Car comparison

Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) · Facelift 2026 C 250dvsVolga C50 2.0T

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) · Facelift 2026

C 250d

200 hp1992 ccDieselAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSedan2026-present
VS

Volga C50

2.0T

200 hp1969 ccGasolineFWDDual-clutchTurbochargedSedan2026-present

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) Facelift 2026 C 250d

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.1 s
  • Fastest top speed
    238 km/h
    148 mph
  • Most powerful
    200 hp
    149 kW
  • Highest torque
    440 Nm
    325 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    5.2 L/100 km
    45.2 mpg US
    54.3 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    1,269 km
    789 mi
  • Best overall score
    61/100
  • Best performance score
    55/100
  • Best economy score
    93/100

Volga C50 2.0T

  • Lightest
    1,610 kg
    3,549 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    124 hp/t
    93 kW/t
    8.1 kg/hp
  • Largest trunk
    500 L
  • Best practicality score
    75/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelMercedes-BenzC-class (W206)Facelift 2026C 250dVolgaC502.0T
Power
200hp149kW
200hp149kW
Torque
440Nm325lb-ft
325Nm240lb-ft
Curb weight
1,775kg3,913lb
1,610kg3,549lb
Gross weight
2,400kg5,291lb
2,043kg4,504lb
Top speed
238 km/h
148 mph
Unrestricted
225 km/h140 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
65.7s99% target: 236 km/h / 146 mph
Calculated
60.5s99% target: 223 km/h / 138 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.1s
7.1s
0-200 km/h
25.2s
Calculated
28.0s
Calculated
0-60 mph
6.8s
Calculated
6.8s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
5.2L/100 km45.2mpg US54.3mpg UK
7.2L/100 km32.7mpg US39.2mpg UK
Fuel consumption city-
10L/100 km23.5mpg US28.2mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway-
5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.0s
Calculated
15.1s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
113hp/t84kW/t51hp/1000 lb
Calculated
124hp/t93kW/t56hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
248Nm/t166lb-ft/ton
Calculated
202Nm/t135lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
1,269km789mi
Calculated
681km423mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,992cc122cu in
1,969cc120cu in
Length
4,766mm188in
4,825mm190in
Width
1,820mm72in
1,880mm74in
Height
1,438mm57in
1,469mm58in
Wheelbase
2,865mm113in
2,800mm110in
Front track
1,582mm62in
1,618mm64in
Rear track
1,594mm63in
1,618mm64in
Ground clearance-
147mm6in
Trunk volume
455L
500L
Doors
4
4
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
66L
49L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) Facelift 2026 C 250dVolga C50 2.0TPowerTorque
  • Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) Facelift 2026 C 250d: Power / Torque
  • Volga C50 2.0T: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)Facelift 2026C 250d3,400-3,600 rpm1,800-2,800 rpm3,850 rpm
VolgaC502.0T4,500 rpm1,800-4,000 rpm4,750 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricMercedes-BenzC-class (W206)Facelift 2026C 250dVolgaC502.0T
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.8 s
6.8 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.1 s
7.1 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
25.2 s
28.0 s
Top speed
238 km/h
148 mph
Unrestricted
225 km/h140 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.7 s
2.7 s
330 ft
101 m
6.8 s
6.8 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.0 s
10.0 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.7 s
12.7 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.0 s
15.1 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
160 km/h
100 mph
158 km/h
98 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)Facelift 2026C 250d
200 hp
149 kW
VolgaC502.0T
200 hp
149 kW

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)Facelift 2026C 250d
440 Nm
325 lb-ft
VolgaC502.0T
325 Nm
240 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)Facelift 2026C 250d
1,775 kg
3,913 lb
VolgaC502.0T
1,610 kg
3,549 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)Facelift 2026C 250d
238 km/h
148 mph
VolgaC502.0T
Unrestricted
225 km/h140 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)Facelift 2026C 250d7.1 s
VolgaC502.0T7.1 s

