Volvo V90
Car comparison
Volvo V90 2.0 D4vsJaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) 20d
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonJaguar XF Sportbrake (X260)
20d
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) 20d
- Highest torque430 Nm317 lb-ft
- Lightest1,767 kg3,896 lb
- Best power-to-weight102 hp/t76 kW/t9.8 kg/hp
- Lowest highway consumption5.0 L/100 km47.0 mpg US56.5 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,158 km719 mi
- Best overall score60/100
- Best performance score47/100
- Best practicality score89/100
Volvo V90 2.0 D4
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.5 s
- Fastest top speed220 km/h137 mph
- Most powerful190 hp142 kW
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.4 L/100 km43.6 mpg US52.3 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption5.9 L/100 km39.9 mpg US47.9 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions142 g/km
- Best economy score92/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolvoV902.0 D4 | JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)20d |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 190hp142kW | 180hp134kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 430Nm317lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,976kg4,356lb | 1,767kg3,896lb |
| Gross weight | - | 2,375kg5,236lb |
| Top speed | 220 km/h 137 mph | 219 km/h 136 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 84.2s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated | 84.2s99% target: 217 km/h / 135 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.5s | 8.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 40.3s Calculated | 41.2s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 8.1s Calculated | 8.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 5.4L/100 km43.6mpg US52.3mpg UK | 5.7L/100 km41.3mpg US49.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK | 7L/100 km33.6mpg US40.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK | 5L/100 km47mpg US56.5mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 16.2s Calculated | 16.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 96hp/t72kW/t44hp/1000 lb Calculated | 102hp/t76kW/t46hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 202Nm/t135lb-ft/ton Calculated | 243Nm/t163lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,111km690mi Calculated | 1,158km719mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,969cc120cu in | 1,999cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,936mm194in | 4,955mm195in |
| Width | 1,879mm74in | 1,987mm78in |
| Height | 1,475mm58in | 1,496mm59in |
| Wheelbase | 2,941mm116in | 2,960mm117in |
| Front track | 1,628mm64in | 1,605mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,629mm64in | 1,607mm63in |
| Ground clearance | 153mm6in | - |
| Trunk volume | 560L | - |
| Max trunk volume | 1,526L | - |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 60L | 66L |
| CO2 emissions | 142g/km | 151g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volvo V90 2.0 D4: Power / Torque
- Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) 20d: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoV902.0 D4 | 4,250 rpm | 1,740-2,520 rpm | 5,000 rpm |
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)20d | 4,000 rpm | 1,750-2,500 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolvoV902.0 D4 | JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)20d |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 8.1 s | 8.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.5 s | 8.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 40.3 s | 41.2 s |
| Top speed | 220 km/h 137 mph | 219 km/h 136 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.1 s | 7.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.6 s | 10.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.6 s | 13.7 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.2 s | 16.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 145 km/h 90 mph | 144 km/h 89 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV902.0 D4 | 190 hp 142 kW |
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)20d | 180 hp 134 kW |
Volvo V90 2.0 D4 has 10 hp more than Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) 20d.
The biggest power difference is between Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) 20d and Volvo V90 2.0 D4: 10 hp (7 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV902.0 D4 | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)20d | 430 Nm 317 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV902.0 D4 | 1,976 kg 4,356 lb |
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)20d | 1,767 kg 3,896 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV902.0 D4 | 220 km/h 137 mph |
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)20d | 219 km/h 136 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV902.0 D4 | 8.5 s |
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)20d | 8.6 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volvo V90 2.0 D4 and Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) 20d: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV902.0 D4 | 5.4 L/100 km 43.6 mpg US 52.3 mpg UK |
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)20d | 5.7 L/100 km 41.3 mpg US 49.6 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV902.0 D4 | 96 hp/t 72 kW/t 10.4 kg/hp |
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)20d | 102 hp/t 76 kW/t 9.8 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV902.0 D4 | 1,111 km 690 mi |
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)20d | 1,158 km 719 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoV902.0 D4 | 190 hp 142 kW | 8.5 s | 220 km/h 137 mph |
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)20d | 180 hp 134 kW | 8.6 s | 219 km/h 136 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoV902.0 D4 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)20d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoV902.0 D4 |
| 5.4 L/100 km 43.6 mpg US 52.3 mpg UK | ||||||
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)20d |
| 5.7 L/100 km 41.3 mpg US 49.6 mpg UK | ||||||
Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) 20d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoV902.0 D4 | 5.4 L/100 km 43.6 mpg US 52.3 mpg UK | 8.5 s |
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)20d | 5.7 L/100 km 41.3 mpg US 49.6 mpg UK | 8.6 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoV902.0 D4 | 96 hp/t 72 kW/t 10.4 kg/hp | 5.4 L/100 km 43.6 mpg US 52.3 mpg UK |
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)20d | 102 hp/t 76 kW/t 9.8 kg/hp | 5.7 L/100 km 41.3 mpg US 49.6 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolvoV902.0 D4 | JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)20d | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 190 hp 142 kW | 180 hp 134 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 430 Nm 317 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.5 s | 8.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 220 km/h 137 mph | 219 km/h 136 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,976 kg 4,356 lb | 1,767 kg 3,896 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 5.4 L/100 km 43.6 mpg US 52.3 mpg UK | 5.7 L/100 km 41.3 mpg US 49.6 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,111 km 690 mi | 1,158 km 719 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 142 g/km | 151 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 560 L 19.8 cu ft | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 96 hp/t 72 kW/t 10.4 kg/hp | 102 hp/t 76 kW/t 9.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volvo V90 2.0 D4 | Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) 20d |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 5.4 L/100 km43.6 mpg US52.3 mpg UK | 5.7 L/100 km41.3 mpg US49.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 9.45 LC100 km | 9.98 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 15.21 LC100 mi | 16.05 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 810 L214 US gal178 UK gal | 855 L226 US gal188 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,418 LC/year | 1,496 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volvo V90 2.0 D4
- Has 10 hp more
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 1 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.3 L/100 km less fuel
- Emits 9 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
Cons
- Heaviest
Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) 20d
- Has 30 Nm more
- Is 209 kg lighter
- Has 6 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 47 km (29 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























