Car comparison

MG ZT · Facelift 2004 4.6 V8vsVolvo S60 2.4i T5 20V

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

MG ZT · Facelift 2004

4.6 V8

260 hp4601 ccGasolineRWDManualNaturally aspiratedSedan2004-2005
VS

Volvo S60

2.4i T5 20V

260 hp2401 ccGasolineFWDManualTurbochargedSedan2005-2009

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

MG ZT Facelift 2004 4.6 V8

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    6.3 s
  • Fastest top speed
    260 km/h
    162 mph Unrestricted
    250 km/h
    155 mph Restricted
  • Most powerful
    260 hp
    194 kW
  • Highest torque
    410 Nm
    302 lb-ft
  • Largest trunk
    432 L
  • Best overall score
    65/100
  • Best performance score
    61/100
  • Best economy score
    71/100
  • Best practicality score
    73/100

Volvo S60 2.4i T5 20V

  • Lightest
    1,520 kg
    3,351 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    171 hp/t
    128 kW/t
    5.8 kg/hp
  • Lowest city consumption
    12.7 L/100 km
    18.5 mpg US
    22.2 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    7.3 L/100 km
    32.2 mpg US
    38.7 mpg UK

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelMGZTFacelift 20044.6 V8VolvoS602.4i T5 20V
Power
260hp194kW
260hp194kW
Torque
410Nm302lb-ft
350Nm258lb-ft
Curb weight
1,770kg3,902lb
1,520kg3,351lb
Gross weight
2,170kg4,784lb
2,025kg4,464lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Calculated
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
65.9s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph
Calculated
63.7s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
6.3s
6.5s
0-200 km/h
20.0s
Calculated
20.0s
Calculated
0-60 mph
6.0s
Calculated
6.2s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
13.2L/100 km17.8mpg US21.4mpg UK
-
Fuel consumption city
17.9L/100 km13.1mpg US15.8mpg UK
12.7L/100 km18.5mpg US22.2mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
10.4L/100 km22.6mpg US27.2mpg UK
7.3L/100 km32.2mpg US38.7mpg UK
Quarter mile
14.2s
Calculated
14.4s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
147hp/t110kW/t67hp/1000 lb
Calculated
171hp/t128kW/t78hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
232Nm/t155lb-ft/ton
Calculated
230Nm/t154lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
492km306mi
Calculated
-
Displacement
4,601cc281cu in
2,401cc147cu in
Length
4,747mm187in
4,576mm180in
Width
1,778mm70in
1,804mm71in
Height
1,427mm56in
1,428mm56in
Wheelbase
2,746mm108in
2,715mm107in
Front track-
1,563mm62in
Rear track-
1,560mm61in
Trunk volume
432L
424L
Max trunk volume
674L
1,034L
Doors
4
4
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
65L
70L
CO2 emissions
314g/km
-

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

MG ZT Facelift 2004 4.6 V8Volvo S60 2.4i T5 20VPowerTorque
  • MG ZT Facelift 2004 4.6 V8: Power / Torque
  • Volvo S60 2.4i T5 20V: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
MGZTFacelift 20044.6 V85,000 rpm4,000 rpm6,000 rpm
VolvoS602.4i T5 20V5,500 rpm2,100 rpm5,750 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricMGZTFacelift 20044.6 V8VolvoS602.4i T5 20V
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.0 s
6.2 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
6.3 s
6.5 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
20.0 s
20.0 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Limited
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.6 s
2.7 s
330 ft
101 m
6.5 s
6.6 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.5 s
9.7 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.1 s
12.3 s
1/4 mile
402 m
14.2 s
14.4 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
170 km/h
106 mph
170 km/h
106 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MGZTFacelift 20044.6 V8
260 hp
194 kW
VolvoS602.4i T5 20V
260 hp
194 kW

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MGZTFacelift 20044.6 V8
410 Nm
302 lb-ft
VolvoS602.4i T5 20V
350 Nm
258 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MGZTFacelift 20044.6 V8
1,770 kg
3,902 lb
VolvoS602.4i T5 20V
1,520 kg
3,351 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MGZTFacelift 20044.6 V8
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
VolvoS602.4i T5 20V
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MGZTFacelift 20044.6 V86.3 s
VolvoS602.4i T5 20V6.5 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between MG ZT Facelift 2004 4.6 V8 and Volvo S60 2.4i T5 20V: 0.2 s.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MGZTFacelift 20044.6 V8
147 hp/t
110 kW/t
6.8 kg/hp
VolvoS602.4i T5 20V
171 hp/t
128 kW/t
5.8 kg/hp

