Car comparison

Kia Optima IV GT 2.0 T-GDIvsJaguar XF (X260) 2.0

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Kia Optima IV

GT 2.0 T-GDI

245 hp1998 ccGasolineFWDAutomaticTwin-turboSedan2016-2018
VS

Jaguar XF (X260)

2.0

250 hp1997 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTwin-turboSedan2017-2018

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    6.6 s
  • Most powerful
    250 hp
    186 kW
  • Highest torque
    365 Nm
    269 lb-ft
  • Best power-to-weight
    148 hp/t
    111 kW/t
    6.7 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    6.9 L/100 km
    34.1 mpg US
    40.9 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    159 g/km
  • Best estimated range
    1,072 km
    666 mi
  • Largest trunk
    540 L
  • Best overall score
    63/100
  • Best performance score
    57/100
  • Best economy score
    88/100
  • Best practicality score
    77/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelKiaOptima IVGT 2.0 T-GDIJaguarXF (X260)2.0
Power
245hp183kW
250hp186kW
Torque
353Nm260lb-ft
365Nm269lb-ft
Curb weight
1,680kg3,704lb
1,685kg3,715lb
Gross weight
2,120kg4,674lb
-
Top speed
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
Calculated
237 km/h
147 mph
To 99% top speed
72.7s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph
Calculated
59.9s99% target: 235 km/h / 146 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.4s
6.6s
0-200 km/h
24.4s
Calculated
23.4s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.1s
Calculated
6.3s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
8.2L/100 km28.7mpg US34.4mpg UK
6.9L/100 km34.1mpg US40.9mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
11.8L/100 km19.9mpg US23.9mpg UK
-
Fuel consumption highway
6.1L/100 km38.6mpg US46.3mpg UK
-
Quarter mile
15.2s
Calculated
14.6s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
146hp/t109kW/t66hp/1000 lb
Calculated
148hp/t111kW/t67hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
210Nm/t141lb-ft/ton
Calculated
217Nm/t145lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
854km530mi
Calculated
1,072km666mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,998cc122cu in
1,997cc122cu in
Length
4,855mm191in
4,954mm195in
Width
1,860mm73in
1,880mm74in
Height
1,465mm58in
1,457mm57in
Wheelbase
2,805mm110in
2,960mm117in
Front track
1,597mm63in
1,605mm63in
Rear track
1,608mm63in
1,594mm63in
Trunk volume
510L
540L
Doors
4
4
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
70L
74L
CO2 emissions
191g/km
159g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Kia Optima IV GT 2.0 T-GDIJaguar XF (X260) 2.0PowerTorque
  • Kia Optima IV GT 2.0 T-GDI: Power / Torque
  • Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
KiaOptima IVGT 2.0 T-GDI6,000 rpm1,350-4,000 rpm6,250 rpm
JaguarXF (X260)2.05,500 rpm1,200-4,500 rpm5,750 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricKiaOptima IVGT 2.0 T-GDIJaguarXF (X260)2.0
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.1 s
6.3 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.4 s
6.6 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
24.4 s
23.4 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
Likely limited
237 km/h
147 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.8 s
2.6 s
330 ft
101 m
6.9 s
6.6 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.2 s
9.7 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.9 s
12.4 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.2 s
14.6 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
160 km/h
100 mph
164 km/h
102 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
KiaOptima IVGT 2.0 T-GDI
245 hp
183 kW
JaguarXF (X260)2.0
250 hp
186 kW

Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0 has 5 hp more than Kia Optima IV GT 2.0 T-GDI.

The biggest power difference is between Kia Optima IV GT 2.0 T-GDI and Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0: 5 hp (4 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
KiaOptima IVGT 2.0 T-GDI
353 Nm
260 lb-ft
JaguarXF (X260)2.0
365 Nm
269 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
KiaOptima IVGT 2.0 T-GDI
1,680 kg
3,704 lb
JaguarXF (X260)2.0
1,685 kg
3,715 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
KiaOptima IVGT 2.0 T-GDI
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
JaguarXF (X260)2.0
237 km/h
147 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
KiaOptima IVGT 2.0 T-GDI7.4 s
JaguarXF (X260)2.06.6 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0 and Kia Optima IV GT 2.0 T-GDI: 0.8 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
KiaOptima IVGT 2.0 T-GDI
8.2 L/100 km
28.7 mpg US
34.4 mpg UK
JaguarXF (X260)2.0
6.9 L/100 km
34.1 mpg US
40.9 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0 and Kia Optima IV GT 2.0 T-GDI: 1.3 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
KiaOptima IVGT 2.0 T-GDI
146 hp/t
109 kW/t
6.9 kg/hp
JaguarXF (X260)2.0
148 hp/t
111 kW/t
6.7 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
KiaOptima IVGT 2.0 T-GDI
854 km
530 mi
JaguarXF (X260)2.0
1,072 km
666 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
KiaOptima IVGT 2.0 T-GDI
245 hp
183 kW
7.4 s
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
JaguarXF (X260)2.0
250 hp
186 kW
6.6 s
237 km/h
147 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
KiaOptima IVGT 2.0 T-GDI
Power
245 hp
183 kW
0-100 km/h7.4 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
510 L
18.0 cu ft
Length
4,855 mm
191.1 in
Height
1,465 mm
57.7 in
JaguarXF (X260)2.0
Power
250 hp
186 kW
0-100 km/h6.6 s
Top speed
237 km/h
147 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
540 L
19.1 cu ft
Length
4,954 mm
195.0 in
Height
1,457 mm
57.4 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
KiaOptima IVGT 2.0 T-GDI
Power
245 hp
183 kW
0-100 km/h7.4 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
8.2 L/100 km
28.7 mpg US
34.4 mpg UK
JaguarXF (X260)2.0
Power
250 hp
186 kW
0-100 km/h6.6 s
Top speed
237 km/h
147 mph
6.9 L/100 km
34.1 mpg US
40.9 mpg UK

Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
KiaOptima IVGT 2.0 T-GDI
8.2 L/100 km
28.7 mpg US
34.4 mpg UK
7.4 s
JaguarXF (X260)2.0
6.9 L/100 km
34.1 mpg US
40.9 mpg UK
6.6 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
KiaOptima IVGT 2.0 T-GDI
146 hp/t
109 kW/t
6.9 kg/hp
8.2 L/100 km
28.7 mpg US
34.4 mpg UK
JaguarXF (X260)2.0
148 hp/t
111 kW/t
6.7 kg/hp
6.9 L/100 km
34.1 mpg US
40.9 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleKiaOptima IVGT 2.0 T-GDIJaguarXF (X260)2.0
Power
245 hp
183 kW
250 hp
186 kW
Torque
353 Nm
260 lb-ft
365 Nm
269 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.4 s
6.6 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
237 km/h
147 mph
Lightness
1,680 kg
3,704 lb
1,685 kg
3,715 lb
Fuel consumption
8.2 L/100 km
28.7 mpg US
34.4 mpg UK
6.9 L/100 km
34.1 mpg US
40.9 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
510 L
18.0 cu ft
Length
4,855 mm
191.1 in
Height
1,465 mm
57.7 in
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
540 L
19.1 cu ft
Length
4,954 mm
195.0 in
Height
1,457 mm
57.4 in
Range score
854 km
530 mi
1,072 km
666 mi
CO2 score
191 g/km
159 g/km
Trunk score
510 L
18.0 cu ft
540 L
19.1 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
146 hp/t
109 kW/t
6.9 kg/hp
148 hp/t
111 kW/t
6.7 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleKia Optima IV GT 2.0 T-GDIJaguar XF (X260) 2.0
Consumption8.2 L/100 km28.7 mpg US34.4 mpg UK6.9 L/100 km34.1 mpg US40.9 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km14.35 LC100 km12.08 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi23.09 LC100 mi19.43 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,230 L325 US gal271 UK gal1,035 L273 US gal228 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,153 LC/year1,811 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Kia Optima IV GT 2.0 T-GDI

  • Is 5 kg lighter
  • Has 13 km/h (8 mph) higher top speed

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Lightest

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Smallest trunk
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0

  • Has 5 hp more
  • Has 12 Nm more
  • Is 0.8 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Uses 1.3 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 3 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 219 km (136 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 30 L more trunk volume
  • Emits 32 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Kia Optima IV GT 2.0 T-GDI
Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

GT 2.0 T-GDI
EcoBoost 245
VS
KiaOptima IVGT 2.0 T-GDIvsFordTaurus VIIEcoBoost 245
2.0
2.0i
VS
JaguarXF (X260)2.0vsJaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0i
GT 2.0 T-GDI
2.0
VS
KiaOptima IVGT 2.0 T-GDIvsJaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0
2.0
2.0
VS
JaguarXF (X260)2.0vsJaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0
GT 2.0 T-GDI
E 300
VS
KiaOptima IVGT 2.0 T-GDIvsMercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 300
2.0
2.0i
VS
JaguarXF (X260)2.0vsJaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0i
GT 2.0 T-GDI
3.0d V6
VS
KiaOptima IVGT 2.0 T-GDIvsMaseratiGhibli III (M157)Facelift 20173.0d V6
2.0
5.0 V8
VS
JaguarXF (X260)2.0vsJaguarXF (X250)5.0 V8
GT 2.0 T-GDI
2.0
VS
KiaOptima IVGT 2.0 T-GDIvsJaguarXF (X260)2.0
2.0
R-S 5.0 V8
VS
JaguarXF (X260)2.0vsJaguarXF (X250)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8
GT 2.0 T-GDI
C 300
VS
KiaOptima IVGT 2.0 T-GDIvsMercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 300
2.0
2.0
VS
JaguarXF (X260)2.0vsJaguarXE (X760)2.0
Kia Optima IV GT 2.0 T-GDI vs Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0 - car comparison - FastVsFaster