Car comparison

Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.9T Bi-Turbo V6vsJaguar F-Pace SVR 5.0 V8

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949)

2.9T Bi-Turbo V6

510 hp2891 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTwin-turboSUV2018-2022
VS

Jaguar F-Pace

SVR 5.0 V8

550 hp5000 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticSuperchargedSUV2018-2020

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.9T Bi-Turbo V6

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    3.8 s
  • Fastest top speed
    283 km/h
    176 mph
  • Lightest
    1,830 kg
    4,034 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    279 hp/t
    208 kW/t
    3.6 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    9.8 L/100 km
    24.0 mpg US
    28.8 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    227 g/km
  • Best overall score
    86/100
  • Best performance score
    85/100
  • Best economy score
    81/100

Jaguar F-Pace SVR 5.0 V8

  • Most powerful
    550 hp
    410 kW
  • Highest torque
    680 Nm
    502 lb-ft
  • Best estimated range
    701 km
    435 mi
  • Best practicality score
    90/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelAlfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.9T Bi-Turbo V6JaguarF-PaceSVR 5.0 V8
Power
510hp380kW
550hp410kW
Torque
600Nm443lb-ft
680Nm502lb-ft
Curb weight
1,830kg4,034lb
1,995kg4,398lb
Top speed
283 km/h
176 mph
283 km/h
176 mph
To 99% top speed
44.9s99% target: 280 km/h / 174 mph
Calculated
55.0s99% target: 280 km/h / 174 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
3.8s
4.3s
0-200 km/h
11.2s
Calculated
13.2s
Calculated
0-60 mph
3.6s
Calculated
4.1s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
9.8L/100 km24mpg US28.8mpg UK
11.7L/100 km20.1mpg US24.1mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
12.3L/100 km19.1mpg US23.0mpg UK
-
Fuel consumption highway
8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK
-
Quarter mile
11.6s
Calculated
12.2s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
279hp/t208kW/t126hp/1000 lb
Calculated
276hp/t206kW/t125hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
328Nm/t219lb-ft/ton
Calculated
341Nm/t228lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
653km406mi
Calculated
701km435mi
Calculated
Displacement
2,891cc176cu in
5,000cc305cu in
Length
4,686mm184in
4,739mm187in
Width
1,903mm75in
2,071mm82in
Height
1,693mm67in
1,670mm66in
Wheelbase
2,818mm111in
2,874mm113in
Front track-
1,648mm65in
Rear track-
1,666mm66in
Trunk volume-
650L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
64L
82L
CO2 emissions
227g/km
279g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.9T Bi-Turbo V6Jaguar F-Pace SVR 5.0 V8PowerTorque
  • Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.9T Bi-Turbo V6: Power / Torque
  • Jaguar F-Pace SVR 5.0 V8: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.9T Bi-Turbo V66,500 rpm2,500 rpm6,750 rpm
JaguarF-PaceSVR 5.0 V86,000-6,500 rpm3,500-4,000 rpm6,750 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricAlfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.9T Bi-Turbo V6JaguarF-PaceSVR 5.0 V8
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
3.6 s
4.1 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
3.8 s
4.3 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
11.2 s
13.2 s
Top speed
283 km/h
176 mph
283 km/h
176 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.0 s
2.1 s
330 ft
101 m
5.2 s
5.4 s
1/8 mile
201 m
7.7 s
8.1 s
1000 ft
305 m
9.8 s
10.3 s
1/4 mile
402 m
11.6 s
12.2 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
203 km/h
126 mph
193 km/h
120 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.9T Bi-Turbo V6
510 hp
380 kW
JaguarF-PaceSVR 5.0 V8
550 hp
410 kW

Jaguar F-Pace SVR 5.0 V8 has 40 hp more than Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.9T Bi-Turbo V6.

The biggest power difference is between Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.9T Bi-Turbo V6 and Jaguar F-Pace SVR 5.0 V8: 40 hp (30 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.9T Bi-Turbo V6
600 Nm
443 lb-ft
JaguarF-PaceSVR 5.0 V8
680 Nm
502 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.9T Bi-Turbo V6
1,830 kg
4,034 lb
JaguarF-PaceSVR 5.0 V8
1,995 kg
4,398 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.9T Bi-Turbo V6
283 km/h
176 mph
JaguarF-PaceSVR 5.0 V8
283 km/h
176 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.9T Bi-Turbo V63.8 s
JaguarF-PaceSVR 5.0 V84.3 s

Although Jaguar F-Pace SVR 5.0 V8 has more power, Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.9T Bi-Turbo V6 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.9T Bi-Turbo V6 and Jaguar F-Pace SVR 5.0 V8: 0.5 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.9T Bi-Turbo V6
9.8 L/100 km
24.0 mpg US
28.8 mpg UK
JaguarF-PaceSVR 5.0 V8
11.7 L/100 km
20.1 mpg US
24.1 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.9T Bi-Turbo V6 and Jaguar F-Pace SVR 5.0 V8: 1.9 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.9T Bi-Turbo V6
279 hp/t
208 kW/t
3.6 kg/hp
JaguarF-PaceSVR 5.0 V8
276 hp/t
206 kW/t
3.6 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.9T Bi-Turbo V6
653 km
406 mi
JaguarF-PaceSVR 5.0 V8
701 km
435 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.9T Bi-Turbo V6
510 hp
380 kW
3.8 s
283 km/h
176 mph
JaguarF-PaceSVR 5.0 V8
550 hp
410 kW
4.3 s
283 km/h
176 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.9T Bi-Turbo V6
Power
510 hp
380 kW
0-100 km/h3.8 s
Top speed
283 km/h
176 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,686 mm
184.5 in
Height
1,693 mm
66.7 in
JaguarF-PaceSVR 5.0 V8
Power
550 hp
410 kW
0-100 km/h4.3 s
Top speed
283 km/h
176 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
650 L
23.0 cu ft
Length
4,739 mm
186.6 in
Height
1,670 mm
65.7 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.9T Bi-Turbo V6
Power
510 hp
380 kW
0-100 km/h3.8 s
Top speed
283 km/h
176 mph
9.8 L/100 km
24.0 mpg US
28.8 mpg UK
JaguarF-PaceSVR 5.0 V8
Power
550 hp
410 kW
0-100 km/h4.3 s
Top speed
283 km/h
176 mph
11.7 L/100 km
20.1 mpg US
24.1 mpg UK

Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.9T Bi-Turbo V6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.9T Bi-Turbo V6
9.8 L/100 km
24.0 mpg US
28.8 mpg UK
3.8 s
JaguarF-PaceSVR 5.0 V8
11.7 L/100 km
20.1 mpg US
24.1 mpg UK
4.3 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.9T Bi-Turbo V6
279 hp/t
208 kW/t
3.6 kg/hp
9.8 L/100 km
24.0 mpg US
28.8 mpg UK
JaguarF-PaceSVR 5.0 V8
276 hp/t
206 kW/t
3.6 kg/hp
11.7 L/100 km
20.1 mpg US
24.1 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleAlfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.9T Bi-Turbo V6JaguarF-PaceSVR 5.0 V8
Power
510 hp
380 kW
550 hp
410 kW
Torque
600 Nm
443 lb-ft
680 Nm
502 lb-ft
Acceleration
3.8 s
4.3 s
Top speed
283 km/h
176 mph
283 km/h
176 mph
Lightness
1,830 kg
4,034 lb
1,995 kg
4,398 lb
Fuel consumption
9.8 L/100 km
24.0 mpg US
28.8 mpg UK
11.7 L/100 km
20.1 mpg US
24.1 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,686 mm
184.5 in
Height
1,693 mm
66.7 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
650 L
23.0 cu ft
Length
4,739 mm
186.6 in
Height
1,670 mm
65.7 in
Range score
653 km
406 mi
701 km
435 mi
CO2 score
227 g/km
279 g/km
Trunk score
-
650 L
23.0 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
279 hp/t
208 kW/t
3.6 kg/hp
276 hp/t
206 kW/t
3.6 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleAlfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.9T Bi-Turbo V6Jaguar F-Pace SVR 5.0 V8
Consumption9.8 L/100 km24 mpg US28.8 mpg UK11.7 L/100 km20.1 mpg US24.1 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km17.15 LC100 km20.47 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi27.60 LC100 mi32.95 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,470 L388 US gal323 UK gal1,755 L464 US gal386 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,573 LC/year3,071 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.9T Bi-Turbo V6

  • Is 165 kg lighter
  • Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Uses 1.9 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 3 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Emits 52 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Lowest power

Jaguar F-Pace SVR 5.0 V8

  • Has 40 hp more
  • Has 80 Nm more
  • Has 48 km (30 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.9T Bi-Turbo V6
Jaguar F-Pace SVR 5.0 V8
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.9T Bi-Turbo V6
Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6 Bi-Turbo
VS
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.9T Bi-Turbo V6vsAlfa RomeoStelvio (949)Facelift 2022Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6 Bi-Turbo
SVR 5.0 V8
SVR 5.0i V8
VS
JaguarF-PaceSVR 5.0 V8vsJaguarF-PaceFacelift 2020SVR 5.0i V8
SVR 5.0 V8
GTS 3.8 V8
VS
JaguarF-PaceSVR 5.0 V8vsMaseratiLevanteGTS 3.8 V8
2.9T Bi-Turbo V6
Turbo 4.0 V8
VS
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.9T Bi-Turbo V6vsPorscheCayenne IIITurbo 4.0 V8
SVR 5.0 V8
4.0 V8
VS
JaguarF-PaceSVR 5.0 V8vsBentleyBentayga4.0 V8
2.9T Bi-Turbo V6
4.0 V8
VS
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.9T Bi-Turbo V6vsBentleyBentaygaFacelift 20204.0 V8
SVR 5.0 V8
Quadrifoglio 2.9 Bi-Turbo V6
VS
JaguarF-PaceSVR 5.0 V8vsAlfa RomeoStelvio (949)Quadrifoglio 2.9 Bi-Turbo V6
2.9T Bi-Turbo V6
M50i V8
VS
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.9T Bi-Turbo V6vsBMWX7 (G07)M50i V8
SVR 5.0 V8
4.0 V8
VS
JaguarF-PaceSVR 5.0 V8vsAston MartinDBX4.0 V8
2.9T Bi-Turbo V6
Trofeo 3.0 V6
VS
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.9T Bi-Turbo V6vsMaseratiGrecaleTrofeo 3.0 V6
SVR 5.0 V8
Turbo S 4.8 V8
VS
JaguarF-PaceSVR 5.0 V8vsPorscheCayenne IIFacelift 2014Turbo S 4.8 V8
SVR 5.0 V8
4.0 V8
VS
JaguarF-PaceSVR 5.0 V8vsBentleyBentayga EWB4.0 V8
Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.9T Bi-Turbo V6 vs Jaguar F-Pace SVR 5.0 V8 - car comparison - FastVsFaster