Jaguar XE (X760)
Car comparison
Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0dvsVolvo S60 II · Facelift 2013 2.0 T3
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolvo S60 II · Facelift 2013
2.0 T3
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0d
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.4 s
- Fastest top speed227 km/h141 mph
- Most powerful163 hp122 kW
- Highest torque380 Nm280 lb-ft
- Lightest1,500 kg3,307 lb
- Best power-to-weight109 hp/t81 kW/t9.2 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption3.8 L/100 km61.9 mpg US74.3 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption4.4 L/100 km53.5 mpg US64.2 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption3.4 L/100 km69.2 mpg US83.1 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions99 g/km
- Best estimated range1,237 km769 mi
- Largest trunk455 L
- Best overall score56/100
- Best performance score48/100
- Best economy score97/100
- Best practicality score73/100
Specification comparison
| Model | JaguarXE (X760)2.0d | VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T3 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 163hp122kW | 152hp113kW |
| Torque | 380Nm280lb-ft | 250Nm184lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,500kg3,307lb | 1,534kg3,382lb |
| Gross weight | 2,100kg4,630lb | 2,060kg4,542lb |
| Top speed | 227 km/h 141 mph | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 75.4s99% target: 225 km/h / 140 mph Calculated | 76.1s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.4s | 8.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 33.3s Calculated | 37.7s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 8.0s Calculated | 8.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 3.8L/100 km61.9mpg US74.3mpg UK | 5.6L/100 km42mpg US50.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 4.4L/100 km53.5mpg US64.2mpg UK | 7.4L/100 km31.8mpg US38.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 3.4L/100 km69.2mpg US83.1mpg UK | 4.6L/100 km51.1mpg US61.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 16.1s Calculated | 16.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 109hp/t81kW/t49hp/1000 lb Calculated | 99hp/t74kW/t45hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 253Nm/t170lb-ft/ton Calculated | 163Nm/t109lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,237km769mi Calculated | 1,205km749mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,999cc122cu in | 1,969cc120cu in |
| Length | 4,672mm184in | 4,635mm182in |
| Width | 1,850mm73in | 1,865mm73in |
| Height | 1,416mm56in | 1,484mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,835mm112in | 2,776mm109in |
| Front track | - | 1,588mm63in |
| Rear track | - | 1,585mm62in |
| Ground clearance | - | 136mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 455L | 380L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 1,749L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 47L | 68L |
| CO2 emissions | 99g/km | 131g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0d: Power / Torque
- Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 T3: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0d | 4,000 rpm | 1,750-2,500 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T3 | 5,000 rpm | 1,300-4,000 rpm | 5,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | JaguarXE (X760)2.0d | VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T3 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 8.0 s | 8.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.4 s | 8.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 33.3 s | 37.7 s |
| Top speed | 227 km/h 141 mph | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.9 s | 2.9 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.2 s | 7.3 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.7 s | 10.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.6 s | 13.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.1 s | 16.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 149 km/h 93 mph | 146 km/h 91 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0d | 163 hp 122 kW |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T3 | 152 hp 113 kW |
Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0d has 11 hp more than Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 T3.
The biggest power difference is between Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 T3 and Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0d: 11 hp (8 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0d | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T3 | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0d | 1,500 kg 3,307 lb |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T3 | 1,534 kg 3,382 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0d | 227 km/h 141 mph |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T3 | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0d | 8.4 s |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T3 | 8.6 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0d and Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 T3: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0d | 3.8 L/100 km 61.9 mpg US 74.3 mpg UK |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T3 | 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0d and Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 T3: 1.8 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0d | 109 hp/t 81 kW/t 9.2 kg/hp |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T3 | 99 hp/t 74 kW/t 10.1 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0d | 1,237 km 769 mi |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T3 | 1,205 km 749 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0d | 163 hp 122 kW | 8.4 s | 227 km/h 141 mph |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T3 | 152 hp 113 kW | 8.6 s | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T3 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0d |
| 3.8 L/100 km 61.9 mpg US 74.3 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T3 |
| 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK | ||||||
Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0d | 3.8 L/100 km 61.9 mpg US 74.3 mpg UK | 8.4 s |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T3 | 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK | 8.6 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0d | 109 hp/t 81 kW/t 9.2 kg/hp | 3.8 L/100 km 61.9 mpg US 74.3 mpg UK |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T3 | 99 hp/t 74 kW/t 10.1 kg/hp | 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | JaguarXE (X760)2.0d | VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T3 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 163 hp 122 kW | 152 hp 113 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.4 s | 8.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 227 km/h 141 mph | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,500 kg 3,307 lb | 1,534 kg 3,382 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 3.8 L/100 km 61.9 mpg US 74.3 mpg UK | 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,237 km 769 mi | 1,205 km 749 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 99 g/km | 131 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 455 L 16.1 cu ft | 380 L 13.4 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 109 hp/t 81 kW/t 9.2 kg/hp | 99 hp/t 74 kW/t 10.1 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0d | Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 T3 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 3.8 L/100 km61.9 mpg US74.3 mpg UK | 5.6 L/100 km42 mpg US50.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 6.65 LC100 km | 9.80 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 10.70 LC100 mi | 15.77 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 570 L151 US gal125 UK gal | 840 L222 US gal185 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 997.50 LC/year | 1,470 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0d
- Has 11 hp more
- Has 130 Nm more
- Is 34 kg lighter
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 7 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 1.8 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 10 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 31 km (20 mi) more estimated range
- Has 75 L more trunk volume
- Emits 32 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 T3
No measurable advantages in the available data.
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























