Jaguar XE (X760)
Car comparison
Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0dvsRoewe i6 1.5 T
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonRoewe i6
1.5 T
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Roewe i6 1.5 T
- Most powerful169 hp126 kW
- Lightest1,270 kg2,800 lb
- Best power-to-weight133 hp/t99 kW/t7.5 kg/hp
- Largest trunk467 L
- Best economy score91/100
- Best practicality score74/100
Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0d
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.2 s
- Fastest top speed227 km/h141 mph
- Highest torque380 Nm280 lb-ft
- Best overall score57/100
- Best performance score49/100
Specification comparison
| Model | JaguarXE (X760)2.0d | Roewei61.5 T |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 163hp122kW | 169hp126kW |
| Torque | 380Nm280lb-ft | 250Nm184lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,474kg3,250lb | 1,270kg2,800lb |
| Gross weight | 2,100kg4,630lb | - |
| Top speed | 227 km/h 141 mph | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 73.3s99% target: 225 km/h / 140 mph Calculated | 71.1s99% target: 223 km/h / 138 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.2s | 8.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 32.4s Calculated | 33.2s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.8s Calculated | 8.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | - | 5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.9s Calculated | 16.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 111hp/t82kW/t50hp/1000 lb Calculated | 133hp/t99kW/t60hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 258Nm/t172lb-ft/ton Calculated | 197Nm/t132lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | - | 763km474mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,999cc122cu in | 1,490cc91cu in |
| Length | 4,672mm184in | 4,671mm184in |
| Width | 1,850mm73in | 1,835mm72in |
| Height | 1,416mm56in | 1,460mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,835mm112in | 2,715mm107in |
| Front track | - | 1,559mm61in |
| Rear track | - | 1,555mm61in |
| Ground clearance | - | 114mm4in |
| Trunk volume | 455L | 467L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 47L | 45L |
| CO2 emissions | 104g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0d: Power / Torque
- Roewe i6 1.5 T: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0d | 4,000 rpm | 1,750-2,500 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
| Roewei61.5 T | 5,600 rpm | 1,700-4,400 rpm | 5,850 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | JaguarXE (X760)2.0d | Roewei61.5 T |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.8 s | 8.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.2 s | 8.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 32.4 s | 33.2 s |
| Top speed | 227 km/h 141 mph | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.8 s | 2.9 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.2 s | 7.3 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.6 s | 10.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.5 s | 13.7 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.9 s | 16.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 151 km/h 94 mph | 150 km/h 93 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0d | 163 hp 122 kW |
| Roewei61.5 T | 169 hp 126 kW |
Roewe i6 1.5 T has 6 hp more than Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0d.
The biggest power difference is between Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0d and Roewe i6 1.5 T: 6 hp (4 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0d | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft |
| Roewei61.5 T | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0d | 1,474 kg 3,250 lb |
| Roewei61.5 T | 1,270 kg 2,800 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0d | 227 km/h 141 mph |
| Roewei61.5 T | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0d | 8.2 s |
| Roewei61.5 T | 8.5 s |
Although Roewe i6 1.5 T has more power, Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0d is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0d and Roewe i6 1.5 T: 0.3 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0d | 111 hp/t 82 kW/t 9.0 kg/hp |
| Roewei61.5 T | 133 hp/t 99 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0d | 163 hp 122 kW | 8.2 s | 227 km/h 141 mph |
| Roewei61.5 T | 169 hp 126 kW | 8.5 s | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Roewei61.5 T |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | JaguarXE (X760)2.0d | Roewei61.5 T | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 163 hp 122 kW | 169 hp 126 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.2 s | 8.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 227 km/h 141 mph | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,474 kg 3,250 lb | 1,270 kg 2,800 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | - | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | - | 763 km 474 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 104 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 455 L 16.1 cu ft | 467 L 16.5 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 111 hp/t 82 kW/t 9.0 kg/hp | 133 hp/t 99 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Roewe i6 1.5 T |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 5.9 L/100 km39.9 mpg US47.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 10.33 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 16.62 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 885 L234 US gal195 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,549 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0d
- Has 130 Nm more
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 2 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
Cons
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Roewe i6 1.5 T
- Has 6 hp more
- Is 204 kg lighter
- Has 22 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 12 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























