Car comparison

Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0dvsAUDI A3 Sedan (8V) · Facelift 2016 1.4 TFSI COD ultra

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Jaguar XE (X760)

2.0d

163 hp1999 ccDieselRWDManualTurbochargedSedan2015-2018
VS

AUDI A3 Sedan (8V) · Facelift 2016

1.4 TFSI COD ultra

150 hp1395 ccGasolineFWDAutomaticTurbochargedSedan2016-2017

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0d

  • Fastest top speed
    227 km/h
    141 mph
  • Most powerful
    163 hp
    122 kW
  • Highest torque
    380 Nm
    280 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    3.8 L/100 km
    61.9 mpg US
    74.3 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    4.4 L/100 km
    53.5 mpg US
    64.2 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    3.4 L/100 km
    69.2 mpg US
    83.1 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    99 g/km
  • Best estimated range
    1,237 km
    769 mi
  • Largest trunk
    455 L
  • Best overall score
    56/100
  • Best performance score
    48/100
  • Best economy score
    97/100
  • Best practicality score
    73/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelJaguarXE (X760)2.0dAUDIA3 Sedan (8V)Facelift 20161.4 TFSI COD ultra
Power
163hp122kW
150hp112kW
Torque
380Nm280lb-ft
250Nm184lb-ft
Curb weight
1,500kg3,307lb
1,245kg2,745lb
Gross weight
2,100kg4,630lb
1,795kg3,957lb
Top speed
227 km/h
141 mph
224 km/h
139 mph
To 99% top speed
75.4s99% target: 225 km/h / 140 mph
Calculated
70.5s99% target: 222 km/h / 138 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
8.4s
8.2s
0-200 km/h
33.3s
Calculated
33.0s
Calculated
0-60 mph
8.0s
Calculated
7.8s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
3.8L/100 km61.9mpg US74.3mpg UK
5L/100 km47mpg US56.5mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
4.4L/100 km53.5mpg US64.2mpg UK
6.1L/100 km38.6mpg US46.3mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
3.4L/100 km69.2mpg US83.1mpg UK
4.3L/100 km54.7mpg US65.7mpg UK
Quarter mile
16.1s
Calculated
15.9s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
109hp/t81kW/t49hp/1000 lb
Calculated
120hp/t90kW/t55hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
253Nm/t170lb-ft/ton
Calculated
201Nm/t134lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
1,237km769mi
Calculated
1,000km621mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,999cc122cu in
1,395cc85cu in
Length
4,672mm184in
4,458mm176in
Width
1,850mm73in
1,796mm71in
Height
1,416mm56in
1,416mm56in
Wheelbase
2,835mm112in
2,637mm104in
Front track-
1,555mm61in
Rear track-
1,526mm60in
Trunk volume
455L
425L
Max trunk volume-
880L
Doors
4
4
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
47L
50L
CO2 emissions
99g/km
114g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0dAUDI A3 Sedan (8V) Facelift 2016 1.4 TFSI COD ultraPowerTorque
  • Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0d: Power / Torque
  • AUDI A3 Sedan (8V) Facelift 2016 1.4 TFSI COD ultra: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
JaguarXE (X760)2.0d4,000 rpm1,750-2,500 rpm4,250 rpm
AUDIA3 Sedan (8V)Facelift 20161.4 TFSI COD ultra5,000-6,000 rpm1,500-3,500 rpm6,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricJaguarXE (X760)2.0dAUDIA3 Sedan (8V)Facelift 20161.4 TFSI COD ultra
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
8.0 s
7.8 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
8.4 s
8.2 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
33.3 s
33.0 s
Top speed
227 km/h
141 mph
224 km/h
139 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.9 s
2.8 s
330 ft
101 m
7.2 s
7.2 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.7 s
10.6 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.6 s
13.5 s
1/4 mile
402 m
16.1 s
15.9 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
149 km/h
93 mph
151 km/h
94 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXE (X760)2.0d
163 hp
122 kW
AUDIA3 Sedan (8V)Facelift 20161.4 TFSI COD ultra
150 hp
112 kW

Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0d has 13 hp more than AUDI A3 Sedan (8V) Facelift 2016 1.4 TFSI COD ultra.

