Roewe i6
Car comparison
Roewe i6 1.5 TvsFord Focus III Sedan · Facelift 2014 1.5 EcoBoost
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonFord Focus III Sedan · Facelift 2014
1.5 EcoBoost
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Roewe i6 1.5 T
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.5 s
- Fastest top speed225 km/h140 mph Unrestricted210 km/h130 mph Restricted
- Highest torque250 Nm184 lb-ft
- Lightest1,270 kg2,800 lb
- Largest trunk467 L
- Best overall score55/100
- Best performance score46/100
- Best practicality score74/100
Ford Focus III Sedan Facelift 2014 1.5 EcoBoost
- Most powerful182 hp136 kW
- Best power-to-weight134 hp/t100 kW/t7.5 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.6 L/100 km42.0 mpg US50.4 mpg UK
- Best estimated range982 km610 mi
- Best economy score92/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Roewei61.5 T | FordFocus III SedanFacelift 20141.5 EcoBoost |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 169hp126kW | 182hp136kW |
| Torque | 250Nm184lb-ft | 240Nm177lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,270kg2,800lb | 1,358kg2,994lb |
| Gross weight | - | 1,900kg4,189lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Calculated | 222 km/h 138 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 71.1s99% target: 223 km/h / 138 mph Calculated | 72.3s99% target: 220 km/h / 137 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.5s | 8.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 33.2s Calculated | 35.4s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 8.1s Calculated | 8.3s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK | 5.6L/100 km42mpg US50.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 4.7L/100 km50mpg US60.1mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 16.2s Calculated | 16.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 133hp/t99kW/t60hp/1000 lb Calculated | 134hp/t100kW/t61hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 197Nm/t132lb-ft/ton Calculated | 177Nm/t118lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 763km474mi Calculated | 982km610mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,490cc91cu in | 1,499cc91cu in |
| Length | 4,671mm184in | 4,534mm179in |
| Width | 1,835mm72in | 1,823mm72in |
| Height | 1,460mm57in | 1,484mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,715mm107in | 2,648mm104in |
| Front track | 1,559mm61in | 1,544mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,555mm61in | 1,559mm61in |
| Ground clearance | 114mm4in | - |
| Trunk volume | 467L | 372L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 45L | 55L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 128g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Roewe i6 1.5 T: Power / Torque
- Ford Focus III Sedan Facelift 2014 1.5 EcoBoost: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Roewei61.5 T | 5,600 rpm | 1,700-4,400 rpm | 5,850 rpm |
| FordFocus III SedanFacelift 20141.5 EcoBoost | 6,000 rpm | 1,600-5,000 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Roewei61.5 T | FordFocus III SedanFacelift 20141.5 EcoBoost |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 8.1 s | 8.3 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.5 s | 8.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 33.2 s | 35.4 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Likely limited | 222 km/h 138 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.9 s | 2.9 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.3 s | 7.4 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.8 s | 10.9 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.7 s | 13.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.2 s | 16.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 150 km/h 93 mph | 148 km/h 92 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Roewei61.5 T | 169 hp 126 kW |
| FordFocus III SedanFacelift 20141.5 EcoBoost | 182 hp 136 kW |
Ford Focus III Sedan Facelift 2014 1.5 EcoBoost has 13 hp more than Roewe i6 1.5 T.
The biggest power difference is between Roewe i6 1.5 T and Ford Focus III Sedan Facelift 2014 1.5 EcoBoost: 13 hp (10 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Roewei61.5 T | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft |
| FordFocus III SedanFacelift 20141.5 EcoBoost | 240 Nm 177 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Roewei61.5 T | 1,270 kg 2,800 lb |
| FordFocus III SedanFacelift 20141.5 EcoBoost | 1,358 kg 2,994 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Roewei61.5 T | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
| FordFocus III SedanFacelift 20141.5 EcoBoost | 222 km/h 138 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Roewei61.5 T | 8.5 s |
| FordFocus III SedanFacelift 20141.5 EcoBoost | 8.7 s |
Although Ford Focus III Sedan Facelift 2014 1.5 EcoBoost has more power, Roewe i6 1.5 T is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Roewe i6 1.5 T and Ford Focus III Sedan Facelift 2014 1.5 EcoBoost: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Roewei61.5 T | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK |
| FordFocus III SedanFacelift 20141.5 EcoBoost | 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Roewei61.5 T | 133 hp/t 99 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp |
| FordFocus III SedanFacelift 20141.5 EcoBoost | 134 hp/t 100 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Roewei61.5 T | 763 km 474 mi |
| FordFocus III SedanFacelift 20141.5 EcoBoost | 982 km 610 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Roewei61.5 T | 169 hp 126 kW | 8.5 s | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
| FordFocus III SedanFacelift 20141.5 EcoBoost | 182 hp 136 kW | 8.7 s | 222 km/h 138 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Roewei61.5 T |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| FordFocus III SedanFacelift 20141.5 EcoBoost |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Roewei61.5 T |
| 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | ||||||
| FordFocus III SedanFacelift 20141.5 EcoBoost |
| 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK | ||||||
Ford Focus III Sedan Facelift 2014 1.5 EcoBoost is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Roewei61.5 T | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | 8.5 s |
| FordFocus III SedanFacelift 20141.5 EcoBoost | 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK | 8.7 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Roewei61.5 T | 133 hp/t 99 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK |
| FordFocus III SedanFacelift 20141.5 EcoBoost | 134 hp/t 100 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp | 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Roewei61.5 T | FordFocus III SedanFacelift 20141.5 EcoBoost | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 169 hp 126 kW | 182 hp 136 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft | 240 Nm 177 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.5 s | 8.7 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph | 222 km/h 138 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,270 kg 2,800 lb | 1,358 kg 2,994 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 763 km 474 mi | 982 km 610 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 128 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 467 L 16.5 cu ft | 372 L 13.1 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 133 hp/t 99 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp | 134 hp/t 100 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Roewe i6 1.5 T | Ford Focus III Sedan Facelift 2014 1.5 EcoBoost |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 5.9 L/100 km39.9 mpg US47.9 mpg UK | 5.6 L/100 km42 mpg US50.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 10.33 LC100 km | 9.80 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 16.62 LC100 mi | 15.77 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 885 L234 US gal195 UK gal | 840 L222 US gal185 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,549 LC/year | 1,470 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Roewe i6 1.5 T
- Has 10 Nm more
- Is 88 kg lighter
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 3 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
- Has 95 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
Ford Focus III Sedan Facelift 2014 1.5 EcoBoost
- Has 13 hp more
- Uses 0.3 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 1 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 219 km (136 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Most powerful
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























