Car comparison

MG ZT · Facelift 2004 4.6 V8vsJaguar X-type (X400) 3.0 i V6 24V

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

MG ZT · Facelift 2004

4.6 V8

260 hp4601 ccGasolineRWDManualNaturally aspiratedSedan2004-2005
VS

Jaguar X-type (X400)

3.0 i V6 24V

231 hp2968 ccGasolineAWDManualNaturally aspiratedSedan2001-2009

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Jaguar X-type (X400) 3.0 i V6 24V

  • Lightest
    1,570 kg
    3,461 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    147 hp/t
    110 kW/t
    6.8 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    10.3 L/100 km
    22.8 mpg US
    27.4 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    14.8 L/100 km
    15.9 mpg US
    19.1 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    7.7 L/100 km
    30.5 mpg US
    36.7 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    592 km
    368 mi
  • Largest trunk
    452 L
  • Best economy score
    79/100
  • Best practicality score
    77/100

MG ZT Facelift 2004 4.6 V8

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    6.3 s
  • Fastest top speed
    260 km/h
    162 mph Unrestricted
    250 km/h
    155 mph Restricted
  • Most powerful
    260 hp
    194 kW
  • Highest torque
    410 Nm
    302 lb-ft
  • Best overall score
    65/100
  • Best performance score
    61/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelMGZTFacelift 20044.6 V8JaguarX-type (X400)3.0 i V6 24V
Power
260hp194kW
231hp172kW
Torque
410Nm302lb-ft
279Nm206lb-ft
Curb weight
1,770kg3,902lb
1,570kg3,461lb
Gross weight
2,170kg4,784lb
2,120kg4,674lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Calculated
235 km/h
146 mph
To 99% top speed
65.9s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph
Calculated
63.1s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
6.3s
7.0s
0-200 km/h
20.0s
Calculated
25.2s
Calculated
0-60 mph
6.0s
Calculated
6.7s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
13.2L/100 km17.8mpg US21.4mpg UK
10.3L/100 km22.8mpg US27.4mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
17.9L/100 km13.1mpg US15.8mpg UK
14.8L/100 km15.9mpg US19.1mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
10.4L/100 km22.6mpg US27.2mpg UK
7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK
Quarter mile
14.2s
Calculated
14.9s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
147hp/t110kW/t67hp/1000 lb
Calculated
147hp/t110kW/t67hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
232Nm/t155lb-ft/ton
Calculated
178Nm/t119lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
492km306mi
Calculated
592km368mi
Calculated
Displacement
4,601cc281cu in
2,968cc181cu in
Length
4,747mm187in
4,672mm184in
Width
1,778mm70in
1,789mm70in
Height
1,427mm56in
1,430mm56in
Wheelbase
2,746mm108in
2,710mm107in
Front track-
1,522mm60in
Rear track-
1,537mm61in
Trunk volume
432L
-
Max trunk volume
674L
452L
Doors
4
4
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
65L
61L
CO2 emissions
314g/km
-

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

MG ZT Facelift 2004 4.6 V8Jaguar X-type (X400) 3.0 i V6 24VPowerTorque
  • MG ZT Facelift 2004 4.6 V8: Power / Torque
  • Jaguar X-type (X400) 3.0 i V6 24V: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
MGZTFacelift 20044.6 V85,000 rpm4,000 rpm6,000 rpm
JaguarX-type (X400)3.0 i V6 24V6,800 rpm3,000 rpm7,050 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricMGZTFacelift 20044.6 V8JaguarX-type (X400)3.0 i V6 24V
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.0 s
6.7 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
6.3 s
7.0 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
20.0 s
25.2 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Limited
235 km/h
146 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.6 s
2.7 s
330 ft
101 m
6.5 s
6.7 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.5 s
9.9 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.1 s
12.7 s
1/4 mile
402 m
14.2 s
14.9 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
170 km/h
106 mph
161 km/h
100 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MGZTFacelift 20044.6 V8
260 hp
194 kW
JaguarX-type (X400)3.0 i V6 24V
231 hp
172 kW

MG ZT Facelift 2004 4.6 V8 has 29 hp more than Jaguar X-type (X400) 3.0 i V6 24V.

The biggest power difference is between Jaguar X-type (X400) 3.0 i V6 24V and MG ZT Facelift 2004 4.6 V8: 29 hp (22 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MGZTFacelift 20044.6 V8
410 Nm
302 lb-ft
JaguarX-type (X400)3.0 i V6 24V
279 Nm
206 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MGZTFacelift 20044.6 V8
1,770 kg
3,902 lb
JaguarX-type (X400)3.0 i V6 24V
1,570 kg
3,461 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MGZTFacelift 20044.6 V8
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
JaguarX-type (X400)3.0 i V6 24V
235 km/h
146 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MGZTFacelift 20044.6 V86.3 s
JaguarX-type (X400)3.0 i V6 24V7.0 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between MG ZT Facelift 2004 4.6 V8 and Jaguar X-type (X400) 3.0 i V6 24V: 0.7 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MGZTFacelift 20044.6 V8
13.2 L/100 km
17.8 mpg US
21.4 mpg UK
JaguarX-type (X400)3.0 i V6 24V
10.3 L/100 km
22.8 mpg US
27.4 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Jaguar X-type (X400) 3.0 i V6 24V and MG ZT Facelift 2004 4.6 V8: 2.9 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MGZTFacelift 20044.6 V8
147 hp/t
110 kW/t
6.8 kg/hp
JaguarX-type (X400)3.0 i V6 24V
147 hp/t
110 kW/t
6.8 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MGZTFacelift 20044.6 V8
492 km
306 mi
JaguarX-type (X400)3.0 i V6 24V
592 km
368 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
MGZTFacelift 20044.6 V8
260 hp
194 kW
6.3 s
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
JaguarX-type (X400)3.0 i V6 24V
231 hp
172 kW
7.0 s
235 km/h
146 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
MGZTFacelift 20044.6 V8
Power
260 hp
194 kW
0-100 km/h6.3 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
432 L
15.3 cu ft
Length
4,747 mm
186.9 in
Height
1,427 mm
56.2 in
JaguarX-type (X400)3.0 i V6 24V
Power
231 hp
172 kW
0-100 km/h7.0 s
Top speed
235 km/h
146 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
452 L
16.0 cu ft
Length
4,672 mm
183.9 in
Height
1,430 mm
56.3 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
MGZTFacelift 20044.6 V8
Power
260 hp
194 kW
0-100 km/h6.3 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
13.2 L/100 km
17.8 mpg US
21.4 mpg UK
JaguarX-type (X400)3.0 i V6 24V
Power
231 hp
172 kW
0-100 km/h7.0 s
Top speed
235 km/h
146 mph
10.3 L/100 km
22.8 mpg US
27.4 mpg UK

