BMW X7 (G07)
Car comparison
BMW X7 (G07) M50i V8vsLand Rover Range Rover IV · Facelift 2017 5.0 V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonLand Rover Range Rover IV · Facelift 2017
5.0 V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW X7 (G07) M50i V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.7 s
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful530 hp395 kW
- Highest torque750 Nm553 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption11.2 L/100 km21.0 mpg US25.2 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption15.3 L/100 km15.4 mpg US18.5 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption8.9 L/100 km26.4 mpg US31.7 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions258 g/km
- Best overall score80/100
- Best performance score80/100
- Best economy score77/100
Land Rover Range Rover IV Facelift 2017 5.0 V8
- Lightest2,383 kg5,254 lb
- Best power-to-weight220 hp/t164 kW/t4.5 kg/hp
- Best estimated range815 km506 mi
- Largest trunk900 L
- Best practicality score93/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BMWX7 (G07)M50i V8 | Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20175.0 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 530hp395kW | 525hp391kW |
| Torque | 750Nm553lb-ft | 625Nm461lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,490kg5,490lb | 2,383kg5,254lb |
| Gross weight | 3,295kg7,264lb | - |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 66.2s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 68.1s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.7s | 5.4s |
| 0-200 km/h | 17.2s Calculated | 23.7s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.5s Calculated | 5.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 11.2L/100 km21mpg US25.2mpg UK | 12.7L/100 km18.5mpg US22.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 15.3L/100 km15.4mpg US18.5mpg UK | 17.9L/100 km13.1mpg US15.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 8.9L/100 km26.4mpg US31.7mpg UK | 9.6L/100 km24.5mpg US29.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.9s Calculated | 13.7s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 213hp/t159kW/t97hp/1000 lb Calculated | 220hp/t164kW/t100hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 301Nm/t202lb-ft/ton Calculated | 262Nm/t175lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 741km460mi Calculated | 815km506mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 4,395cc268cu in | 5,000cc305cu in |
| Length | 5,151mm203in | 5,000mm197in |
| Width | 2,000mm79in | 2,073mm82in |
| Height | 1,805mm71in | 1,869mm74in |
| Wheelbase | 3,105mm122in | 2,922mm115in |
| Front track | 1,682mm66in | 1,693mm67in |
| Rear track | 1,703mm67in | 1,685mm66in |
| Ground clearance | 221mm9in | 220mm9in |
| Trunk volume | 326L | 900L |
| Max trunk volume | 2,120L | - |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 6 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 83L | 104L |
| CO2 emissions | 258g/km | 294g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMWX7 (G07)M50i V8 | Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20175.0 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.5 s | 5.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.7 s | 5.4 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 17.2 s | 23.7 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.1 s | 2.2 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.5 s | 5.8 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.4 s | 8.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.8 s | 11.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.9 s | 13.7 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 177 km/h 110 mph | 164 km/h 102 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX7 (G07)M50i V8 | 530 hp 395 kW |
| Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20175.0 V8 | 525 hp 391 kW |
BMW X7 (G07) M50i V8 has 5 hp more than Land Rover Range Rover IV Facelift 2017 5.0 V8.
The biggest power difference is between Land Rover Range Rover IV Facelift 2017 5.0 V8 and BMW X7 (G07) M50i V8: 5 hp (4 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX7 (G07)M50i V8 | 750 Nm 553 lb-ft |
| Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20175.0 V8 | 625 Nm 461 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX7 (G07)M50i V8 | 2,490 kg 5,490 lb |
| Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20175.0 V8 | 2,383 kg 5,254 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX7 (G07)M50i V8 | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20175.0 V8 | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX7 (G07)M50i V8 | 4.7 s |
| Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20175.0 V8 | 5.4 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW X7 (G07) M50i V8 and Land Rover Range Rover IV Facelift 2017 5.0 V8: 0.7 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX7 (G07)M50i V8 | 11.2 L/100 km 21.0 mpg US 25.2 mpg UK |
| Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20175.0 V8 | 12.7 L/100 km 18.5 mpg US 22.2 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW X7 (G07) M50i V8 and Land Rover Range Rover IV Facelift 2017 5.0 V8: 1.5 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX7 (G07)M50i V8 | 213 hp/t 159 kW/t 4.7 kg/hp |
| Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20175.0 V8 | 220 hp/t 164 kW/t 4.5 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX7 (G07)M50i V8 | 741 km 460 mi |
| Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20175.0 V8 | 815 km 506 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX7 (G07)M50i V8 | 530 hp 395 kW | 4.7 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20175.0 V8 | 525 hp 391 kW | 5.4 s | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX7 (G07)M50i V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20175.0 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX7 (G07)M50i V8 |
| 11.2 L/100 km 21.0 mpg US 25.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20175.0 V8 |
| 12.7 L/100 km 18.5 mpg US 22.2 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW X7 (G07) M50i V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BMWX7 (G07)M50i V8 | 11.2 L/100 km 21.0 mpg US 25.2 mpg UK | 4.7 s |
| Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20175.0 V8 | 12.7 L/100 km 18.5 mpg US 22.2 mpg UK | 5.4 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BMWX7 (G07)M50i V8 | 213 hp/t 159 kW/t 4.7 kg/hp | 11.2 L/100 km 21.0 mpg US 25.2 mpg UK |
| Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20175.0 V8 | 220 hp/t 164 kW/t 4.5 kg/hp | 12.7 L/100 km 18.5 mpg US 22.2 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMWX7 (G07)M50i V8 | Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20175.0 V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 530 hp 395 kW | 525 hp 391 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 750 Nm 553 lb-ft | 625 Nm 461 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.7 s | 5.4 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,490 kg 5,490 lb | 2,383 kg 5,254 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 11.2 L/100 km 21.0 mpg US 25.2 mpg UK | 12.7 L/100 km 18.5 mpg US 22.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 741 km 460 mi | 815 km 506 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 258 g/km | 294 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 326 L 11.5 cu ft | 900 L 31.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 213 hp/t 159 kW/t 4.7 kg/hp | 220 hp/t 164 kW/t 4.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW X7 (G07) M50i V8 | Land Rover Range Rover IV Facelift 2017 5.0 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 11.2 L/100 km21 mpg US25.2 mpg UK | 12.7 L/100 km18.5 mpg US22.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 19.60 LC100 km | 22.22 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 31.54 LC100 mi | 35.77 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,680 L444 US gal370 UK gal | 1,905 L503 US gal419 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,940 LC/year | 3,334 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW X7 (G07) M50i V8
- Has 5 hp more
- Has 125 Nm more
- Is 0.7 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 25 km/h (16 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 1.5 L/100 km less fuel
- Emits 36 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
Cons
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Land Rover Range Rover IV Facelift 2017 5.0 V8
- Is 107 kg lighter
- Has 7 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 74 km (46 mi) more estimated range
- Has 574 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























