Volvo V50 · Facelift 2007
Car comparison
Volvo V50 · Facelift 2007 2.4 D5vsJaguar X-Type Estate 2.5 i V6 24V Sport
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonJaguar X-Type Estate
2.5 i V6 24V Sport
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volvo V50 Facelift 2007 2.4 D5
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.0 s
- Fastest top speed225 km/h140 mph
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Lightest1,453 kg3,203 lb
- Best power-to-weight124 hp/t92 kW/t8.1 kg/hp
- Lowest city consumption8.3 L/100 km28.3 mpg US34.0 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.1 L/100 km46.1 mpg US55.4 mpg UK
- Best overall score60/100
- Best performance score50/100
- Best economy score90/100
Jaguar X-Type Estate 2.5 i V6 24V Sport
- Most powerful196 hp146 kW
- Largest trunk445 L
- Best practicality score82/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolvoV50Facelift 20072.4 D5 | JaguarX-Type Estate2.5 i V6 24V Sport |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 180hp134kW | 196hp146kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 241Nm178lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,453kg3,203lb | 1,610kg3,549lb |
| Gross weight | 2,020kg4,453lb | 2,080kg4,586lb |
| Top speed | 225 km/h 140 mph | 222 km/h 138 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 74.2s99% target: 223 km/h / 138 mph Calculated | 79.8s99% target: 220 km/h / 137 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.0s | 8.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 33.3s Calculated | 37.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.6s Calculated | 8.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption city | 8.3L/100 km28.3mpg US34.0mpg UK | 13.8L/100 km17mpg US20.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK | 7.3L/100 km32.2mpg US38.7mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.8s Calculated | 16.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 124hp/t92kW/t56hp/1000 lb Calculated | 122hp/t91kW/t55hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 275Nm/t184lb-ft/ton Calculated | 150Nm/t100lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 952km592mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 2,400cc146cu in | 2,495cc152cu in |
| Length | 4,522mm178in | 4,716mm186in |
| Width | 1,770mm70in | 1,789mm70in |
| Height | 1,457mm57in | 1,483mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,640mm104in | 2,710mm107in |
| Front track | 1,535mm60in | 1,522mm60in |
| Rear track | 1,531mm60in | 1,537mm61in |
| Trunk volume | 417L | 445L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,307L | 1,415L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 60L | 61L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volvo V50 Facelift 2007 2.4 D5: Power / Torque
- Jaguar X-Type Estate 2.5 i V6 24V Sport: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoV50Facelift 20072.4 D5 | 4,000 rpm | 2,000-2,750 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
| JaguarX-Type Estate2.5 i V6 24V Sport | 6,800 rpm | 3,000 rpm | 7,050 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolvoV50Facelift 20072.4 D5 | JaguarX-Type Estate2.5 i V6 24V Sport |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.6 s | 8.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.0 s | 8.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 33.3 s | 37.5 s |
| Top speed | 225 km/h 140 mph | 222 km/h 138 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.8 s | 2.8 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.0 s | 7.2 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.4 s | 10.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.4 s | 13.7 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.8 s | 16.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 150 km/h 93 mph | 146 km/h 91 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV50Facelift 20072.4 D5 | 180 hp 134 kW |
| JaguarX-Type Estate2.5 i V6 24V Sport | 196 hp 146 kW |
Jaguar X-Type Estate 2.5 i V6 24V Sport has 16 hp more than Volvo V50 Facelift 2007 2.4 D5.
The biggest power difference is between Volvo V50 Facelift 2007 2.4 D5 and Jaguar X-Type Estate 2.5 i V6 24V Sport: 16 hp (12 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV50Facelift 20072.4 D5 | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| JaguarX-Type Estate2.5 i V6 24V Sport | 241 Nm 178 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV50Facelift 20072.4 D5 | 1,453 kg 3,203 lb |
| JaguarX-Type Estate2.5 i V6 24V Sport | 1,610 kg 3,549 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV50Facelift 20072.4 D5 | 225 km/h 140 mph |
| JaguarX-Type Estate2.5 i V6 24V Sport | 222 km/h 138 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV50Facelift 20072.4 D5 | 8.0 s |
| JaguarX-Type Estate2.5 i V6 24V Sport | 8.5 s |
Although Jaguar X-Type Estate 2.5 i V6 24V Sport has more power, Volvo V50 Facelift 2007 2.4 D5 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volvo V50 Facelift 2007 2.4 D5 and Jaguar X-Type Estate 2.5 i V6 24V Sport: 0.5 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV50Facelift 20072.4 D5 | 124 hp/t 92 kW/t 8.1 kg/hp |
| JaguarX-Type Estate2.5 i V6 24V Sport | 122 hp/t 91 kW/t 8.2 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoV50Facelift 20072.4 D5 | 180 hp 134 kW | 8.0 s | 225 km/h 140 mph |
| JaguarX-Type Estate2.5 i V6 24V Sport | 196 hp 146 kW | 8.5 s | 222 km/h 138 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoV50Facelift 20072.4 D5 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| JaguarX-Type Estate2.5 i V6 24V Sport |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolvoV50Facelift 20072.4 D5 | JaguarX-Type Estate2.5 i V6 24V Sport | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 180 hp 134 kW | 196 hp 146 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 241 Nm 178 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.0 s | 8.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 225 km/h 140 mph | 222 km/h 138 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,453 kg 3,203 lb | 1,610 kg 3,549 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 952 km 592 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 417 L 14.7 cu ft | 445 L 15.7 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 124 hp/t 92 kW/t 8.1 kg/hp | 122 hp/t 91 kW/t 8.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volvo V50 Facelift 2007 2.4 D5 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.3 L/100 km37.3 mpg US44.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 11.03 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 17.74 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 945 L250 US gal208 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,654 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volvo V50 Facelift 2007 2.4 D5
- Has 159 Nm more
- Is 157 kg lighter
- Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 3 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
- Has 2 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Smallest trunk
Jaguar X-Type Estate 2.5 i V6 24V Sport
- Has 16 hp more
- Has 28 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Most powerful
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























