Car comparison

Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0vsKia Optima IV GT 2.0 T-GDI

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Jaguar XE (X760)

2.0

240 hp1999 ccGasolineRWDAutomaticTurbochargedSedan2015-2017
VS

Kia Optima IV

GT 2.0 T-GDI

245 hp1998 ccGasolineFWDAutomaticTwin-turboSedan2016-2018

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    6.9 s
  • Fastest top speed
    260 km/h
    162 mph Unrestricted
    250 km/h
    155 mph Restricted
  • Lightest
    1,530 kg
    3,373 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    157 hp/t
    117 kW/t
    6.4 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    7.5 L/100 km
    31.4 mpg US
    37.7 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    10.2 L/100 km
    23.1 mpg US
    27.7 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    6.0 L/100 km
    39.2 mpg US
    47.1 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    179 g/km
  • Best overall score
    63/100
  • Best performance score
    58/100
  • Best economy score
    87/100

Kia Optima IV GT 2.0 T-GDI

  • Most powerful
    245 hp
    183 kW
  • Highest torque
    353 Nm
    260 lb-ft
  • Best estimated range
    854 km
    530 mi
  • Largest trunk
    510 L
  • Best practicality score
    76/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelJaguarXE (X760)2.0KiaOptima IVGT 2.0 T-GDI
Power
240hp179kW
245hp183kW
Torque
340Nm251lb-ft
353Nm260lb-ft
Curb weight
1,530kg3,373lb
1,680kg3,704lb
Gross weight
2,120kg4,674lb
2,120kg4,674lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Calculated
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
69.7s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph
Calculated
72.7s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
6.9s
7.4s
0-200 km/h
21.5s
Calculated
24.4s
Calculated
0-60 mph
6.6s
Calculated
7.1s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
7.5L/100 km31.4mpg US37.7mpg UK
8.2L/100 km28.7mpg US34.4mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
10.2L/100 km23.1mpg US27.7mpg UK
11.8L/100 km19.9mpg US23.9mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK
6.1L/100 km38.6mpg US46.3mpg UK
Quarter mile
14.8s
Calculated
15.2s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
157hp/t117kW/t71hp/1000 lb
Calculated
146hp/t109kW/t66hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
222Nm/t149lb-ft/ton
Calculated
210Nm/t141lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
840km522mi
Calculated
854km530mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,999cc122cu in
1,998cc122cu in
Length
4,672mm184in
4,855mm191in
Width
1,850mm73in
1,860mm73in
Height
1,416mm56in
1,465mm58in
Wheelbase
2,835mm112in
2,805mm110in
Front track-
1,597mm63in
Rear track-
1,608mm63in
Trunk volume
455L
510L
Doors
4
4
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
63L
70L
CO2 emissions
179g/km
191g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0Kia Optima IV GT 2.0 T-GDIPowerTorque
  • Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0: Power / Torque
  • Kia Optima IV GT 2.0 T-GDI: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
JaguarXE (X760)2.05,500 rpm1,750-4,000 rpm5,750 rpm
KiaOptima IVGT 2.0 T-GDI6,000 rpm1,350-4,000 rpm6,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricJaguarXE (X760)2.0KiaOptima IVGT 2.0 T-GDI
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.6 s
7.1 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
6.9 s
7.4 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
21.5 s
24.4 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Likely limited
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.7 s
2.8 s
330 ft
101 m
6.7 s
6.9 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.9 s
10.2 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.6 s
12.9 s
1/4 mile
402 m
14.8 s
15.2 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
166 km/h
103 mph
160 km/h
100 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXE (X760)2.0
240 hp
179 kW
KiaOptima IVGT 2.0 T-GDI
245 hp
183 kW

Kia Optima IV GT 2.0 T-GDI has 5 hp more than Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0.

The biggest power difference is between Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0 and Kia Optima IV GT 2.0 T-GDI: 5 hp (4 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXE (X760)2.0
340 Nm
251 lb-ft
KiaOptima IVGT 2.0 T-GDI
353 Nm
260 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXE (X760)2.0
1,530 kg
3,373 lb
KiaOptima IVGT 2.0 T-GDI
1,680 kg
3,704 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXE (X760)2.0
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
KiaOptima IVGT 2.0 T-GDI
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXE (X760)2.06.9 s
KiaOptima IVGT 2.0 T-GDI7.4 s

