Skoda Octavia II Combi
Car comparison
Skoda Octavia II Combi RS 2.0 TFSIvsRenault Laguna II Grandtour 2.0 i 16V GT
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonRenault Laguna II Grandtour
2.0 i 16V GT
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Skoda Octavia II Combi RS 2.0 TFSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.5 s
- Fastest top speed238 km/h148 mph
- Lightest1,415 kg3,120 lb
- Best power-to-weight141 hp/t105 kW/t7.1 kg/hp
- Lowest city consumption10.9 L/100 km21.6 mpg US25.9 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption6.2 L/100 km37.9 mpg US45.6 mpg UK
- Largest trunk580 L
- Best overall score63/100
- Best performance score51/100
- Best economy score86/100
- Best practicality score87/100
Renault Laguna II Grandtour 2.0 i 16V GT
- Most powerful204 hp152 kW
- Highest torque300 Nm221 lb-ft
Specification comparison
| Model | SkodaOctavia II CombiRS 2.0 TFSI | RenaultLaguna II Grandtour2.0 i 16V GT |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 200hp149kW | 204hp152kW |
| Torque | 280Nm207lb-ft | 300Nm221lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,415kg3,120lb | 1,465kg3,230lb |
| Gross weight | 1,955kg4,310lb | 2,095kg4,619lb |
| Top speed | 238 km/h 148 mph | 232 km/h 144 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 72.6s99% target: 236 km/h / 146 mph Calculated | 77.8s99% target: 230 km/h / 143 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.5s | 8.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 27.3s Calculated | 31.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.1s Calculated | 7.8s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.9L/100 km29.8mpg US35.8mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption city | 10.9L/100 km21.6mpg US25.9mpg UK | 14.8L/100 km15.9mpg US19.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK | 7.5L/100 km31.4mpg US37.7mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.4s Calculated | 15.9s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 141hp/t105kW/t64hp/1000 lb Calculated | 139hp/t104kW/t63hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 198Nm/t132lb-ft/ton Calculated | 205Nm/t137lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 696km433mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 1,998cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,572mm180in | 4,695mm185in |
| Width | 1,769mm70in | 1,772mm70in |
| Height | 1,468mm58in | 1,443mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,578mm101in | 2,740mm108in |
| Front track | 1,526mm60in | 1,525mm60in |
| Rear track | 1,514mm60in | 1,480mm58in |
| Trunk volume | 580L | 475L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,630L | 1,500L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 55L | 70L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Skoda Octavia II Combi RS 2.0 TFSI: Power / Torque
- Renault Laguna II Grandtour 2.0 i 16V GT: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia II CombiRS 2.0 TFSI | 5,100 rpm | 1,800 rpm | 5,350 rpm |
| RenaultLaguna II Grandtour2.0 i 16V GT | 5,000 rpm | 3,000 rpm | 5,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | SkodaOctavia II CombiRS 2.0 TFSI | RenaultLaguna II Grandtour2.0 i 16V GT |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.1 s | 7.8 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.5 s | 8.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 27.3 s | 31.5 s |
| Top speed | 238 km/h 148 mph | 232 km/h 144 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.8 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.9 s | 7.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.2 s | 10.6 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.0 s | 13.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.4 s | 15.9 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 156 km/h 97 mph | 151 km/h 94 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia II CombiRS 2.0 TFSI | 200 hp 149 kW |
| RenaultLaguna II Grandtour2.0 i 16V GT | 204 hp 152 kW |
Renault Laguna II Grandtour 2.0 i 16V GT has 4 hp more than Skoda Octavia II Combi RS 2.0 TFSI.
The biggest power difference is between Skoda Octavia II Combi RS 2.0 TFSI and Renault Laguna II Grandtour 2.0 i 16V GT: 4 hp (3 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia II CombiRS 2.0 TFSI | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft |
| RenaultLaguna II Grandtour2.0 i 16V GT | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia II CombiRS 2.0 TFSI | 1,415 kg 3,120 lb |
| RenaultLaguna II Grandtour2.0 i 16V GT | 1,465 kg 3,230 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia II CombiRS 2.0 TFSI | 238 km/h 148 mph |
| RenaultLaguna II Grandtour2.0 i 16V GT | 232 km/h 144 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia II CombiRS 2.0 TFSI | 7.5 s |
| RenaultLaguna II Grandtour2.0 i 16V GT | 8.2 s |
Although Renault Laguna II Grandtour 2.0 i 16V GT has more power, Skoda Octavia II Combi RS 2.0 TFSI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Skoda Octavia II Combi RS 2.0 TFSI and Renault Laguna II Grandtour 2.0 i 16V GT: 0.7 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia II CombiRS 2.0 TFSI | 141 hp/t 105 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp |
| RenaultLaguna II Grandtour2.0 i 16V GT | 139 hp/t 104 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia II CombiRS 2.0 TFSI | 200 hp 149 kW | 7.5 s | 238 km/h 148 mph |
| RenaultLaguna II Grandtour2.0 i 16V GT | 204 hp 152 kW | 8.2 s | 232 km/h 144 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia II CombiRS 2.0 TFSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| RenaultLaguna II Grandtour2.0 i 16V GT |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | SkodaOctavia II CombiRS 2.0 TFSI | RenaultLaguna II Grandtour2.0 i 16V GT | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 200 hp 149 kW | 204 hp 152 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.5 s | 8.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 238 km/h 148 mph | 232 km/h 144 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,415 kg 3,120 lb | 1,465 kg 3,230 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 696 km 433 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 580 L 20.5 cu ft | 475 L 16.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 141 hp/t 105 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp | 139 hp/t 104 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Skoda Octavia II Combi RS 2.0 TFSI |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.9 L/100 km29.8 mpg US35.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 13.83 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 22.25 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,185 L313 US gal261 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,074 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Skoda Octavia II Combi RS 2.0 TFSI
- Is 50 kg lighter
- Is 0.7 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 6 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed
- Has 2 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 105 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
Renault Laguna II Grandtour 2.0 i 16V GT
- Has 4 hp more
- Has 20 Nm more
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