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)Facelift 2026C 250d
5.2 L/100 km
45.2 mpg US
54.3 mpg UK
VolgaC502.0T
7.2 L/100 km
32.7 mpg US
39.2 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) Facelift 2026 C 250d and Volga C50 2.0T: 2.0 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)Facelift 2026C 250d
113 hp/t
84 kW/t
8.9 kg/hp
VolgaC502.0T
124 hp/t
93 kW/t
8.0 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)Facelift 2026C 250d
1,269 km
789 mi
VolgaC502.0T
681 km
423 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)Facelift 2026C 250d
200 hp
149 kW
7.1 s
238 km/h
148 mph
VolgaC502.0T
200 hp
149 kW
7.1 s
Unrestricted
225 km/h140 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)Facelift 2026C 250d
Power
200 hp
149 kW
0-100 km/h7.1 s
Top speed
238 km/h
148 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
455 L
16.1 cu ft
Length
4,766 mm
187.6 in
Height
1,438 mm
56.6 in
VolgaC502.0T
Power
200 hp
149 kW
0-100 km/h7.1 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
225 km/h140 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
500 L
17.7 cu ft
Length
4,825 mm
190.0 in
Height
1,469 mm
57.8 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)Facelift 2026C 250d
Power
200 hp
149 kW
0-100 km/h7.1 s
Top speed
238 km/h
148 mph
5.2 L/100 km
45.2 mpg US
54.3 mpg UK
VolgaC502.0T
Power
200 hp
149 kW
0-100 km/h7.1 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
225 km/h140 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
7.2 L/100 km
32.7 mpg US
39.2 mpg UK

Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) Facelift 2026 C 250d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)Facelift 2026C 250d
5.2 L/100 km
45.2 mpg US
54.3 mpg UK
7.1 s
VolgaC502.0T
7.2 L/100 km
32.7 mpg US
39.2 mpg UK
7.1 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)Facelift 2026C 250d
113 hp/t
84 kW/t
8.9 kg/hp
5.2 L/100 km
45.2 mpg US
54.3 mpg UK
VolgaC502.0T
124 hp/t
93 kW/t
8.1 kg/hp
7.2 L/100 km
32.7 mpg US
39.2 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleMercedes-BenzC-class (W206)Facelift 2026C 250dVolgaC502.0T
Power
200 hp
149 kW
200 hp
149 kW
Torque
440 Nm
325 lb-ft
325 Nm
240 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.1 s
7.1 s
Top speed
238 km/h
148 mph
Unrestricted
225 km/h140 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Lightness
1,775 kg
3,913 lb
1,610 kg
3,549 lb
Fuel consumption
5.2 L/100 km
45.2 mpg US
54.3 mpg UK
7.2 L/100 km
32.7 mpg US
39.2 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
455 L
16.1 cu ft
Length
4,766 mm
187.6 in
Height
1,438 mm
56.6 in
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
500 L
17.7 cu ft
Length
4,825 mm
190.0 in
Height
1,469 mm
57.8 in
Range score
1,269 km
789 mi
681 km
423 mi
Trunk score
455 L
16.1 cu ft
500 L
17.7 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
113 hp/t
84 kW/t
8.9 kg/hp
124 hp/t
93 kW/t
8.1 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleMercedes-Benz C-class (W206) Facelift 2026 C 250dVolga C50 2.0T
Consumption5.2 L/100 km45.2 mpg US54.3 mpg UK7.2 L/100 km32.7 mpg US39.2 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km9.10 LC100 km12.60 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi14.65 LC100 mi20.28 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used780 L206 US gal172 UK gal1,080 L285 US gal238 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,365 LC/year1,890 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) Facelift 2026 C 250d

  • Has 115 Nm more
  • Has 13 km/h (8 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 2.0 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 589 km (366 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Heaviest
  • Smallest trunk

Volga C50 2.0T

  • Is 165 kg lighter
  • Has 12 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 45 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 250d
Volga C50 2.0T
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

C 250d
C 220d
VS
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)Facelift 2026C 250dvsMercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 220d
2.0T
C 250d
VS
VolgaC502.0TvsMercedes-BenzC-class (W206)Facelift 2026C 250d
C 250d
C 220d
VS
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)Facelift 2026C 250dvsMercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 220d
2.0T
40 TFSI
VS
VolgaC502.0TvsAUDIA3 Sedan (8Y)Facelift 202440 TFSI
C 250d
C 250d
VS
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)Facelift 2026C 250dvsMercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 250d
2.0T
2.0 TFSI
VS
VolgaC502.0TvsAUDIA5L Sedan (B10)2.0 TFSI
C 250d
C 220d
VS
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)Facelift 2026C 250dvsMercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 220d
2.0T
380TSI
VS
VolgaC502.0TvsVolkswagenMagotan (B9)380TSI
C 250d
C 220d
VS
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)Facelift 2026C 250dvsMercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)Facelift 2018C 220d
C 250d
C 250d
VS
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)Facelift 2026C 250dvsMercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)C 250d
2.0T
E 260
VS
VolgaC502.0TvsMercedes-BenzE-class (W214)E 260
C 250d
C 350 V6
VS
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)Facelift 2026C 250dvsMercedes-BenzC-class (W203)Facelift 2004C 350 V6
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) · Facelift 2026 C 250d vs Volga C50 2.0T - car comparison - FastVsFaster