Volvo V50 · Facelift 2007
Car comparison
Volvo V50 · Facelift 2007 2.4 D5vsVolvo XC70 II · Facelift 2013 2.4 D5
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolvo XC70 II · Facelift 2013
2.4 D5
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volvo XC70 II Facelift 2013 2.4 D5
- Most powerful215 hp160 kW
- Highest torque420 Nm310 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.3 L/100 km44.4 mpg US53.3 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption6.1 L/100 km38.6 mpg US46.3 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.8 L/100 km49.0 mpg US58.9 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,321 km821 mi
- Largest trunk575 L
- Best overall score62/100
- Best economy score93/100
- Best practicality score88/100
Volvo V50 Facelift 2007 2.4 D5
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.0 s
- Fastest top speed225 km/h140 mph
- Lightest1,453 kg3,203 lb
- Best power-to-weight124 hp/t92 kW/t8.1 kg/hp
- Best performance score50/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolvoV50Facelift 20072.4 D5 | VolvoXC70 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 180hp134kW | 215hp160kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 420Nm310lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,453kg3,203lb | 1,919kg4,231lb |
| Gross weight | 2,020kg4,453lb | 2,390kg5,269lb |
| Top speed | 225 km/h 140 mph | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 74.1s99% target: 223 km/h / 138 mph Calculated | 79.9s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.0s | 8.0s |
| 0-200 km/h | 33.3s Calculated | 38.1s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.6s Calculated | 7.6s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK | 5.3L/100 km44.4mpg US53.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 8.3L/100 km28.3mpg US34.0mpg UK | 6.1L/100 km38.6mpg US46.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK | 4.8L/100 km49mpg US58.9mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.8s Calculated | 15.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 124hp/t92kW/t56hp/1000 lb Calculated | 112hp/t84kW/t51hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 275Nm/t184lb-ft/ton Calculated | 219Nm/t146lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 952km592mi Calculated | 1,321km821mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,400cc146cu in | 2,400cc146cu in |
| Length | 4,522mm178in | 4,838mm190in |
| Width | 1,770mm70in | 1,870mm74in |
| Height | 1,457mm57in | 1,604mm63in |
| Wheelbase | 2,640mm104in | 2,815mm111in |
| Front track | 1,535mm60in | 1,614mm64in |
| Rear track | 1,531mm60in | 1,580mm62in |
| Trunk volume | 417L | 575L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,307L | 1,600L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 60L | 70L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 139g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volvo V50 Facelift 2007 2.4 D5: Power / Torque
- Volvo XC70 II Facelift 2013 2.4 D5: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoV50Facelift 20072.4 D5 | 4,000 rpm | 2,000-2,750 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
| VolvoXC70 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5 | 4,000 rpm | 1,500-3,250 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolvoV50Facelift 20072.4 D5 | VolvoXC70 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.6 s | 7.6 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.0 s | 8.0 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 33.3 s | 38.1 s |
| Top speed | 225 km/h 140 mph | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.8 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.0 s | 6.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.4 s | 10.4 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.4 s | 13.3 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.8 s | 15.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 150 km/h 93 mph | 147 km/h 91 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV50Facelift 20072.4 D5 | 180 hp 134 kW |
| VolvoXC70 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5 | 215 hp 160 kW |
Volvo XC70 II Facelift 2013 2.4 D5 has 35 hp more than Volvo V50 Facelift 2007 2.4 D5.
The biggest power difference is between Volvo V50 Facelift 2007 2.4 D5 and Volvo XC70 II Facelift 2013 2.4 D5: 35 hp (26 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV50Facelift 20072.4 D5 | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| VolvoXC70 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5 | 420 Nm 310 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV50Facelift 20072.4 D5 | 1,453 kg 3,203 lb |
| VolvoXC70 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5 | 1,919 kg 4,231 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV50Facelift 20072.4 D5 | 225 km/h 140 mph |
| VolvoXC70 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5 | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV50Facelift 20072.4 D5 | 8.0 s |
| VolvoXC70 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5 | 8.0 s |
Although Volvo XC70 II Facelift 2013 2.4 D5 has more power, Volvo V50 Facelift 2007 2.4 D5 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV50Facelift 20072.4 D5 | 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK |
| VolvoXC70 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5 | 5.3 L/100 km 44.4 mpg US 53.3 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volvo XC70 II Facelift 2013 2.4 D5 and Volvo V50 Facelift 2007 2.4 D5: 1.0 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV50Facelift 20072.4 D5 | 124 hp/t 92 kW/t 8.1 kg/hp |
| VolvoXC70 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5 | 112 hp/t 84 kW/t 8.9 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV50Facelift 20072.4 D5 | 952 km 592 mi |
| VolvoXC70 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5 | 1,321 km 821 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoV50Facelift 20072.4 D5 | 180 hp 134 kW | 8.0 s | 225 km/h 140 mph |
| VolvoXC70 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5 | 215 hp 160 kW | 8.0 s | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoV50Facelift 20072.4 D5 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolvoXC70 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoV50Facelift 20072.4 D5 |
| 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolvoXC70 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5 |
| 5.3 L/100 km 44.4 mpg US 53.3 mpg UK | ||||||
Volvo XC70 II Facelift 2013 2.4 D5 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoV50Facelift 20072.4 D5 | 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK | 8.0 s |
| VolvoXC70 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5 | 5.3 L/100 km 44.4 mpg US 53.3 mpg UK | 8.0 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoV50Facelift 20072.4 D5 | 124 hp/t 92 kW/t 8.1 kg/hp | 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK |
| VolvoXC70 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5 | 112 hp/t 84 kW/t 8.9 kg/hp | 5.3 L/100 km 44.4 mpg US 53.3 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolvoV50Facelift 20072.4 D5 | VolvoXC70 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 180 hp 134 kW | 215 hp 160 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 420 Nm 310 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.0 s | 8.0 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 225 km/h 140 mph | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,453 kg 3,203 lb | 1,919 kg 4,231 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK | 5.3 L/100 km 44.4 mpg US 53.3 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 952 km 592 mi | 1,321 km 821 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 139 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 417 L 14.7 cu ft | 575 L 20.3 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 124 hp/t 92 kW/t 8.1 kg/hp | 112 hp/t 84 kW/t 8.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volvo V50 Facelift 2007 2.4 D5 | Volvo XC70 II Facelift 2013 2.4 D5 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.3 L/100 km37.3 mpg US44.8 mpg UK | 5.3 L/100 km44.4 mpg US53.3 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 11.03 LC100 km | 9.28 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 17.74 LC100 mi | 14.93 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 945 L250 US gal208 UK gal | 795 L210 US gal175 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,654 LC/year | 1,391 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volvo V50 Facelift 2007 2.4 D5
- Is 466 kg lighter
- Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
- Has 12 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
Volvo XC70 II Facelift 2013 2.4 D5
- Has 35 hp more
- Has 20 Nm more
- Uses 1.0 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 368 km (229 mi) more estimated range
- Has 158 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























