Kia Optima IV
Car comparison
Kia Optima IV GT 2.0 T-GDIvsFord Taurus VII EcoBoost 245
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonFord Taurus VII
EcoBoost 245
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Kia Optima IV GT 2.0 T-GDI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.4 s
- Fastest top speed250 km/h155 mph Unrestricted240 km/h149 mph Restricted
- Most powerful245 hp183 kW
- Highest torque353 Nm260 lb-ft
- Lightest1,680 kg3,704 lb
- Best power-to-weight146 hp/t109 kW/t6.9 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption8.2 L/100 km28.7 mpg US34.4 mpg UK
- Best estimated range854 km530 mi
- Best overall score62/100
- Best performance score56/100
- Best economy score85/100
Ford Taurus VII EcoBoost 245
- Largest trunk534 L
- Best practicality score77/100
Specification comparison
| Model | KiaOptima IVGT 2.0 T-GDI | FordTaurus VIIEcoBoost 245 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 245hp183kW | 245hp183kW |
| Torque | 353Nm260lb-ft | 350Nm258lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,680kg3,704lb | 1,794kg3,955lb |
| Gross weight | 2,120kg4,674lb | 2,169kg4,782lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Calculated | 218 km/h 135 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 72.7s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph Calculated | 66.1s99% target: 216 km/h / 134 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.4s | 7.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 24.4s Calculated | 34.7s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.1s Calculated | 7.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 8.2L/100 km28.7mpg US34.4mpg UK | 8.2L/100 km28.7mpg US34.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 11.8L/100 km19.9mpg US23.9mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.1L/100 km38.6mpg US46.3mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 15.2s Calculated | 15.7s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 146hp/t109kW/t66hp/1000 lb Calculated | 137hp/t102kW/t62hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 210Nm/t141lb-ft/ton Calculated | 195Nm/t131lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 854km530mi Calculated | 780km485mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,998cc122cu in | 1,999cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,855mm191in | 4,996mm197in |
| Width | 1,860mm73in | 1,878mm74in |
| Height | 1,465mm58in | 1,503mm59in |
| Wheelbase | 2,805mm110in | 2,949mm116in |
| Front track | 1,597mm63in | 1,608mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,608mm63in | 1,618mm64in |
| Ground clearance | - | 133mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 510L | 534L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 70L | 64L |
| CO2 emissions | 191g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Kia Optima IV GT 2.0 T-GDI: Power / Torque
- Ford Taurus VII EcoBoost 245: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| KiaOptima IVGT 2.0 T-GDI | 6,000 rpm | 1,350-4,000 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| FordTaurus VIIEcoBoost 245 | 5,500 rpm | 1,750-4,500 rpm | 6,500 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | KiaOptima IVGT 2.0 T-GDI | FordTaurus VIIEcoBoost 245 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.1 s | 7.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.4 s | 7.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 24.4 s | 34.7 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Likely limited | 218 km/h 135 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.8 s | 2.8 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.9 s | 7.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.2 s | 10.4 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.9 s | 13.3 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.2 s | 15.7 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 160 km/h 100 mph | 151 km/h 94 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| KiaOptima IVGT 2.0 T-GDI | 245 hp 183 kW |
| FordTaurus VIIEcoBoost 245 | 245 hp 183 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| KiaOptima IVGT 2.0 T-GDI | 353 Nm 260 lb-ft |
| FordTaurus VIIEcoBoost 245 | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| KiaOptima IVGT 2.0 T-GDI | 1,680 kg 3,704 lb |
| FordTaurus VIIEcoBoost 245 | 1,794 kg 3,955 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| KiaOptima IVGT 2.0 T-GDI | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
| FordTaurus VIIEcoBoost 245 | 218 km/h 135 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| KiaOptima IVGT 2.0 T-GDI | 7.4 s |
| FordTaurus VIIEcoBoost 245 | 7.9 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Kia Optima IV GT 2.0 T-GDI and Ford Taurus VII EcoBoost 245: 0.5 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| KiaOptima IVGT 2.0 T-GDI | 8.2 L/100 km 28.7 mpg US 34.4 mpg UK |
| FordTaurus VIIEcoBoost 245 | 8.2 L/100 km 28.7 mpg US 34.4 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| KiaOptima IVGT 2.0 T-GDI | 146 hp/t 109 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp |
| FordTaurus VIIEcoBoost 245 | 137 hp/t 102 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| KiaOptima IVGT 2.0 T-GDI | 854 km 530 mi |
| FordTaurus VIIEcoBoost 245 | 780 km 485 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| KiaOptima IVGT 2.0 T-GDI | 245 hp 183 kW | 7.4 s | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
| FordTaurus VIIEcoBoost 245 | 245 hp 183 kW | 7.9 s | 218 km/h 135 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KiaOptima IVGT 2.0 T-GDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| FordTaurus VIIEcoBoost 245 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KiaOptima IVGT 2.0 T-GDI |
| 8.2 L/100 km 28.7 mpg US 34.4 mpg UK | ||||||
| FordTaurus VIIEcoBoost 245 |
| 8.2 L/100 km 28.7 mpg US 34.4 mpg UK | ||||||
Kia Optima IV GT 2.0 T-GDI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| KiaOptima IVGT 2.0 T-GDI | 8.2 L/100 km 28.7 mpg US 34.4 mpg UK | 7.4 s |
| FordTaurus VIIEcoBoost 245 | 8.2 L/100 km 28.7 mpg US 34.4 mpg UK | 7.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| KiaOptima IVGT 2.0 T-GDI | 146 hp/t 109 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp | 8.2 L/100 km 28.7 mpg US 34.4 mpg UK |
| FordTaurus VIIEcoBoost 245 | 137 hp/t 102 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp | 8.2 L/100 km 28.7 mpg US 34.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | KiaOptima IVGT 2.0 T-GDI | FordTaurus VIIEcoBoost 245 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 245 hp 183 kW | 245 hp 183 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 353 Nm 260 lb-ft | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.4 s | 7.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph | 218 km/h 135 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,680 kg 3,704 lb | 1,794 kg 3,955 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 8.2 L/100 km 28.7 mpg US 34.4 mpg UK | 8.2 L/100 km 28.7 mpg US 34.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 854 km 530 mi | 780 km 485 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 191 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 510 L 18.0 cu ft | 534 L 18.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 146 hp/t 109 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp | 137 hp/t 102 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Kia Optima IV GT 2.0 T-GDI | Ford Taurus VII EcoBoost 245 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 8.2 L/100 km28.7 mpg US34.4 mpg UK | 8.2 L/100 km28.7 mpg US34.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 14.35 LC100 km | 14.35 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 23.09 LC100 mi | 23.09 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,230 L325 US gal271 UK gal | 1,230 L325 US gal271 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,153 LC/year | 2,153 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Kia Optima IV GT 2.0 T-GDI
- Has 3 Nm more
- Is 114 kg lighter
- Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 32 km/h (20 mph) higher top speed
- Has 9 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 73 km (45 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Smallest trunk
Ford Taurus VII EcoBoost 245
- Has 24 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























