Volvo V90
Car comparison
Volvo V90 2.0 D4vsVolvo XC70 II · Facelift 2013 2.4 D5
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolvo XC70 II · Facelift 2013
2.4 D5
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volvo XC70 II Facelift 2013 2.4 D5
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.3 s
- Most powerful215 hp160 kW
- Highest torque440 Nm325 lb-ft
- Lightest1,932 kg4,259 lb
- Best power-to-weight111 hp/t83 kW/t9.0 kg/hp
- Largest trunk575 L
- Best overall score61/100
- Best performance score48/100
- Best practicality score88/100
Volvo V90 2.0 D4
- Fastest top speed220 km/h137 mph
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.4 L/100 km43.6 mpg US52.3 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption5.9 L/100 km39.9 mpg US47.9 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.1 L/100 km46.1 mpg US55.4 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions142 g/km
- Best estimated range1,111 km690 mi
- Best economy score92/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolvoV902.0 D4 | VolvoXC70 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 190hp142kW | 215hp160kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 440Nm325lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,976kg4,356lb | 1,932kg4,259lb |
| Gross weight | - | 2,400kg5,291lb |
| Top speed | 220 km/h 137 mph | 205 km/h 127 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 84.2s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated | 74.3s99% target: 203 km/h / 126 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.5s | 8.3s |
| 0-200 km/h | 40.3s Calculated | 58.2s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 8.1s Calculated | 7.9s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 5.4L/100 km43.6mpg US52.3mpg UK | 6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK | 8.6L/100 km27.4mpg US32.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK | 5.2L/100 km45.2mpg US54.3mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 16.2s Calculated | 16.1s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 96hp/t72kW/t44hp/1000 lb Calculated | 111hp/t83kW/t50hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 202Nm/t135lb-ft/ton Calculated | 228Nm/t152lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,111km690mi Calculated | 1,094km680mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,969cc120cu in | 2,400cc146cu in |
| Length | 4,936mm194in | 4,838mm190in |
| Width | 1,879mm74in | 1,870mm74in |
| Height | 1,475mm58in | 1,604mm63in |
| Wheelbase | 2,941mm116in | 2,815mm111in |
| Front track | 1,628mm64in | 1,614mm64in |
| Rear track | 1,629mm64in | 1,580mm62in |
| Ground clearance | 153mm6in | - |
| Trunk volume | 560L | 575L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,526L | 1,600L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 60L | 70L |
| CO2 emissions | 142g/km | 169g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volvo V90 2.0 D4: Power / Torque
- Volvo XC70 II Facelift 2013 2.4 D5: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoV902.0 D4 | 4,250 rpm | 1,740-2,520 rpm | 5,000 rpm |
| VolvoXC70 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5 | 4,000 rpm | 1,500-3,000 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolvoV902.0 D4 | VolvoXC70 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 8.1 s | 7.9 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.5 s | 8.3 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 40.3 s | 58.2 s |
| Top speed | 220 km/h 137 mph | 205 km/h 127 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.1 s | 7.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.6 s | 10.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.6 s | 13.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.2 s | 16.1 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 145 km/h 90 mph | 143 km/h 89 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV902.0 D4 | 190 hp 142 kW |
| VolvoXC70 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5 | 215 hp 160 kW |
Volvo XC70 II Facelift 2013 2.4 D5 has 25 hp more than Volvo V90 2.0 D4.
The biggest power difference is between Volvo V90 2.0 D4 and Volvo XC70 II Facelift 2013 2.4 D5: 25 hp (19 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV902.0 D4 | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| VolvoXC70 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5 | 440 Nm 325 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV902.0 D4 | 1,976 kg 4,356 lb |
| VolvoXC70 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5 | 1,932 kg 4,259 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV902.0 D4 | 220 km/h 137 mph |
| VolvoXC70 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5 | 205 km/h 127 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV902.0 D4 | 8.5 s |
| VolvoXC70 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5 | 8.3 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volvo XC70 II Facelift 2013 2.4 D5 and Volvo V90 2.0 D4: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV902.0 D4 | 5.4 L/100 km 43.6 mpg US 52.3 mpg UK |
| VolvoXC70 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5 | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volvo V90 2.0 D4 and Volvo XC70 II Facelift 2013 2.4 D5: 1.0 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV902.0 D4 | 96 hp/t 72 kW/t 10.4 kg/hp |
| VolvoXC70 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5 | 111 hp/t 83 kW/t 9.0 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV902.0 D4 | 1,111 km 690 mi |
| VolvoXC70 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5 | 1,094 km 680 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoV902.0 D4 | 190 hp 142 kW | 8.5 s | 220 km/h 137 mph |
| VolvoXC70 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5 | 215 hp 160 kW | 8.3 s | 205 km/h 127 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoV902.0 D4 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolvoXC70 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoV902.0 D4 |
| 5.4 L/100 km 43.6 mpg US 52.3 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolvoXC70 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5 |
| 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK | ||||||
Volvo XC70 II Facelift 2013 2.4 D5 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoV902.0 D4 | 5.4 L/100 km 43.6 mpg US 52.3 mpg UK | 8.5 s |
| VolvoXC70 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5 | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK | 8.3 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoV902.0 D4 | 96 hp/t 72 kW/t 10.4 kg/hp | 5.4 L/100 km 43.6 mpg US 52.3 mpg UK |
| VolvoXC70 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5 | 111 hp/t 83 kW/t 9.0 kg/hp | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolvoV902.0 D4 | VolvoXC70 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 190 hp 142 kW | 215 hp 160 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 440 Nm 325 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.5 s | 8.3 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 220 km/h 137 mph | 205 km/h 127 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,976 kg 4,356 lb | 1,932 kg 4,259 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 5.4 L/100 km 43.6 mpg US 52.3 mpg UK | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,111 km 690 mi | 1,094 km 680 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 142 g/km | 169 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 560 L 19.8 cu ft | 575 L 20.3 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 96 hp/t 72 kW/t 10.4 kg/hp | 111 hp/t 83 kW/t 9.0 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volvo V90 2.0 D4 | Volvo XC70 II Facelift 2013 2.4 D5 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 5.4 L/100 km43.6 mpg US52.3 mpg UK | 6.4 L/100 km36.8 mpg US44.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 9.45 LC100 km | 11.20 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 15.21 LC100 mi | 18.02 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 810 L214 US gal178 UK gal | 960 L254 US gal211 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,418 LC/year | 1,680 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volvo V90 2.0 D4
- Has 15 km/h (9 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 1.0 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 17 km (11 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 27 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Volvo XC70 II Facelift 2013 2.4 D5
- Has 25 hp more
- Has 40 Nm more
- Is 44 kg lighter
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 15 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 15 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























