 kW
0-100 km/h7.1 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
225 km/h140 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
7.2 L/100 km
32.7 mpg US
39.2 mpg UK

Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 200 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 200
6.9 L/100 km
34.1 mpg US
40.9 mpg UK
7.1 s
VolgaC502.0T
7.2 L/100 km
32.7 mpg US
39.2 mpg UK
7.1 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 200
125 hp/t
93 kW/t
8.0 kg/hp
6.9 L/100 km
34.1 mpg US
40.9 mpg UK
VolgaC502.0T
124 hp/t
93 kW/t
8.1 kg/hp
7.2 L/100 km
32.7 mpg US
39.2 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleMercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 200VolgaC502.0T
Power
204 hp
152 kW
200 hp
149 kW
Torque
300 Nm
221 lb-ft
325 Nm
240 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.1 s
7.1 s
Top speed
241 km/h
150 mph
Unrestricted
225 km/h140 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Lightness
1,630 kg
3,594 lb
1,610 kg
3,549 lb
Fuel consumption
6.9 L/100 km
34.1 mpg US
40.9 mpg UK
7.2 L/100 km
32.7 mpg US
39.2 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
455 L
16.1 cu ft
Length
4,751 mm
187.0 in
Height
1,437 mm
56.6 in
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
500 L
17.7 cu ft
Length
4,825 mm
190.0 in
Height
1,469 mm
57.8 in
Range score
725 km
450 mi
681 km
423 mi
Trunk score
455 L
16.1 cu ft
500 L
17.7 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
125 hp/t
93 kW/t
8.0 kg/hp
124 hp/t
93 kW/t
8.1 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleMercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 200Volga C50 2.0T
Consumption6.9 L/100 km34.1 mpg US40.9 mpg UK7.2 L/100 km32.7 mpg US39.2 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km12.08 LC100 km12.60 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi19.43 LC100 mi20.28 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,035 L273 US gal228 UK gal1,080 L285 US gal238 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,811 LC/year1,890 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 200

  • Has 4 hp more
  • Has 16 km/h (10 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 0.3 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 1 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 44 km (27 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Heaviest
  • Smallest trunk

Volga C50 2.0T

  • Has 25 Nm more
  • Is 20 kg lighter
  • Has 45 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 200
Volga C50 2.0T
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

C 200
C 250d
VS
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 200vsMercedes-BenzC-class (W206)Facelift 2026C 250d
C 200
C 220d
VS
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 200vsMercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 220d
2.0T
40 TFSI
VS
VolgaC502.0TvsAUDIA3 Sedan (8Y)Facelift 202440 TFSI
C 200
C 250d
VS
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 200vsMercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 250d
2.0T
2.0 TFSI
VS
VolgaC502.0TvsAUDIA5L Sedan (B10)2.0 TFSI
C 200
C 200
VS
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 200vsMercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 200
2.0T
380TSI
VS
VolgaC502.0TvsVolkswagenMagotan (B9)380TSI
C 200
C 220d
VS
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 200vsMercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)Facelift 2018C 220d
2.0T
C 220d
VS
VolgaC502.0TvsMercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 220d
C 200
C 250d
VS
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 200vsMercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)C 250d
2.0T
E 260
VS
VolgaC502.0TvsMercedes-BenzE-class (W214)E 260
C 200
C 350 V6
VS
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 200vsMercedes-BenzC-class (W203)Facelift 2004C 350 V6
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 200 vs Volga C50 2.0T - car comparison - FastVsFaster