Skoda Octavia II Combi
Car comparison
Skoda Octavia II Combi RS 2.0 TFSIvsJaguar X-Type Estate 2.5 i V6 24V Sport
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonJaguar X-Type Estate
2.5 i V6 24V Sport
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Skoda Octavia II Combi RS 2.0 TFSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.5 s
- Fastest top speed238 km/h148 mph
- Most powerful200 hp149 kW
- Highest torque280 Nm207 lb-ft
- Lightest1,415 kg3,120 lb
- Best power-to-weight141 hp/t105 kW/t7.1 kg/hp
- Lowest city consumption10.9 L/100 km21.6 mpg US25.9 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption6.2 L/100 km37.9 mpg US45.6 mpg UK
- Largest trunk580 L
- Best overall score63/100
- Best performance score51/100
- Best economy score86/100
- Best practicality score87/100
Specification comparison
| Model | SkodaOctavia II CombiRS 2.0 TFSI | JaguarX-Type Estate2.5 i V6 24V Sport |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 200hp149kW | 196hp146kW |
| Torque | 280Nm207lb-ft | 241Nm178lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,415kg3,120lb | 1,610kg3,549lb |
| Gross weight | 1,955kg4,310lb | 2,080kg4,586lb |
| Top speed | 238 km/h 148 mph | 222 km/h 138 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 72.6s99% target: 236 km/h / 146 mph Calculated | 79.8s99% target: 220 km/h / 137 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.5s | 8.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 27.3s Calculated | 37.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.1s Calculated | 8.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.9L/100 km29.8mpg US35.8mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption city | 10.9L/100 km21.6mpg US25.9mpg UK | 13.8L/100 km17mpg US20.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK | 7.3L/100 km32.2mpg US38.7mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.4s Calculated | 16.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 141hp/t105kW/t64hp/1000 lb Calculated | 122hp/t91kW/t55hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 198Nm/t132lb-ft/ton Calculated | 150Nm/t100lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 696km433mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 2,495cc152cu in |
| Length | 4,572mm180in | 4,716mm186in |
| Width | 1,769mm70in | 1,789mm70in |
| Height | 1,468mm58in | 1,483mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,578mm101in | 2,710mm107in |
| Front track | 1,526mm60in | 1,522mm60in |
| Rear track | 1,514mm60in | 1,537mm61in |
| Trunk volume | 580L | 445L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,630L | 1,415L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 55L | 61L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Skoda Octavia II Combi RS 2.0 TFSI: Power / Torque
- Jaguar X-Type Estate 2.5 i V6 24V Sport: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia II CombiRS 2.0 TFSI | 5,100 rpm | 1,800 rpm | 5,350 rpm |
| JaguarX-Type Estate2.5 i V6 24V Sport | 6,800 rpm | 3,000 rpm | 7,050 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | SkodaOctavia II CombiRS 2.0 TFSI | JaguarX-Type Estate2.5 i V6 24V Sport |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.1 s | 8.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.5 s | 8.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 27.3 s | 37.5 s |
| Top speed | 238 km/h 148 mph | 222 km/h 138 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.8 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.9 s | 7.2 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.2 s | 10.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.0 s | 13.7 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.4 s | 16.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 156 km/h 97 mph | 146 km/h 91 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia II CombiRS 2.0 TFSI | 200 hp 149 kW |
| JaguarX-Type Estate2.5 i V6 24V Sport | 196 hp 146 kW |
Skoda Octavia II Combi RS 2.0 TFSI has 4 hp more than Jaguar X-Type Estate 2.5 i V6 24V Sport.
The biggest power difference is between Jaguar X-Type Estate 2.5 i V6 24V Sport and Skoda Octavia II Combi RS 2.0 TFSI: 4 hp (3 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia II CombiRS 2.0 TFSI | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft |
| JaguarX-Type Estate2.5 i V6 24V Sport | 241 Nm 178 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia II CombiRS 2.0 TFSI | 1,415 kg 3,120 lb |
| JaguarX-Type Estate2.5 i V6 24V Sport | 1,610 kg 3,549 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia II CombiRS 2.0 TFSI | 238 km/h 148 mph |
| JaguarX-Type Estate2.5 i V6 24V Sport | 222 km/h 138 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia II CombiRS 2.0 TFSI | 7.5 s |
| JaguarX-Type Estate2.5 i V6 24V Sport | 8.5 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Skoda Octavia II Combi RS 2.0 TFSI and Jaguar X-Type Estate 2.5 i V6 24V Sport: 1.0 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia II CombiRS 2.0 TFSI | 141 hp/t 105 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp |
| JaguarX-Type Estate2.5 i V6 24V Sport | 122 hp/t 91 kW/t 8.2 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia II CombiRS 2.0 TFSI | 200 hp 149 kW | 7.5 s | 238 km/h 148 mph |
| JaguarX-Type Estate2.5 i V6 24V Sport | 196 hp 146 kW | 8.5 s | 222 km/h 138 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia II CombiRS 2.0 TFSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| JaguarX-Type Estate2.5 i V6 24V Sport |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | SkodaOctavia II CombiRS 2.0 TFSI | JaguarX-Type Estate2.5 i V6 24V Sport | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 200 hp 149 kW | 196 hp 146 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft | 241 Nm 178 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.5 s | 8.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 238 km/h 148 mph | 222 km/h 138 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,415 kg 3,120 lb | 1,610 kg 3,549 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 696 km 433 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 580 L 20.5 cu ft | 445 L 15.7 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 141 hp/t 105 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp | 122 hp/t 91 kW/t 8.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Skoda Octavia II Combi RS 2.0 TFSI |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.9 L/100 km29.8 mpg US35.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 13.83 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 22.25 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,185 L313 US gal261 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,074 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Skoda Octavia II Combi RS 2.0 TFSI
- Has 4 hp more
- Has 39 Nm more
- Is 195 kg lighter
- Is 1.0 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 16 km/h (10 mph) higher top speed
- Has 20 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 135 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Jaguar X-Type Estate 2.5 i V6 24V Sport
No measurable advantages in the available data.
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























