Volkswagen Passat Alltrack (B8) · Facelift 2019
Car comparison
Volkswagen Passat Alltrack (B8) · Facelift 2019 2.0 TDIvsVolvo V90 2.0 D4
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolvo V90
2.0 D4
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volkswagen Passat Alltrack (B8) Facelift 2019 2.0 TDI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.7 s
- Fastest top speed223 km/h139 mph
- Most powerful190 hp142 kW
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Lightest1,650 kg3,638 lb
- Best power-to-weight115 hp/t86 kW/t8.7 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.1 L/100 km46.1 mpg US55.4 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption5.8 L/100 km40.6 mpg US48.7 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.6 L/100 km51.1 mpg US61.4 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions133 g/km
- Best estimated range1,294 km804 mi
- Largest trunk639 L
- Best overall score63/100
- Best performance score51/100
- Best economy score93/100
- Best practicality score90/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolkswagenPassat Alltrack (B8)Facelift 20192.0 TDI | VolvoV902.0 D4 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 190hp142kW | 190hp142kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,650kg3,638lb | 1,976kg4,356lb |
| Gross weight | 2,320kg5,115lb | - |
| Top speed | 223 km/h 139 mph | 220 km/h 137 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 69.5s99% target: 221 km/h / 137 mph Calculated | 84.3s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.7s | 8.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 32.5s Calculated | 40.3s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.3s Calculated | 8.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK | 5.4L/100 km43.6mpg US52.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK | 5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4.6L/100 km51.1mpg US61.4mpg UK | 5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.6s Calculated | 16.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 115hp/t86kW/t52hp/1000 lb Calculated | 96hp/t72kW/t44hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 242Nm/t162lb-ft/ton Calculated | 202Nm/t135lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,294km804mi Calculated | 1,111km690mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,968cc120cu in | 1,969cc120cu in |
| Length | 4,888mm192in | 4,936mm194in |
| Width | 1,853mm73in | 1,879mm74in |
| Height | 1,527mm60in | 1,475mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,788mm110in | 2,941mm116in |
| Front track | 1,586mm62in | 1,628mm64in |
| Rear track | 1,569mm62in | 1,629mm64in |
| Ground clearance | - | 153mm6in |
| Trunk volume | 639L | 560L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,769L | 1,526L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 66L | 60L |
| CO2 emissions | 133g/km | 142g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volkswagen Passat Alltrack (B8) Facelift 2019 2.0 TDI: Power / Torque
- Volvo V90 2.0 D4: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenPassat Alltrack (B8)Facelift 20192.0 TDI | - | 1,900-3,300 rpm | 3,550 rpm |
| VolvoV902.0 D4 | 4,250 rpm | 1,740-2,520 rpm | 5,000 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolkswagenPassat Alltrack (B8)Facelift 20192.0 TDI | VolvoV902.0 D4 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.3 s | 8.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.7 s | 8.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 32.5 s | 40.3 s |
| Top speed | 223 km/h 139 mph | 220 km/h 137 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.9 s | 7.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.3 s | 10.6 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.2 s | 13.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.6 s | 16.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 152 km/h 94 mph | 145 km/h 90 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenPassat Alltrack (B8)Facelift 20192.0 TDI | 190 hp 142 kW |
| VolvoV902.0 D4 | 190 hp 142 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenPassat Alltrack (B8)Facelift 20192.0 TDI | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| VolvoV902.0 D4 | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenPassat Alltrack (B8)Facelift 20192.0 TDI | 1,650 kg 3,638 lb |
| VolvoV902.0 D4 | 1,976 kg 4,356 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenPassat Alltrack (B8)Facelift 20192.0 TDI | 223 km/h 139 mph |
| VolvoV902.0 D4 | 220 km/h 137 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenPassat Alltrack (B8)Facelift 20192.0 TDI | 7.7 s |
| VolvoV902.0 D4 | 8.5 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volkswagen Passat Alltrack (B8) Facelift 2019 2.0 TDI and Volvo V90 2.0 D4: 0.8 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenPassat Alltrack (B8)Facelift 20192.0 TDI | 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK |
| VolvoV902.0 D4 | 5.4 L/100 km 43.6 mpg US 52.3 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenPassat Alltrack (B8)Facelift 20192.0 TDI | 115 hp/t 86 kW/t 8.7 kg/hp |
| VolvoV902.0 D4 | 96 hp/t 72 kW/t 10.4 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenPassat Alltrack (B8)Facelift 20192.0 TDI | 1,294 km 804 mi |
| VolvoV902.0 D4 | 1,111 km 690 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenPassat Alltrack (B8)Facelift 20192.0 TDI | 190 hp 142 kW | 7.7 s | 223 km/h 139 mph |
| VolvoV902.0 D4 | 190 hp 142 kW | 8.5 s | 220 km/h 137 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenPassat Alltrack (B8)Facelift 20192.0 TDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolvoV902.0 D4 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenPassat Alltrack (B8)Facelift 20192.0 TDI |
| 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolvoV902.0 D4 |
| 5.4 L/100 km 43.6 mpg US 52.3 mpg UK | ||||||
Volkswagen Passat Alltrack (B8) Facelift 2019 2.0 TDI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenPassat Alltrack (B8)Facelift 20192.0 TDI | 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK | 7.7 s |
| VolvoV902.0 D4 | 5.4 L/100 km 43.6 mpg US 52.3 mpg UK | 8.5 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenPassat Alltrack (B8)Facelift 20192.0 TDI | 115 hp/t 86 kW/t 8.7 kg/hp | 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK |
| VolvoV902.0 D4 | 96 hp/t 72 kW/t 10.4 kg/hp | 5.4 L/100 km 43.6 mpg US 52.3 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolkswagenPassat Alltrack (B8)Facelift 20192.0 TDI | VolvoV902.0 D4 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 190 hp 142 kW | 190 hp 142 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.7 s | 8.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 223 km/h 139 mph | 220 km/h 137 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,650 kg 3,638 lb | 1,976 kg 4,356 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK | 5.4 L/100 km 43.6 mpg US 52.3 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,294 km 804 mi | 1,111 km 690 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 133 g/km | 142 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 639 L 22.6 cu ft | 560 L 19.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 115 hp/t 86 kW/t 8.7 kg/hp | 96 hp/t 72 kW/t 10.4 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volkswagen Passat Alltrack (B8) Facelift 2019 2.0 TDI | Volvo V90 2.0 D4 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 5.1 L/100 km46.1 mpg US55.4 mpg UK | 5.4 L/100 km43.6 mpg US52.3 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 8.92 LC100 km | 9.45 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 14.36 LC100 mi | 15.21 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 765 L202 US gal168 UK gal | 810 L214 US gal178 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,339 LC/year | 1,418 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volkswagen Passat Alltrack (B8) Facelift 2019 2.0 TDI
- Is 326 kg lighter
- Is 0.8 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 3 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.3 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 19 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 183 km (114 mi) more estimated range
- Has 79 L more trunk volume
- Emits 9 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Volvo V90 2.0 D4
No measurable advantages in the available data.
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























