Mercedes-Benz GLS (X167)
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz GLS (X167) GLS 600 V8vsLand Rover Range Rover IV · Facelift 2017 5.0 V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonLand Rover Range Rover IV · Facelift 2017
5.0 V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz GLS (X167) GLS 600 V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.9 s
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Highest torque730 Nm538 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption12.0 L/100 km19.6 mpg US23.5 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions273 g/km
- Best performance score79/100
- Best economy score75/100
Land Rover Range Rover IV Facelift 2017 5.0 V8
- Most powerful565 hp421 kW
- Lightest2,598 kg5,728 lb
- Best power-to-weight217 hp/t162 kW/t4.6 kg/hp
- Best estimated range796 km495 mi
- Best overall score81/100
- Best practicality score92/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzGLS (X167)GLS 600 V8 | Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20175.0 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 558hp416kW | 565hp421kW |
| Torque | 730Nm538lb-ft | 700Nm516lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,785kg6,140lb | 2,598kg5,728lb |
| Gross weight | 3,250kg7,165lb | 3,200kg7,055lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 73.1s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 73.7s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.9s | 5.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 18.5s Calculated | 19.7s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.6s Calculated | 5.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 12L/100 km19.6mpg US23.5mpg UK | 13.1L/100 km18mpg US21.6mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.1s Calculated | 13.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 200hp/t149kW/t91hp/1000 lb Calculated | 217hp/t162kW/t99hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 262Nm/t175lb-ft/ton Calculated | 269Nm/t180lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 750km466mi Calculated | 796km495mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,982cc243cu in | 5,000cc305cu in |
| Length | 5,205mm205in | 5,200mm205in |
| Width | 2,030mm80in | - |
| Height | 1,838mm72in | 1,868mm74in |
| Wheelbase | 3,135mm123in | 3,120mm123in |
| Front track | 1,699mm67in | 1,693mm67in |
| Rear track | 1,723mm68in | 1,685mm66in |
| Ground clearance | - | 297mm12in |
| Trunk volume | 520L | - |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 4 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 90L | 104L |
| CO2 emissions | 273g/km | 298g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mercedes-Benz GLS (X167) GLS 600 V8: Power / Torque
- Land Rover Range Rover IV Facelift 2017 5.0 V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLS (X167)GLS 600 V8 | 6,000-6,500 rpm | 2,500-5,000 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
| Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20175.0 V8 | 6,000-6,500 rpm | 3,500-5,000 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzGLS (X167)GLS 600 V8 | Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20175.0 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.6 s | 5.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.9 s | 5.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 18.5 s | 19.7 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.1 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.6 s | 5.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.5 s | 8.9 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.0 s | 11.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.1 s | 13.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 174 km/h 108 mph | 170 km/h 106 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLS (X167)GLS 600 V8 | 558 hp 416 kW |
| Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20175.0 V8 | 565 hp 421 kW |
Land Rover Range Rover IV Facelift 2017 5.0 V8 has 7 hp more than Mercedes-Benz GLS (X167) GLS 600 V8.
The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz GLS (X167) GLS 600 V8 and Land Rover Range Rover IV Facelift 2017 5.0 V8: 7 hp (5 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLS (X167)GLS 600 V8 | 730 Nm 538 lb-ft |
| Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20175.0 V8 | 700 Nm 516 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLS (X167)GLS 600 V8 | 2,785 kg 6,140 lb |
| Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20175.0 V8 | 2,598 kg 5,728 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLS (X167)GLS 600 V8 | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20175.0 V8 | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLS (X167)GLS 600 V8 | 4.9 s |
| Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20175.0 V8 | 5.5 s |
Although Land Rover Range Rover IV Facelift 2017 5.0 V8 has more power, Mercedes-Benz GLS (X167) GLS 600 V8 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz GLS (X167) GLS 600 V8 and Land Rover Range Rover IV Facelift 2017 5.0 V8: 0.6 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLS (X167)GLS 600 V8 | 12.0 L/100 km 19.6 mpg US 23.5 mpg UK |
| Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20175.0 V8 | 13.1 L/100 km 18.0 mpg US 21.6 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mercedes-Benz GLS (X167) GLS 600 V8 and Land Rover Range Rover IV Facelift 2017 5.0 V8: 1.1 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLS (X167)GLS 600 V8 | 200 hp/t 149 kW/t 5.0 kg/hp |
| Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20175.0 V8 | 217 hp/t 162 kW/t 4.6 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLS (X167)GLS 600 V8 | 750 km 466 mi |
| Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20175.0 V8 | 796 km 495 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLS (X167)GLS 600 V8 | 558 hp 416 kW | 4.9 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20175.0 V8 | 565 hp 421 kW | 5.5 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLS (X167)GLS 600 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20175.0 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLS (X167)GLS 600 V8 |
| 12.0 L/100 km 19.6 mpg US 23.5 mpg UK | ||||||
| Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20175.0 V8 |
| 13.1 L/100 km 18.0 mpg US 21.6 mpg UK | ||||||
Mercedes-Benz GLS (X167) GLS 600 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLS (X167)GLS 600 V8 | 12.0 L/100 km 19.6 mpg US 23.5 mpg UK | 4.9 s |
| Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20175.0 V8 | 13.1 L/100 km 18.0 mpg US 21.6 mpg UK | 5.5 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLS (X167)GLS 600 V8 | 200 hp/t 149 kW/t 5.0 kg/hp | 12.0 L/100 km 19.6 mpg US 23.5 mpg UK |
| Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20175.0 V8 | 217 hp/t 162 kW/t 4.6 kg/hp | 13.1 L/100 km 18.0 mpg US 21.6 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzGLS (X167)GLS 600 V8 | Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20175.0 V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 558 hp 416 kW | 565 hp 421 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 730 Nm 538 lb-ft | 700 Nm 516 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.9 s | 5.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,785 kg 6,140 lb | 2,598 kg 5,728 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 12.0 L/100 km 19.6 mpg US 23.5 mpg UK | 13.1 L/100 km 18.0 mpg US 21.6 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 750 km 466 mi | 796 km 495 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 273 g/km | 298 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 520 L 18.4 cu ft | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 200 hp/t 149 kW/t 5.0 kg/hp | 217 hp/t 162 kW/t 4.6 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz GLS (X167) GLS 600 V8 | Land Rover Range Rover IV Facelift 2017 5.0 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 12 L/100 km19.6 mpg US23.5 mpg UK | 13.1 L/100 km18 mpg US21.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 21.00 LC100 km | 22.93 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 33.80 LC100 mi | 36.89 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,800 L476 US gal396 UK gal | 1,965 L519 US gal432 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,150 LC/year | 3,439 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz GLS (X167) GLS 600 V8
- Has 30 Nm more
- Is 0.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 1.1 L/100 km less fuel
- Emits 25 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
Cons
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
Land Rover Range Rover IV Facelift 2017 5.0 V8
- Has 7 hp more
- Is 187 kg lighter
- Has 17 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 46 km (29 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























