Car comparison

Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0dvsKia Optima IV GT 2.0 T-GDI

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Jaguar XE (X760)

2.0d

240 hp1999 ccDieselAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSedan2017-2018
VS

Kia Optima IV

GT 2.0 T-GDI

245 hp1998 ccGasolineFWDAutomaticTwin-turboSedan2016-2018

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0d

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    6.1 s
  • Fastest top speed
    260 km/h
    162 mph Unrestricted
    250 km/h
    155 mph Restricted
  • Highest torque
    500 Nm
    369 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,650 kg
    3,638 lb
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    5.2 L/100 km
    45.2 mpg US
    54.3 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    137 g/km
  • Best estimated range
    1,077 km
    669 mi
  • Best overall score
    66/100
  • Best performance score
    63/100
  • Best economy score
    93/100

Kia Optima IV GT 2.0 T-GDI

  • Most powerful
    245 hp
    183 kW
  • Best power-to-weight
    146 hp/t
    109 kW/t
    6.9 kg/hp
  • Largest trunk
    510 L
  • Best practicality score
    76/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelJaguarXE (X760)2.0dKiaOptima IVGT 2.0 T-GDI
Power
240hp179kW
245hp183kW
Torque
500Nm369lb-ft
353Nm260lb-ft
Curb weight
1,650kg3,638lb
1,680kg3,704lb
Gross weight-
2,120kg4,674lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Calculated
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
64.7s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph
Calculated
72.7s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
6.1s
7.4s
0-200 km/h
19.5s
Calculated
24.4s
Calculated
0-60 mph
5.8s
Calculated
7.1s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
5.2L/100 km45.2mpg US54.3mpg UK
8.2L/100 km28.7mpg US34.4mpg UK
Fuel consumption city-
11.8L/100 km19.9mpg US23.9mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway-
6.1L/100 km38.6mpg US46.3mpg UK
Quarter mile
14.1s
Calculated
15.2s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
145hp/t108kW/t66hp/1000 lb
Calculated
146hp/t109kW/t66hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
303Nm/t203lb-ft/ton
Calculated
210Nm/t141lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
1,077km669mi
Calculated
854km530mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,999cc122cu in
1,998cc122cu in
Length
4,672mm184in
4,855mm191in
Width
1,967mm77in
1,860mm73in
Height
1,425mm56in
1,465mm58in
Wheelbase
2,835mm112in
2,805mm110in
Front track
1,602mm63in
1,597mm63in
Rear track
1,603mm63in
1,608mm63in
Trunk volume
455L
510L
Doors
4
4
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
56L
70L
CO2 emissions
137g/km
191g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0dKia Optima IV GT 2.0 T-GDIPowerTorque
  • Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0d: Power / Torque
  • Kia Optima IV GT 2.0 T-GDI: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
JaguarXE (X760)2.0d4,000 rpm1,500 rpm4,250 rpm
KiaOptima IVGT 2.0 T-GDI6,000 rpm1,350-4,000 rpm6,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricJaguarXE (X760)2.0dKiaOptima IVGT 2.0 T-GDI
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
5.8 s
7.1 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
6.1 s
7.4 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
19.5 s
24.4 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Likely limited
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.5 s
2.8 s
330 ft
101 m
6.4 s
6.9 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.4 s
10.2 s
1000 ft
305 m
11.9 s
12.9 s
1/4 mile
402 m
14.1 s
15.2 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
171 km/h
106 mph
160 km/h
100 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXE (X760)2.0d
240 hp
179 kW
KiaOptima IVGT 2.0 T-GDI
245 hp
183 kW

Kia Optima IV GT 2.0 T-GDI has 5 hp more than Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0d.

The biggest power difference is between Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0d and Kia Optima IV GT 2.0 T-GDI: 5 hp (4 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXE (X760)2.0d
500 Nm
369 lb-ft
KiaOptima IVGT 2.0 T-GDI
353 Nm
260 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXE (X760)2.0d
1,650 kg
3,638 lb
KiaOptima IVGT 2.0 T-GDI
1,680 kg
3,704 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXE (X760)2.0d
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
KiaOptima IVGT 2.0 T-GDI
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXE (X760)2.0d6.1 s
KiaOptima IVGT 2.0 T-GDI7.4 s

