Porsche Cayenne II · Facelift 2014
Car comparison
Porsche Cayenne II · Facelift 2014 Turbo S 4.8 V8vsJaguar F-Pace SVR 5.0 V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonJaguar F-Pace
SVR 5.0 V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Porsche Cayenne II Facelift 2014 Turbo S 4.8 V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.1 s
- Fastest top speed284 km/h176 mph
- Most powerful570 hp425 kW
- Highest torque800 Nm590 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption11.5 L/100 km20.5 mpg US24.6 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions267 g/km
- Best estimated range870 km540 mi
- Largest trunk670 L
- Best overall score87/100
- Best performance score85/100
- Best economy score76/100
- Best practicality score91/100
Jaguar F-Pace SVR 5.0 V8
- Lightest1,995 kg4,398 lb
- Best power-to-weight276 hp/t206 kW/t3.6 kg/hp
Specification comparison
| Model | PorscheCayenne IIFacelift 2014Turbo S 4.8 V8 | JaguarF-PaceSVR 5.0 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 570hp425kW | 550hp410kW |
| Torque | 800Nm590lb-ft | 680Nm502lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,235kg4,927lb | 1,995kg4,398lb |
| Gross weight | 2,900kg6,393lb | - |
| Top speed | 284 km/h 176 mph | 283 km/h 176 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 57.7s99% target: 281 km/h / 175 mph Calculated | 55.0s99% target: 280 km/h / 174 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.1s | 4.3s |
| 0-200 km/h | 13.0s Calculated | 13.2s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 3.9s Calculated | 4.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 11.5L/100 km20.5mpg US24.6mpg UK | 11.7L/100 km20.1mpg US24.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 15.9L/100 km14.8mpg US17.8mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 8.9L/100 km26.4mpg US31.7mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 12.1s Calculated | 12.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 255hp/t190kW/t116hp/1000 lb Calculated | 276hp/t206kW/t125hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 358Nm/t240lb-ft/ton Calculated | 341Nm/t228lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 870km540mi Calculated | 701km435mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 4,806cc293cu in | 5,000cc305cu in |
| Length | 4,855mm191in | 4,739mm187in |
| Width | 1,954mm77in | 2,071mm82in |
| Height | 1,702mm67in | 1,670mm66in |
| Wheelbase | 2,895mm114in | 2,874mm113in |
| Front track | 1,661mm65in | 1,648mm65in |
| Rear track | 1,675mm66in | 1,666mm66in |
| Trunk volume | 670L | 650L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,780L | - |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 100L | 82L |
| CO2 emissions | 267g/km | 279g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Porsche Cayenne II Facelift 2014 Turbo S 4.8 V8: Power / Torque
- Jaguar F-Pace SVR 5.0 V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IIFacelift 2014Turbo S 4.8 V8 | 6,000 rpm | 2,500-4,000 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| JaguarF-PaceSVR 5.0 V8 | 6,000-6,500 rpm | 3,500-4,000 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | PorscheCayenne IIFacelift 2014Turbo S 4.8 V8 | JaguarF-PaceSVR 5.0 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 3.9 s | 4.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.1 s | 4.3 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 13.0 s | 13.2 s |
| Top speed | 284 km/h 176 mph | 283 km/h 176 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.0 s | 2.1 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.3 s | 5.4 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 7.9 s | 8.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.2 s | 10.3 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.1 s | 12.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 193 km/h 120 mph | 193 km/h 120 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IIFacelift 2014Turbo S 4.8 V8 | 570 hp 425 kW |
| JaguarF-PaceSVR 5.0 V8 | 550 hp 410 kW |
Porsche Cayenne II Facelift 2014 Turbo S 4.8 V8 has 20 hp more than Jaguar F-Pace SVR 5.0 V8.
