Jaguar XJ (X351) · Facelift 2015
Car comparison
Jaguar XJ (X351) · Facelift 2015 2.0vsJaguar XE (X760) 2.0d
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonJaguar XE (X760)
2.0d
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 2.0
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.9 s
- Fastest top speed241 km/h150 mph
- Most powerful240 hp179 kW
- Best power-to-weight138 hp/t103 kW/t7.2 kg/hp
- Best overall score60/100
- Best performance score52/100
- Best economy score84/100
- Best practicality score78/100
Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0d
- Highest torque380 Nm280 lb-ft
- Lightest1,474 kg3,250 lb
- Lowest CO2 emissions104 g/km
Specification comparison
| Model | JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0 | JaguarXE (X760)2.0d |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 240hp179kW | 163hp122kW |
| Torque | 340Nm251lb-ft | 380Nm280lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,735kg3,825lb | 1,474kg3,250lb |
| Gross weight | - | 2,100kg4,630lb |
| Top speed | 241 km/h 150 mph | 227 km/h 141 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 80.2s99% target: 239 km/h / 148 mph Calculated | 73.3s99% target: 225 km/h / 140 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.9s | 8.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 28.6s Calculated | 32.4s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.5s Calculated | 7.8s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 15.7s Calculated | 15.9s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 138hp/t103kW/t63hp/1000 lb Calculated | 111hp/t82kW/t50hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 196Nm/t131lb-ft/ton Calculated | 258Nm/t172lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 952km592mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 1,999cc122cu in | 1,999cc122cu in |
| Length | 5,130mm202in | 4,672mm184in |
| Width | 1,899mm75in | 1,850mm73in |
| Height | 1,460mm57in | 1,416mm56in |
| Wheelbase | 3,032mm119in | 2,835mm112in |
| Front track | 1,626mm64in | - |
| Rear track | 1,604mm63in | - |
| Trunk volume | - | 455L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 80L | 47L |
| CO2 emissions | 199g/km | 104g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 2.0: Power / Torque
- Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0d: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0 | 5,500 rpm | 2,000-4,000 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0d | 4,000 rpm | 1,750-2,500 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0 | JaguarXE (X760)2.0d |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.5 s | 7.8 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.9 s | 8.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 28.6 s | 32.4 s |
| Top speed | 241 km/h 150 mph | 227 km/h 141 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.8 s | 2.8 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.0 s | 7.2 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.4 s | 10.6 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.3 s | 13.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.7 s | 15.9 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 153 km/h 95 mph | 151 km/h 94 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0 | 240 hp 179 kW |
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0d | 163 hp 122 kW |
Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 2.0 has 77 hp more than Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0d.
The biggest power difference is between Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0d and Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 2.0: 77 hp (57 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0 | 340 Nm 251 lb-ft |
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0d | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0 | 1,735 kg 3,825 lb |
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0d | 1,474 kg 3,250 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0 | 241 km/h 150 mph |
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0d | 227 km/h 141 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0 | 7.9 s |
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0d | 8.2 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 2.0 and Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0d: 0.3 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0 | 138 hp/t 103 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp |
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0d | 111 hp/t 82 kW/t 9.0 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0 | 240 hp 179 kW | 7.9 s | 241 km/h 150 mph |
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0d | 163 hp 122 kW | 8.2 s | 227 km/h 141 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0 | JaguarXE (X760)2.0d | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 240 hp 179 kW | 163 hp 122 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 340 Nm 251 lb-ft | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.9 s | 8.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 241 km/h 150 mph | 227 km/h 141 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,735 kg 3,825 lb | 1,474 kg 3,250 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 952 km 592 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 199 g/km | 104 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | - | 455 L 16.1 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 138 hp/t 103 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp | 111 hp/t 82 kW/t 9.0 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 2.0 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 8.4 L/100 km28 mpg US33.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 14.70 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 23.66 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,260 L333 US gal277 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,205 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 2.0
- Has 77 hp more
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 14 km/h (9 mph) higher top speed
- Has 28 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Heaviest
- Highest CO2 emissions
Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0d
- Has 40 Nm more
- Is 261 kg lighter
- Emits 95 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lightest
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