Although Kia Optima IV GT 2.0 T-GDI has more power, Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0d is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0d and Kia Optima IV GT 2.0 T-GDI: 1.3 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXE (X760)2.0d
5.2 L/100 km
45.2 mpg US
54.3 mpg UK
KiaOptima IVGT 2.0 T-GDI
8.2 L/100 km
28.7 mpg US
34.4 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0d and Kia Optima IV GT 2.0 T-GDI: 3.0 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXE (X760)2.0d
145 hp/t
108 kW/t
6.9 kg/hp
KiaOptima IVGT 2.0 T-GDI
146 hp/t
109 kW/t
6.9 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXE (X760)2.0d
1,077 km
669 mi
KiaOptima IVGT 2.0 T-GDI
854 km
530 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
JaguarXE (X760)2.0d
240 hp
179 kW
6.1 s
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
KiaOptima IVGT 2.0 T-GDI
245 hp
183 kW
7.4 s
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
JaguarXE (X760)2.0d
Power
240 hp
179 kW
0-100 km/h6.1 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
455 L
16.1 cu ft
Length
4,672 mm
183.9 in
Height
1,425 mm
56.1 in
KiaOptima IVGT 2.0 T-GDI
Power
245 hp
183 kW
0-100 km/h7.4 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
510 L
18.0 cu ft
Length
4,855 mm
191.1 in
Height
1,465 mm
57.7 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
JaguarXE (X760)2.0d
Power
240 hp
179 kW
0-100 km/h6.1 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
5.2 L/100 km
45.2 mpg US
54.3 mpg UK
KiaOptima IVGT 2.0 T-GDI
Power
245 hp
183 kW
0-100 km/h7.4 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
8.2 L/100 km
28.7 mpg US
34.4 mpg UK

Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
JaguarXE (X760)2.0d
5.2 L/100 km
45.2 mpg US
54.3 mpg UK
6.1 s
KiaOptima IVGT 2.0 T-GDI
8.2 L/100 km
28.7 mpg US
34.4 mpg UK
7.4 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
JaguarXE (X760)2.0d
145 hp/t
108 kW/t
6.9 kg/hp
5.2 L/100 km
45.2 mpg US
54.3 mpg UK
KiaOptima IVGT 2.0 T-GDI
146 hp/t
109 kW/t
6.9 kg/hp
8.2 L/100 km
28.7 mpg US
34.4 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleJaguarXE (X760)2.0dKiaOptima IVGT 2.0 T-GDI
Power
240 hp
179 kW
245 hp
183 kW
Torque
500 Nm
369 lb-ft
353 Nm
260 lb-ft
Acceleration
6.1 s
7.4 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
Lightness
1,650 kg
3,638 lb
1,680 kg
3,704 lb
Fuel consumption
5.2 L/100 km
45.2 mpg US
54.3 mpg UK
8.2 L/100 km
28.7 mpg US
34.4 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
455 L
16.1 cu ft
Length
4,672 mm
183.9 in
Height
1,425 mm
56.1 in
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
510 L
18.0 cu ft
Length
4,855 mm
191.1 in
Height
1,465 mm
57.7 in
Range score
1,077 km
669 mi
854 km
530 mi
CO2 score
137 g/km
191 g/km
Trunk score
455 L
16.1 cu ft
510 L
18.0 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
145 hp/t
108 kW/t
6.9 kg/hp
146 hp/t
109 kW/t
6.9 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleJaguar XE (X760) 2.0dKia Optima IV GT 2.0 T-GDI
Consumption5.2 L/100 km45.2 mpg US54.3 mpg UK8.2 L/100 km28.7 mpg US34.4 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km9.10 LC100 km14.35 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi14.65 LC100 mi23.09 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used780 L206 US gal172 UK gal1,230 L325 US gal271 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,365 LC/year2,153 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0d

  • Has 147 Nm more
  • Is 30 kg lighter
  • Is 1.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 3.0 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 223 km (139 mi) more estimated range
  • Emits 54 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Smallest trunk

Kia Optima IV GT 2.0 T-GDI

  • Has 5 hp more
  • Has 0 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 55 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Most powerful
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0d
Kia Optima IV GT 2.0 T-GDI
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0d
P250
VS
JaguarXE (X760)2.0dvsJaguarXE (X760)Facelift 2019P250
GT 2.0 T-GDI
EcoBoost 245
VS
KiaOptima IVGT 2.0 T-GDIvsFordTaurus VIIEcoBoost 245
2.0d
2.0i
VS
JaguarXE (X760)2.0dvsJaguarXE (X760)Facelift 20202.0i
GT 2.0 T-GDI
2.0
VS
KiaOptima IVGT 2.0 T-GDIvsJaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0
2.0d
2.0d
VS
JaguarXE (X760)2.0dvsJaguarXF (X260)2.0d
GT 2.0 T-GDI
E 300
VS
KiaOptima IVGT 2.0 T-GDIvsMercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 300
2.0d
2.0i
VS
JaguarXE (X760)2.0dvsJaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0i
GT 2.0 T-GDI
3.0d V6
VS
KiaOptima IVGT 2.0 T-GDIvsMaseratiGhibli III (M157)Facelift 20173.0d V6
GT 2.0 T-GDI
C 300
VS
KiaOptima IVGT 2.0 T-GDIvsMercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 300
GT 2.0 T-GDI
350 V6
VS
KiaOptima IVGT 2.0 T-GDIvsLexusES VI (XV60)Facelift 2015350 V6
2.0d
2.0 BiTDI
VS
JaguarXE (X760)2.0dvsVolkswagenPassat (B8)2.0 BiTDI
GT 2.0 T-GDI
2.0
VS
KiaOptima IVGT 2.0 T-GDIvsJaguarXE (X760)2.0
Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0d vs Kia Optima IV GT 2.0 T-GDI - car comparison - FastVsFaster