Volvo V90
Car comparison
Volvo V90 2.0 D4vsJaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) 20d
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonJaguar XF Sportbrake (X260)
20d
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volvo V90 2.0 D4
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.5 s
- Fastest top speed230 km/h143 mph Unrestricted220 km/h137 mph Restricted
- Most powerful190 hp142 kW
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.7 L/100 km50.0 mpg US60.1 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption5.6 L/100 km42.0 mpg US50.4 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.2 L/100 km56.0 mpg US67.3 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions124 g/km
- Best estimated range1,170 km727 mi
- Best overall score60/100
- Best performance score48/100
- Best economy score94/100
Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) 20d
- Highest torque430 Nm317 lb-ft
- Lightest1,767 kg3,896 lb
- Best power-to-weight102 hp/t76 kW/t9.8 kg/hp
- Best practicality score89/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolvoV902.0 D4 | JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)20d |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 190hp142kW | 180hp134kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 430Nm317lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,882kg4,149lb | 1,767kg3,896lb |
| Gross weight | - | 2,375kg5,236lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph Calculated | 219 km/h 136 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 88.7s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph Calculated | 84.2s99% target: 217 km/h / 135 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.5s | 8.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 35.5s Calculated | 41.2s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 8.1s Calculated | 8.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 4.7L/100 km50mpg US60.1mpg UK | 5.7L/100 km41.3mpg US49.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 5.6L/100 km42mpg US50.4mpg UK | 7L/100 km33.6mpg US40.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4.2L/100 km56mpg US67.3mpg UK | 5L/100 km47mpg US56.5mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 16.2s Calculated | 16.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 101hp/t75kW/t46hp/1000 lb Calculated | 102hp/t76kW/t46hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 213Nm/t142lb-ft/ton Calculated | 243Nm/t163lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,170km727mi Calculated | 1,158km719mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,969cc120cu in | 1,999cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,936mm194in | 4,955mm195in |
| Width | 1,879mm74in | 1,987mm78in |
| Height | 1,475mm58in | 1,496mm59in |
| Wheelbase | 2,941mm116in | 2,960mm117in |
| Front track | 1,628mm64in | 1,605mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,629mm64in | 1,607mm63in |
| Ground clearance | 153mm6in | - |
| Trunk volume | 560L | - |
| Max trunk volume | 1,526L | - |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 55L | 66L |
| CO2 emissions | 124g/km | 151g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volvo V90 2.0 D4: Power / Torque
- Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) 20d: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoV902.0 D4 | 4,250 rpm | 1,740-2,520 rpm | 5,000 rpm |
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)20d | 4,000 rpm | 1,750-2,500 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolvoV902.0 D4 | JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)20d |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 8.1 s | 8.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.5 s | 8.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 35.5 s | 41.2 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph Likely limited | 219 km/h 136 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.8 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.1 s | 7.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.7 s | 10.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.7 s | 13.7 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.2 s | 16.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 146 km/h 91 mph | 144 km/h 89 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV902.0 D4 | 190 hp 142 kW |
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)20d | 180 hp 134 kW |
Volvo V90 2.0 D4 has 10 hp more than Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) 20d.
The biggest power difference is between Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) 20d and Volvo V90 2.0 D4: 10 hp (7 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV902.0 D4 | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)20d | 430 Nm 317 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV902.0 D4 | 1,882 kg 4,149 lb |
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)20d | 1,767 kg 3,896 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV902.0 D4 | Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph |
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)20d | 219 km/h 136 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV902.0 D4 | 8.5 s |
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)20d | 8.6 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volvo V90 2.0 D4 and Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) 20d: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV902.0 D4 | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK |
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)20d | 5.7 L/100 km 41.3 mpg US 49.6 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volvo V90 2.0 D4 and Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) 20d: 1.0 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV902.0 D4 | 101 hp/t 75 kW/t 9.9 kg/hp |
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)20d | 102 hp/t 76 kW/t 9.8 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV902.0 D4 | 1,170 km 727 mi |
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)20d | 1,158 km 719 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoV902.0 D4 | 190 hp 142 kW | 8.5 s | Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph |
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)20d | 180 hp 134 kW | 8.6 s | 219 km/h 136 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoV902.0 D4 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)20d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoV902.0 D4 |
| 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK | ||||||
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)20d |
| 5.7 L/100 km 41.3 mpg US 49.6 mpg UK | ||||||
Volvo V90 2.0 D4 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoV902.0 D4 | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK | 8.5 s |
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)20d | 5.7 L/100 km 41.3 mpg US 49.6 mpg UK | 8.6 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoV902.0 D4 | 101 hp/t 75 kW/t 9.9 kg/hp | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK |
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)20d | 102 hp/t 76 kW/t 9.8 kg/hp | 5.7 L/100 km 41.3 mpg US 49.6 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolvoV902.0 D4 | JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)20d | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 190 hp 142 kW | 180 hp 134 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 430 Nm 317 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.5 s | 8.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph | 219 km/h 136 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,882 kg 4,149 lb | 1,767 kg 3,896 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK | 5.7 L/100 km 41.3 mpg US 49.6 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,170 km 727 mi | 1,158 km 719 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 124 g/km | 151 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 560 L 19.8 cu ft | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 101 hp/t 75 kW/t 9.9 kg/hp | 102 hp/t 76 kW/t 9.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volvo V90 2.0 D4 | Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) 20d |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 4.7 L/100 km50 mpg US60.1 mpg UK | 5.7 L/100 km41.3 mpg US49.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 8.23 LC100 km | 9.98 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 13.24 LC100 mi | 16.05 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 705 L186 US gal155 UK gal | 855 L226 US gal188 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,234 LC/year | 1,496 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volvo V90 2.0 D4
- Has 10 hp more
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 11 km/h (7 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 1.0 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 12 km (8 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 27 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Heaviest
Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) 20d
- Has 30 Nm more
- Is 115 kg lighter
- Has 1 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