The biggest power difference is between Jaguar F-Pace SVR 5.0 V8 and Porsche Cayenne II Facelift 2014 Turbo S 4.8 V8: 20 hp (15 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IIFacelift 2014Turbo S 4.8 V8 | 800 Nm 590 lb-ft |
| JaguarF-PaceSVR 5.0 V8 | 680 Nm 502 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IIFacelift 2014Turbo S 4.8 V8 | 2,235 kg 4,927 lb |
| JaguarF-PaceSVR 5.0 V8 | 1,995 kg 4,398 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IIFacelift 2014Turbo S 4.8 V8 | 284 km/h 176 mph |
| JaguarF-PaceSVR 5.0 V8 | 283 km/h 176 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IIFacelift 2014Turbo S 4.8 V8 | 4.1 s |
| JaguarF-PaceSVR 5.0 V8 | 4.3 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Porsche Cayenne II Facelift 2014 Turbo S 4.8 V8 and Jaguar F-Pace SVR 5.0 V8: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IIFacelift 2014Turbo S 4.8 V8 | 11.5 L/100 km 20.5 mpg US 24.6 mpg UK |
| JaguarF-PaceSVR 5.0 V8 | 11.7 L/100 km 20.1 mpg US 24.1 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IIFacelift 2014Turbo S 4.8 V8 | 255 hp/t 190 kW/t 3.9 kg/hp |
| JaguarF-PaceSVR 5.0 V8 | 276 hp/t 206 kW/t 3.6 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IIFacelift 2014Turbo S 4.8 V8 | 870 km 540 mi |
| JaguarF-PaceSVR 5.0 V8 | 701 km 435 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IIFacelift 2014Turbo S 4.8 V8 | 570 hp 425 kW | 4.1 s | 284 km/h 176 mph |
| JaguarF-PaceSVR 5.0 V8 | 550 hp 410 kW | 4.3 s | 283 km/h 176 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IIFacelift 2014Turbo S 4.8 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| JaguarF-PaceSVR 5.0 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IIFacelift 2014Turbo S 4.8 V8 |
| 11.5 L/100 km 20.5 mpg US 24.6 mpg UK | ||||||
| JaguarF-PaceSVR 5.0 V8 |
| 11.7 L/100 km 20.1 mpg US 24.1 mpg UK | ||||||
Porsche Cayenne II Facelift 2014 Turbo S 4.8 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IIFacelift 2014Turbo S 4.8 V8 | 11.5 L/100 km 20.5 mpg US 24.6 mpg UK | 4.1 s |
| JaguarF-PaceSVR 5.0 V8 | 11.7 L/100 km 20.1 mpg US 24.1 mpg UK | 4.3 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IIFacelift 2014Turbo S 4.8 V8 | 255 hp/t 190 kW/t 3.9 kg/hp | 11.5 L/100 km 20.5 mpg US 24.6 mpg UK |
| JaguarF-PaceSVR 5.0 V8 | 276 hp/t 206 kW/t 3.6 kg/hp | 11.7 L/100 km 20.1 mpg US 24.1 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | PorscheCayenne IIFacelift 2014Turbo S 4.8 V8 | JaguarF-PaceSVR 5.0 V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 570 hp 425 kW | 550 hp 410 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 800 Nm 590 lb-ft | 680 Nm 502 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.1 s | 4.3 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 284 km/h 176 mph | 283 km/h 176 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,235 kg 4,927 lb | 1,995 kg 4,398 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 11.5 L/100 km 20.5 mpg US 24.6 mpg UK | 11.7 L/100 km 20.1 mpg US 24.1 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 870 km 540 mi | 701 km 435 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 267 g/km | 279 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 670 L 23.7 cu ft | 650 L 23.0 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 255 hp/t 190 kW/t 3.9 kg/hp | 276 hp/t 206 kW/t 3.6 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Porsche Cayenne II Facelift 2014 Turbo S 4.8 V8 | Jaguar F-Pace SVR 5.0 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 11.5 L/100 km20.5 mpg US24.6 mpg UK | 11.7 L/100 km20.1 mpg US24.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 20.13 LC100 km | 20.47 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 32.39 LC100 mi | 32.95 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,725 L456 US gal379 UK gal | 1,755 L464 US gal386 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,019 LC/year | 3,071 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Porsche Cayenne II Facelift 2014 Turbo S 4.8 V8
- Has 20 hp more
- Has 120 Nm more
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 1 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.2 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 169 km (105 mi) more estimated range
- Has 20 L more trunk volume
- Emits 12 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Heaviest
Jaguar F-Pace SVR 5.0 V8
- Is 240 kg lighter
- Has 21 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























