Skoda Octavia II Combi
Car comparison
Skoda Octavia II Combi RS 2.0 TFSIvsJaguar X-Type Estate 3.0 i V6 24V Sport
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonJaguar X-Type Estate
3.0 i V6 24V Sport
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Skoda Octavia II Combi RS 2.0 TFSI
- Fastest top speed238 km/h148 mph
- Highest torque280 Nm207 lb-ft
- Lightest1,415 kg3,120 lb
- Lowest city consumption10.9 L/100 km21.6 mpg US25.9 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption6.2 L/100 km37.9 mpg US45.6 mpg UK
- Largest trunk580 L
- Best overall score63/100
- Best economy score86/100
- Best practicality score87/100
Jaguar X-Type Estate 3.0 i V6 24V Sport
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.2 s
- Most powerful231 hp172 kW
- Best power-to-weight143 hp/t107 kW/t7.0 kg/hp
- Best performance score52/100
Specification comparison
| Model | SkodaOctavia II CombiRS 2.0 TFSI | JaguarX-Type Estate3.0 i V6 24V Sport |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 200hp149kW | 231hp172kW |
| Torque | 280Nm207lb-ft | 279Nm206lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,415kg3,120lb | 1,610kg3,549lb |
| Gross weight | 1,955kg4,310lb | 2,080kg4,586lb |
| Top speed | 238 km/h 148 mph | 232 km/h 144 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 72.6s99% target: 236 km/h / 146 mph Calculated | 69.4s99% target: 230 km/h / 143 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.5s | 7.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 27.3s Calculated | 27.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.1s Calculated | 6.9s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.9L/100 km29.8mpg US35.8mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption city | 10.9L/100 km21.6mpg US25.9mpg UK | 14.9L/100 km15.8mpg US19.0mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK | 7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.4s Calculated | 15.1s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 141hp/t105kW/t64hp/1000 lb Calculated | 143hp/t107kW/t65hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 198Nm/t132lb-ft/ton Calculated | 173Nm/t116lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 696km433mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 2,968cc181cu in |
| Length | 4,572mm180in | 4,716mm186in |
| Width | 1,769mm70in | 1,789mm70in |
| Height | 1,468mm58in | 1,483mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,578mm101in | 2,710mm107in |
| Front track | 1,526mm60in | 1,522mm60in |
| Rear track | 1,514mm60in | 1,537mm61in |
| Trunk volume | 580L | 445L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,630L | 1,415L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 55L | 61L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Skoda Octavia II Combi RS 2.0 TFSI: Power / Torque
- Jaguar X-Type Estate 3.0 i V6 24V Sport: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia II CombiRS 2.0 TFSI | 5,100 rpm | 1,800 rpm | 5,350 rpm |
| JaguarX-Type Estate3.0 i V6 24V Sport | 6,800 rpm | 3,000 rpm | 7,050 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | SkodaOctavia II CombiRS 2.0 TFSI | JaguarX-Type Estate3.0 i V6 24V Sport |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.1 s | 6.9 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.5 s | 7.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 27.3 s | 27.9 s |
| Top speed | 238 km/h 148 mph | 232 km/h 144 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.9 s | 6.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.2 s | 10.0 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.0 s | 12.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.4 s | 15.1 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 156 km/h 97 mph | 156 km/h 97 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia II CombiRS 2.0 TFSI | 200 hp 149 kW |
| JaguarX-Type Estate3.0 i V6 24V Sport | 231 hp 172 kW |
Jaguar X-Type Estate 3.0 i V6 24V Sport has 31 hp more than Skoda Octavia II Combi RS 2.0 TFSI.
The biggest power difference is between Skoda Octavia II Combi RS 2.0 TFSI and Jaguar X-Type Estate 3.0 i V6 24V Sport: 31 hp (23 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia II CombiRS 2.0 TFSI | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft |
| JaguarX-Type Estate3.0 i V6 24V Sport | 279 Nm 206 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia II CombiRS 2.0 TFSI | 1,415 kg 3,120 lb |
| JaguarX-Type Estate3.0 i V6 24V Sport | 1,610 kg 3,549 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia II CombiRS 2.0 TFSI | 238 km/h 148 mph |
| JaguarX-Type Estate3.0 i V6 24V Sport | 232 km/h 144 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia II CombiRS 2.0 TFSI | 7.5 s |
| JaguarX-Type Estate3.0 i V6 24V Sport | 7.2 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Jaguar X-Type Estate 3.0 i V6 24V Sport and Skoda Octavia II Combi RS 2.0 TFSI: 0.3 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia II CombiRS 2.0 TFSI | 141 hp/t 105 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp |
| JaguarX-Type Estate3.0 i V6 24V Sport | 143 hp/t 107 kW/t 7.0 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia II CombiRS 2.0 TFSI | 200 hp 149 kW | 7.5 s | 238 km/h 148 mph |
| JaguarX-Type Estate3.0 i V6 24V Sport | 231 hp 172 kW | 7.2 s | 232 km/h 144 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia II CombiRS 2.0 TFSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| JaguarX-Type Estate3.0 i V6 24V Sport |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | SkodaOctavia II CombiRS 2.0 TFSI | JaguarX-Type Estate3.0 i V6 24V Sport | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 200 hp 149 kW | 231 hp 172 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft | 279 Nm 206 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.5 s | 7.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 238 km/h 148 mph | 232 km/h 144 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,415 kg 3,120 lb | 1,610 kg 3,549 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 696 km 433 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 580 L 20.5 cu ft | 445 L 15.7 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 141 hp/t 105 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp | 143 hp/t 107 kW/t 7.0 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Skoda Octavia II Combi RS 2.0 TFSI |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.9 L/100 km29.8 mpg US35.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 13.83 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 22.25 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,185 L313 US gal261 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,074 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Skoda Octavia II Combi RS 2.0 TFSI
- Has 1 Nm more
- Is 195 kg lighter
- Has 6 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed
- Has 135 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
Jaguar X-Type Estate 3.0 i V6 24V Sport
- Has 31 hp more
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 2 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























