Lexus LS III · Facelift 2004
Car comparison
Lexus LS III · Facelift 2004 430 V8vsMG ZT · Facelift 2004 4.6 V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMG ZT · Facelift 2004
4.6 V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Lexus LS III Facelift 2004 430 V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.3 s
- Fastest top speed265 km/h165 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful282 hp210 kW
- Highest torque417 Nm308 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight154 hp/t115 kW/t6.5 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption11.4 L/100 km20.6 mpg US24.8 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption16.3 L/100 km14.4 mpg US17.3 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption8.5 L/100 km27.7 mpg US33.2 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions270 g/km
- Best estimated range737 km458 mi
- Largest trunk570 L
- Best overall score68/100
- Best performance score63/100
- Best economy score76/100
- Best practicality score78/100
MG ZT Facelift 2004 4.6 V8
- Lightest1,770 kg3,902 lb
Specification comparison
| Model | LexusLS IIIFacelift 2004430 V8 | MGZTFacelift 20044.6 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 282hp210kW | 260hp194kW |
| Torque | 417Nm308lb-ft | 410Nm302lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,835kg4,045lb | 1,770kg3,902lb |
| Gross weight | 2,340kg5,159lb | 2,170kg4,784lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 65.0s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated | 65.9s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.3s | 6.3s |
| 0-200 km/h | 19.2s Calculated | 20.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.0s Calculated | 6.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 11.4L/100 km20.6mpg US24.8mpg UK | 13.2L/100 km17.8mpg US21.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 16.3L/100 km14.4mpg US17.3mpg UK | 17.9L/100 km13.1mpg US15.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 8.5L/100 km27.7mpg US33.2mpg UK | 10.4L/100 km22.6mpg US27.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.2s Calculated | 14.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 154hp/t115kW/t70hp/1000 lb Calculated | 147hp/t110kW/t67hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 227Nm/t152lb-ft/ton Calculated | 232Nm/t155lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 737km458mi Calculated | 492km306mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 4,293cc262cu in | 4,601cc281cu in |
| Length | 5,025mm198in | 4,747mm187in |
| Width | 1,830mm72in | 1,778mm70in |
| Height | 1,470mm58in | 1,427mm56in |
| Wheelbase | 2,925mm115in | 2,746mm108in |
| Front track | 1,575mm62in | - |
| Rear track | 1,575mm62in | - |
| Trunk volume | 570L | 432L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 674L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 84L | 65L |
| CO2 emissions | 270g/km | 314g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Lexus LS III Facelift 2004 430 V8: Power / Torque
- MG ZT Facelift 2004 4.6 V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| LexusLS IIIFacelift 2004430 V8 | 5,600 rpm | 3,500 rpm | 5,850 rpm |
| MGZTFacelift 20044.6 V8 | 5,000 rpm | 4,000 rpm | 6,000 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | LexusLS IIIFacelift 2004430 V8 | MGZTFacelift 20044.6 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.0 s | 6.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.3 s | 6.3 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 19.2 s | 20.0 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.5 s | 6.5 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.5 s | 9.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.1 s | 12.1 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.2 s | 14.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 172 km/h 107 mph | 170 km/h 106 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LexusLS IIIFacelift 2004430 V8 | 282 hp 210 kW |
| MGZTFacelift 20044.6 V8 | 260 hp 194 kW |
Lexus LS III Facelift 2004 430 V8 has 22 hp more than MG ZT Facelift 2004 4.6 V8.
The biggest power difference is between MG ZT Facelift 2004 4.6 V8 and Lexus LS III Facelift 2004 430 V8: 22 hp (16 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LexusLS IIIFacelift 2004430 V8 | 417 Nm 308 lb-ft |
| MGZTFacelift 20044.6 V8 | 410 Nm 302 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LexusLS IIIFacelift 2004430 V8 | 1,835 kg 4,045 lb |
| MGZTFacelift 20044.6 V8 | 1,770 kg 3,902 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LexusLS IIIFacelift 2004430 V8 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| MGZTFacelift 20044.6 V8 | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LexusLS IIIFacelift 2004430 V8 | 6.3 s |
| MGZTFacelift 20044.6 V8 | 6.3 s |
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LexusLS IIIFacelift 2004430 V8 | 11.4 L/100 km 20.6 mpg US 24.8 mpg UK |
| MGZTFacelift 20044.6 V8 | 13.2 L/100 km 17.8 mpg US 21.4 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Lexus LS III Facelift 2004 430 V8 and MG ZT Facelift 2004 4.6 V8: 1.8 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LexusLS IIIFacelift 2004430 V8 | 154 hp/t 115 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp |
| MGZTFacelift 20044.6 V8 | 147 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LexusLS IIIFacelift 2004430 V8 | 737 km 458 mi |
| MGZTFacelift 20044.6 V8 | 492 km 306 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| LexusLS IIIFacelift 2004430 V8 | 282 hp 210 kW | 6.3 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| MGZTFacelift 20044.6 V8 | 260 hp 194 kW | 6.3 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LexusLS IIIFacelift 2004430 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| MGZTFacelift 20044.6 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LexusLS IIIFacelift 2004430 V8 |
| 11.4 L/100 km 20.6 mpg US 24.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| MGZTFacelift 20044.6 V8 |
| 13.2 L/100 km 17.8 mpg US 21.4 mpg UK | ||||||
Lexus LS III Facelift 2004 430 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| LexusLS IIIFacelift 2004430 V8 | 11.4 L/100 km 20.6 mpg US 24.8 mpg UK | 6.3 s |
| MGZTFacelift 20044.6 V8 | 13.2 L/100 km 17.8 mpg US 21.4 mpg UK | 6.3 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| LexusLS IIIFacelift 2004430 V8 | 154 hp/t 115 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp | 11.4 L/100 km 20.6 mpg US 24.8 mpg UK |
| MGZTFacelift 20044.6 V8 | 147 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | 13.2 L/100 km 17.8 mpg US 21.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | LexusLS IIIFacelift 2004430 V8 | MGZTFacelift 20044.6 V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 282 hp 210 kW | 260 hp 194 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 417 Nm 308 lb-ft | 410 Nm 302 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.3 s | 6.3 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,835 kg 4,045 lb | 1,770 kg 3,902 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 11.4 L/100 km 20.6 mpg US 24.8 mpg UK | 13.2 L/100 km 17.8 mpg US 21.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 737 km 458 mi | 492 km 306 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 270 g/km | 314 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 570 L 20.1 cu ft | 432 L 15.3 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 154 hp/t 115 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp | 147 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Lexus LS III Facelift 2004 430 V8 | MG ZT Facelift 2004 4.6 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 11.4 L/100 km20.6 mpg US24.8 mpg UK | 13.2 L/100 km17.8 mpg US21.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 19.95 LC100 km | 23.10 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 32.11 LC100 mi | 37.18 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,710 L452 US gal376 UK gal | 1,980 L523 US gal436 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,993 LC/year | 3,465 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Lexus LS III Facelift 2004 430 V8
- Has 22 hp more
- Has 7 Nm more
- Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 1.8 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 7 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 244 km (152 mi) more estimated range
- Has 138 L more trunk volume
- Emits 44 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Heaviest
MG ZT Facelift 2004 4.6 V8
- Is 65 kg lighter
Pros
- Lightest
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























