Jaguar XE (X760)
Car comparison
Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0dvsMercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 180
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMercedes-Benz C-class (W205)
C 180
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0d
- Fastest top speed227 km/h141 mph
- Most powerful163 hp122 kW
- Highest torque380 Nm280 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption3.8 L/100 km61.9 mpg US74.3 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption4.4 L/100 km53.5 mpg US64.2 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption3.4 L/100 km69.2 mpg US83.1 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions99 g/km
- Best estimated range1,237 km769 mi
- Best overall score56/100
- Best performance score48/100
- Best economy score97/100
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 180
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.3 s
- Lightest1,350 kg2,976 lb
- Best power-to-weight116 hp/t86 kW/t8.7 kg/hp
- Largest trunk480 L
- Best practicality score74/100
Specification comparison
| Model | JaguarXE (X760)2.0d | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 180 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 163hp122kW | 156hp116kW |
| Torque | 380Nm280lb-ft | 250Nm184lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,500kg3,307lb | 1,350kg2,976lb |
| Gross weight | 2,100kg4,630lb | 1,990kg4,387lb |
| Top speed | 227 km/h 141 mph | 225 km/h 140 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 75.4s99% target: 225 km/h / 140 mph Calculated | 72.1s99% target: 223 km/h / 138 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.4s | 8.3s |
| 0-200 km/h | 33.3s Calculated | 33.2s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 8.0s Calculated | 7.9s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 3.8L/100 km61.9mpg US74.3mpg UK | 6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 4.4L/100 km53.5mpg US64.2mpg UK | 7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 3.4L/100 km69.2mpg US83.1mpg UK | 5.4L/100 km43.6mpg US52.3mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 16.1s Calculated | 16.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 109hp/t81kW/t49hp/1000 lb Calculated | 116hp/t86kW/t52hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 253Nm/t170lb-ft/ton Calculated | 185Nm/t124lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,237km769mi Calculated | 651km404mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,999cc122cu in | 1,595cc97cu in |
| Length | 4,672mm184in | 4,686mm184in |
| Width | 1,850mm73in | 1,810mm71in |
| Height | 1,416mm56in | 1,442mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,835mm112in | 2,840mm112in |
| Front track | - | 1,588mm63in |
| Rear track | - | 1,570mm62in |
| Ground clearance | - | 92mm4in |
| Trunk volume | 455L | 480L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 47L | 41L |
| CO2 emissions | 99g/km | 142g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0d: Power / Torque
- Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 180: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0d | 4,000 rpm | 1,750-2,500 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 180 | 5,300 rpm | 1,200-4,000 rpm | 5,550 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | JaguarXE (X760)2.0d | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 180 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 8.0 s | 7.9 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.4 s | 8.3 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 33.3 s | 33.2 s |
| Top speed | 227 km/h 141 mph | 225 km/h 140 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.9 s | 2.9 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.2 s | 7.2 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.7 s | 10.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.6 s | 13.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.1 s | 16.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 149 km/h 93 mph | 150 km/h 93 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0d | 163 hp 122 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 180 | 156 hp 116 kW |
Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0d has 7 hp more than Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 180.
The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 180 and Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0d: 7 hp (5 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0d | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 180 | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0d | 1,500 kg 3,307 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 180 | 1,350 kg 2,976 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0d | 227 km/h 141 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 180 | 225 km/h 140 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0d | 8.4 s |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 180 | 8.3 s |
Although Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0d has more power, Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 180 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 180 and Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0d: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0d | 3.8 L/100 km 61.9 mpg US 74.3 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 180 | 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0d and Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 180: 2.5 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0d | 109 hp/t 81 kW/t 9.2 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 180 | 116 hp/t 86 kW/t 8.7 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0d | 1,237 km 769 mi |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 180 | 651 km 404 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0d | 163 hp 122 kW | 8.4 s | 227 km/h 141 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 180 | 156 hp 116 kW | 8.3 s | 225 km/h 140 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 180 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0d |
| 3.8 L/100 km 61.9 mpg US 74.3 mpg UK | ||||||
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 180 |
| 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK | ||||||
Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0d | 3.8 L/100 km 61.9 mpg US 74.3 mpg UK | 8.4 s |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 180 | 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK | 8.3 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0d | 109 hp/t 81 kW/t 9.2 kg/hp | 3.8 L/100 km 61.9 mpg US 74.3 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 180 | 116 hp/t 86 kW/t 8.7 kg/hp | 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | JaguarXE (X760)2.0d | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 180 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 163 hp 122 kW | 156 hp 116 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.4 s | 8.3 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 227 km/h 141 mph | 225 km/h 140 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,500 kg 3,307 lb | 1,350 kg 2,976 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 3.8 L/100 km 61.9 mpg US 74.3 mpg UK | 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,237 km 769 mi | 651 km 404 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 99 g/km | 142 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 455 L 16.1 cu ft | 480 L 17.0 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 109 hp/t 81 kW/t 9.2 kg/hp | 116 hp/t 86 kW/t 8.7 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0d | Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 180 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 3.8 L/100 km61.9 mpg US74.3 mpg UK | 6.3 L/100 km37.3 mpg US44.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 6.65 LC100 km | 11.03 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 10.70 LC100 mi | 17.74 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 570 L151 US gal125 UK gal | 945 L250 US gal208 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 997.50 LC/year | 1,654 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0d
- Has 7 hp more
- Has 130 Nm more
- Has 2 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 2.5 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 586 km (364 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 43 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 180
- Is 150 kg lighter
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 7 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 25 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