MG ZT Facelift 2004 4.6 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
MGZTFacelift 20044.6 V8
13.2 L/100 km
17.8 mpg US
21.4 mpg UK
6.3 s
JaguarX-type (X400)3.0 i V6 24V
10.3 L/100 km
22.8 mpg US
27.4 mpg UK
7.0 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
MGZTFacelift 20044.6 V8
147 hp/t
110 kW/t
6.8 kg/hp
13.2 L/100 km
17.8 mpg US
21.4 mpg UK
JaguarX-type (X400)3.0 i V6 24V
147 hp/t
110 kW/t
6.8 kg/hp
10.3 L/100 km
22.8 mpg US
27.4 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleMGZTFacelift 20044.6 V8JaguarX-type (X400)3.0 i V6 24V
Power
260 hp
194 kW
231 hp
172 kW
Torque
410 Nm
302 lb-ft
279 Nm
206 lb-ft
Acceleration
6.3 s
7.0 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
235 km/h
146 mph
Lightness
1,770 kg
3,902 lb
1,570 kg
3,461 lb
Fuel consumption
13.2 L/100 km
17.8 mpg US
21.4 mpg UK
10.3 L/100 km
22.8 mpg US
27.4 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
432 L
15.3 cu ft
Length
4,747 mm
186.9 in
Height
1,427 mm
56.2 in
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
452 L
16.0 cu ft
Length
4,672 mm
183.9 in
Height
1,430 mm
56.3 in
Range score
492 km
306 mi
592 km
368 mi
CO2 score
314 g/km
-
Trunk score
432 L
15.3 cu ft
452 L
16.0 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
147 hp/t
110 kW/t
6.8 kg/hp
147 hp/t
110 kW/t
6.8 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleMG ZT Facelift 2004 4.6 V8Jaguar X-type (X400) 3.0 i V6 24V
Consumption13.2 L/100 km17.8 mpg US21.4 mpg UK10.3 L/100 km22.8 mpg US27.4 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km23.10 LC100 km18.03 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi37.18 LC100 mi29.01 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,980 L523 US gal436 UK gal1,545 L408 US gal340 UK gal
Annual fuel cost3,465 LC/year2,704 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

MG ZT Facelift 2004 4.6 V8

  • Has 29 hp more
  • Has 131 Nm more
  • Is 0.7 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 25 km/h (16 mph) higher top speed

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Smallest trunk

Jaguar X-type (X400) 3.0 i V6 24V

  • Is 200 kg lighter
  • Uses 2.9 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 0 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 100 km (62 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 20 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
MG ZT 4.6 V8
Jaguar X-type (X400) 3.0 i V6 24V
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

4.6 V8
2.0
VS
MGZTFacelift 20044.6 V8vsMitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0
3.0 i V6 24V
3.0 i V6 24V Sport
VS
JaguarX-type (X400)3.0 i V6 24VvsJaguarX-Type Estate3.0 i V6 24V Sport
4.6 V8
2.9 T6 24V
VS
MGZTFacelift 20044.6 V8vsVolvoS80Facelift 20032.9 T6 24V
3.0 i V6 24V
4.2 V8 32V L
VS
JaguarX-type (X400)3.0 i V6 24VvsJaguarXJ (X350)4.2 V8 32V L
4.6 V8
430 V8
VS
MGZTFacelift 20044.6 V8vsLexusLS IIIFacelift 2004430 V8
3.0 i V6 24V
2.5
VS
JaguarX-type (X400)3.0 i V6 24VvsVolvoS40 II2.5
4.6 V8
3.2 FSI V6
VS
MGZTFacelift 20044.6 V8vsAUDIA6 (4F/C6)3.2 FSI V6
3.0 i V6 24V
330xi
VS
JaguarX-type (X400)3.0 i V6 24VvsBMW3 Series Sedan (E46)Facelift 2001330xi
4.6 V8
3.2 i V6 24V
VS
MGZTFacelift 20044.6 V8vsAcuraTL III (UA6/7)3.2 i V6 24V
3.0 i V6 24V
3.3i V6 24V
VS
JaguarX-type (X400)3.0 i V6 24VvsHyundaiSonata V (NF)3.3i V6 24V
4.6 V8
2.4i T5 20V
VS
MGZTFacelift 20044.6 V8vsVolvoS602.4i T5 20V
3.0 i V6 24V
3.3 i V6 24V
VS
JaguarX-type (X400)3.0 i V6 24VvsHyundaiNF3.3 i V6 24V
MG ZT · Facelift 2004 4.6 V8 vs Jaguar X-type (X400) 3.0 i V6 24V - car comparison - FastVsFaster