Jaguar F-Pace
Car comparison
Jaguar F-Pace SVR 5.0 V8vsLand Rover Range Rover IV · Facelift 2017 5.0 V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonLand Rover Range Rover IV · Facelift 2017
5.0 V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Jaguar F-Pace SVR 5.0 V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.3 s
- Fastest top speed283 km/h176 mph
- Lightest1,995 kg4,398 lb
- Best power-to-weight276 hp/t206 kW/t3.6 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption11.7 L/100 km20.1 mpg US24.1 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions279 g/km
- Best overall score86/100
- Best performance score84/100
- Best economy score75/100
Land Rover Range Rover IV Facelift 2017 5.0 V8
- Most powerful565 hp421 kW
- Highest torque700 Nm516 lb-ft
- Best estimated range796 km495 mi
- Best practicality score92/100
Specification comparison
| Model | JaguarF-PaceSVR 5.0 V8 | Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20175.0 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 550hp410kW | 565hp421kW |
| Torque | 680Nm502lb-ft | 700Nm516lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,995kg4,398lb | 2,598kg5,728lb |
| Gross weight | - | 3,200kg7,055lb |
| Top speed | 283 km/h 176 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 54.9s99% target: 280 km/h / 174 mph Calculated | 82.9s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.3s | 5.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 13.2s Calculated | 20.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.1s Calculated | 5.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 11.7L/100 km20.1mpg US24.1mpg UK | 13.1L/100 km18mpg US21.6mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.2s Calculated | 13.7s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 276hp/t206kW/t125hp/1000 lb Calculated | 217hp/t162kW/t99hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 341Nm/t228lb-ft/ton Calculated | 269Nm/t180lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 701km435mi Calculated | 796km495mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 5,000cc305cu in | 5,000cc305cu in |
| Length | 4,739mm187in | 5,200mm205in |
| Width | 2,071mm82in | 2,073mm82in |
| Height | 1,670mm66in | 1,868mm74in |
| Wheelbase | 2,874mm113in | 3,120mm123in |
| Front track | 1,648mm65in | 1,693mm67in |
| Rear track | 1,666mm66in | 1,685mm66in |
| Ground clearance | - | 297mm12in |
| Trunk volume | 650L | - |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 82L | 104L |
| CO2 emissions | 279g/km | 298g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Jaguar F-Pace SVR 5.0 V8: Power / Torque
- Land Rover Range Rover IV Facelift 2017 5.0 V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarF-PaceSVR 5.0 V8 | 6,000-6,500 rpm | 3,500-4,000 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
| Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20175.0 V8 | 6,000-6,500 rpm | 3,500-5,000 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | JaguarF-PaceSVR 5.0 V8 | Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20175.0 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.1 s | 5.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.3 s | 5.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 13.2 s | 20.9 s |
| Top speed | 283 km/h 176 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.1 s | 2.2 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.4 s | 5.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.1 s | 8.9 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.3 s | 11.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.2 s | 13.7 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 193 km/h 120 mph | 167 km/h 104 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarF-PaceSVR 5.0 V8 | 550 hp 410 kW |
| Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20175.0 V8 | 565 hp 421 kW |
Land Rover Range Rover IV Facelift 2017 5.0 V8 has 15 hp more than Jaguar F-Pace SVR 5.0 V8.
The biggest power difference is between Jaguar F-Pace SVR 5.0 V8 and Land Rover Range Rover IV Facelift 2017 5.0 V8: 15 hp (11 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarF-PaceSVR 5.0 V8 | 680 Nm 502 lb-ft |
| Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20175.0 V8 | 700 Nm 516 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarF-PaceSVR 5.0 V8 | 1,995 kg 4,398 lb |
| Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20175.0 V8 | 2,598 kg 5,728 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarF-PaceSVR 5.0 V8 | 283 km/h 176 mph |
| Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20175.0 V8 | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarF-PaceSVR 5.0 V8 | 4.3 s |
| Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20175.0 V8 | 5.5 s |
Although Land Rover Range Rover IV Facelift 2017 5.0 V8 has more power, Jaguar F-Pace SVR 5.0 V8 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Jaguar F-Pace SVR 5.0 V8 and Land Rover Range Rover IV Facelift 2017 5.0 V8: 1.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarF-PaceSVR 5.0 V8 | 11.7 L/100 km 20.1 mpg US 24.1 mpg UK |
| Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20175.0 V8 | 13.1 L/100 km 18.0 mpg US 21.6 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Jaguar F-Pace SVR 5.0 V8 and Land Rover Range Rover IV Facelift 2017 5.0 V8: 1.4 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarF-PaceSVR 5.0 V8 | 276 hp/t 206 kW/t 3.6 kg/hp |
| Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20175.0 V8 | 217 hp/t 162 kW/t 4.6 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarF-PaceSVR 5.0 V8 | 701 km 435 mi |
| Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20175.0 V8 | 796 km 495 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarF-PaceSVR 5.0 V8 | 550 hp 410 kW | 4.3 s | 283 km/h 176 mph |
| Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20175.0 V8 | 565 hp 421 kW | 5.5 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarF-PaceSVR 5.0 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20175.0 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarF-PaceSVR 5.0 V8 |
| 11.7 L/100 km 20.1 mpg US 24.1 mpg UK | ||||||
| Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20175.0 V8 |
| 13.1 L/100 km 18.0 mpg US 21.6 mpg UK | ||||||
Jaguar F-Pace SVR 5.0 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| JaguarF-PaceSVR 5.0 V8 | 11.7 L/100 km 20.1 mpg US 24.1 mpg UK | 4.3 s |
| Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20175.0 V8 | 13.1 L/100 km 18.0 mpg US 21.6 mpg UK | 5.5 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| JaguarF-PaceSVR 5.0 V8 | 276 hp/t 206 kW/t 3.6 kg/hp | 11.7 L/100 km 20.1 mpg US 24.1 mpg UK |
| Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20175.0 V8 | 217 hp/t 162 kW/t 4.6 kg/hp | 13.1 L/100 km 18.0 mpg US 21.6 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | JaguarF-PaceSVR 5.0 V8 | Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20175.0 V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 550 hp 410 kW | 565 hp 421 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 680 Nm 502 lb-ft | 700 Nm 516 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.3 s | 5.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 283 km/h 176 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,995 kg 4,398 lb | 2,598 kg 5,728 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 11.7 L/100 km 20.1 mpg US 24.1 mpg UK | 13.1 L/100 km 18.0 mpg US 21.6 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 701 km 435 mi | 796 km 495 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 279 g/km | 298 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 650 L 23.0 cu ft | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 276 hp/t 206 kW/t 3.6 kg/hp | 217 hp/t 162 kW/t 4.6 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Jaguar F-Pace SVR 5.0 V8 | Land Rover Range Rover IV Facelift 2017 5.0 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 11.7 L/100 km20.1 mpg US24.1 mpg UK | 13.1 L/100 km18 mpg US21.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 20.47 LC100 km | 22.93 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 32.95 LC100 mi | 36.89 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,755 L464 US gal386 UK gal | 1,965 L519 US gal432 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,071 LC/year | 3,439 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Jaguar F-Pace SVR 5.0 V8
- Is 603 kg lighter
- Is 1.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 23 km/h (14 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 1.4 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 58 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Emits 19 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
Land Rover Range Rover IV Facelift 2017 5.0 V8
- Has 15 hp more
- Has 20 Nm more
- Has 95 km (59 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