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
MGZTFacelift 20044.6 V8
260 hp
194 kW
6.3 s
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
VolvoS602.4i T5 20V
260 hp
194 kW
6.5 s
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
MGZTFacelift 20044.6 V8
Power
260 hp
194 kW
0-100 km/h6.3 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
432 L
15.3 cu ft
Length
4,747 mm
186.9 in
Height
1,427 mm
56.2 in
VolvoS602.4i T5 20V
Power
260 hp
194 kW
0-100 km/h6.5 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
424 L
15.0 cu ft
Length
4,576 mm
180.2 in
Height
1,428 mm
56.2 in

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleMGZTFacelift 20044.6 V8VolvoS602.4i T5 20V
Power
260 hp
194 kW
260 hp
194 kW
Torque
410 Nm
302 lb-ft
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
Acceleration
6.3 s
6.5 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Lightness
1,770 kg
3,902 lb
1,520 kg
3,351 lb
Fuel consumption
13.2 L/100 km
17.8 mpg US
21.4 mpg UK
-
Practicality
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
432 L
15.3 cu ft
Length
4,747 mm
186.9 in
Height
1,427 mm
56.2 in
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
424 L
15.0 cu ft
Length
4,576 mm
180.2 in
Height
1,428 mm
56.2 in
Range score
492 km
306 mi
-
CO2 score
314 g/km
-
Trunk score
432 L
15.3 cu ft
424 L
15.0 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
147 hp/t
110 kW/t
6.8 kg/hp
171 hp/t
128 kW/t
5.8 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleMG ZT Facelift 2004 4.6 V8
Consumption13.2 L/100 km17.8 mpg US21.4 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km23.10 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi37.18 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,980 L523 US gal436 UK gal
Annual fuel cost3,465 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

MG ZT Facelift 2004 4.6 V8

  • Has 60 Nm more
  • Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 8 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Heaviest

Volvo S60 2.4i T5 20V

  • Is 250 kg lighter
  • Has 24 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
MG ZT 4.6 V8
Volvo S60 2.4i T5 20V
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

4.6 V8
2.0
VS
MGZTFacelift 20044.6 V8vsMitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0
2.4i T5 20V
2.0 T5
VS
VolvoS602.4i T5 20VvsVolvoS60 II2.0 T5
4.6 V8
2.9 T6 24V
VS
MGZTFacelift 20044.6 V8vsVolvoS80Facelift 20032.9 T6 24V
2.4i T5 20V
2.0 T5
VS
VolvoS602.4i T5 20VvsVolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T5
4.6 V8
430 V8
VS
MGZTFacelift 20044.6 V8vsLexusLS IIIFacelift 2004430 V8
4.6 V8
3.2 FSI V6
VS
MGZTFacelift 20044.6 V8vsAUDIA6 (4F/C6)3.2 FSI V6
2.4i T5 20V
2.5
VS
VolvoS602.4i T5 20VvsVolvoS40 II2.5
4.6 V8
3.2 i V6 24V
VS
MGZTFacelift 20044.6 V8vsAcuraTL III (UA6/7)3.2 i V6 24V
2.4i T5 20V
3.2 JTS V6
VS
VolvoS602.4i T5 20VvsAlfa Romeo1593.2 JTS V6
4.6 V8
330xi
VS
MGZTFacelift 20044.6 V8vsBMW3 Series Sedan (E46)Facelift 2001330xi
2.4i T5 20V
2.5 T5
VS
VolvoS602.4i T5 20VvsVolvoS40 IIFacelift 20072.5 T5
4.6 V8
2.7 V6
VS
MGZTFacelift 20044.6 V8vsAUDIA6 (4B/C5)Facelift 20012.7 V6
MG ZT · Facelift 2004 4.6 V8 vs Volvo S60 2.4i T5 20V - car comparison - FastVsFaster