MG ZT · Facelift 2004
Car comparison
MG ZT · Facelift 2004 4.6 V8vsAcura TL III (UA6/7) 3.2 i V6 24V
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAcura TL III (UA6/7)
3.2 i V6 24V
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Acura TL III (UA6/7) 3.2 i V6 24V
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.0 s
- Most powerful273 hp204 kW
- Lightest1,655 kg3,649 lb
- Best power-to-weight165 hp/t123 kW/t6.1 kg/hp
- Lowest city consumption11.8 L/100 km19.9 mpg US23.9 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption8.1 L/100 km29.0 mpg US34.9 mpg UK
- Largest trunk454 L
- Best practicality score74/100
MG ZT Facelift 2004 4.6 V8
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Highest torque410 Nm302 lb-ft
- Best overall score65/100
- Best performance score61/100
- Best economy score71/100
Specification comparison
| Model | MGZTFacelift 20044.6 V8 | AcuraTL III (UA6/7)3.2 i V6 24V |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 260hp194kW | 273hp204kW |
| Torque | 410Nm302lb-ft | 323Nm238lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,770kg3,902lb | 1,655kg3,649lb |
| Gross weight | 2,170kg4,784lb | - |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 65.9s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 55.1s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.3s | 6.0s |
| 0-200 km/h | 20.0s Calculated | 20.8s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.0s Calculated | 5.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 13.2L/100 km17.8mpg US21.4mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption city | 17.9L/100 km13.1mpg US15.8mpg UK | 11.8L/100 km19.9mpg US23.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 10.4L/100 km22.6mpg US27.2mpg UK | 8.1L/100 km29mpg US34.9mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.2s Calculated | 14.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 147hp/t110kW/t67hp/1000 lb Calculated | 165hp/t123kW/t75hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 232Nm/t155lb-ft/ton Calculated | 195Nm/t131lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 492km306mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 4,601cc281cu in | 3,210cc196cu in |
| Length | 4,747mm187in | 4,808mm189in |
| Width | 1,778mm70in | 1,835mm72in |
| Height | 1,427mm56in | 1,440mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,746mm108in | 2,740mm108in |
| Front track | - | 1,577mm62in |
| Rear track | - | 1,575mm62in |
| Trunk volume | 432L | 454L |
| Max trunk volume | 674L | - |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 65L | 65L |
| CO2 emissions | 314g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- MG ZT Facelift 2004 4.6 V8: Power / Torque
- Acura TL III (UA6/7) 3.2 i V6 24V: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MGZTFacelift 20044.6 V8 | 5,000 rpm | 4,000 rpm | 6,000 rpm |
| AcuraTL III (UA6/7)3.2 i V6 24V | 6,200 rpm | 5,000 rpm | 6,450 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | MGZTFacelift 20044.6 V8 | AcuraTL III (UA6/7)3.2 i V6 24V |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.0 s | 5.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.3 s | 6.0 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 20.0 s | 20.8 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.5 s | 6.3 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.5 s | 9.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.1 s | 11.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.2 s | 14.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 170 km/h 106 mph | 170 km/h 105 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MGZTFacelift 20044.6 V8 | 260 hp 194 kW |
| AcuraTL III (UA6/7)3.2 i V6 24V | 273 hp 204 kW |
Acura TL III (UA6/7) 3.2 i V6 24V has 13 hp more than MG ZT Facelift 2004 4.6 V8.
The biggest power difference is between MG ZT Facelift 2004 4.6 V8 and Acura TL III (UA6/7) 3.2 i V6 24V: 13 hp (10 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MGZTFacelift 20044.6 V8 | 410 Nm 302 lb-ft |
| AcuraTL III (UA6/7)3.2 i V6 24V | 323 Nm 238 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MGZTFacelift 20044.6 V8 | 1,770 kg 3,902 lb |
| AcuraTL III (UA6/7)3.2 i V6 24V | 1,655 kg 3,649 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MGZTFacelift 20044.6 V8 | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| AcuraTL III (UA6/7)3.2 i V6 24V | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MGZTFacelift 20044.6 V8 | 6.3 s |
| AcuraTL III (UA6/7)3.2 i V6 24V | 6.0 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Acura TL III (UA6/7) 3.2 i V6 24V and MG ZT Facelift 2004 4.6 V8: 0.3 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MGZTFacelift 20044.6 V8 | 147 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp |
| AcuraTL III (UA6/7)3.2 i V6 24V | 165 hp/t 123 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MGZTFacelift 20044.6 V8 | 260 hp 194 kW | 6.3 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| AcuraTL III (UA6/7)3.2 i V6 24V | 273 hp 204 kW | 6.0 s | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MGZTFacelift 20044.6 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| AcuraTL III (UA6/7)3.2 i V6 24V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | MGZTFacelift 20044.6 V8 | AcuraTL III (UA6/7)3.2 i V6 24V | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 260 hp 194 kW | 273 hp 204 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 410 Nm 302 lb-ft | 323 Nm 238 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.3 s | 6.0 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,770 kg 3,902 lb | 1,655 kg 3,649 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 13.2 L/100 km 17.8 mpg US 21.4 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 492 km 306 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 314 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 432 L 15.3 cu ft | 454 L 16.0 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 147 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | 165 hp/t 123 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | MG ZT Facelift 2004 4.6 V8 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 13.2 L/100 km17.8 mpg US21.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 23.10 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 37.18 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,980 L523 US gal436 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,465 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
MG ZT Facelift 2004 4.6 V8
- Has 87 Nm more
- Has 20 km/h (12 mph) higher top speed
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Acura TL III (UA6/7) 3.2 i V6 24V
- Has 13 hp more
- Is 115 kg lighter
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 18 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 22 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























