Jaguar F-Pace
Car comparison
Jaguar F-Pace SVR 5.0 V8vsLand Rover Range Rover IV · Facelift 2017 5.0 V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonLand Rover Range Rover IV · Facelift 2017
5.0 V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Jaguar F-Pace SVR 5.0 V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.3 s
- Fastest top speed283 km/h176 mph
- Most powerful550 hp410 kW
- Highest torque680 Nm502 lb-ft
- Lightest1,995 kg4,398 lb
- Best power-to-weight276 hp/t206 kW/t3.6 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption11.7 L/100 km20.1 mpg US24.1 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions279 g/km
- Best overall score86/100
- Best performance score84/100
- Best economy score75/100
Land Rover Range Rover IV Facelift 2017 5.0 V8
- Best estimated range815 km506 mi
- Largest trunk900 L
- Best practicality score93/100
Specification comparison
| Model | JaguarF-PaceSVR 5.0 V8 | Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20175.0 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 550hp410kW | 525hp391kW |
| Torque | 680Nm502lb-ft | 625Nm461lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,995kg4,398lb | 2,383kg5,254lb |
| Top speed | 283 km/h 176 mph | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 54.9s99% target: 280 km/h / 174 mph Calculated | 68.1s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.3s | 5.4s |
| 0-200 km/h | 13.2s Calculated | 23.7s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.1s Calculated | 5.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 11.7L/100 km20.1mpg US24.1mpg UK | 12.7L/100 km18.5mpg US22.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 17.9L/100 km13.1mpg US15.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 9.6L/100 km24.5mpg US29.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.2s Calculated | 13.7s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 276hp/t206kW/t125hp/1000 lb Calculated | 220hp/t164kW/t100hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 341Nm/t228lb-ft/ton Calculated | 262Nm/t175lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 701km435mi Calculated | 815km506mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 5,000cc305cu in | 5,000cc305cu in |
| Length | 4,739mm187in | 5,000mm197in |
| Width | 2,071mm82in | 2,073mm82in |
| Height | 1,670mm66in | 1,869mm74in |
| Wheelbase | 2,874mm113in | 2,922mm115in |
| Front track | 1,648mm65in | 1,693mm67in |
| Rear track | 1,666mm66in | 1,685mm66in |
| Ground clearance | - | 220mm9in |
| Trunk volume | 650L | 900L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 82L | 104L |
| CO2 emissions | 279g/km | 294g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | JaguarF-PaceSVR 5.0 V8 | Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20175.0 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.1 s | 5.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.3 s | 5.4 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 13.2 s | 23.7 s |
| Top speed | 283 km/h 176 mph | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.1 s | 2.2 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.4 s | 5.8 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.1 s | 8.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.3 s | 11.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.2 s | 13.7 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 193 km/h 120 mph | 164 km/h 102 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarF-PaceSVR 5.0 V8 | 550 hp 410 kW |
| Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20175.0 V8 | 525 hp 391 kW |
Jaguar F-Pace SVR 5.0 V8 has 25 hp more than Land Rover Range Rover IV Facelift 2017 5.0 V8.
The biggest power difference is between Land Rover Range Rover IV Facelift 2017 5.0 V8 and Jaguar F-Pace SVR 5.0 V8: 25 hp (19 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarF-PaceSVR 5.0 V8 | 680 Nm 502 lb-ft |
| Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20175.0 V8 | 625 Nm 461 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarF-PaceSVR 5.0 V8 | 1,995 kg 4,398 lb |
| Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20175.0 V8 | 2,383 kg 5,254 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarF-PaceSVR 5.0 V8 | 283 km/h 176 mph |
| Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20175.0 V8 | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarF-PaceSVR 5.0 V8 | 4.3 s |
| Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20175.0 V8 | 5.4 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Jaguar F-Pace SVR 5.0 V8 and Land Rover Range Rover IV Facelift 2017 5.0 V8: 1.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarF-PaceSVR 5.0 V8 | 11.7 L/100 km 20.1 mpg US 24.1 mpg UK |
| Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20175.0 V8 | 12.7 L/100 km 18.5 mpg US 22.2 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Jaguar F-Pace SVR 5.0 V8 and Land Rover Range Rover IV Facelift 2017 5.0 V8: 1.0 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarF-PaceSVR 5.0 V8 | 276 hp/t 206 kW/t 3.6 kg/hp |
| Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20175.0 V8 | 220 hp/t 164 kW/t 4.5 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarF-PaceSVR 5.0 V8 | 701 km 435 mi |
| Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20175.0 V8 | 815 km 506 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarF-PaceSVR 5.0 V8 | 550 hp 410 kW | 4.3 s | 283 km/h 176 mph |
| Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20175.0 V8 | 525 hp 391 kW | 5.4 s | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarF-PaceSVR 5.0 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20175.0 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarF-PaceSVR 5.0 V8 |
| 11.7 L/100 km 20.1 mpg US 24.1 mpg UK | ||||||
| Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20175.0 V8 |
| 12.7 L/100 km 18.5 mpg US 22.2 mpg UK | ||||||
Jaguar F-Pace SVR 5.0 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| JaguarF-PaceSVR 5.0 V8 | 11.7 L/100 km 20.1 mpg US 24.1 mpg UK | 4.3 s |
| Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20175.0 V8 | 12.7 L/100 km 18.5 mpg US 22.2 mpg UK | 5.4 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| JaguarF-PaceSVR 5.0 V8 | 276 hp/t 206 kW/t 3.6 kg/hp | 11.7 L/100 km 20.1 mpg US 24.1 mpg UK |
| Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20175.0 V8 | 220 hp/t 164 kW/t 4.5 kg/hp | 12.7 L/100 km 18.5 mpg US 22.2 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | JaguarF-PaceSVR 5.0 V8 | Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20175.0 V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 550 hp 410 kW | 525 hp 391 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 680 Nm 502 lb-ft | 625 Nm 461 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.3 s | 5.4 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 283 km/h 176 mph | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,995 kg 4,398 lb | 2,383 kg 5,254 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 11.7 L/100 km 20.1 mpg US 24.1 mpg UK | 12.7 L/100 km 18.5 mpg US 22.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 701 km 435 mi | 815 km 506 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 279 g/km | 294 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 650 L 23.0 cu ft | 900 L 31.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 276 hp/t 206 kW/t 3.6 kg/hp | 220 hp/t 164 kW/t 4.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Jaguar F-Pace SVR 5.0 V8 | Land Rover Range Rover IV Facelift 2017 5.0 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 11.7 L/100 km20.1 mpg US24.1 mpg UK | 12.7 L/100 km18.5 mpg US22.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 20.47 LC100 km | 22.22 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 32.95 LC100 mi | 35.77 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,755 L464 US gal386 UK gal | 1,905 L503 US gal419 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,071 LC/year | 3,334 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Jaguar F-Pace SVR 5.0 V8
- Has 25 hp more
- Has 55 Nm more
- Is 388 kg lighter
- Is 1.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 48 km/h (30 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 1.0 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 55 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Emits 15 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Smallest trunk
Land Rover Range Rover IV Facelift 2017 5.0 V8
- Has 114 km (71 mi) more estimated range
- Has 250 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