Although Kia Optima IV GT 2.0 T-GDI has more power, Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0 and Kia Optima IV GT 2.0 T-GDI: 0.5 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXE (X760)2.0
7.5 L/100 km
31.4 mpg US
37.7 mpg UK
KiaOptima IVGT 2.0 T-GDI
8.2 L/100 km
28.7 mpg US
34.4 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0 and Kia Optima IV GT 2.0 T-GDI: 0.7 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXE (X760)2.0
157 hp/t
117 kW/t
6.4 kg/hp
KiaOptima IVGT 2.0 T-GDI
146 hp/t
109 kW/t
6.9 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXE (X760)2.0
840 km
522 mi
KiaOptima IVGT 2.0 T-GDI
854 km
530 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
JaguarXE (X760)2.0
240 hp
179 kW
6.9 s
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
KiaOptima IVGT 2.0 T-GDI
245 hp
183 kW
7.4 s
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
JaguarXE (X760)2.0
Power
240 hp
179 kW
0-100 km/h6.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
455 L
16.1 cu ft
Length
4,672 mm
183.9 in
Height
1,416 mm
55.7 in
KiaOptima IVGT 2.0 T-GDI
Power
245 hp
183 kW
0-100 km/h7.4 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
510 L
18.0 cu ft
Length
4,855 mm
191.1 in
Height
1,465 mm
57.7 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
JaguarXE (X760)2.0
Power
240 hp
179 kW
0-100 km/h6.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
7.5 L/100 km
31.4 mpg US
37.7 mpg UK
KiaOptima IVGT 2.0 T-GDI
Power
245 hp
183 kW
0-100 km/h7.4 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
8.2 L/100 km
28.7 mpg US
34.4 mpg UK

Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
JaguarXE (X760)2.0
7.5 L/100 km
31.4 mpg US
37.7 mpg UK
6.9 s
KiaOptima IVGT 2.0 T-GDI
8.2 L/100 km
28.7 mpg US
34.4 mpg UK
7.4 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
JaguarXE (X760)2.0
157 hp/t
117 kW/t
6.4 kg/hp
7.5 L/100 km
31.4 mpg US
37.7 mpg UK
KiaOptima IVGT 2.0 T-GDI
146 hp/t
109 kW/t
6.9 kg/hp
8.2 L/100 km
28.7 mpg US
34.4 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleJaguarXE (X760)2.0KiaOptima IVGT 2.0 T-GDI
Power
240 hp
179 kW
245 hp
183 kW
Torque
340 Nm
251 lb-ft
353 Nm
260 lb-ft
Acceleration
6.9 s
7.4 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
Lightness
1,530 kg
3,373 lb
1,680 kg
3,704 lb
Fuel consumption
7.5 L/100 km
31.4 mpg US
37.7 mpg UK
8.2 L/100 km
28.7 mpg US
34.4 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
455 L
16.1 cu ft
Length
4,672 mm
183.9 in
Height
1,416 mm
55.7 in
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
510 L
18.0 cu ft
Length
4,855 mm
191.1 in
Height
1,465 mm
57.7 in
Range score
840 km
522 mi
854 km
530 mi
CO2 score
179 g/km
191 g/km
Trunk score
455 L
16.1 cu ft
510 L
18.0 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
157 hp/t
117 kW/t
6.4 kg/hp
146 hp/t
109 kW/t
6.9 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleJaguar XE (X760) 2.0Kia Optima IV GT 2.0 T-GDI
Consumption7.5 L/100 km31.4 mpg US37.7 mpg UK8.2 L/100 km28.7 mpg US34.4 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km13.13 LC100 km14.35 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi21.12 LC100 mi23.09 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,125 L297 US gal247 UK gal1,230 L325 US gal271 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,969 LC/year2,153 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0

  • Is 150 kg lighter
  • Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 0.7 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 11 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Emits 12 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Smallest trunk

Kia Optima IV GT 2.0 T-GDI

  • Has 5 hp more
  • Has 13 Nm more
  • Has 14 km (8 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 55 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0
Kia Optima IV GT 2.0 T-GDI
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0
P250
VS
JaguarXE (X760)2.0vsJaguarXE (X760)Facelift 2019P250
GT 2.0 T-GDI
EcoBoost 245
VS
KiaOptima IVGT 2.0 T-GDIvsFordTaurus VIIEcoBoost 245
2.0
2.0i
VS
JaguarXE (X760)2.0vsJaguarXE (X760)Facelift 20202.0i
GT 2.0 T-GDI
2.0
VS
KiaOptima IVGT 2.0 T-GDIvsJaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0
GT 2.0 T-GDI
E 300
VS
KiaOptima IVGT 2.0 T-GDIvsMercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 300
2.0
2.0d
VS
JaguarXE (X760)2.0vsJaguarXF (X260)2.0d
2.0
2.0i
VS
JaguarXE (X760)2.0vsJaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0i
GT 2.0 T-GDI
3.0d V6
VS
KiaOptima IVGT 2.0 T-GDIvsMaseratiGhibli III (M157)Facelift 20173.0d V6
2.0
2.0 BiTDI
VS
JaguarXE (X760)2.0vsVolkswagenPassat (B8)2.0 BiTDI
GT 2.0 T-GDI
C 300
VS
KiaOptima IVGT 2.0 T-GDIvsMercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 300
GT 2.0 T-GDI
350 V6
VS
KiaOptima IVGT 2.0 T-GDIvsLexusES VI (XV60)Facelift 2015350 V6
GT 2.0 T-GDI
2.0d
VS
KiaOptima IVGT 2.0 T-GDIvsJaguarXE (X760)2.0d
Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0 vs Kia Optima IV GT 2.0 T-GDI - car comparison - FastVsFaster