The biggest power difference is between AUDI A3 Sedan (8V) Facelift 2016 1.4 TFSI COD ultra and Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0d: 13 hp (10 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXE (X760)2.0d
380 Nm
280 lb-ft
AUDIA3 Sedan (8V)Facelift 20161.4 TFSI COD ultra
250 Nm
184 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXE (X760)2.0d
1,500 kg
3,307 lb
AUDIA3 Sedan (8V)Facelift 20161.4 TFSI COD ultra
1,245 kg
2,745 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXE (X760)2.0d
227 km/h
141 mph
AUDIA3 Sedan (8V)Facelift 20161.4 TFSI COD ultra
224 km/h
139 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXE (X760)2.0d8.4 s
AUDIA3 Sedan (8V)Facelift 20161.4 TFSI COD ultra8.2 s

Although Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0d has more power, AUDI A3 Sedan (8V) Facelift 2016 1.4 TFSI COD ultra is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AUDI A3 Sedan (8V) Facelift 2016 1.4 TFSI COD ultra and Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0d: 0.2 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXE (X760)2.0d
3.8 L/100 km
61.9 mpg US
74.3 mpg UK
AUDIA3 Sedan (8V)Facelift 20161.4 TFSI COD ultra
5.0 L/100 km
47.0 mpg US
56.5 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0d and AUDI A3 Sedan (8V) Facelift 2016 1.4 TFSI COD ultra: 1.2 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXE (X760)2.0d
109 hp/t
81 kW/t
9.2 kg/hp
AUDIA3 Sedan (8V)Facelift 20161.4 TFSI COD ultra
120 hp/t
90 kW/t
8.3 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXE (X760)2.0d
1,237 km
769 mi
AUDIA3 Sedan (8V)Facelift 20161.4 TFSI COD ultra
1,000 km
621 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
JaguarXE (X760)2.0d
163 hp
122 kW
8.4 s
227 km/h
141 mph
AUDIA3 Sedan (8V)Facelift 20161.4 TFSI COD ultra
150 hp
112 kW
8.2 s
224 km/h
139 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
JaguarXE (X760)2.0d
Power
163 hp
122 kW
0-100 km/h8.4 s
Top speed
227 km/h
141 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
455 L
16.1 cu ft
Length
4,672 mm
183.9 in
Height
1,416 mm
55.7 in
AUDIA3 Sedan (8V)Facelift 20161.4 TFSI COD ultra
Power
150 hp
112 kW
0-100 km/h8.2 s
Top speed
224 km/h
139 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
425 L
15.0 cu ft
Length
4,458 mm
175.5 in
Height
1,416 mm
55.7 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
JaguarXE (X760)2.0d
Power
163 hp
122 kW
0-100 km/h8.4 s
Top speed
227 km/h
141 mph
3.8 L/100 km
61.9 mpg US
74.3 mpg UK
AUDIA3 Sedan (8V)Facelift 20161.4 TFSI COD ultra
Power
150 hp
112 kW
0-100 km/h8.2 s
Top speed
224 km/h
139 mph
5.0 L/100 km
47.0 mpg US
56.5 mpg UK

Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
JaguarXE (X760)2.0d
3.8 L/100 km
61.9 mpg US
74.3 mpg UK
8.4 s
AUDIA3 Sedan (8V)Facelift 20161.4 TFSI COD ultra
5.0 L/100 km
47.0 mpg US
56.5 mpg UK
8.2 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
JaguarXE (X760)2.0d
109 hp/t
81 kW/t
9.2 kg/hp
3.8 L/100 km
61.9 mpg US
74.3 mpg UK
AUDIA3 Sedan (8V)Facelift 20161.4 TFSI COD ultra
120 hp/t
90 kW/t
8.3 kg/hp
5.0 L/100 km
47.0 mpg US
56.5 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleJaguarXE (X760)2.0dAUDIA3 Sedan (8V)Facelift 20161.4 TFSI COD ultra
Power
163 hp
122 kW
150 hp
112 kW
Torque
380 Nm
280 lb-ft
250 Nm
184 lb-ft
Acceleration
8.4 s
8.2 s
Top speed
227 km/h
141 mph
224 km/h
139 mph
Lightness
1,500 kg
3,307 lb
1,245 kg
2,745 lb
Fuel consumption
3.8 L/100 km
61.9 mpg US
74.3 mpg UK
5.0 L/100 km
47.0 mpg US
56.5 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
455 L
16.1 cu ft
Length
4,672 mm
183.9 in
Height
1,416 mm
55.7 in
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
425 L
15.0 cu ft
Length
4,458 mm
175.5 in
Height
1,416 mm
55.7 in
Range score
1,237 km
769 mi
1,000 km
621 mi
CO2 score
99 g/km
114 g/km
Trunk score
455 L
16.1 cu ft
425 L
15.0 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
109 hp/t
81 kW/t
9.2 kg/hp
120 hp/t
90 kW/t
8.3 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleJaguar XE (X760) 2.0dAUDI A3 Sedan (8V) Facelift 2016 1.4 TFSI COD ultra
Consumption3.8 L/100 km61.9 mpg US74.3 mpg UK5 L/100 km47 mpg US56.5 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km6.65 LC100 km8.75 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi10.70 LC100 mi14.08 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used570 L151 US gal125 UK gal750 L198 US gal165 UK gal
Annual fuel cost997.50 LC/year1,313 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0d

  • Has 13 hp more
  • Has 130 Nm more
  • Has 3 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 1.2 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 237 km (147 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 30 L more trunk volume
  • Emits 15 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Heaviest

AUDI A3 Sedan (8V) Facelift 2016 1.4 TFSI COD ultra

  • Is 255 kg lighter
  • Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 12 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0d
AUDI A3 Sedan (8V) 1.4 TFSI COD ultra
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0d
D180
VS
JaguarXE (X760)2.0dvsJaguarXE (X760)Facelift 2019D180
1.4 TFSI COD ultra
1.4 TFSI COD ultra
VS
AUDIA3 Sedan (8V)Facelift 20161.4 TFSI COD ultravsAUDIA3 Sedan (8V)1.4 TFSI COD ultra
2.0d
2.0d
VS
JaguarXE (X760)2.0dvsJaguarXE (X760)Facelift 20202.0d
1.4 TFSI COD ultra
35 TFSI
VS
AUDIA3 Sedan (8V)Facelift 20161.4 TFSI COD ultravsAUDIA3 Sedan (8Y)35 TFSI
2.0d
2.0d
VS
JaguarXE (X760)2.0dvsJaguarXF (X260)2.0d
1.4 TFSI COD ultra
35 TFSI
VS
AUDIA3 Sedan (8V)Facelift 20161.4 TFSI COD ultravsAUDIA3 Sedan (8Y)Facelift 202435 TFSI
2.0d
2.0
VS
JaguarXE (X760)2.0dvsJaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0
1.4 TFSI COD ultra
1.4 TFSI COD ultra
VS
AUDIA3 Sedan (8V)Facelift 20161.4 TFSI COD ultravsAUDIA3 Sportback (8V)Facelift 20161.4 TFSI COD ultra
2.0d
C 180
VS
JaguarXE (X760)2.0dvsMercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 180
1.4 TFSI COD ultra
1.4 TFSI COD ultra
VS
AUDIA3 Sedan (8V)Facelift 20161.4 TFSI COD ultravsAUDIA3 (8V)Facelift 20161.4 TFSI COD ultra
2.0d
1.4 TFSI COD ultra
VS
JaguarXE (X760)2.0dvsAUDIA3 Sedan (8V)Facelift 20161.4 TFSI COD ultra
1.4 TFSI COD ultra
1.4 TFSI COD ultra
VS
AUDIA3 Sedan (8V)Facelift 20161.4 TFSI COD ultravsAUDIA3 Cabriolet (8V)Facelift 20161.4 TFSI COD ultra
Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0d vs AUDI A3 Sedan (8V) · Facelift 2016 1.4 TFSI COD ultra - car comparison - FastVsFaster